Case Record For:	97-0632-TP-COI
Case Title:	INTRASTATE UNIVERSAL SERVICE DISCOUNTS
Status:	CL-CLOSED
Industry Code:	TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code:	COI-Commission inquiry
Date Opened:	6/11/1997
Date Closed:	5/13/2010

• Case Documents
• Public Comments
• Parties of Record
• Related Cases

Printable Docket Card Service List

View per page

Date Filed Summary Pages 08/25/2010 Memorandum Contra of the Appalachian Peace and Justice Network and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition to Tracfone Wireless, Inc's Motion for Protective Order filed by M. Smalz on behalf of Ohio Poverty Law Center, J. Maskovyak on behalf of Appalachian Peace and Justice Network and E. Jacobs on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition. 24 08/18/2010 Notification to the Commission that TracFone Wireless, Inc. will now expand its Safelink Wireless Lifeline offering for both current and new customers filed by J. Fuentes. 2 05/13/2010 Service notice. 1 05/13/2010 Memo closing case with an effective date of 05/13/10. 1 05/13/2010 Entry ordering, that, consistent with Finding (4), TracFone must provide the Commission staff, by June 2, 2010, with a demonstration of its contribution to both the 9-1-1 and TRS funds specific to its ETC operations and revenue in Ohio. 7 05/06/2010 Memo requesting that this case be reopened with an effective date of 05/06/10. 1 04/02/2010 Case Action form closing case with an effective date of 4/2/2010. 1 01/27/2010 Revised tariff pages, PUCO Tariff No. 1, electronically filed by Teresa Orahood on behalf of American Broadband and Telecommunications Company. 10 01/27/2010 Service Notice 22 01/27/2010 Supplemental Finding and order stating that American Broadband is granted designation as an ETC for the limited purpose of Lifeline service consistent with Findings (6) and (7); that they comply with the provisions of 05-461, Commission entry of April 13, 2005. 13 01/27/2010 Memo to file final tariffs with an effective date of 1/27/2010. 1 01/26/2010 Third supplemental information provided in support of petition of American Broadband and Telecommunications Company for designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier in the state of Ohio, electronically filed by Teresa Orahood on behalf of T. O'Brien. 4 12/22/2009 Revised tariff pages PUCO No. 1, electronically filed by Teresa Orahood on behalf of American Broadband and Telecommunications Company. 10 11/20/2009 Second Supplemental Information in support of petition of American Broadband and Telecommunications Company electronically filed by Teresa Orahood on behalf of American Broadband and Telecommunications Company 20 09/15/2009 Finding & Order stating that all carriers identified in Finding (4) are hereby certified to the FCC and USAC as being eligible to receive federal high cost support, as well as high cost loop support, local switching support and any high cost support received as a result of a purchase of exchanges for rural carriers, as such carriers have demonstrated their intent to utilize such funding in a manner consistent with Section 254(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. 4 09/14/2009 Affidavits for rural carriers filed by J. Matz on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association. 37 09/01/2009 Affidavit of Lonnie D. Pederson filed by L. Pederson on behalf of Telephone Service Company. 2 08/26/2009 Service Notice. 21 08/26/2009 Entry ordering that consistent with Finding (4), each Ohio rural carrier that wishes to be eligible for one or more of the high cost support mechanisms identified in Finding (2), shall file with the Commission a completed and notarized copy of the attached affidavit form, certifying that federal high cost support is being used consistent with Section 254(e), by no later than September 14, 2009. 4 07/08/2009 Entry ordering that the application for rehearing is granted in part and denied in part as stated; that TracFone's motion for leave to file its reply memorandum is denied in accordance with Finding (16); that TracFone's motion for an extension of time to file its compliance plan is granted pursuant to Finding (18). 10 07/02/2009 Response of American Broadband and Telecommunications Company to the Comments of The Office of the Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Teresa Orahood on behalf of American Broadband and Telecommunications Company. 8 06/29/2009 Correspondence asking for changes to the service list electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive on behalf of The Columbus Grove Telephone Company. 