DIS - Case Record for 00-1265-TP-ORD Skip to main content

Case Record For:

00-1265-TP-ORD

 File a Public Comment
Case Title: MINIMUM TELEPHONE SERVICE STANDARDS
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: ORD-Administrative order
Date Opened: 7/11/2000
Date Closed: 1/19/2011
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
12/26/2013Document already available in DIS. tmt8
01/19/2011Memo closing case with an effective date of 01/19/11.1
12/19/2008Service notice.26
12/18/2008Service Notice26
12/17/2008Entry on rehearing stating that the Consumer Groups' application for rehearing is denied as discussed in this entry.7
12/15/2008Memorandum contra Consumer Groups' application for rehearing electronically filed by Ms. Mary K. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio.6
12/15/2008Memorandum in opposition to application for rehearing by the Office of the Consumers' Counsel, et al. electronically filed by Mr. Douglas E. Hart on behalf of CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY.9
12/15/2008Memorandum of the Ohio Telecom Association in opposition to application for rehearing of the Consumer Groups electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association.5
12/05/2008Application for rehearing and memorandum in support by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, The Appalachian People's Action Coalition, Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition, Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland, Consumers for Fair Utility Rates, Cleveland Housing Network and the Neighborhood Environmental Coalition electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel23
11/13/2008Service Notice.26
11/12/2008Entry nunc pro tunc ordering that the appendix to the November 5, 2008, finding and order be revised as set forth in finding 2.2
11/06/2008Service Notice86
11/05/2008Finding and order stating that Rule 10 be revised as set forth in the appendix to this finding and order; that attached revised Rule 4901:1-5-10. O.A.C., should be filed with the Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review, the Secretary of State, and the Legislative Service Commission in accordance with divisions (D) and (E) of Section 111.15, Revised Code; the final rule be effective on the earliest date permitted by law; AT&T's May 28, 2008, waiver request in moot and that all telecommunications service providers in Ohio review and amend their tariffs, if applicable, in accordance with this finding and order.14
09/05/2008Reply Comments of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, The Appalachian Peoples Action Coalition, The City of Cleveland, Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition, The Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland, Consumers For Fair Utility Rates, Cleveland Housing Network and the Neighborhood Environmental Coalition electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel.14
09/05/2008Reply Comments electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.9
09/05/2008Reply Comments electronically filed by Mr. Douglas E. Hart on behalf of CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY.5
09/05/2008Reply Comments of the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association, electronically filed by Stephen M Howard on behalf of Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association.8
09/05/2008Reply comments of the Ohio Telecom Association, electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association.7
08/25/2008Certificate of service electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel.3
08/25/2008Certificate of Service electronically filed by Mr. Douglas E. Hart on behalf of CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY.2
08/25/2008Certificate of service electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association3
08/25/2008Certificate of service electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Verizon North Inc.3
08/25/2008Certificate of service filed on behalf of CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc. electronically filed by Mrs. Vickie Norris on behalf of CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc.2
08/22/2008Initial Comments filed in response to Commission's July 31, 2008 Entry by Daniel R. Conway, Attorney, on behalf of CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc. electronically filed by Mrs. Vickie Norris on behalf of CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc.4
08/22/2008Comments of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, the Appalachian Peoples Action Coalition, the City of Cleveland, Communities United for Action, Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition, The Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland, Consumers for Fair Utility Rates, Cleveland Housing Network and the Neighborhood Environmental Coalition electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and David C. Bergmann and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel25
08/22/2008Comments of Verizon North Inc. in response to the Commission's July 31, 2008 Entry electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Verizon North Inc.4
08/22/2008Initial comments of AT&T Ohio's electronically filed by Ms. Mary K. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio.5
08/22/2008Comments of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC in Response to the Commission's July 31, 2008 Entry electronically filed by Mr. Douglas E. Hart on behalf of CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY.5
08/22/2008Comments of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq in response to the Commission's July, 31 2008 Entry electronically filed by Sonya I Summers on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq.6
08/22/2008Comments of the Ohio Telecom Association in Response to Entry of July 31, 2008 electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association20
08/22/2008Additional initial comments of the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association electronically filed by Stephen M Howard on behalf of Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association.8
08/22/2008Comments of Windstream Ohio, Inc. and Windstream Western Reserve, Inc. to the Commission July 31, 2008 entry filed by W. Adams.8
07/31/2008Service notice.28
07/31/2008Entry ordering AT&T's motion for protective order is granted; that OCC's request to disregard AT&T's supplemental affidavit is denied; that Rule 10(B) be reopened for comment in accordance with Finding (9); that Rule 10(B) not be enforced until the Commission makes a determination in this docket; that AT&T's waiver request be held in abeyance pending resolution of this issue.8
07/30/2008Entry ordering Staff's request for an extension of time and request for an expedited ruling are granted; staff will docket its final determination in this matter on September 4, 2008.( JJ)2
07/30/2008Service Notice1
07/28/2008Memorandum Reply to OCC's Memo Contra to AT&T Ohio's supplemental information. electronically filed by Ms. Mary K. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio6
07/28/2008Motion for an extension of time to file Staff's final determination and request for an expedited ruling and memorandum in support submitted by A. Hammerstein on behalf of the Staff of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.5
07/21/2008Comments on the affidavit of Cathy Pleines supplementing AT&T Ohio's May 28, 2008 request for waiver by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel12
07/17/2008Confidential target for affidavit of Cathy Pleines filed by M.Fenlon on behalf of AT&T. 1
07/17/2008Affidavit of Cathy Pleines filed by M.R. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio. 10
07/17/2008Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed by M.R. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio. 9
07/09/2008Service Notice20
07/09/2008Entry denying AT&T's application for rehearing; that AT&T's request for additional time is denied; that OCC's rehearing application is granted for the limited purpose of allowing the Commission to make the clarifications it has set forth in Findings (11) through (15) of this entry. 18
07/02/2008Notice of withdrawal of The Ohio Telecom Association to Withdraw a Portion of its June 23, 2008 Filing electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association.5
06/25/2008Motion to strike a portion of the Ohio Telecom Association's memorandum contra application for rehearing, memorandum in support by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Patti Mallarnee on behalf of Etter, Terry L Mr.10
06/23/2008Memorandum Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC's Memorandum in Opposition to the Application for Rehearing of the OCC electronically filed by Evelyn W King on behalf of CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY7
06/23/2008Reply AT&T Ohio's Reply to OCC's Memorandum Contra electronically filed by Ms. Mary K. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio6
06/23/2008 Memorandum Contra AT&T Ohio's Application for Rehearing by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Patti Mallarnee on behalf of Etter, Terry L Mr.19
06/23/2008Memorandum contra to the application for rehearing of the OCC electronically filed by Ms. Mary K. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio.8
06/23/2008Memorandum of the Ohio Telecom Association in opposition to the application for rehearing of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, and in response to the application for rehearing of AT&T Ohio electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association.9
06/16/2008Memorandum Contra AT&T Ohio's request for waiver by the Office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel, electronically filed by Ms. Deb J. Bingham on behalf of Etter, Terry L.22
06/13/2008AT&T Ohio's Application for Rehearing electronically filed by Ms. Mary K. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio.16
06/13/2008Application for Rehearing of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Patti Mallarnee on behalf of Etter, Terry L Mr.19
06/10/2008Return mail receipt.2
05/28/2008Request for waiver electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.20
