DIS - Case Record for 99-0938-TP-COI Skip to main content

Case Record For:

99-0938-TP-COI

Case Title: AMERITECH OHIO/MINIMUM TELEPHONE
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: COI-Commission inquiry
Date Opened: 8/12/1999
Date Closed: 3/16/2009
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
03/16/2009Memo closing case with an effective date of 3/16/09.1
10/24/2008Correspondence reporting on compliance with the September 24, 2008 Entry electronically filed by Mrs. Verneda J. Engram on behalf of AT&T Ohio3
09/25/2008Service Notice1
09/24/2008Entry ordered that within 30 days of the date of this entry, AT&T Ohio shall transfer to Ohio United Way all remaining dollars in the Customer Fund and Ohio United Way shall use the funds to expand 2-1-1 service in Ohio,ordered that upon transfer AT&T Ohio may then close its accounting records for the Customer Fund. 3
09/03/2008Letter requesting the remaining $13,129.70 from the AT&T Customer Fund to be used over the next 11 months during efforts of 2-1-1 expansion, filed on behalf of the Ohio United Way by S. Herd. 13
01/07/2008Letter asking for an additional extension of the $ 13,129.70 to be used over the next 18 months during our efforts of 2-1-1 expansion filed by S. Herd on behalf of Ohio United Way.1
08/04/2006Additional information filed by Robert Wentz on behalf of AT&T.1
07/12/2006Service Notice10
07/12/2006Entry ordering that AT&T Ohio shall retain the remaining $13,129.70 in Customer Fund and use the dollars to cover the nonrecurring implementation costs associated with the provision of 2-1-1 service in those counties served by AT&T Ohio 2-1-1 service has not yet been implemented.3
07/07/2004Service Notice10
07/07/2004Entry ordering that in all other respects the Commission's June 9, 2004 entry on rehearing remains in effect.3
07/07/2004Service Notice1
07/06/2004Letter requesting access monies to purchase equipment filed on behalf of Columbiana County by G. Williams.1
07/06/2004Letter regarding the invoice on 2001 planning figures, filed on behalf of Monroe County by M. Forni.2
06/09/2004Entry on Rehearing, Ordered that the application for rehearing and request for clarification filed by Ameritech are granted or denied as discussed herein, that the applications for rehearing filed by AARP/Edgemont are granted or denied as discussed herein, that the application for rehearing filed by OCC is denied, that the dollars remaining the Customer Fund be disbursed according to the findings of this entry, that the Commission's Docketing Division release into the public record the information filed by Ameritech Ohio on March 27, 2002, and February 18, 2003, that Ameritech's motions for protective orders filed on February 17, 2004, and March 1, 2004 are granted until September 1, 2005, that the protective treatment that exists for any documents in this case shall expire on September 1, 2005, and that this case be closed of record. (ATTACHED DISSENTING AND CONCURRING OPINION OF COM. JUDITH JONES.)38
06/09/2004Service Notice10
06/07/2004Report of the staff concerning SBC Ohio's compliance with the Commission's Directives in it's June 20, 2002 Entry on rehearing in this proceeding and the distribution of the customer fund filed on behalf of the staff of The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.8
03/01/2004Additional report I&R 2004 Force Load Plan as ordered by the Commission filed by M. Fenlon.6
03/01/2004Confidential SBC Midwest I & R Ohio- 2004 Force Load Plan filed on behalf of applicant. (FILED UNDER SEAL)5
02/17/2004Confidential portion of report filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by M. Fenlon. (FILED UNDER SEAL)13
02/17/2004Consistent with Commission's January 31, 2002 Order and March 21, 2002 Entry the following reports are being filed: E&C Headcount Planning Model; OSP E&C Organization; Central Office Operations; I&R Force/Load Model; IM 2001-2003; Chapter II-6 Report and Chapter II-4 Report, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by M. Fenlon.20
07/16/2003Notice of substitution of counsel filed on behalf of applicant by D. Stinson.3
04/24/2003Entry ordering that SBC's request to use allocations from the Customer Fund for additional advanced services deployment in Appalachia, the broadband pilot community, and the implementation of 2-1-1 service is granted to the extent as discussed in this entry, that SBC's request to use an allocation from the Customer Fund for the broadband outreach program and air pressure system rehabilitation is denied, that SBC shall work with Commission staff to clarify the 2-1-1 service tariff (Case No. 01-3058-TP-ATA), ordered that the various participants involved in the approved initiatives will work with staff prior to the implementation of the initiatives, that SBC shall provide Commission staff with a bimonthly accounting of the progress of the initiatives.14
04/15/2003Interlocutory appeal filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by M Fenlon.25
04/10/2003Entry ordering that SBC Ohio's motion for a protective order be denied and within 15 days of the date of this entry the docketing division should release the attachment to SBC Ohio's letter filed in this case on February 18, 2003, which previouly has been held under seal. (SF)7
03/11/2003Report filed on behalf of SBC Ohio regarding use of the customer fund, filed by M. Fenlon.10
02/18/2003Reports filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by M. Fenlon.3
02/18/2003Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by M. Fenlon.6
02/18/2003Confidential attachments to SBC Ohio's letter filed on February 18, 2003. (FILED UNDER SEAL)11
11/18/2002Request that the Commission not automatically approve the request of Ameritech, dated October 31, 2002, to use the Customer Fund created in this matter for the purpose of extending advanced services, filed on behalf of AARP by W. Gruber; and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs.3
11/15/2002Request for thorough review of Ameritech request to use customer fund, filed on behalf of AARP by W. Gruber; and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (Fax)4
10/31/2002Letter regarding the SBC' total cost to carry out the collaborative plan filed by M. Fenlon.4
10/10/2002Request for Documents and Access filed on behalf of Edgemont's filed by E. Jacobs.2
10/10/2002Request for documents and access on behalf of AARP filed by W. Gruber.2
09/12/2002Entry granting the applications for rehearing by AARP/Edgemont and OCC for the limited purpose of allowing the Commission additional time to consider the arguments raised on rehearing.3
09/12/2002Service Notice.10
08/26/2002Memorandum contra the applications for rehearing of OCC and AARP/Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by W. Adams.9
08/19/2002Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter.11
08/16/2002Application of AARP and Edgemont Neighborhood Collation for rehearing filed by W. Gruber.20
08/15/2002Entry on rehearing granting the applications for rehearing of Ameritech and AARP/Edgemont for the limited purpose of allowing the Commission additional time to consider the arguments raised on rehearing.13