3 06/26/2009 Comments by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Bergmann, David C. 14 06/18/2009 Revised tariff pages PUCO Tariff No. 1 filed by T. O'Brien on behalf of American Broadband and Telecommunications Company. 3 06/15/2009 Supplemental information provided in support of petition of American Broadband and Telecommunications Company for designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier in the State of Ohio filed by T. O'Brien. 18 06/10/2009 Service Notice. 21 06/10/2009 Entry ordering MTI's motion to withdraw its application is granted. 2 05/28/2009 Midwestern Telecommunications Inc. withdrawal of application for designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier filed by A. Holt. 1 05/05/2009 Application of Midwestern Telecommunications Inc. for designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier filed by A. Holt. 4 02/04/2009 Application for certification for status as a nonrural eligible telecommunications carrier (ETC) filed by T. O'Brien on behalf of American Broadband and Telecommunications Company. 28 09/17/2008 Service Notice 20 09/17/2008 Finding and Order ordered that all carriers identified in finding (4) are hereby certified to the FCC and USAC. 5 09/09/2008 Affidavits filed by J. Matz on behalf of the Ohio Telecom Association. 37 08/20/2008 Affidavit of Lonnie Pedersen filed on behalf of Telephone Service Company. 2 08/13/2008 Service Notice 15 08/13/2008 Entry ordering that consistent with finding 4, each Ohio rural carrier that wishes to be eligible for one or more of the high cost support mechanisms identified in finding 2, shall file with the Commission a completed and notarized copy of the attached affidavit form, certifying that federal high cost support is being used consistent with Section 254(e), by no later than September 10, 2008. 4 03/18/2008 Returned mail. 1 09/19/2007 Finding and Order ordering that all carriers identified in Finding (4) above are hereby certified to the FCC and USAC as being eligible to receive federal high cost support, as well as high cost loop support [47 C.F.R., Part 36], local switching support [47 C.F.R. §54.301], and any high cost support received as a result of a purchase of exchanges [47 C.F.R. §54.305] for rural carriers, as such carriers have demonstrated their intent to utilize such funding in a manner consistent with Section 254(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. 4 09/19/2007 Service Notice 21 09/14/2007 Affidavit of rural and non-rural carriers filed by J. Matz on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association. 37 09/07/2007 Affidavit that certifies that high cost funding, (high cost loop support 47.C.F.R., Part 36) local switching support (47.C.F.R., 54.305) is being utilized by this company consistent with U.S.C. 254(3) filed on behalf of Telephone Service Company by L. Pedersen. 2 08/29/2007 Service notice. 21 08/29/2007 Entry ordering that consistent with finding 4, each Ohio rural carrier that wishes to be eligible for one or more of the high cost support mechanisms identified in Finding 2 shall file with the Commission a completed and notarized copy of the attached affidavit form by no later than September 19, 2007. 4 12/14/2006 Service Notice 21 12/13/2006 Finding and order approving applications for rural ETC status identified in Finding (2) and the applications for nonrural ETC status identified in finding (3) for the purpose of federal universal support. 3 11/01/2006 Application for certification for status as a non-rural eligible telecommunications carrier (ETC), filed on behalf of Windstream Ohio, Inc. by K. Hobbs. 5 11/01/2006 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier (ETC), filed on behalf of Windstream Western Reserve, Inc. by K. Hobbs. 6 10/31/2006 Application for certification as a nonrural eligible telecommunications carrier by United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq, filed by B. Donahue. 4 10/31/2006 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier (ETC) for the following companies: Benton Ridge Telephone Company, CenturyTel of Ohio, The Conneaut Telephone Company and Pattersonville Telephone Company, filed by J. Matz. 13 10/30/2006 Application for certification for status as Rural Eligible Communications Carrier (ETC), filed on behalf of McClure Telephone Company by D. Schroeder. 4 10/30/2006 Application for certifications for status as a Rural Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC), for the following companies: Bascom Mutual Telephone Company, Glandorf Telephone Company, New Knoxville Telephone Company, The Ridgeville Telephone Company and Sherwood Mutual Telephone Association, Inc. filed by J. Matz. 16 10/26/2006 Service Notice 16 10/25/2006 Application for certification for status as a Rural Eligible Telecommunications Carrier on behalf of Vaughnsville Telephone Company filed by M. Kaplan. 