05/15/2008Service notice.19
05/14/2008Entry ordering OTA's motion seeking blanket waiver from the obligations of Rule 4901:1-5-10 (B), 0.A.C., labeled as "the Service Termination Rule", is denied; AT&T's request to treat it's reply memorandum as an individual request for waiver of the Service Termination Rule is denied; a limited waiver of the new Service Termination Rule is granted in accordance with the directives of Finding 7, to the extent necessary to address the concerns of companies with respect to residental and business customers whose stand-alone BLES accounts consist of two or three BLES lines; the Commission will not begin enforcing the new rule provision until January, 1, 2009.13
04/17/2008Reply Memorandum of the Ohio Telecom Association in support of application for an order granting waiver of Ohio Administrative Code Section 4901:1-5-10, electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association.10
04/17/2008Reply filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio, AT&T Long Distance, AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc., and TCG Ohio by J. Kelly. 12
04/07/2008Memorandum contra application of the Ohio Telecom Association for waiver filed on behalf of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel by T. Etter.14
03/20/2008Application of the Ohio Telecom Association for an order granting waiver of Ohio Administrative Code; Section 4901:1-5-10 filed by C. Flahive.8
03/19/2008Finding and order stating the Embarq's application for waiver is granted in accordance with finding 5.6
03/19/2008Service Notice19
03/18/2008Motion for waiver and memorandum in support under O.A.C. Code. 4901:1-5-02(B)(1) and request for grace period under O.A.C. Code 4901:1-05-08(D) filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by T. Lodge.14
03/05/2008Service Notice.1
03/05/2008Finding and order that the Verizon application for a limited exemption is denied; that Verizon has failed to satisfy the conditions of the stipulation entered in case 07-511-TP-UNC; that Verizon expend the $250,000 forfeiture as directed in finding 12; that staff will continue to monitor Verizon's performance and docket staff's final determination per finding 13.11
02/15/2008Comments by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by T. Etter. 11
02/06/2008Entry ordering that interested persons be afforded the opportunity to file comments on the staff report of investigation by not later than February 15, 2008. (JRJ)2
02/06/2008Service Notice19
02/04/2008Comments of the Office of the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel filed by T. Etter.9
02/04/2008Motion for leave to file comments out of time and memorandum in support filed on behalf of the Office of the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel by T. Etter. 34
02/01/2008Supplemental response of Verizon North, Inc. to the staff report filed by T. Lodge.11
01/31/2008Correspondence praising and appreciating the reliable and safe services rendered by Verizon North, Inc. filed by R. Huff. (FAX)1
01/29/2008Comments filed by T. Etter on behalf of OCC.14
01/29/2008Entry ordering that interested persons be afforded an opportunity to comment on the staff report of investigation in accordance with finding (3). (JRJ)2
01/29/2008Service Notice19
01/28/2008Response of Verizon North, Inc. to January 24, 2008 staff report filed by T. Lodge.11
01/24/2008Staff report filed.5
01/24/2008Service Notice1
12/12/2007Reply memorandum of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq in support of waiver application filed by J. Stewart.6
12/03/2007Memorandum contra Embarq's application for waiver by the office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel by T. Etter.21
11/14/2007Application for waiver of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq filed by J. Stewart.39
10/24/2007Submission of Errata filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by T. Lodge.5
10/24/2007Entry ordered that, AT&T Ohio's September 7, 2007, request to withdraw its August 23, 2007, ad-of-God waiver request is granted and Verizon's September 30, 2007, request to withdraw its August 24, 2007, act-of-God waiver request is granted.2
10/24/2007Service Notice23
10/23/2007Application for limited exemption of OAC 4901:1-5-20(B)(4) filed by T. Lodge on behalf of Verizon North Inc.35
10/02/2007Withdrawal of Act of God waiver request filed by C. Cole on behalf of Verizon. 1
10/01/2007Letter withdrawing the Act of God waiver request dated August 24, 2007 filed by C. Cole on behalf of Verizon. (FAX)2
09/07/2007Letter stating that AT&T Ohio withdraws its waiver request and also advise that customer credits have been and will continue to be applied in accordance with the Rule 16 as a result of the extreme weather event, filed by M. Fenlon.3
08/28/2007Request of Verizon North Inc. for a waiver of paragraphs (A) and (B) of the MTSS Rule 18 due to verifiable Acts of God beginning on August 19, 2007 filed by C. Cole. (original)1
08/24/2007Request of Verizon North Inc. for a waiver of a paragraphs (A) and (B) of the MTSS Rule 18 due to verifiable Acts of God beginning on August 19, 2007 filed by C. Cole. (FAX)1
08/23/2007Request for a waiver of rule 16 of the minimum telephone standards filed by M. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio.4
07/26/2007Service Notice23
07/25/2007Entry ordering that Embarq's July 16, 2007, requests to withdraw its waiver applications in these cases are granted.3
07/16/2007Request that the motion be withdrawn on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq, filed by B. Donahue.2
07/16/2007Request that the motions be withdrawn on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq, filed by J. Stewart.2
07/13/2007Memorandum contra Embarq's application for waiver of the rules for billing its customers as amended filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter.14
07/09/2007Memorandum Contra Embarq's application for waivers of various disclosure requirements by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, The Appalachian People's Action Coalition, and Board of County Commissioners, Lucas County, Ohio filed by T. Etter.34
07/06/2007Amendment to application for waiver of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq.19
06/25/2007Application for waiver of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq filed by J. Stewart.18
06/20/2007Application for waiver of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq filed by J. Stewart.10
03/07/2007Entry ordered; that, in accordance with the above findings, AT&T's request for waiver of MTSS Rules 4901:1-5-16(A) and (B), O.A.C, is approved for the dates of July 28, 2006, through July 31, 2006, in each of the Kirtland, Leroy, Mentor, Painesville and Willoughby exchanges; that with regard to service outages occurring in each of these five exchanges on these four specific dates, 48 hours should be added to each of the time frames established in MTSS Rule 16(B) for purposes of determining credits to customers' accounts; that AT&T's motion for protective order filed on September 15, 2006 is granted in accordance with the Finding 10; that all other aspects of AT&T's waiver request are denied.7
03/07/2007Service Notice26
11/06/2006Confidential version of comments filed on behalf of Ohio Consumers Counsel by T. Etter.1
11/06/2006Comments on AT&T Ohio's July 31, 2006 request for an Act of God waiver of its obligation to pay credits to customers, as supplemented on September 15, 2006, by The Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel by T. Etter.21
10/26/2006Service Notice23
10/25/2006Entry ordering that Verizon's request for waiver is approved for a certain limited number of days in a certain limited number of the exchanges included in its request; the waiver request is denied for all exchanges and all dates not specified in the appendix to this entry; 48 hours shall be added to each of the time frames established in MTSS Rule 16 (B) for purposes of determining credits to customers located in the Verizon exchanges listed.11
10/06/2006Motion for protection order and memorandum in support on behalf of AT&T Ohio filed by J. Kelly.16
09/15/2006Supplement to its request for a waiver of MTSS Rule 16, filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by M. Fenlon.89
09/15/2006Motion for protective order and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by M. Fenlon.8
09/15/2006Confidential document: Exhibits 5 and 6 filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio. (5 pgs)1
08/23/2006Entry granting Verizon Ohio's request for waiver of Rule 4901:1-5-06(B)(1), O.A.C.2
08/23/2006Service Notice1
08/09/2006Corrected spreadsheet filed by C. Cole on behalf of Verizon North Inc.6
08/04/2006Comments on Verizon's supplemental materials to its June 23, 2006 request for ACT OF GOD waiver of its obligation to pay credits to customers on behalf of OCC filed by T. Etter.33
07/31/2006Request for a waiver of rule 16 of the minimum Telephone Service Standards on behalf of AT&T Ohio filed by M. Fenlon.4
07/27/2006Request for waiver filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by C. Flahive and T. Lodge.6
07/21/2006Supplement to request for Waiver with respect to O.A.D. 4901:1-5-16 (MTSS Rule 16) paragraphs (A) and (B) filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by C. Cole. (original)10
07/20/2006Supplement to Request for waiver with respect the O.A.C.4901:1-5-16 (MTSS Rule 16) paragraphs (A) and (B) filed on behalf Verizon North, Inc. by C. Cole. (FAX)11
07/14/2006Supplement to request for waiver filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by C. Cole.14
07/10/2006Comments of Ohio Consumers' Counsel on Verizon's June 23, 2006 waiver request filed by T. Etter.10
06/26/2006Letter requesting waivers of paragraphs (A) and (B) of MTSS rule 16 due to verifiable Acts of God beginning on June 22, 2006 filed by C. Cole on behalf of Verizon North Inc.1
06/23/2006Request of waivers of paragraphs (A) and (B) of MTTS Rule 16 due to verifiable Acts of God beginning on June 22, 2006, filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by C. Cole. (FAX)2