08/07/2002Letter of AARP to Ameritech Ohio pursuant to the entry on rehearing of June 20, 2002 filed by W. Gruber.3
08/06/2002Letter regarding AARP and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition's combined memorandum contra and motion to strike filed by W. Adams.1
08/01/2002SBC Ameritech Ohio's memorandum contra AARP and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition's application for rehearing filed by W. Adams.10
08/01/2002Motion to strike and memorandum of AARP and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition Contra the application of Ameritech Ohio for rehearing filed by W. Gruber.8
08/01/2002Memorandum of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel contra SBC Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing and request for clarification filed by T. Etter.10
07/24/2002Correspondence letter opposing Senate Bill 2430, filed by Jim & Laurie Dazley.1
07/22/2002Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AARP by W. Gruber; and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs.10
07/22/2002Application for rehearing and request for clarification and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by W. Adams.7
07/18/2002Entry ordering that Ameritech's request for clarification is granted to the extend discussed in Finding 8; that Ameritech's motion to stay the marketing provisions discussed in Findings 4s through d is granted; that the finding of inadequate service against Ameritech is lifted; that Ameritech is authorized to resume its dividend payments; that this case be closed of record. Dissenting Opinion of Commissioner Judith A. Jones.18
07/09/2002Memorandum contra the motion of Ameritech Ohio for stay and request for expedited ruling, filed on behalf of AARP by W. Gruber; and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (Original copy)8
07/08/2002Memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's motion for stay and request for expedited ruling, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann.11
07/08/2002Letter regarding Ameritech Ohio's letter of June 26, 2002, concerning their compliance with the Commission's orders in this case, filed on behalf of OCC by R. Tongren.3
07/08/2002Memorandum contra the motion of Ameritech Ohio for stay and request for expedited ruling, filed on behalf of AARP by W. Gruber; and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (Fax copy)8
06/27/2002Entry ordering that in all other respect, the June 20 2002, entry on rehearing remain in full force and effect. 2
06/27/2002Letter on behalf of Ameritech amending its application made on 7/26/00, the amendment is being made to reflect, for the period 5/1/02 through 4/30/04, a residential unbundled local switching port rate, filed by S. Drombetta.4
06/26/2002Letter regarding the Affidavit of James C. Smith by J. Smith. 9
06/26/2002Ameritech Ohio's motion for stay and request for expedited ruling filed by M. Fenlon.7
06/20/2002Service Notice10
06/20/2002Entry on rehearing granting in part and denying in part Ameritech's application for rehearing; that the application for rehearing filed by OCC is denied; that the application for rehearing filed by AARP/Edgemont is granted in part and denied in part; that Ameritech pay the state of Ohio $8.5 million by 5:00 p.m.on 6/27/02; that Ameritech inform the Commission within 10 days of this entry, as discussed in Finding 53, it is not willing to use $3.65 million to assist Columbiana and Monroe Counties in funding their 9-1-1 service and distributing the remainder to its customers; that Ameritech comply with the time frames set forth in Finding 67; that the stay granted on 4/30/02 is dissolved; that a protective order exists for 18 months from the date of this entry for the material filed by Ameritech on 3/27 and 5/1/02; that Ameritech work with the staff concerning the filings of its performance measurements in the merger case as set forth in Finding 70; Dissenting opinion Commissioner Judith A. Jones.49
06/13/2002Letter regarding Ohio Consumers' Counsel purports to bring to the Commission's attention an "inconsistency" in Ameritech Ohio's position for residential unbundled local switching ("ULS") port rate ordered, filed by W. Adams.2
06/11/2002Correction on 6/10/02, the Ohio Consumers' Counsel ("OCC") intended to filed a letter in Case No. 99-936-TP-COI. However, due to a typographical error, the letter was captioned as Case No. 99-998-TP-COI. OCC is refiling the letter in the proper docket and respectfully requests removal of the letter 99-998-TP-COI docket, filed by T. Etter.1
06/11/2002Letter regarding the Ohio Consumers' Counsel (OCC) on behalf of the residential customers of Ameritech Ohio, relative to its compliance with certain provisions of the minimum telephone service standards, filed by T. Etter.2
06/10/2002Notice of allocation of funds to assist in the implementation of 9-1-1 service in Washington County filed by M. Fenlon on behalf of Ameritech Ohio.1
05/30/2002Entry ordering that Ameritech's motion for an extension of time to comply with the requirement that the company calculate the Year Two merger stipulation performance measurements in accordance with the Second Supplemental Opinion and Order is granted; the Commission will address the time frame for Ameritech to submit the Year Two performance measures in a subsequent entry.3
05/30/2002Service Notice.9
05/20/2002Letter clarifying Ameritech Ohio's May 2, 2002 filing of Force Load information, filed by M. Fenlon.2
05/13/2002Motion for extension of time and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by W. Adams.8
05/01/2002Confidential projected force load model filed on behalf of applicant by M. Fenlon. (FILED UNDER SEAL)4
05/01/2002Letter regarding additional confidential information that should be included in Ameritech Ohio's motion for protective order filed on March 27, 2002, filed by M. Fenlon.2
04/30/2002Entry ordering that Ameritech's motion to stay the requirement that it reduce the residential ULS port rate by $1.50 per month beginning 5/1/02, is granted.13
04/19/2002Reply of WorldCom, Inc. to Ameritech's Memorandum contra its motion for leave to intervene by J. Sanders.4
04/17/2002Memorandum contra WorldCom, Inc.'s motion to intervene, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by W. Adams.6
04/12/2002Memorandum of WorldCom, Inc. contra Ameritech Ohio's motion for stay, filed by J. Sanders.4
04/12/2002Motion of WorldCom, Inc. for leave to intervene, filed by J. Sanders.6
04/05/2002Ameritech Ohio's motion for stay and request for expedited ruling, filed by W. Adams.6
03/27/2002Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing filed by Ameritech, OCC, and AARP/Edgemont are granted for the limited purpose of allowing the Commission additional time to consider the arguments raised on rehearing.2
03/27/2002Service Notice.10
03/27/2002Confidential documents filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Fenlon. (FILED UNDER SEAL)17
03/27/2002Required documents filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Fenlon.6
03/27/2002Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Fenlon.5
03/25/2002Errata to application for rehearing, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Fenlon.10