3 10/25/2006 Application for certification for status as a Rural Eligible Telecommunications Carrier, pursuant to the Commission's entry dated September 27, 2006, (ETC) on behalf of the following companies: Arcadia Telephone Company; the Arthur Mutual Telephone Company; Continental Telephone Company; Doylestown Telephone Company; The Fort Jennings Telephone Company; Little Miami Communications Corporations; The Nova Telephone Company; Oakwood Telephone Company and The Vanlue Telephone Company filed by J. Matz. 33 10/25/2006 Finding order, ordering that Nexus' application is denied consistent with Finding (6). 4 10/24/2006 Application for certification for status as a Nonrural Eligible Telecommunications Carrier, pursuant to the Commission's entry dated September 27, 2006, on behalf of AT&T Ohio, filed by R. Wentz 5 10/23/2006 Application for certification for status as a Nonrural Eligible Telecommunications Carrier, pursuant to the Commission's entry dated September 27, 2006, on behalf of Cincinnati Bell filed by M. Romito. 4 10/12/2006 Service Notice 18 10/11/2006 Entry ordered that; appendix B of the September 27, 2006, entry in this matter is modified nunc pro tunc and all non-rural carriers desiring to continue their status as an ETC file the revised appendix B attached to this entry by no later than November 1, 2006, that; in all other respects the September 27, 2006, entry shall remain in full force and effect. 4 10/11/2006 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier (ETC), filed on behalf of Ayersville Telephone Company by J. Matz. 40 10/11/2006 Application for certification as a non-rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by C. Cole. 4 10/05/2006 Appendix A (form of application for Certification for status as a Rural Eligible Telecommunications Carrier), filed on behalf of The Champaign Telephone Company by T. Carney. 4 10/03/2006 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of Chillicothe Telephone Company by K. Rickey. 4 10/02/2006 Rural Eligible Telecommunications Carrier Application filed on behalf of Telephone Service Company by L. Pedersen. 4 09/27/2006 Entry ordering that all carriers desiring to continue their status as an ETC must comply with the requirements of this entry and refile their applications by November 1, 2006. 9 09/27/2006 Service Notice 19 09/20/2006 Service Notice 15 09/20/2006 Finding and Order; ordering that all carriers identified in Finding (5) are hereby certified to the FCC and USAC as being eligible to receive federal high cost support. 4 09/08/2006 Affidavits for companies listed in filing by Ohio Telephone Association, J. Matz. 38 09/06/2006 Affidavit of P. Thomas Picard on behalf of Conneaut Telephone Company filed by C. Flahive. 2 08/22/2006 Affidavit of Telephone Service Company filed by L. Penderson. 2 08/10/2006 Service Notice 16 08/09/2006 Entry ordered that each Ohio non-rural carrier that anticipates funding for the year 2007 from the federal hold-harmless provision identified in Finding 2, and each rural carrier that wishes to be eligible for one or more of the high cost support mechanisms identified in Finding 3, shall file with the Commission a completed and notarized copy of the appropriate attached affidavit form, certifying that federal high cost support is being used consistent with Section 254(e) by no later that September 8, 2006. 6 12/22/2005 Petition for designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier in the state of Ohio filed on behalf of Nexus Communications, Inc. dba TSI filed by S. Fenker. 34 12/07/2005 Entry granting Budget Phone's motion to withdraw its application without prejudice. 2 12/07/2005 Service Notice 18 11/15/2005 Letter requesting to withdraw the application, without prejudice, filed by S. Greene on behalf of Budget Phone, Inc. 1 10/28/2005 Supplemental proof of service by the Appalachian People's Action Coalition (APAC) filed by M. Smalz. 2 10/27/2005 Motion to intervene by the Appalachian People's Action Coalition (APAC), memorandum in support filed by M. Smalz. 4 10/27/2005 Comments regarding the application of Budget Phone, Inc. for eligible telecommunications carrier status and to revise its prepaid local exchange tariff and request for hearing by the Office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel, Consumers for Fair Utility Rates, The Neighborhood Environmental Coalition and Appalachian Peoples Action Coalition filed by T. Etter. 