06/12/2006Memorandum contra AT&T Ohio's request for waivers filed by T. Etter, Ohio Consumers' Counsel; M. Smalz, Appalachian People's Action Coalition; E. Jacobs, Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition; K. Bruce, City of Toledo; S. McAdams, City of Maumee; B. Ballenger, City of Northwood; P. Goldberg, City of Oregon; P. Gwyn, City of Perrysburg; P. Skaff, City of Holland; J. Moan, City of Sylvania; L. Keiffer, Lucas County; J. Meissner, Consumers for Fair Utility Rates and The Neighborhood Environmental Coalition.30
05/31/2006AT&T Ohio's request for waivers Network issues filed by J. Kelly.6
05/31/2006AT&T Ohio's request for waivers business office issues filed by M. Fenlon.10
03/15/2006Entry ordering that in accordance with the findings in this entry, AT&T's February 23, 2006 request for waiver of Rule 4901:1-5-06(B)(1), O.A.C. is granted.2
03/15/2006Service Notice1
02/23/2006Request for waiver and request for expedited ruling filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by J. Kelly.5
01/10/2006Notice of withdrawal of the law firm of Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease LLP listed as counsel of record for AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. or AT&T Corp, and no notice of withdrawal of counsel has been filed, the undersigned respectfully requests that the Commission recognize such an intention and permit such withdrawal, and substitution of counsel of John J. Reidy, III and David J. Chorzempa of Chicago, Il., filed by B. Kahn, P. Downey, K. Herlihy and S. Howard.18
01/09/2006Service Notice14
01/04/2006Entry ordered; that, in accordance with the above findings, Columbus Grove's December 21, 2005 request for waiver of Rule 4901:1-5-06(B)(1), O.A.C. is granted.2
12/21/2005Request of Columbus Grove Telephone Company for waiver and expedited ruling filed by C. Flahive.7
11/09/2005Entry ordering that applications for rehearing filed by OCC, NOPEC, and LICA are denied.7
09/28/2005Finding and order extending the hours of the Commission's call center and granting a waiver for portions of various administrative code rules in relation to statutory changes mandated by Amended House Bill 66.6
08/08/2005Reply to the memorandum contra of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel and The Ohio Criminal Justice Program of The American Friends Service Committee filed by J. Sanders on behalf of MCI.12
07/27/2005Memorandum contra request of MCI for waivers, filed by the office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel by T. Etter and Ohio Criminal Justice Program/American Friends Service Committee by M. Wieser.16
07/26/2005Request for waiver and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Bullseye Telecom, Inc. by S. Bloomfield.4
07/13/2005Correspondence stating that Cincinnati Bell Any Distance Inc. intends to provide customers who subscribe to bucket plans, as described in the application with the total number of minutes used and the total number of calls made during the applicable billing period filed by J. Kinney. (FAX)1
07/13/2005Entry ordering that in accordance with the finding in this entry, CBAD's May 12, 2005 request for waiver of Rule 4901:1-5-15(C), O.A.C., is granted.4
07/13/2005Service Notice56
07/12/2005Request of MCI for waivers filed by J. Sanders.9
06/10/2005Motion Pro Hac Vice and motion for substitution of counsel filed by B. Kahn on behalf of AT&T and TCG Ohio.6
05/12/2005Request for Waiver of the call detail billing requirements set forth in the MTSS Rule 4901:1-5-15 (C), O.A.C., filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Any Distance Inc. by J. Kinney.7
05/12/2005Service Notice20
05/11/2005Entry ordered that in accordance with the above findings, SBC January 5, 2005, request for waiver of Rule 4901:1-5-16(A) and (B), O.A.C., is granted for the period of January 3 through January 20, 2005, for the 154 wire centers named in the footnote to Finding (2) of this entry; that 48 hours shall be added to each of the timeframes established in MTSS Rule 16 (B) for purposes of determining credits to customers located in the 154 involved wire centers; that SBC's request for waiver of MTSS Rule 20(B) is denied in accordance with Finding (10)); that SBC's motion for protective order, filed on April 8, 2005 is granted pursuant to Finding (11).8
05/11/2005Entry ordered, that in accordance with the above findings, Verizon's January 5, 2005, request for waiver of MTSS Rule 4901:1-5-16 (A) and (B), O.A.C., is granted for the period of January 3 through January 22, 2005, for the 167 exchanges identified in the company's April 8, 2005 supplemental filing and in the footnote to Finding (2) of this entry, that 48 shall be added to each of the timeframes established in MTSS Rule 16 (B) for purposes of determining credits to customers located in the involved 167 Verizon exchanges.4
05/11/2005Entry ordered, that in accordance with the above findings, Alltel's January 6, 2005, request for waiver of MTSS Rule 4901:1-5-16(A) and (B), O.A.C., is granted for the period of January 4 through January 6, 2005, for the Granville, Gratiot, Hanover-Marne, Newark, and St. Louisville exchanges, that 48 hours shall be added to each of the timeframes established in MTSS Rule 16 (B) for purposes of determining credits to customers located in the Granville, Gratiot, Hanover-Marne, Newark, and St. Louisville exchanges.5
04/18/2005Supplement to initial filing of January 4, 2005 with specific and applicable reporting information, filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio, Inc. by K. Hobbs.28
04/08/2005Supplement to request for waiver(Part 2 of 2).143
04/08/2005Supplement to request for a waiver of rules 16 and 20 of the minimum telephone service standards filed by M. Fenlon on behalf of SBC Ohio(Part 1 of 2).142
04/08/2005Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed by M. Fenlon on behalf of SBC Ohio.8
04/06/2005 Supplement to request for waiver with respect to O.A.C. 4901:1-5-16 (MTSS Rule 16) Paragraphs (A) and (B) due to verifiable acts of God beginning on January 3, 2005, filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by C. Cole. (original) 29
04/05/2005Supplement to request for waiver with respect to O.A.C. 4901:1-5-16 (MTSS Rule 16) Paragraphs (A) and (B) due to verifiable acts of God beginning on January 3, 2005, filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by C. Cole. (FAX)28
03/09/2005Entry ordering that in accordance with the findings, SBC Ohio's February 22, 2005 request for waiver of rule 4901:1-5-06-(B)(1)., is granted.2
03/09/2005Entry on rehearing ordering that OCC's rehearing application is denied.4
03/09/2005Service Notice19
02/28/2005Memorandum contra OCC's application for rehearing filed by M. Fenlon on behalf of SBC Ohio.6
02/28/2005Memorandum in opposition to application for rehearing filed by C. Flahive on behalf of Verizon North, Inc.11
02/28/2005Memorandum of the Western Reserve Telephone Company in opposition to application for rehearing of the Office of the Consumers' Counsel filed by C. Flahive.8
02/22/2005Request for waiver and for expedited ruling filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.5
02/18/2005Application for rehearing and memorandum in support of the entries granting (ACT OF GOD) waivers by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel by T. Etter.15
02/02/2005Service Notice19
02/02/2005Entry ordering that the Commission's January 19, 2005 entry in this case pertaining to Verizon's act of God waiver requests should, nunc pro tunc, be amended and corrected as described in this entry.2
01/19/2005Service Notice1
01/19/2005Entry ordering that in accordance with the above findings, Verizon's two requests for waiver of MTSS rules 4901:1-5-16(A) and (B), O.A.C, are granted in accordance with Finding (1); that 48 hours shall be added to each of the timeframes established in MTSS Rule 16 (B) for purposes of determining credits to customers located in the involved exchanges.7
01/19/2005Entry ordering that in accordance with the above findings, Western Reserve's September 22, 2004 request for waiver of MTSS rules 4901:1-5-16(A) and (B), O.A.C is granted for the period of September 17 through September 27, 2004 for the Powhatan Point, Quaker City, and Chester exchanges; that 48 hours shall be added to each of the timeframes established in rule MTSS Rule 16 (B) for purposes of determining credits to customers located in these exchanges.5
01/19/2005Entry stating that SBC Ohio's request for waiver of MTSS rules 4901:1-5-16(A) and (B) is granted in accordance with Finding (11); that 48 hours shall be added to each of the timeframes established in MTSS rule 16(B) for purposes of determining credits to customers located in involved exchanges; that SBC's motion for protective order, as modified by its related letter submitted on December 7, 2004 is granted.8
01/14/2005Correspondence stating that Sprint is agreeable to releasing certain information contained in telephone outage reported, the exchange affected, and the length of time the outage continued file by J. Stewart.4
01/12/2005Request for waivers of paragraphs (a) and (b) of Ohio Administrative code 4901:1-5-16 (MTSS rule 16) due to verifiable acts of God filed by C. Flahive on behalf of ALLTEL, Ohio, Inc.5
01/10/2005Request for a waiver of rule 16(d), and rule 20(b) and (c) of the minimum telephone service standards filed by M. Fenlon on behalf of SBC Ohio.5
01/10/2005Request waivers of paragraph (a) and (b) of MTSS rule 16 due to a verifiable act of God beginning on January 6 and continuing into January 7, 2005 filed by C. Flahive on behalf of Telephone Service Company.5
01/06/2005Request for waivers of paragraphs (a) and (b) of MTSS rule 16 due to Acts of God beginning on January 3, 2005 filed by C. Cole on behalf of Verizon North, Inc.1
01/06/2005Request of ALLTEL Ohio Inc. for waivers of paragraphs (a) and (b) of MTSS Rule due to variables Acts of God on January 4 and continuing through January 6, 2005 filed by C. Flahive.4
01/05/2005Request for a waiver of rule 16 of the minimum telephone service standards filed by J. Kelly on behalf of SBC Ohio.7
01/05/2005Letter stating that Verizon North request waivers of paragraphs (a) and (b) of MTSS rule 16 due to verifiable Acts of God beginning on January 3, 2005 filed by C. Cole,1