03/21/2002Entry ordering that Ameritech's motion for an extension of time to comply with 14 of the requirements ordered by the Commission is granted to the extent discussed in this entry; the Commission will address the time for compliance when it issues its entry on rehearing; that, within 15 days of the date of this entry, Ameritech shall provide $450,000 from the Customer Fund to Washington County.4
03/21/2002Service notice10
03/14/2002Memorandum contra the applications for rehearing of OCC, AARP, and The Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by W. Adams.14
03/14/2002Memorandum contra Ameritech's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of AARP by W. Gruber; and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs.8
03/14/2002Memorandum contra filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter.24
03/11/2002Letter regarding 911 cost estimates, filed by Samuel R. Cook, Chairman, Washington County Commissioners.4
03/04/2002Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AARP by W. Gruber; and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs.15
03/04/2002Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter.12
03/04/2002Application for rehearing and request for clarification filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by W. Adams.107
02/28/2002Letter regarding the E-911 service on behalf of Washington County, filed by J. Grimes.1
02/25/2002Memorandum of AARP and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition contra Ameritech's motion for extension of time and request for expedited ruling filed by W. Gruber.4
02/22/2002Memorandum of AARP and Edgemont Neighborhood coalition contra the motion of Ameritech Ohio for extension of time and request for expedited ruling, filed by W. Gruber.4
02/13/2002Ameritech Ohio's motion for extension of time and request for expedited ruling, filed by W. Adams.16
02/05/2002Letter stating that Ameritech Ohio has, as of this date, complied with the Commission's directive set forth in the January 31, 2002, supplemental opinion and order, filed by M. Fenlon.2
01/31/2002Service Notice10
01/31/2002Opinion and order ordering Liberty need not file any additional updates to its audit report; Ameritech shall comply with all orders and directives as set forth in this opinion and order and file or submit all required reports and plans within established time periods; Ameritech carry out all voluntary actions specified by its response to the audit report; that Ameritech shall determine and deliver all credits owed customers; that any credits not returned be added to the Customer Fund and benefit the Company's customers; that from 5/1/02 thru 4/30/04 Ameritech's bundled local switching port rate be $3.13; that Ameritech deploy the advanced telecommunications services within 12 months of this order; that Ameritech pay forfeiture of $8,500,000 to the state of Ohio within 60 days of this order; that up to $400,000 of the Customer Fund shall be allocated to implementing 9-1-1 service in Monroe County53
01/31/2002Second Supplemental Opinion & Order that Liberty need not file any additional updates to its audit report; that from May 1, 2002 through April 30, 2004 Ameritech's residential unbundled local switching port rate shall be $3.13, unless otherwise ordered by the Commission.53
01/29/2002Letter regard to the current status of the Monroe county E-911 committees filed by M. Forni.1
11/27/2001Letter regarding the findings of the conclusions of the report update, filed by J. Kelly.2
11/13/2001Audit of Ameritech-Ohio's Service quality recording and reporting first update to final report. (filed date 11/9/01)46
10/11/2001State concerning the independent audit of Ameritech by Liberty Consulting, filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter.6
10/09/2001Notice of appearance of counsel and request for service of papers filed on behalf of4
10/04/2001October 2001 progress report audit of Ameritech policies, procedures and compliance with service quality requirements filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Reilly.2
09/25/2001Initial response to Liberty's September 21, 2001 audit report, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Ryan.65
09/24/2001Entry ordering that Finding 4 of the September 21, 2001, entry be revised, nunc pro tunc, to read as follows: ordered that Liberty shall appear at the Commission's October 11, 2001, meeting to describe its audit process and explain its findings and recommendations; ordered that Ameritech and the intervenors in the case shall have an opportunity at the Commission's October 11, 2001, meeting to respond to the auditor's process, findings, and recommendations. (AE)2
09/24/2001Service Notice.9
09/21/2001Final audit report filed. (Part 2 of 2)186
09/21/2001Final report on the audit of Ameritech Ohio's service quality recording and reporting submitted by The Liberty Consulting Group. (Part 1 of 2)201
09/21/2001Entry ordering that Liberty shall appear at the Commission's October 4, 2001, meeting to describe its audit process and explain its findings and recommendations; that Ameritech and the intervenors in the case shall have an opportunity at the Commission's October 4, 2001, meeting to respond to the auditor's process, findings, and recommendations. (AE)2
09/19/2001Service Notice.9
09/17/2001Entry ordering that Liberty shall have until September 21, 2001, to file the primary audit report. (AE)2
09/17/2001Request for an extension for filing the report, filed on behalf of The Liberty Consulting Group by J. Antonuk.2
09/05/2001Service Notice.9
09/05/2001Entry denying Ameritech's application for rehearing; that the clarifications expressed in this entry be observed.5
08/30/2001Entry ordering that Liberty shall have until September 18, 2001, to file the primary audit report; that Liberty shall file status reports for the monthly audit/performance reports by no later than October 1, 2001. (AE)2
08/30/2001Service Notice.9
08/27/2001Schedule extension request filed.2
08/13/2001Application for rehearing and request for clarification and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.14
08/10/2001Notice of addition of counsel filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs.1
08/02/2001August 2001 progress report audit of Ameritech policies, procedures, and compliance with service quality requirements filed.2
07/12/2001Entry ordering that up $400,000 of the Ameritech fund shall be allocated to Washington County for implementing the 9-1-1 service; $400,000 shall also be allocated to Columbiana County for 9-1-1 service; within 20 days of this entry Monroe County shall file a letter about the status of their 9-1-1 planing and whether the would accept a similar level of funding; within 15 days of this entry Ameritech shall distribute $25,435.17 to AARP from the fund; the balance of the fund shall accrue interest at the rate of one percent per month beginning 7/20/016
07/12/2001Service Notice8
07/11/2001Correspondence letter from Dave Crammer and Sean Logan, County Commissioners of Columbiana County in reference to 911 service.1
07/05/2001Notice of an ex parte communication with certain Commissioners, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.6