12/20/2004Supplemental Comments of The Office of the Consumers' Counsel filed by T. Etter.11
12/13/2004Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed by J. Stewart on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint.8
12/07/2004Public Service Commission Service Disruption Report filed by M. Fenlon on behalf of SBC Ohio.4
11/23/2004Entry stating that OCC's rehearing application is denied in accordance with Finding (5); Dissenting Opinion of Commissioner Judith A. Jones.7
11/23/2004Service Notice19
11/19/2004Additional media material that was inadvertently excluded from SBC's Supplement to its Request for a Wavier filed by M. Fenlon.97
11/18/2004Supplement to its request for waiver of Rule 16 of The Minimum Telephone Service Standards filed by M. Fenlon on behalf of SBC Ohio.119
11/18/2004Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed by M. Fenlon on behalf of SBC Ohio.6
11/18/2004Confidential document supplement to its request for a waiver of rule 16 of the minium telephone service standards filed by J. Kelly on behalf of SBC Ohio.1
11/08/2004Memorandum contra the application for rehearing of the Office of the Ohio Consumer's Counsel filed by J. Kelly on behalf of SBC Ohio.7
11/01/2004Documentation for 2 waivers filed on September 10, 2004 and September 21, 2004 pursuant to Ohio Administrative Code 4901:1-5-16, provided to staff in consideration of both waiver requests filed on behalf of Verizon by C. Cole.35
10/29/2004Application of The Office of Consumers' Council for rehearing of the 9/29/04 entry authorizing SBC Ohio, Inc. to apply strike exceptions to MTSS Rules 16(A)(3) and 16(D)(3), memorandum in support filed by T. Etter.16
10/12/2004Correspondence letters filed by K. Hobbs on behalf of The Western Reserve Telephone Company.3
09/30/2004Service Notice20
09/29/2004Entry ordering that joint motion to intervene on June 14, 2004 by CFUR and NEC is denied and that the request for releif sought by SBC Ohio is granted and that the motion for protective order is granted.9
09/22/2004Request for waiver of paragraphs A and B of the MTSS rule 16 due to verifiable Acts of God filed on behalf of Verizon North Inc. by T. Lodge.4
09/22/2004Request for waivers of paragraphs (A) and (B) of MTSS Rule 16 due to verifiable Acts of God beginning with the remnants of Hurricane Francis on 9/8/04, worsened by the remnants of Hurricane Ivan on 9/17, and continuing through the present filed by C. Flahive on behalf of the Western Reserve Telephone Company.4
09/21/2004Request for waivers of certain paragraphs of the MTSS Rule 16 due to verifiable Acts of God occurring September 17- September 18, 2004 filed on behalf of Verizon North by C. Cole. (FAX)1
09/17/2004Preliminary comments filed on behalf of the Ohio Consumers Counsel by T. Etter.11
09/13/2004Letter regarding the MTSS Rule 16 on behalf of C. Cole by T. Lodge.1
09/10/2004Request for waiver of Rule 16 of the Minimum Telephone Service Standards filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by M. Fenlon.4
09/10/2004Letter regarding request for waivers of paragraphs (A) and (B) of MTSS Rule 16, filed by C. Cole.(FAX)1
08/04/2004Entry ordering that, in accordance with the above Findings, SBC Ohio's July 16, 2004 request for waiver of Rule 4901:1-5-06(B)(1), O.A.C. is granted.2
08/04/2004Service Notice19
07/20/2004Response to SBC Ohio's memorandum contra motion to intervene filed on behalf of The Neighborhood Environmental Coalition's and The Consumers for Fair Utility Rates by J. Meissner.15
07/19/2004Motion for brief extension of time to file response to SBC Ohio's memorandum contra filed on behalf of The Neighborhood Environmental al Coalition's and the Consumers for a Fair Utility Rates' motion to intervene by J. Meissner. (original)5
07/16/2004Motion for brief extension of time to file response to SBC Ohio's memorandum contra the Neighborhood Environmental Coalitions and The Consumers for Fair Utility Rates motion to intervene filed by J. Meissner. (FAX)4
07/16/2004Request for waiver of Section 4905:1-5-06(B)(1) of the Ohio Administrative Code and request for expedited ruling filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.5
07/02/2004Memorandum Contra The Neighborhood Environmental Coalition's and the Consumers for Fair Utility Rates motions to intervene filed on behalf of SBC Ohio filed by M. Kelly.6
06/30/2004Supplement to its notice of exception and request for waivers under the Minimum Telephone Service Standards, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by M. Fenlon.15
06/30/2004Motion for protective order, filed by SBC Ohio by M. Fenlon.8
06/30/2004Confidential Notice filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.(FILED UNDER SEAL)14
06/14/2004Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed by J. Meissner on behalf of the Neighborhood Environmental Coalition and The Consumers for Fair Utility Rates. (FAX)24
05/28/2004Memorandum contra SBC Ohio's request for waiver and request for expedited ruling, filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter; Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs; Appalachian People's Action Coalition by M. Smalz; and City of Cleveland by W. Zigli.11
05/21/2004Notice of exception and request for expedited ruling on waivers under the minimum telephone service standards, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.10
05/05/2004Entry ordering that in accordance with findings, SBC Ohio's April 8, 2004 request for waiver of Rule 4901:1-5-06 (B)(1), O.A.C. is granted.2
05/05/2004Service Notice19
04/08/2004Request for waiver and request for expedited ruling, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.5
03/31/2004Service Notice18
03/30/2004Entry ordering that Verizon's 3/5/2004 request for waiver to Rule 4901:1-5-06(B)(1) O.A.C. is granted.2
03/05/2004Request for waiver of Verizon North Inc. filed by C. Flahive.7
02/11/2004Entry ordering that in accordance with the above findings, the rehearing applications of SBC Ohio, OTA, and CBT are hereby denied and the December 17, 2003 Entry in this case is affirmed, that CBT's motion for stay of the December 17, 2003 Entry is denied, that SBC Ohio's request for a me-too wavier, as filed in 00-1265-docket on January 16, 2004 is denied, with attached concurring opinions of Chairman Alan R. Schriber and Commissioner Donald L. Mason.11
02/11/2004Entry ordering that in accordance with the above findings, Verizon's January 23, 2004 request for waiver of Rule 4901:1-5-06(B)(1) is granted.2
02/11/2004Finding and Order, ordered that the application as revised and filed in Case No. 03-1149-TP-ZTA is approved in accordance with finding 7, that OCC's motion to intervene in Case No. 03-1149-TP-ZTA is denied in accordance with finding 8, that a wavier of MTSS Rule 4901:1-5-13(A)(3)(a), OAC is granted in accordance with Finding 13, ordered that a waiver of MTSS Rule 4901:1-5-17(J)(2)(b), OAC is unnecessary as set forth in finding 14, ordered that the waiver of Rule 4901:1-6-17(A), OAC sought by SBC Ohio is granted in accordance with finding 15, that Case No. 03-1149-TP-ZTA is closed of record.7
02/11/2004Service Notice26
02/09/2004Reply to the Memorandum Contra filed by OCC and the Appalachian People's Action Coalition of January 30, 2004, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.10
02/04/2004Entry ordering that in accordance with the findings, that the request by Ohio's small ILEC's for a blanket waiver of MTSS Rules 20(D)(1) and 20(D)(4) is denied and they need not have or deploy the same sophisticated answer time measurement and compliance verification systems as the Commission expects Ohio's large ILEC's to have in place, instead, they are allowed to utilize less sophisticated means.7
02/04/2004Entry ordering that in accordance with the findings, SBC's 12/16/2004 request for waiver of rule 4901:1-5-15(C), O.A.C. is granted and that with compliance with MTSS Rule 15(C) is achieved in situations involving the bill of any LEC or IXC whose customer is subscribed to a flat rate, unlimited toll calling plan that the company provide, at the customer's request, all of the bill detail specified in the MTSS Rule 15(C). LECs and IXCs who wish to begin using the abbreviated bill format must provide prior notice to all affected customers and send notice to be reviewed by the Commission's Consumer Staff prior to it's use.3
02/04/2004Service Notice26
01/30/2004Memorandum Contra of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel and the Appalachian People's Action Coalition to SBC Ohio's request for waiver filed by T. Etter and M. Smalz.15
01/29/2004A letter requesting a waiver of certain provisions of the MTSS and the service requirements form on 1/16/2004 filed on behalf of SBC by J. Kelly.3
01/23/2004Request for waiver filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by T. Lodge.6
01/16/2004Request for a waiver, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.23
01/15/2004Service Notice.26
01/14/2004Entry ordering that OCC's application for rehearing is denied in accordance with finding 5.4
01/05/2004Memorandum of ALLTEL Ohio, Inc. and The Western Reserve Telephone Company filed by C. Flahive.7
12/29/2003Service list filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter.7
12/24/2003Application for rehearing of the portion of the November 25, 2003 Entry granting an"Act of God" waiver request of Alltel Ohio, Inc. and The Western Reserve Telephone Company, filed on behalf of Office of the Consumers Counsel by T. Etter.7
12/16/2003SBC Ohio's request for waiver filed by M. Fenlon.5
12/09/2003Service Notice5
12/09/2003Entry ordering that Verizon's November 26,2003 request for waiver of Rule 4901:1-5-06(B)(1), O.A.C. is granted.2
11/26/2003Request for waiver of Verizon North Inc. filed by T. Lodge.6
11/25/2003Entry ordering that in accordance with the above findings, Alltel-Western Reserve's July 10, 2003 and July 11, 2003, request for waiver of Rules 4901:1-5-16 (A) and (B) O.A.C. are granted in part and denied in part, that 48 hours shall be added to each of the time frames established in Rule 16 (B) for purposes of determining credits to customers located in the exchanges granted relief in finding (8) above.5