07/03/2001Auditor's audit schedule filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Reilly.3
07/02/2001July 2001 progress report audit of Ameritech's policies, procedures, and compliance with service quality requirements filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Reilly.5
06/18/2001Letter providing notice of an ex parte communication with certain Commissioners in connection with this case, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.5
06/01/2001June 2001 progress report filed.6
05/04/2001Follow up to letter dated April 25, 2001 responding to the Liberty Consulting Group's memorandum regarding the Ameritech audit schedule, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Smith.4
05/04/2001Response to The Liberty Consulting Group's memorandum regarding the Ameritech audit schedule, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Smith.2
04/25/2001Entry ordering that the application for rehearing filed by OCC and Edgemont be denied for the reasons stated in this entry.16
04/25/2001Entry ordering that Liberty shall have until September 1, 2001, to file the primary audit report, the secondary audit/performance report, and the first monthly audit/performance report; that Ameritech shall commit immediately the necessary resources required to respond in a timely manner to any data requests made by Liberty; that Liberty shall file reports by June 1, July 2, and August 1, 2001, that provide information regarding the status of the primary audit report and the causes of any additional delays in meeting the September 1 date; Liberty should include status reports for the secondary audit/performance report and the first monthly audit/performance report when it files the July 2 and August 1, 2001, reports.3
04/19/2001Memorandum to Jason Well from John Antonuk regarding Ameritech Audit Schedule, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Reilly.4
04/16/2001Memorandum contra filed by J. Kelly on behalf of Ameritech15
04/06/2001Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter.20
03/12/2001Service Notice.13
03/08/2001Supplemental opinion and order stating that Ameritech may declare and distribute a dividend provided that amount of dividend payment is no larger than any dividend payment made by Ameritech since it was acquired by SBC Communications.16
02/26/2001Liberty's call monitoring proposal filed.7
02/23/2001Letter supporting Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition's motion to reopen the proceeding and supplement the record, filed on behalf of OCC by R. Tongren.1
02/22/2001Motion to reopen the proceeding and supplement the record with December 2000 service quality data, filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs.8
02/21/2001Motion to reopen the proceeding and supplement the record with December 2000 service quality data filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs.8
02/20/2001Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by J. Barnes, Gallia County Department of Human Services.1
02/12/2001Joint reply memorandum to Ameritech Ohio's memorandum Contra6
02/05/2001Memorandum contra filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.6
01/26/2001Memorandum in support of motion to reopen the proceeding and supplement the record filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter.4
01/25/2001Motion to reopen the proceeding and supplement the record filed by E. Jacobs.9
01/22/2001Letter stating that the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition will not file a reply brief in this matter, filed by E. Jacobs. (FILED 1/17/01)1
01/18/2001Transcript filed Volume VIII. (Part 2 of 2)139
01/18/2001Transcript filed for hearing held 1/4/01, (SF), 135 pgs., Submitted. (PUCO-Columbus, OH) (Volume VIII) (Part 1 of 2)201
01/17/2001Letter stating that The Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition will not file a reply brief and that it stands on its initial brief field January 11, 2001, filed by E. Jacobs.1
01/16/2001Ameritech Ohio's reply brief filed by J. Kelly.16
01/16/2001Ameritech Ohio's reply brief filed by J. Kelly.16
01/16/2001Post-Hearing reply brief of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio, L.P. and Corecomm Newco, Inc. filed by S. Bloomfield.6
01/16/2001Reply brief filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter.8
01/12/2001Initial post hearing brief of the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition regarding dividend payment by Ameritech Ohio filed by E. Jacobs.8
01/11/2001Post-hearing brief filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by S. Bloomfield.9
01/11/2001Initial brief filed on behalf of applicant by J. Kelly.21
01/11/2001Initial post hearing brief filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter.33
01/11/2001Initial post hearing brief filed on behalf of The Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs.7
01/05/2001Service Notice.11
01/05/2001Deposition of Michael R. Schaedler, on behalf of Ohio Consumers Council.86
01/05/2001Service notice filed.11
01/04/2001Entry ordering that the audit of Ameritech Ohio be conducted in accordance with the findings of this entry; that Ameritech Ohio bear the cost of the audit pursuant to Section 4903.24, Revised Code; that Ameritech Ohio and the auditors shall observe the requirements set forth herein.3
01/04/2001Deposition of Michael E. Schaedler taken January 3, 2001, filed.86
01/04/2001Deposition of Vic Grabill taken January 3, 2001, filed.79
12/29/2000Motion for subpoena filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs.4
12/28/2000Letter regarding the testimony of Michael R. Schaedler and Vic Grabill and service list filed on behalf of applicant by J. Kelly.2
12/28/2000Direct testimony of Michael R. Schaedler filed on behalf of applicant.8
12/28/2000Direct testimony of Vic Grabill filed on behalf of applicant.35
12/28/2000Testimony of Karen J. Hardie filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter.29
12/28/2000Notice to take depositions and subpoena duces tecum filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs.2
12/28/2000Service Notice.9
12/27/2000Entry ordering that the request to continue the hearing be denied; that the request to expedite discovery responses be denied as set forth in Finding 8; that the request to schedule a prehearing conference be denied. (AE)3
12/26/2000Memorandum contra the motion to expedite discovery response dates filed by the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.4
12/26/2000Memorandum contra the motion to continue hearing date, expedite discovery response dates, and to set a prehearing filed by the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.6
12/22/2000Notice of participation filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Reilly.2
12/21/2000Motion to expedite discovery response dates, and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by B. Cohen.4
12/20/2000Motion to continue hearing date, expedite discovery response dates, and to set a prehearing, request for expedited ruling on these motions and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs.4
12/20/2000Interrogatories and requests for production of documents first set, filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs.7
12/18/2000Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter.7
12/15/2000Correspondence letter supporting the Ameritech proposal to fund Emergency 911 equipment costs, filed by J. Matthews, Mayor of the City of Marietta.1
12/14/2000Entry ordering hearing be held on 1/4/01, 10:00 a.m. at the Commission offices; direct, expert testimony be filed no later that 7 days prior to the hearing4
12/14/2000Correspondence filed.13
12/13/2000Letter requesting the Commision to act on the Company's motion for relief filed by J. Kelly.2
12/01/2000Correspondence letter regarding poor service quality from Ameritech Ohio, filed by Larry Leach, Fairfield County Meals On Wheels.1
11/24/2000Correspondence letter supporting the proposal, filed by S. Brehm, Ohio University.2
11/24/2000Correspondence letter supporting the proposal, filed by Sheriff Robert R. Schlicher, Jr., Washington County Sheriff's Office.1
11/21/2000Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Mick and Carolyn Duvall.5
11/14/2000Correspondence letter supporting the investigation, filed by Joyce McDaniels, Eleanor M. Kahle Senior Center.2
11/08/2000Correspondence letter supporting utilizing a significant portion of the Ameritech fine to implement 9-1-1 systems in Columbiana, Monroe and Washington Counties, filed by Governor Bob Taft. (1 pg.)1
11/08/2000Response letter to implement 9-1-1 systems in Columbiana, Monroe and Washington Counties filed by B. Taft.1
11/02/2000Correspondence letter in support of the Ameritech funds to be used toward implementing E-911 in the counties which do not presently have 911 systems and are served by Ameritech, filed by J. Padgett, Ohio Department of Development.3
11/01/2000Correspondence letter supporting the settlement proposal, filed by Sheriff Robert R. Schlicher, Jr., Washington County Sheriff. (1 pg.) 1
10/31/2000AARP's proposed plan and comments on Ameritech Ohio's proposed use of funds owed to the state and consumer filed by W. Gruber.7
10/31/2000Proposal of the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition for use of funds filed by E. Jacobs. 4
10/31/2000Comments filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by J. Sanders and T. O'Brien.4
10/31/2000Correspondence in support of the Ameritech proposal, filed by Mayor Joe Matthews, City of Marietta. (1 pg.) 1
10/31/2000Comments regarding the use of credits and waivers for customers who have not been identified and the use of funds to benefit customers, filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter. (20 pgs.)20
10/31/2000Proposed plan and comments on Ameritech Ohio's proposed use of funds owed to the state and consumers, filed on behalf of AARP by W. Gruber. (8 pgs.)8
10/31/2000Proposal for use of funds, filed on behalf of the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (4 pgs.)4
10/31/2000Proposed plans for the use of approximately $5.7 million dollars to benefit Ameritech Ohio's customers, filed on behalf of the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association by S. Howard. (2 pgs.)2
10/31/2000Correspondence letter suggesting to use the Ameritech Settlement, filed by M. Forni, Monroe County Commissioners. (1 pg.)1
10/31/2000Proposal of the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition for use of funds filed by E. Jacobs.3
10/31/2000Letter on behalf of the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association, regarding the proposed plans for the Ameritech Ohio's customers filed by S. Howard.2
10/31/2000Correspondence in support of the Ameritech proposal, filed by Mayor Joe Matthews, City of Marietta. (1 pg.) 1
10/30/2000Correspondence letter supporting the investigation, filed by John and Cathy Stevenson. (1 pg.) (FILED 10/27/00 INCORRECTLY IN CASE NO. 99-993-TP-COI)1
10/30/2000Response letter to the Ameritech settlement plan and its proposals to benefit its customers. Filed by J. Carnes (1 pg)1
10/27/2000Correspondence filed on behalf of concerned consumers, John and Cathy Stevenson.1
10/26/2000Correspondence letter supporting the investigation into Ameritech's service, filed by Mayor Robert McPherson, City of Reynoldsburg, Ohio. (3 pgs.)3
10/26/2000Correspondence letter supporting the funding of E-911 systems implementation, filed by Samuel Cook, Washington County Commissioners. (1 pg.)1
10/26/2000Correspondence letter supporting Ameritech's proposed plan, filed by Lynn H. Willett, Ph.D., Muskingum Tech. (1 pg.)1
10/20/2000Reply and memorandum in support to Ameritech Ohio's memor- andum contra, filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by J. Dorrian. (4 pgs.)4
10/19/2000Correspondence letters supporting the investigation, filed by Jerri McClaskey and Patricia Shepherd. (4 pgs.)4
10/18/2000Entry ordering that the Commission's fiscal division send an invoice to Ameritech for the Commission's costs investigating and addressing the consumer complaints against Ameritech; that Ameritech shall submit payment within 30 days of receipt of the invoice.2
10/18/2000Entry ordering that Ameritech Ohio bear the cost of the audit pursuant to section 4903.24, Revised Code and that Ameritech Ohio and the auditors shall observe the requirements set forth herein.5
10/18/2000Correspondence letter supporting the investigation, filed by Edward Baumer. (1 pg.) (FILED 10/16/00 INCORRECTLY AS A NEW CASE---00-1928-TP-CSS---WHICH HAS SINCE BEEN VOIDED)1
10/18/2000Entry ordering that the Commission staff submit the request for proposal for conducting the audit of Ameritech Ohio to various auditing and consulting firms; that Ameritech Ohio bear the cost of the audit; that Ameritech Ohio and the auditors shall observe the requirements set forth herein.5
10/16/2000Correspondence letter in support of the investigation, filed by Cindy Minton, Greene County Domestic Violence Project. (3 pgs.)3
10/13/2000Memorandum contra filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (5 pgs.)5
10/13/2000Correspondence letter supporting the investigation, filed by Steve Hoffman. (2 pgs.)2
10/13/2000Correspondence letter supporting the investigation, filed by Ron Lester. (1 pg.)1
10/13/2000Correspondence letter supporting the investigation, filed by Edward Nagorny. (1 pg.)1
10/13/2000Correspondence letter supporting the investigation, filed by O. Winget. (1 pg.)1
10/13/2000Letter regarding Ameritech's poor service, and customer service filed by S. Hoffman.2
10/13/2000Correspondence letter from Edward J. Nagorny.1
10/13/2000Letter regarding the service problems filed by S. Hoffman.2
10/13/2000Correspondence letter from Otis Winget.1
10/13/2000Correspondence regarding cut lines filed by Ron. E. Lester1
10/12/2000Entry ordering that Ameritech Ohio bear the cost of the audit pursuant to section 4903.24, Revised Code and that Ameritech Ohio and the auditors shall observe the requirements set forth herein. 6
10/12/2000Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Nancy S. Irvine. (1 pg.)1
10/11/2000AARP's reply to Ameritech Ohio's memorandum contra- AARP's motion for reimbursement.9
10/11/2000Reply to Ameritech Ohio's memorandum contra AARP's motion for reimbursement, filed on behalf of AARP by W. Gruber. 5