11/07/2003Requests by Alltel Ohio, Inc. and The Western Reserve Telephone Company for waivers of MTSS rule 16(A) and (B) filed on behalf of Alltel and Western Reserve by T. Etter.2
11/05/2003Various documents previously submitted to staff, filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio, Inc. and The Western Reserve Telephone Company by C. Flahive.(part 2 of 2)162
11/05/2003Various documents previously submitted to staff, filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio, Inc. and The Western Reserve Telephone Company by C. Flahive. (part 1 of 2)162
09/09/2003Request for waiver of Sections 4901:1-5-15(C)(2) and 4901:1-5-15(D), ("MTSS Rules 15(C) (2) and (D); and for Sections 4901:1-5-17(B)(1) and 4901:1-5-17(L), (MTSS Rules 4901:1-5-17(B)(1) and (L), filed on behalf of Voice Solutions Network by B. Renner.4
09/04/2003Request for waiver of Section 4901:1-5-15(C) (2) and 4901:1-5-5-15 (D), filed on behalf of Voice Solutions Network, LLC dba OnlyOne by B. Renner.(fax)4
09/03/2003Request for waiver of Section 4901:1-5-15(C)(2) and 4901:1-5-15(D) of the OAC, filed on behalf of Voice Solutions Network by B. Renner.4
08/29/2003Waiver request filed on behalf of Voice Solutions Networks, LLC dba OnlyOne by B. Renner.8
08/28/2003Response to the supplemental reply memorandum of the small telephone companies, filed on behalf of the Ohio Consumers Counsel by T. Etter.9
08/19/2003Entry ordering that, in accordance with the findings in this entry, Sprint's July 24, 2003 request for waiver of Rule 4901p1-5-06(B)(1), O.A.C., is granted.2
08/19/2003Supplemental reply memorandum filed on behalf of The Small Telephone Companies by T. Lodge.7
07/24/2003Request for waiver of Chapter 4901:1-5-6(B)(1) of the Ohio Administrative Code of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, filed by J. Stewart.6
07/17/2003Letter to Commission , filed on behalf of The Ohio Consumers Counsel by T. Etter.3
07/17/2003Response to correspondence filed by the Ohio Consumers Counsel, filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio, Inc. and The Western Reserve Telephone Company by C. Flahive.2
07/15/2003Substitute pages 2 and 3 for the correspondence filed July 14, 2003, filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve Telephone Co. by T. Lodge.3
07/14/2003Letter to Commission staff requesting amendment of their request for waivers of paragraphs (A) and (B) of Ohio Adm. Code 4901:1-5-16 (MTSS Rule 16) filed on July 10, 2003, filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio and The Western Reserve Telephone Company by C. Flahive.46
07/11/2003Letter requesting waivers of paragraphs (A) and (B) of MTSS rule 16, on behalf of Western Reserve Telephone Company and ALLTEL Ohio, Inc., by C. Flahive.1
07/10/2003Letter requesting waivers of paragraphs (A) and (B) of MTSS rule 16, on behalf of Western Reserve Telephone Company and ALLTEL Ohio, Inc., by C. Flahive. (FAX)1
06/09/2003Reply comments filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly14
06/05/2003Entry ordered that AT&T request for temporary waiver is granted with regards to its provision of warm line service to its former (disconnected) customers located SBC Ohio's service territory who obtain local telephone service via the unbundled network element platform.26
05/29/2003Memorandum contra to SBC's Ohio request for waiver, filed on behalf of The Ohio Consumers Counsel by T. Etter.13
05/22/2003Entry ordered that Sprint's request to withdraw its April 22, 2003 request of waiver shall be granted.25
05/20/2003Request for waivers from 4901:1-5-13(A)(3)(a), 4901:1-5-17(J)(2)(b) and 4901:1-6-17(A) of the Ohio Administrative Code filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.10
05/12/2003Request to withdraw the request for waiver, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by B. Donahue.4
04/22/2003Request for waiver of Section 4905:1-5-06(B)(1) of the OAC filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart.6
04/11/2003Revised tariff pages filed on behalf of applicant by M. Chuang.66
03/25/2003Entry ordering that Revolution's request for withdrawal of its February 14, 2003 motion is granted.2
03/25/2003Service Notice.23
03/21/2003Application for waiver of MTSS Rule 17 (1), filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by D. Trabaris.4
03/14/2003Notice of withdrawal and for clarification of Rules 4901:5-15 and 4901:1-5-17, Ohio Administrative Code or in the alternative a request for a waiver, filed on behalf of Revolution Communications Company, LLC dba 1-800-4-A-Phone by J. Migden.3
03/11/2003Reply of Revolution Communications Company, LLC to joint memorandum contra, filed by J. Migden.6
03/07/2003Reply memorandum of The Small Telephone Companies in support of motion for waiver of MTSS filed by T. Lodge. 7
03/03/2003Joint memorandum contra motion of Revolution Communications Company for a clarification of rules and request for a waiver, filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter.; Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs; Appalachian People's Action Coalition by M. Smalz; City of Toledo by K. Bruce; City of Cleveland by W. Zigli; and Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland by J. Meissner.13
02/25/2003Memorandum of the Ohio Consumers Counsel contra motion of the Small Telephone Companies for waiver of MTSS, filed by T. Etter.8
02/14/2003Motion for clarification of rules or in the alternative a request for a waiver and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Revolution Communications Co. by J. Migden.8
02/13/2003Entry ordering that request for a waiver is granted on an expedited basis.25
02/13/2003Entry ordering that COI's temporary waiver request appears reasonable and should be granted.24
02/10/2003Motion of the Small Telephone Companies for waiver of MTSS 4901:1-5-20(D)(1), (D)(4) and memorandum in support of this motion, filed by T. Lodge. 13
01/24/2003Request for waiver, filed on behalf of COI by P. Engle.3
01/24/2003Request for waiver and request for expedited ruling filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.5
12/09/2002Affidavit of David H. Miller filed on behalf of Suretel, Inc. filed by J. Kelroy.2
11/21/2002Entry ordering that Sprint's November 4, 2002 request for waiver of Rule 4901:1-5-06(B)(1), O.A.C. is granted.26
11/13/2002Request for waiver filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart.4
11/04/2002Request for waiver filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. 10
10/11/2002Revisions to the local exchange services tariff on behalf of Metro Teleconnect Companies, Inc. filed by S. Hafeli.10
10/03/2002Entry ordering that no waiver of MTSS Rule 17(K)(1) is necessary in order for Ameritech to proceed with its proposal to print the postmark date of its bills; before implementing its proposal, Ameritech must provide information to its customers concerning the new format; that all telecommunications providers in Ohio who offer PCFs, including Ameritech, are hereby authorized to lift a PCF upon the oral authorization of a subscriber made during a call placed directly by the subscriber to the telecommunications provider, so long as the subscriber provides during the call appropriate verification data.88
09/04/2002Memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's request for waiver and request for expedited ruling, filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter.9
08/29/2002Request for waiver and request for an expedited ruling filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Fenlon.6
08/12/2002Revisions to the local exchange services tariff on behalf of Metro Teleconnect Companies, Inc. filed by S. Hafeli.20
08/08/2002Entry ordering that AT&T November 21, 2001 request for waiver from MTSS rule 15(A) is granted, subject to the conditions elaborated in Finding (5) of this entry.4
08/08/2002Service Notice24
07/03/2002Change of attorney filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Trabaris.1
07/02/2002Request that its request filed on June 19, 2002 be withdrawn, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.3
06/19/2002Ameritech Ohio's request for waiver and request for expedited ruling filed by J. Kelly.5
05/07/2002MTSS filing submitted on behalf of Buckland Telephone Co. by D. Place.41
04/25/2002Entry ordering that Ameritech's request for an extension of time for implementing of the new four hour window appointment scheduling policy is granted.3
04/25/2002Service Notice.24
04/16/2002Detailed information and timeline for implementation of the warm line requirement filed by M. Fenlon on behalf of Ameritech Ohio.11
04/11/2002Revised local exchange services tariff of Metro Teleconnect Companies, Inc. ("Metro Teleconnect") and the Affidavit of Mr. Chad Hazam, President, filed by S. Hafeli.114
03/28/2002Service Notice.28
03/27/2002Entry ordering that Ameritech's March 14, 2002 request for a waiver of Rule 4901:1-5-06(B)(1), O.A.C. is granted on an expedited basis.2
03/25/2002Affidavit of Steven Fenker filed on behalf of Nexus Communications, Inc. by S. Fenker.2
03/20/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 1, filed on behalf of Revolution Communications Co. by J. Migden.101
03/18/2002Affidavit of Larry W. Seab filed on behalf of NOW Communications, Inc. by J. Migden.2
03/14/2002Request for waiver and request for expedited ruling filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.5
03/11/2002Corrected 563 registration form filed on behalf of Frontier Communications of Ohio by D. Alkins.4
03/11/2002Revised tariff, PUCO No. 2; the purpose of this filing is to make its tariff comply with the order of the PUCO in Case No. 00-1265-TP-ORD issued on September 13, 2001 (MTTS Order), filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by D. Ferris. (FILED 2/27/02 INCORRECTLY AS A NEW CASE NO. 02-526-TP-ATA WHICH HAS SINCE BEEN VOIDED)22
03/11/2002Revised tariff; this filing proposes to make its tariff comply with the Order of the PUCO in Case No. 96-1175-TP-COI issued on December 20, 2001 (Toll Blocking Order), filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by D. Ferris. (FILED 2/27/02 INCORRECTLY AS A NEW CASE NO. 02-525-TP-ATA WHICH HAS SINCE BEEN VOIDED)9
03/06/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 1, Section 2, original pages 40 and 41, filed on behalf of Focal Communications Corp. of Ohio by D. Meldazis.4