10/11/2000Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Michael Brandt, Smart Structures, Inc. (1 pg.)1
10/10/2000AARP's reply to Ameritech Ohio's memorandum contra AARP's motion for reimbursement filed by J. Kelroy.11
10/10/2000Reply to memorandum contra filed by W. Gruber on behalf of AARP (11 pgs)11
10/06/2000Service Notice8
10/05/2000Entry ordering Ameritech to issue to all identified customer accounts the credits and waivers discussed in Findings 3 through 7; that Ameritech provide a final accounting of the credits and waivers issued within 90 days of the date of this entry; that all interested persons have until 10/31/00 to file proposed plans for the use of approximately $5.7 million to benefit Ameritech's customers.5
10/05/2000Entry ordering that Ameritech issue to all identified customer accounts the credit and waivers discussed in findings 3 through 7; that Ameritech shall provide a final accounting of the credits and waivers issued within 90 days of the date of this entry; that all interested persons shall have until October 31, 2000, to file proposed plans for the use of approximately $5.7 million to benefit Ameritech's customers; that Nextlink's motion to intervene be denied at this time.5
10/04/2000Revised report filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (6 pgs.)6
10/03/2000Correspondence regarding a choice for telephone service, filed on behalf of OCC by R. Tongren. (4 pgs.) 4
09/29/2000Ameritech Ohio's memorandum contra AARP'S motion for reimbursement. Filed by J. Kelley (9 pgs) 9
09/28/2000Motion to intervene of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio, L.P. and memorandum in support filed by J. Dorrian.3
09/28/2000Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by J. Dorrian. (3 pgs.)3
09/27/2000Correspondence regarding the application, filed by Eugene and Sandy Miller. (7 pgs.)7
09/25/2000AARP'S motion for reimbursement of fees, expenses and costs and request for expedited ruling filed by B. Weston.5
09/22/2000Motion for reimbursement of fees, expenses and costs and request for expedited ruling filed on behalf of AARP by B. Weston. (5 pgs.) 5
09/22/2000Notice of substitution of counsel filed on behalf of AARP by W. Gruber and B. Weston. (2 pgs.) 2
09/22/2000Notice of substitution of counsel for AARP filed by W. Gruber and B. Weston7
09/19/2000Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Geralyn Bettinger. (4 pgs.) (FILED 9/12/00 INCORRECTLY IN CASE NO. 00-1265-TP-ORD)4
09/19/2000Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Sophie A. Clark. (19 pgs.) (FILED 9/12/00 INCORRECTLY IN CASE NO. 00-1265-TP-ORD)19
09/19/2000Entry ordering that Ameritech's application for rehearing filed on August 21, 2000, is granted in part and denied in part; that AARP's application for rehearing filed on August 21, 2000, is granted in part and denied in part.54
09/05/2000Resonse of The Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition to Ameritech Ohio's report, filed by E. Jacobs. (4 pgs.) 4
09/05/2000Comments filed on behalf of AARP by B. Weston. (21 pgs.)21
09/05/2000Response to Ameritech Ohio's report filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (4 pgs.)4
09/01/2000Correction to AARP's memorandum contra Ameritech's appli- cation for rehearing which was filed on August 1, 2000, filed by B. Weston. (1 pg.)1
09/01/2000Correction of erratum in AARP memorandum contra, filed by B. Weston.1
08/31/2000Reply memorandum to Ameritech's memorandum contra Nextlink's motion to intervene, filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by T. Rodgers. (4 pgs.)4
08/31/2000Memorandum in response to Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing submitted by the staff of the PUCO by J. Martin.21
08/31/2000Memorandum Contra to AARPS application for rehearing filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.29
08/31/2000Reply memorandum to AARP's memorandum contra NextLink's motion to intervene, filed on behalf of NextLink Ohio by T. Rodgers. (3 pgs.)3
08/31/2000Memorandum in response to Ameritech Ohio's applicaiton for rehearing, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by J. Martin. (21 pgs.)21
08/31/2000Memorandum contra Ameritech's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of AARP by B. Weston. (25 pgs.)25
08/31/2000Memorandum contra AARP's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (29 pgs.)29
08/31/2000Memorandum contra the application for rehearing of Ameri- tech Ohio, filed on behalf of Corecomm Newco by J. Sanders and T. O'Brien. (12 pgs.)12
08/25/2000Proof of Publication filed. (Cuyahoga County)1
08/25/2000Report filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (5 pgs.)5
08/25/2000Memorandum in response to Nextlink's motion to intervene, filed on behalf of AARP by B. Weston. (3 pgs.)3
08/24/2000Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Cuyahoga County) 1
08/23/2000Ameritech Ohio's memorandum contra filed by J. Kelly.5
08/23/2000Reply filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (7 pgs.) 7
08/21/2000Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (77 pgs.)77
08/21/2000Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AARP by B. Weston. (44 pgs.) 44
08/21/2000Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed by B. Weston on behalf of AARP.44
08/18/2000Service notice filed.3
08/18/2000Service notice filed.3
08/17/2000Ameritech Ohio's Report, filed by J. Kelly.7
08/17/2000Entry ordering that Ameritech Ohio's motion for an eight-day extension to file a report detailing the customers that can be identified as eligible for a creditor waiver is granted. (AE)2
08/17/2000Report filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (7 pgs.)7
08/16/2000Motion for extension of time filed by J. Kelly on behalf of Ameritech.4
08/15/2000Motion to intervene of Nextlink Ohio, Inc. filed by T. Rodgers4
08/14/2000Comments filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by T. Rodgers. (5 pgs.) 5
08/14/2000Letter requesting that the motion of Ameritech be held in abeyance until Ameritech is able to show, to the satisfaction of the Commission and its staff, that it has complied with the July 20 order, filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by J. Sanders. (3 pgs.)3
08/14/2000Comments filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by T. Rodgers. (5 pgs.) 5
08/14/2000Request that Ameritech Ohio's motion be held in abeyance until Ameritech is able to show that it has complied with the July 20 order, filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by J. Sanders. (3 pgs.) 3
08/14/2000Letter supporting the issues and positions set forth in the letter filed by CoreComm Newco on August 14, 2000, filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by S. Bloomfield. (1 pg.)1
08/14/2000Statement regarding delcaration of dividends or distribu- tion, request for oral hearing, and affidavit of Mark Cooper filed on behalf of The Edgemont Neighborhood Coali- tion by E. Jacobs. (13 pgs.)13
08/04/2000Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Harold M. Welles. (2 pgs.)2
08/04/2000Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Harold M. Welles. (2 pgs.)2
08/04/2000Service Notice3