03/04/2002Revised tariff, PUCO No. 1, Section 2, original pages 40 and 41, filed on behalf of Focal Communications Corp. of Ohio by S. Talley.5
02/22/2002Ameritech Ohio's Request for waiver, filed by J. Kelly.7
02/22/2002Request for additional time to implement and for clarification of Certain Minimum Telephone Service Standards, filed by J. Kelly.3
02/19/2002Tariff revised pages no.1 of amendment of the Minimum Telephone Service Standards, D. Alkins.51
02/14/2002Revised tariff pages to Frontier Communications of America Inc., Ohio tariff no. 1, filed by D. Alkins.59
02/13/2002Proposed tariff amendments on behalf of Choice One Communications of Ohio Inc., PUCO tariff no. 3, filed by G. Huber.26
02/12/2002Affidavit filed on behalf of Lightyear Communications, Inc., by R. Norton.2
02/11/2002Affidavit on behalf of KMC Tlecom III, Inc. by M. Ozanick.2
02/11/2002Replacement tariff pages, Section 2, Third Revised Sheets 15 and 2C filed by K. Hobbs on behalf of Western Reserve Telephone Company.3
02/06/2002Affidavit of Craig Ferguson filed on behalf of Global Tel*Link Corp. by C. Ferguson.1
02/06/2002Affidavit of Joseph R. Morris filed on behalf of First Communications, LLC by B. Ferris. (FILED 2/1/02)2
02/06/2002Affidavit of Jerry Finefrock filed on behalf of Long Distance of Michigan, Inc. dba LDMI by S. Dawson.2
02/06/2002Revised tariffs, PUCO Nos. 8 and 1, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by K. Reid.16
02/05/2002Replacement tariff, PUCO No. 2, Section 18, original sheets 9 through 15, filed on behalf of Alltel Communications, Inc. by K. Hobbs.8
02/04/2002Replacement pages for tariff filing on 1/28/02 filed by K. Hobbs on behalf of Alltel Communications.9
02/04/2002Replacement pages for tariff filing on 1/28/02 filed by K. Hobbs on behalf of Western Reserve Telephone Company16
02/04/2002Additional tariff revisions filed by L. Claytor on behalf of Horizon Chillicothe Telephone.10
02/01/2002Tariff Revision and Affidavit for DSLnet Communications LLC PUCO Tariff No. 1 filed by Carey Roesel on behalf of DSLnet Communications, LLC. 13
02/01/2002Affidavit and revised tariff pages filed by T. O'Brien on behalf of CoreComm Newco, Inc.50
02/01/2002Affidavit and revised tariff pages filed by M. Byrnes on behalf of Z-Tel Communications, Inc.19
02/01/2002Affidavit and revised tariff pages filed by C. Wightman on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio, L.P.19
02/01/2002Affidavit and revised tariff pages filed by M. Byrnes on behalf of FiberNet of Ohio, LLC.21
02/01/2002Affidavit and revised tariff pages filed by S. Kurlan on behalf of Allegiance Telecom, Inc.8
02/01/2002Letter withdrawing tariff revision filed on 1/24/02 and affidavit of Lyndall Nipps filed by S. Kurlan on behalf of Allegiance Telecom, Inc.2
02/01/2002Affidavit and revised tariff sheets filed by M. Byrnes on behalf of Custom Network Solutions, Inc.14
02/01/2002Affidavit and revised tariff pages filed by M. Byrnes on behalf of QCC, Inc.11
02/01/2002Affidavit and revised tariff pages filed by C. Wightman on behalf of Global NAPS Ohio, Inc.11
02/01/2002Affidavit and revised tariff pages filed by C. Roesel on behalf of Horizon Personal Communications, Inc. d/b/a Horizon Long Distance.9
02/01/2002Affidavit and revised tariff pages filed by C. Wightman on behalf of Operator Service Company.15
02/01/2002Affidavit and revised tariff pages filed by C. Wightman on behalf of Talk America Inc.21
02/01/2002Affidavit and revised tariff pages filed by S. Dawson on behalf of Long Distance of Michigan, Inc. d/b/a LDMI Telecommunications, also d/b/a FoneTel23
02/01/2002Affidavit of Anton J. Bily filed by C. Wightman on behalf of Connect America Communications, Inc.2
02/01/2002Affidavit and revised tariff pages filed by V. Roesel on behalf of Telecommunications Resources, Inc.17
02/01/2002Affidavit of Joseph R Morris filed on behalf of First Communications LLC, by B. Ferris.1
02/01/2002Affidavit tariff revision filed on behalf of PDS Inc. dba Phone Deblt Systems, Inc. tariff pages reflect updates to the minimum telephone service standards (MTSS) by M. Bynes.14
02/01/2002Affidavit and tariff revision filed on behalf of Custom Teleconnect, Inc., filed by m. Byrnes.11
02/01/2002Affidavit and a tariff revision filed on behalf of American Long Lines, Inc. by C. Roesel.17
02/01/2002Affidavit and tariff revision filed on behalf of ACN Communication Services, Inc. filed by m. Bynes.16
02/01/2002Affidavit and tariff revision on behalf of Globalcom, Inc dba GCI Globalcom, Inc., filed by C. Roesel.18
02/01/2002Affidavit and tariff revision filed on behalf of ESS Communications, L.L.C. revised tariff pages with the Minimum Telephone Service Standards (MTSS) by M. Byrnes.12
01/31/2002Affidavit filed on behalf of Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc. dba Verizon Long by C. Wightman.2
01/31/2002Letter regarding the affidavit of NYNEX Long Distance Company dba Verizon Enterprise Solutions Atlantic Communications, Inc. dba Verizon Long Distance, filed by C. Wightman.2
01/31/2002Affidavit filed on behalf of T-NETIX Telecommunications Services, Inc. by R. Norton.2
01/31/2002Tariff revision for Combined Public Communications, Inc. for the new Minimum Telephone Service Standards, filed by R. Norton.13
01/31/2002Affidavit of David L. Ziegler of Qwest Communications Corporation filed by J. Sanders.2
01/31/2002Tariff revisions filed on behalf of National Brands, Inc. dba Sharenet Communications Company, filed by C. Wightman.14
01/30/2002Affidavit, Exhibit A - Superseded Tariff Pages, and Exhibit B - Proposed Revised Tariff Pages filed by T. Forte on behalf of BellSouth BSE, Inc.21
01/29/2002Service Notice63
01/29/2002Tariff proposed revision for CenturyTel Long Distance, Inc. filed by T. Forte.13
01/29/2002Tariff proposed revision for Network Communications International Corp. (NCIC) filed by T. Forte.13
01/29/2002Affidavit of National Accounts, Inc. tariff in compliance filed by T. Forte.2
01/29/2002Affidavit verifying the tariff of Saturn Telecommunication Services Inc. filed by S. Dawson.2
01/29/2002Tariff proposed revision for Legacy Long Distance International Inc. filed by T. Forte.13
01/29/2002Tariff proposed revision for BellSouth Long Distance Inc. filed by T. Forte.13
01/29/2002Tariff proposed revision for Business Telecom Inc. filed by T. Forte11
01/29/2002Affidavit of the AmeriVision Communications, Inc. tariff in compliance filed by T. Forte.2
01/28/2002Tariff revision local exchange filed on behalf of Allegiance Telecom of Ohio, Inc. adds the minimum telephone service standards (MTSS) filed by S. Kurlan.6
01/28/2002Letter regarding tariffs filed on behalf of the Western Reserve Telephone Company, filed by K. Hobbs.1
01/28/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 1, filed on behalf of TON Services, Inc. by R. Norton. (INCORRECTLY FILED AS A NEW CASE NO. 02-224-CT-ZTA WHICH HAS SINCE BEEN VOIDED)13
01/28/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 2, filed on behalf of Lightyear Communications by R. Norton. (INCORRECTLY FILED AS A NEW CASE NO. 02-225-CT-ZTA WHICH HAS SINCE BEEN VOIDED)13
01/28/2002Entry ordering that rehearing shall be extended until 2/1/02. (AE)2
01/25/2002Affidavit filed on behalf of the Western Reserve Telephone Company by S. Rowell. 61
01/25/2002Affidavit of Amy Hartzler filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group, Inc. by B. Ferris.2
01/25/2002Affidavit of Stephen B. Rowell filed on behalf of ALLTEL Communications, Inc.33
01/25/2002Affidavit filed on behalf of Joan Campion of World Com Inc. by J. Sanders.2
01/25/2002Affidavit filed on behalf of ALLTEL Ohio Inc. by S. Rowell. 69
01/24/2002Replacement tariff page PUCO no. 7 fifth revised sheet no. 4 filed on behalf of The Germantown Independent Telephone Company by C. Flahive.2
01/24/2002Affidavit file on behalf of TCG Ohio by S. Briar.3
01/24/2002Affidavit of compliance along with amendments to its PUCO tariff no. 1 filed by J. Kirby.29
01/24/2002Letter requesting an extension of affidavit and tariff revisions on behalf of the carriers listed in attachment A by C. Wightman.2
01/24/2002Replacement tariff pages PUCO no. 7 filed on behalf of Doylestown Telephone Company by C. Flahive. 3
01/24/2002Affidavit filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco, Inc. by S. Kellogg.1
01/23/2002Revised tariff pages PUCO tariff No. 1 filed by A. Edmonds on behalf of NOS Communications, Inc., NOSVA LP and Affinity Network Inc.37
01/23/2002Revised PUCO Tariff No. 3, filed by Jerry Kirby on behalf of eMeritus Communications Inc. 32
01/23/2002DELETE NO IMAGE Affidavit and revised tariff pages filed by V. Schlesinger on behalf of Teligent Services, Inc.121
01/23/2002Revised Tariff PUCO No. 3 and Affidavit of Teligent Services, Inc. filed by Victoria Schlesinger on behalf of Teligent Services, Inc. 121
01/23/2002Tariff, PUCO No. 2, filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by S. Briar.20
01/23/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 5, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry.10
01/23/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 5, filed on behalf of Ayersville Telephone Company by C. Flahive.80
01/23/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 8, filed on behalf of Arcadia Telephone Company by C. Flahive.56
01/23/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 3, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by S. Briar.9
01/23/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 3, filed on behalf of Oakwood Telephone Company by C. Flahive.31
01/23/2002Request for an additional nine days or until February 1, 2002 in which to comply, filed on behalf of Allegiance Telecom of Ohio by T. O'Brien.1
01/23/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 6, filed on behalf of The Conneaut Telephone Company by C. Flahive.50
01/23/2002DELETE NO IMAGE Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 3, filed on behalf of Teligent Services, Inc. by V. Schlesinger.121
01/23/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 12, filed on behalf of CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc. by V. Norris.14
01/23/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 6, filed on behalf of Vanlue Telephone Company by C. Flahive.41