08/04/2000Letter supporting the issues and positions set forth in the letter filed by CoreComm Newco, filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by S. Bloomfield. (1 pg.)1
08/03/2000Proof of Publication State of Ohio, Franklin County.1
08/03/2000Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Franklin County) 2
08/03/2000Entry ordering that Ameritech's motion for a stay of the marketing procedures on calls related to new service is denied.4
08/01/2000Entry ordering that the Commission will allow a reasonable, but not lengthy, period for Ameritech Ohio to improve substantially its service; the Commission will permit Ameritech Ohio to declare and distribute dividends up to and including September 30, 2000; any statements received by the Commission as a result of the legal notice that address the issue of whether a declaration of dividends or distribution by Ameritech Ohio will postpone its compliance with the Commission's order or affect the adequacy of service rendered or to be rendered by Ameritech Ohio, or that request a hearing in the issue, will be considered by the Commission in determining whether Ameritech should be permitted to declare after September 30, 2000, a dividend or distribution.3
08/01/2000Correspondence letter to Ameritech Ohio, filed by Harold M. Welles. (2 pgs.)2
07/28/2000Motion for partial stay and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (7 pgs.)7
07/26/2000Legal Notice Faxed to: Cleveland Plain Dealer (Cuyahoga Co.) Columbus Dispatch (Franklin Co.)6
07/26/2000Legal notices filed.6
07/25/2000Entry ordering that the Secretary of the Commission cause publication of the legal notice in accordance with Finding 6. (AE) (3 pgs.)3
07/24/2000Motion for clarification or, in the alternative, motion for relief pursuant to R. C. 4905.46 and request for ex- pedited ruling filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (6 pgs.) 6
07/20/2000Dissenting Opinion of Commissioner Judith A. Jones.2
07/20/2000Opinion & Order that Ameritech shall credit service charges to its customers in an amount not less than $603,882 for improperly claimed weather-related exceptions; that Ameritech shall waive not less than $3,495,353 for nonrecurring installation charges for Centrex and multiline service customers; that Ameritech shall waive not less than $185,639 in nonrecurring installation charges for missed installation appointments and credit service charges not less than $814,050 for missed appointments or commitments; that Ameritech file a report by August 17, 2000, detailing the customers that can be identified in each of these categories and to which a waiver or credit can be provided; that Ameritech shall file a report by August 17, 2000, in which it suggests one or more plans for the use of $3.65 million and the remainder of the ordered $5.1 million in credits and waivers to benefit its customers; that Ameritech file a proposal by August 17, 2000 which provides information concerning who should conduct the audit, their qualifications, the proposed scope of the audit, and timeliness of the audit; that this case shall remain open for at least 18 months following the date of this order.52
03/09/2000Additional information regarding pending case filed by G. Siler on behalf of Sinel Company, Inc. 6
03/09/2000Letter regarding alleged problem with Ameritech Service. Respectfully submitted by, G. Siler (6 pgs)6
03/02/2000Letter regarding certain billing practices and customer service deficiencies practiced by Ameritech filed by M. McMahon.26
03/02/2000Letter documenting certain billing practices and customer service deficiences practiced by Ameritech, filed by M. McMahon, McMahon, DeGulis, Hoffmann & Blumenthal, L.L.P. (26 pgs.)26
02/04/2000Reply brief filed by PUCO staff S. Reilly.38
02/04/2000Reply brief filed on behalfof Edgemont Neighborhood Coali- tion by E. Jacobs. (3 pgs.) 3
02/04/2000Reply brief filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by J. Sanders and T. O'Brien. (10 pgs.) 10
02/04/2000Reply brief filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Reilly. (38 pgs.) 38
02/04/2000Reply brief of AARP filed by B. Weston.121
02/04/2000Reply brief filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.68
02/04/2000Reply brief filed on behalf of AARP by B. Weston. (122 pgs.)122
02/04/2000Reply brief filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (68 pgs.)68
02/04/2000Reply brief filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Reilly. (38 pgs.)38
02/04/2000Reply brief filed on behalfof Edgemont Neighborhood Coali- tion by E. Jacobs. (4 pgs.)4
01/31/2000Ameritech's initial brief.83
01/21/2000Post hearing brief filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Reilly. (89 pgs.) 89
01/21/2000Initial brief of Corecomm Newco, Inc. filed by J. Sanders and T. O'Brien.90
01/21/2000Brief filed on behalf of AARP by B. Weston. (45 pgs.) 45
01/21/2000Initial brief filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (83 pgs.)83
12/27/1999Transcript filed for hearing held December 13, 1999, (SF), 111 pgs., Submitted. (PUCO-Columbus, OH) (Volume VII)110
12/21/1999Deposition of Michael R. Schaedler taken December 6, 1999, filed. (88 pgs.) (FILED 12/20/99 INCORRECTLY IN CASE NO. 99-98-CT-ACE)88
12/20/1999Deposition of M. Schaedler.119
12/10/1999Subpoena to Michael R. Schaedler, Ameritech Ohio, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Farkas. (3 pgs.)3
12/03/1999Subpoena duces tecum filed on behalf of the PUCO staff. (3 pgs.) 3
12/03/1999Subpoena duces tecum filed on behalf of the PUCO staff. (3 pgs.)3
12/03/1999Staff notice of deposition (of Michael Schaedler), filed by S. Reilly. (3 pgs.) 3
11/30/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 11/16/99, (SF), 142 pgs., Con't. (PUCO-Columbus, OH) (Volume VI)142
11/30/1999Rebuttal testimony of Marcia Bailey filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (9 pgs.)9
11/30/1999Rebuttal testimony of Michael R. Schaedler filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (7 pgs.)7
11/30/1999Certificate of service filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (2 pgs.)2
11/29/1999Transcript filed for hearing held November 15, 1999, (SF), 89 pgs., Continued. (PUCO-Columbus, OH) (Volume V)279
11/24/1999Transcript filed for hearing held November 12, 1999, (SF), 116 pgs., Continued. (PUCO-Columbus, OH) (Volume IV)263
11/24/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 11/10/99, (SF), 169 pgs., Con't. (PUCO-Columbus, OH) (Volume III) 169
11/23/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 11/9/99, (SF), 163 pgs., Con't. (PUCO-Columbus, OH) (Volume II) 196
11/22/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 11/8/99, (SF), 27 pgs., Con't. (PUCO-Columbus, OH) (Volume I)27
11/19/1999Correspondence letter regarding J. Lawson Service by Ameritech. (2 pgs)3
11/16/1999Motion to Withdraw and Affidavit in Support. Filed by J. Myers (3 pgs)3
11/10/1999Returns of service for the PUCO subpoenas, filed on behalf of AARP by B. Weston. (9 pgs.) 9
11/10/1999Returns of service for the PUCO subpoenas, filed on behalf of AARP by B. Weston. (9 pgs.)9
11/08/1999Memorandum contra AARP's motion, filed on behalf of Ameri- tech Ohio by J. Kelly. (5 pgs.)5