01/23/2002Affidavit and tariffs, PUCO Nos. 5 and 8, filed on behalf of Little Miami Communications Corp. by C. Flahive.87
01/23/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 2, filed on behalf of XO Ohio by C. Emmel.28
01/23/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 7, filed on behalf of Verizon North by M. Colquitt.26
01/23/2002DELETE NO IMAGE Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 1, filed on behalf of NOS Communications, Inc., NOSVA Limited Partnership, and Affinity Network Incorporated by A. Edmonds.37
01/23/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 12, filed on behalf of Chillicothe Telephone Co. by L. Claytor.80
01/23/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 2, filed on behalf of Verizon Select Services by D. Fowler.21
01/23/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 2, filed on behalf of Excel Telecommunications, Inc. by J. Kirby.26
01/23/2002DELETE NO IMAGE Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 3, filed on behalf of eMeritus Communications, Inc. by J. Kirby.32
01/23/2002Affidavit filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by S. Sharp.2
01/23/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO NO. 8, filed on behalf of Continental Telephone Company by C. Flahive.54
01/23/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 20, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by R. Wentz.28
01/23/2002Request for an additional nine days or until February 1, 2002 in which to comply, filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by T. O'Brien.1
01/23/2002Request for an additional nine days or until February 1, 2002 in which to comply, filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by S. Kellogg. (Fax copy)1
01/23/2002Affidavit and tariffs, PUCO Nos. 1 and 3, filed on behalf of NuVox Communications of Ohio, Inc. by T. O'Brien.19
01/23/2002Affidavit and tariffs, PUCO Nos. 1 and 8, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by M. Romito.32
01/23/2002DELETE NO IMAGE Affidavit and revised tariff pages filed by V. Schlesinger on behalf of Teligent Services, Inc. 121
01/22/2002Affidavit and revised tariff, PUCO No. 5, filed on behalf of Champaign Telephone Co. by C. Flahive.78
01/22/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 1, filed on behalf of CT Communications Network by C. Flahive.41
01/22/2002Application to amend existing tariff, declaration of Scott A. White, superseded tariff sheets and revised tariff Sheets Nos. 2, 3, 25, 26, and 27 filed by S. Klinzman on behalf of Legent Communications Corporation d/b/a Long Distance America.17
01/18/2002Affidavit and tariff revisions filed by C. Flahive on behalf of Vaughnsville Telephone Company61
01/18/2002Affidavit and tariff revisions filed by C. Flahive on behalf of Sherwood Mutual Telephone Association, Inc.72
01/18/2002Affidavit and tariff revisions filed by E. Damman on behalf of Farmers Mutual Telephone Company.50
01/18/2002Affidavit and tariff revisions filed by C. Flahive on behalf of Pattersonville Telephone Company37
01/18/2002Affidavit and tariff revision filed by C. Flahive on behalf of Benton Ridge Telephone Company.52
01/17/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 6, filed on behalf of Columbus Grove Telephone Co. by C. Flahive.70
01/17/2002Affidavit and tariff filed on behalf of Doylestown Communications, Inc. by C. Flahive.33
01/17/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 3, filed on behalf of Middle Point Home Telephone Co. by C. Flahive.46
01/17/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 7, filed on behalf of Doylestown Telephone Co. by C. Flahive.54
01/17/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 6, filed on behalf of Orwell Telephone Co. by C. Flahive.57
01/16/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 3, filed on behalf of Arthur Mutual Telephone Co. by C. Flahive.72
01/16/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 2, filed on behalf of The Ridgeville Telephone Co. by C. Flahive.44
01/16/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 12, filed on behalf of Sycamore Telephone Co. by C. Flahive.54
01/16/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 4, filed on behalf of Fort Jennings Telephone Co. by C. Flahive.62
01/16/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 5, filed on behalf of McClure Telephone Co. by C. Flahive.62
01/15/2002Affidavit and tariffs, PUCO No. 5, filed on behalf of Telephone Service Co. by C. Flahive.46
01/15/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 3, filed on behalf of The Bascom Mutual Telephone Co. by C. Flahive.60
01/15/2002Affidavit and tariff, PUCO No. 1, filed on behalf of TSC Communications, Inc. by C. Flahive.69
01/15/2002Affidavit and tariff revisions, PUCO No. 1, filed on behalf of Bright Long Distance Ltd. by C. Flahive.33
01/15/2002Affidavit and tariffs, PUCO No. 5, filed on behalf of Wabash Mutual Telephone Co. by C. Flahive.60
01/14/2002Affidavit and tariff revisions filed on behalf of the Nova Telephone Company ("Nova") revised tariff sheets for the new Minimum Telephone Service Standards, filed by C. Flahive.74
01/14/2002Affidavit and tariff revisions filed on behalf of Frontier Communications of Michigan, Inc., filed by C. Flahive.73
01/14/2002Affidavit and tariff revisions filed on behalf of Minford Telephone Company filed by C. Flahive.63
01/14/2002Affidavit and tariff revisions filed on behalf of The Germantown Independent Telephone Company, filed by C. Flahive.54
01/08/2002Minimum telephone standards compliance filing submitted on behalf of The Ottoville Mutual Telephone Co. by D. Hoersten.286
01/08/2002Minimum telephone service standards requirements filed on behalf of Kalida Telephone Co. by C. Phillips.202
01/08/2002Minimum telephone service standards filed on behalf of Glandorf Telephone Co. by L. Heckman.184
01/04/2002Tariff, PUCO No. 1, filed on behalf of GoldStar Communications by E. Morris.198
12/31/2001Registration form filed on behalf of New Knoxville Telephone Co.3
12/28/2001Minimum telephone service standards compliance filed on behalf The New Knoxville Telephone Company by P. Meyer. 224
12/18/2001AT&T reply to OCC's motion to intervene; opposition to AT&T application for waiver of miss rule 15(A), filed by D. Chorzempa.8
12/17/2001Letter regarding complying with the requirement of the new MTSS rules filed by P. Crocker.2
12/13/2001Affidavit of Larry Wilcox25
12/10/2001Service Notice.24
12/06/2001Entry granting the waiver requests pertaining to Rule 4901:1-5-06(B), OAC filed by CenturyTel, Verizon, Sprint, and jointly by Alltel and Western Reserve.4
12/06/2001Motion to intervene, opposition to AT&T's application for waiver of MTSS Rule 15(A) filed by T. Etter on behalf of OCC.9
12/06/2001Entry granting Ameritech's request for waiver of Rule 4901:1-5-06(B)(1), OAC.2
11/30/2001Service Notice9
11/29/2001Entry ordering that the partial payment allocation process, codified in Rule 4901:1-5-17(C), O.A.C. shall be implemented in accordance with the clarification set forth in this entry.4
11/27/2001Ameritech Ohio's request for clarification or, in the alternative request for waiver, filed by J. Kelly5
11/21/2001Application for waiver of MTSS rule 15(A) filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by B. Kahn.8
11/21/2001Request for waiver to extend the effective date of the entry issued October 25, 2001, filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve Telephone by K. Hobbs.1
11/20/2001Ameritech Ohio's reply to the opposition filed by WorldCom and AT&T on 11/13/01.9
11/15/2001Application for waiver of specific MTSS standards filed by B. Donahue on behalf of United Telephone.4
11/13/2001WorldCom's and AT&T response in opposition to Ameritech Ohio's request for additional time to implement and request for clarification of certain minimum telephone service standards. Respectfully submitted by, E. Siegel.9
11/09/2001Application for waiver for Verizon North Inc. Filed by, T. Lodge.6
11/08/2001Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing filed on October 15, 2001 by AT&T and Verizon are denied; that Verizon's request for a waiver from Rules 4901:1-5-19(A)(3) and 4901:1-5-20(B)(5), O.A.C. are denied pursuant to Findings 9 and 12.7
11/08/2001Service Notice9
10/25/2001Request for additional time to implement a request for clarification of certain minimum telephone service standards filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Fenlon.13
10/25/2001Memorandum contra applications for rehearing, filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter.6
10/15/2001Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Chorzempa.7
10/15/2001Application for further rehearing or waiver and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Lodge.12
10/04/2001Service Notice.8
10/04/2001Entry Nunc Pro Tunc ordering that the sixth ordering paragraph of the September 13, 2001 Entry on Rehearing in this docket is hereby revised, nunc pro tunc, such that reference made therein to Rule 4901:1-5-17(H), O.A.C., is deleted and replaced with a reference, instead, to Rule 4901:1-5-17(I), O.A.C.2
10/01/2001Entry scheduling a an MTSS implementation workshop at 1:30 p.m. on October 29, 2001, Hearing Rooms 11B and 11C, Commission offices. (AE)10
09/14/2001Service Notice.52
09/13/2001Entry ordering that the rehearing is granted to the extent indicated in the "discussion" section of this entry and is, likewise, denied as indicated there; that the new MTSS rules, which were earlier adopted, are hereby rescinded; that existing Chapter 4901:1-5, O.A.C. is hereby rescinded, with such rescission becoming effective simultaneously with the effectiveness of the new rules being adopted today; that copies of new Chapter 4901:1-5, O.A.C., as set forth in the appendix of this entry on rehearing, be filed with the Joint Committee on Agency Review, the Legislative Service Commission, and the Secretary of State.155
07/24/2001Service Notice7
07/24/2001Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing filed on 6/28/01 are granted for the limited purpose of allowing the Commission additional time to consider the issues raised on rehearing.2
07/24/2001Letter to William Hills stating the Commission has the intent to refile the listed rules at a later date filed by A. Schriber.1
07/24/2001Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing filed on June 28, 2001 are granted for the limited purpose of allowing the Commission additional time to consider the issues raised on rehearing.2
07/09/2001Ameritech's memorandum contra the applications for rehearing filed by M. Fenlon.19
07/09/2001AT&T's memorandum contra certain applications for rehearing of OCC, OTIA, Ameritech, Sprint, and Verizon filed by D. Chorzempa.13
07/09/2001Reply comments of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company L.P. filed by J. Stewart.5
07/09/2001Memorandum contra application for rehearing filed by T. Etter on behalf of OCC.22
07/09/2001Memorandum in opposition to Ohio Consumers' Counsel's application for rehearing filed by C. Flahive on behalf of The Ohio Telecommunications Industry Association.5
07/02/2001Errata to application of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company L.P. for rehearing, filed by J. Stewart.3
06/28/2001Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by S. Bloomfield; ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris; KMC Telecom Inc. by B. Ferris; and McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services by M. Christensen.10
06/28/2001Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Lodge.16
06/28/2001Application for rehearing and request for clarification, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.52
06/28/2001Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company, L.P. by J. Stewart.9
06/28/2001Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of WorldCom, Inc. by J. Sanders and E. Siegel.30
06/28/2001Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, TCG Ohio, and AT&T Wireless Services by J. Kelroy.17
06/28/2001Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecommunications Industry Association by T. Lodge.27
06/28/2001Application for rehearing and clarification and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter.22
06/28/2001Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of XO Ohio by T. Rodgers.11
06/27/2001Amended tariff, PUCO No. 5, original page 1, filed on behalf of applicant by P. Meyer.2
06/27/2001Amended tariff, PUCO No. 5, original pages 1 and 2, filed on behalf of applicant by P. Meyer.3
05/30/2001Service Notice.6
05/29/2001Finding & Order that existing Chapter 4901:1-5, O.A.C. is hereby rescinded with such recession becoming effective simultaneously with the effectiveness of the new rules being adopted today; that new Chapter 4901:1-5, O.A.C., as set forth in Appendix A to this order, is hereby adopted; that copies of new Chapter 4901:1-5, O.A.C., be filed with the Joint Committee on Agency Review, the Legislative Service Commission, and the Secretary of State; that all local service providers and toll service providers in the state of Ohio shall, within 30 days of this order, file tariff amendments incorporating appropriate language from Appendix B to this order; that all telecommunications service providers shall file amended tariff pages within 30 days after the rules being adopted in this case become legally effective; that an interim policy on the filing and minimum content requirement for local service providers' tariffs is adopted and shall remain in effect during the pendency of Case No. 99-998-TP-COI, or until the Commission specifically orders otherwise.286
09/15/2000Reply comments filed by T. Lodge (14 pgs)6
09/15/2000Reply comments of CoreComm Newco, Inc., Association of Communications Enterprises f/k/a Telecommunications Resellers Association, AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc., TCG Ohio Time Warner Telecom of Ohio, L.P. ICG Telecom Group, Inc., and McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc. filed by their representatives.19
09/15/2000Reply comments filed by T. O'Brien, S. Bloomfield, D. Chor- zempa, B. Kahn, P. Sherwood, B. Ferris, E. Crutcher, M. Christensen. (19 pgs)21
09/15/2000Reply comments filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by D. Marshall. (8 pgs.)8
09/14/2000Reply comments; filed on behalf of Suretel, Inc. dba Sure-Tel, Inc. by B. Kahn.6
09/14/2000Ameritech Ohio's reply comments filed by J. Kelly.35
09/14/2000Reply comments filed by B. Kahn on behalf of Sure-Tel, Inc. (6 pgs)35
09/14/2000Reply comments of the Ohio Telecommunications Industry Association filed by T. Lodge.14
09/14/2000Reply comments filed by J. Benetine on behalf Nextlink, Ohio, Inc.8
09/14/2000Reply comments of WorldCom filed by J. Sanders and J. Campion. (17 pgs)17
09/14/2000Reply comments of WorldCom filed by J. Sanders and J. Camp- ion. (17 pgs)17
09/14/2000Reply comments filed by J. Kelly on behalf of Ameritech (35 pgs)55
09/14/2000Reply comments filed on behalf of Verizon by T. Lodge (21 pgs)21
09/14/2000Reply comments filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Co. by J. Stewart. (22 pgs.) (FILED 9/14/00)22
09/14/2000Reply comments of OCC filed by T. Etter (55 pgs)55
09/12/2000Various correspondence letters filed by concerned consumers.19
09/12/2000Correspondence letter opposing Ameritech's proposal, filed by Sophie A. Clark.19
09/09/2000Certificate of service filed by K. Wile on behalf Teligent Service, Inc.5
09/08/2000Reply comments filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by T. Rodgers. (8 pgs.)8
09/07/2000Certificate of Service. Filed by: T. Etter. (2 pgs.)2
09/07/2000Certificate of service filed on behalf of Sprint by J. Stewart. (3 pgs.)3
09/07/2000Certificate of service filed by K. Wile on behalf of Teligent Services, Inc. (5 pgs)5
09/06/2000Certificate of service filed on behalf of Sprint by J. Stewart. (3 pgs.)3
09/06/2000Certificate of service filed by T. Etter on behalf of OCC.2
09/05/2000Certificate of service filed on behalf of The Ohio Tele- communications Industry Assoc. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.)4
09/05/2000Certificate of service filed on behalf of Verizon North and Verizon Select Services by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.)4
09/05/2000Certificate of service filed on behalf of Alltel Communi- cations, Alltel Ohio, and Western Reserve Telephone by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.)4
09/05/2000Certificate of service filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco be S. Bloomfield. (2 pgs.)2
09/05/2000Certificate of service filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve Telephone by T. Lodge.3
09/01/2000Entry ordering that all those who have file initial comments in this docket should immediately serve copies of their initial comments upon all those persons identified in the attached service list; that anyone who later submits reply comments should also serve copies of them upon all those identified in the attached service list. (AE) (3 pgs.)3
08/31/2000Initial comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecommuni- cations Industry Assoc. by T. Lodge. (20 pgs.)20
08/31/2000Notice of Suretel, Inc. dba Sure-Tel, Inc. reserving the right to file reply comments, filed by B. Kahn. (1 pg.)1
08/31/2000Initial comments filed on behalf of Verizon North and Verizon Select Services by T. Lodge. (29 pgs.)29
08/31/2000Initial comments filed on behalf of Alltel Communications, Alltel Ohio, Inc., and Western Reserve Telephone Company by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.)4
08/31/2000Initial comments filed on behalf of Teligent Services, Inc., by K. Wile and D. Williamson.21
08/31/2000Comments filed on behalf of Corecomm Newco, Inc., by T. O'Brien; Association of Communications Enterprises fka Telecommunications Resellers Assoc.by S. Bloomfield; AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc., and TCG Ohio by D. Chorzempa and B. Kahn; Time Warner Telecom of Ohio, L.P. by S. Bloomfield and P. Sherwood; ICG Telecom Group, Inc. by B. Ferris; and McLeod USA Telecommunications Services, Inc. by E. Crutcher & M. Christensen.29
08/31/2000Initial comments filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc., by T. Lodge.28
08/31/2000Notice reserving the right to file reply comments, filed on behalf of Suretel, Inc. dba Sure-Tel, Inc. by B. Kahn. (1 pg.)1
08/31/2000Initial comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (27 pgs.)27
08/31/2000Comments filed on behalf of Corecomm Newco by T. O'Brien; Association For Communications Enterprises fkn Telecom- munications Resellers Assoc. by S. Bloomfield; AT&T Com- munications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Chorzempa and B. Kahn; Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by S. Bloomfield and P. Sherwood; ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris; and McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services by E. Crutcher and M. Christen- sen. (29 pgs.)29
08/31/2000Initial comments filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company L.P. by J. Stewart. (37 pgs.)37
08/31/2000Initial comments filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by D. Marshall. (28 pgs.)28
08/31/2000Initial comments filed on behalf of Teligent Services, Inc. by K. Wile. (21 pgs.)21
08/31/2000Comments filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter. (191 pgs.)191
08/31/2000Initial comments filed on behalf of WorldCom, Inc. by J. Sanders and J. Campion. (19 pgs.)19
08/31/2000Initial comments filed on behalf of Worldcom, Inc., by J. Sanders.19
08/30/2000Comments filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by T. Rodger. (11 pgs.)11
08/07/2000Notice that the OSLECA trustees on August 2, 2000, voted to give the Commission ten (10) days notice that $75,000 orless of the hardship funds will be utilized in accordance with the guidelines issued on September 2, 1999, filed on behalf of Ohio Small Local Exchange Carriers Association by P. Collins. (1 pg.)1
08/03/2000Entry ordering that interested persons and entities be authorized to file initial comments by August 31, 2000, and reply comments by September 14, 2000; scheduling a conference at 1:30 p.m. on August 10, 2000, at the Com- mission offices. (83 pgs.)83
07/11/2000In the matter of the Amendment of the Minimum Telephone Service Standards as set forth in Chapter 4901:1-5 of the Ohio Administrative Code. (1 pg.)1