11/03/1999Motion for issuance of subpoenas and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AARP by B. Weston. (7 pgs.)7
10/31/1999Comments filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Reilly.4
10/29/1999Reply to entry entered October 14, 1999 filed by J. Meyers.2
10/29/1999Reply to entry entered 10-14-99, filed by Joseph Myers. (2 pgs.)2
10/27/1999Motion for an order requiring Ameritech to preserve records and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AARP by B. Weston. (5 pgs.)5
10/27/1999Staff notice of depositions (Mr. John D. Judd) filed by S. Reilly. (2 pgs.)2
10/26/1999Subpoena Duces Tecum to Michael R. Schaedler filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Reilly.3
10/26/1999Subpoena to Mr. Vitas R. Cyvas filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Reilly.3
10/26/1999Subpoena duces tecum (to Marcia Bailey) filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Reilly.3
10/26/1999Subpoena duces tecum (to Michael R. Schaedler) filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Reilly.3
10/26/1999Deposition of Kathleen Mehl taken September 29, 1999, filed.96
10/26/1999Subpoena duces tecum (to George "Ed" Norris) filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Reilly.3
10/26/1999Subpoena to Mr. Vitas R. Cyvas, Ameritech Ohio, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Reilly.3
10/26/1999Subpoena duces tecum to Ms. Marcia Bailey, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Reilly. (3 pgs.)3
10/20/1999Exhibits to Testimony of Richard C. Reese filed by S. Reilly (358 pgs)358
10/20/1999Testimony of Rchard C. Reese filed by S. Reilly (40 pgs)40
10/20/1999Testimony of Dr. Mark N. Cooper on behalf of AARP (61 pgs)61
10/20/1999Exhibits to testimony of Richard C. Reese. (part 1 of 2)200
10/20/1999Continue Exhibits to testimony of Richard C. Reese (part 2 of 2).114
10/20/1999Certificate of service, filed by J. Kelly (2 pgs)2
10/20/1999Testimony of John D. Jude Ameritech Ohio Exhibit, filed by J. Kelly and M. Mulcahy (9 pgs)9
10/20/1999Testimony of Marcia Bailey Ameritech Ohio Exhibit, filed by J. Kelly and M. Mulcahy (17 pgs)17
10/20/1999Testimony of George "ED" Norris Ameritech Ohio Exhibit, filed by J. Kelly and M. Mulchay (26 pgs)26
10/20/1999Testimonty of Michael R. Schaedler Ameritech Ohio Exhibit filed by J. Kelly and M. Mulcahy (25 pgs)25
10/19/1999Deposition of Edward Norris (5 pgs)5
10/14/1999Memorandum contra the supplemental motion to intervene, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (3 pgs.)3
10/14/1999Entry ordering that Mr. Myers be granted to October 21, 1999, to clarify his motion to intervene in accordance with Finding 6; that CoreComm's motion to intervene be granted in accordance with Finding 8; that the hearing be continued to November 8, 1999, at 10:00 a.m. at the Commission offices; that the date for parties to pre-file testimony shall be October 20, 1999, and the deadline for seeking intervention in this matter shall be October 20, 1999. (AE) (4 pgs.)4
10/08/1999Supplemental filing, deposition of Joseph Prestigomo taken September 21, 1999, filed.3
10/08/1999Deposition of Kathleen Mehl taken September 29, 1999, filed.5
10/07/1999Motion for continuance of hearing date and pre-filed testimony and memorandum in support filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Reilly. (3 pgs.)3
10/06/1999Supplemental motion to intervene filed on behalf of Joseph Myers by J. Myers. (2 pgs.)2
10/06/1999Motion for leave to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by J. Sanders and T. O'Brien. (5 pgs.)5
10/04/1999Deposition of Marcia Bailey taken September 14, 1999, filed. (4 pgs.)4
10/04/1999Deposition of Michael R. Schaedler taken September 15, 1999, filed. (6 pgs.)6
10/04/1999Supplemental filing, deposition of Marcia Bailey taken September 14, 1999, filed.4
10/04/1999Deposition of Michael R. Schaedler taken September 15, 1999, filed.6
10/04/1999Deposition of Edward Norris taken October 1, 1999, filed.108
10/04/1999Deposition of Edward Norris taken 10/1/99 filed. (107 pgs)107
10/01/1999Memorandum contra motion to intervene, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (3 pgs.)3
09/30/1999Deposition of Kathleen Mehl taken September 29, 1999, filed. (91 pgs.)91
09/30/1999Supplemental filing, deposition of Ruth-Ann Naughton taken September 17, 1999, filed. (6 pgs.) 6
09/29/1999Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed by Joseph Myers. (1 pg.)1
09/27/1999Staff notice of depositions filed by S. Reilly. (2 pgs.)2
09/24/1999Entry granting the motions to intervene filed by AARP and Edgemont; that staff's request to continue the hearing be granted and that the hearing is continued to 10:00 a.m. on October 15, 1999; that any party intending the present direct, expert testimony comply with Finding 5. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
09/23/1999Notice of depositions filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Reilly. (2 pgs.)2
09/23/1999Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (6 pgs.)6
09/22/1999Deposition of Joseph Prestigomo taken September 21, 1999, filed. (22 pgs.)22
09/21/1999Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AARP by B. Weston. (5 pgs.)5
09/21/1999Motion for continuance of hearing date and date to file pre-filed testimony and memorandum in support filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Reilly. (3 pgs.)3
09/20/1999Deposition of Ruth-Anne Naughton taken September 17, 1999, filed.77
09/20/1999Deposition of Ruth-Anne Naughton taken September 17, 1999, filed. (62 pgs.)62
09/16/1999Deposition of Marcia Bailey taken September 14, 1999, filed.126
09/16/1999Deposition of Michael R. Schaedler taken September 15, 1999, filed.132
09/16/1999Deposition of Michael R. Schaedler taken September 15, 1999, filed. (120 pgs.)120
09/16/1999Deposition of Marcia Bailey taken September 14, 1999, filed. (76 pgs.)76
09/08/1999Report filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (52 pgs.)52
09/01/1999Response to Ameritech Ohio's motion for extension of time, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Reilly. (3 pgs.)3
09/01/1999Entry ordering that Ameritech Ohio's motion for an extension of time and staff's request to continue the hearing be granted as set forth in Finding 4; that any party intending to present direct, expert testimony comply with Finding 5. (AE)3
08/30/1999Motion for extension of time and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (5 pgs.)5
08/26/1999Correspondence regarding the application, filed by Kelly Allan, Kelly Allan Associates, Ltd. (2 pgs.)2
08/12/1999In the matter of the Commission ordered investigation of Ameritech Ohio relative to its compliance with certain provisions of the Minimum Telephone Service Standards set forth in Chapter 4901:1-5, Ohio Administrative Code. (1 pg.)1
08/12/1999Requested information submitted: Tariff PUCO No. 5 (Water Tariff); Tariff PUCO No. 1 (Water Tariff); Tariff PUCO No. 1 (Sewer Tariff) Filed by: S. Bloomfield. (5 pgs.) Entry scheduling a hearing at 1:30 p.m. on September 21, 1999, at the Commission offices; that, in accordance with Finding 6, Ameritech shall file a report in this docket by September 1, 1999. (87 pgs.)87