30 10/27/2005 Motion to intervene by the office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel and memorandum in support filed by T. Etter 5 09/21/2005 Service Notice 18 09/21/2005 Finding and order stating that carriers identified in finding (5), are hereby certified to the FCC and USAC as being eligible to receive federal high cost support (including interim hold harmless support for non-rural carriers, as well as high cost loop support (47 C.F.R., Part 36), local switching support (47 C.F.R. S54.301), and any high cost support received as a result of a purchase of exchanges (47 C.F.R. S54.305) for rural carriers, as such carriers have demonstrated their intent to utilize such funding in a manner consistent with Section 254(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. 4 09/07/2005 Affidavits of telephone companies pursuant to entry of August 17, 2005 filed by J. Matz on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association. 40 09/07/2005 Affidavit for rural carriers filed by D. Lee on behalf of the Sycamore Telephone Co. 2 08/17/2005 Entry ordered; that consistent with Finding 5, each Ohio non-rural carrier that anticipates funding for the year 2006 from the federal hold-harmless provision identified in Finding 2, and each rural carrier that wishes to be eligible for one or more of the high cost support mechanisms identified in Finding 3, shall file with the Commission a completed and notarized copy of the appropriate attached affidavit form, certifying that federal high cost support is being used consistent with Section 254(e), by no later than September 7, 2005. 6 08/17/2005 Service Notice 18 07/12/2005 Application for certification for status as a nonrural eligible telecommunication carrier filed by R. Munn, Jr. on behalf of Budget Phone, Inc. 20 09/08/2004 Service Notice 15 09/08/2004 Finding and order stating that all carriers identified in Finding 5 are hereby certified to the FCC and USAC as being eligible to receive federal high cost support in a manner consistent with Section 254(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. 4 08/25/2004 Affidavit filed on behalf of The Western Reserve Telephone Co. by K. Hobbs. 2 08/25/2004 Affidavit of Alltel Ohio, Inc. filed by K. Hobbs. 2 08/12/2004 Notarized affidavits certifying that high cost funding, local switching support and any high cost support received as a result of a purchase of exchanges is being utilized by companies on attached list, filed by J. Matz. 38 08/04/2004 Entry ordered, that, consistent with Finding 5, each Ohio non-rural carrier that anticipates funding for the year 2005 from the federal hold-harmless provision identified in Finding 2, above, and each rural carrier that wishes to be eligible for on or more of the high cost support mechanisms identified in Finding 3, above, shall file with the Commission a completed and notarized copy of the appropriate attached affidavit form, certifying that federal high cost support is being used consistent with Section 254 (c), by no later that August 25, 2004. 5 08/04/2004 Service Notice 27 09/12/2003 Service Notice. 26 09/11/2003 Finding & Order that, all carriers identified in Finding 5 are hereby certified to the RCC and USAC as being eligible to receive federal high cost support (including interim hold harmless support for non-rural carriers, as well as high cost loop support 47 C.F.R., Part 36, local switching support 47 C.F.R. & 54.301, and any high cost support received as a result of a purchase of exchanges 47 C.F.R. & 54.305 for rural carriers, as such carriers have demonstrated their intent to utilize such funding in a manner consistent with Section 254(3) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. 4 09/05/2003 Amendment to the original document filed September 2, 2003, pursuant to the Commission's August 14, 2003 Entry, filed on behalf Ohio Telephone Association by J. Matz. 5 09/02/2003 Affidavits filed on behalf of Arcadia Telephone, Arthur Mutual Telephone, Ayersville Telephone, Bascom Mutual Telephone, Benton Ridge Telephone, Buckland Telephone, CenturyTel of Ohio, Champaign Telephone, Chillicothe Telephone, Columbus Grove Telephone, Conneaut Telephone, Continental Telephone, Doylestown Telephone, Farmers Mutual Telephone, Fort Jennings Telephone, Frontier Communications of Michigan, Germantown Independent Telephone, Kalida Telephone, Little Miami Communications, McClure Telephone, Middle Point Home Telephone, Minford Telephone, New Knoxville Telephone, Nova Telephone, Oakwood Telephone, Orwell Telephone, Ottoville Mutual Telephone, Sherwood Mutual Telephone, Sycamore Telephone, Telephone Service, Vanlue Telephone, and Vaughnsville Telephone by J. Matz. 35 09/02/2003 Affidavit filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio by K. Hobbs. 2 09/02/2003 Affidavit filed on behalf of Western Reserve Telephone Co. by K. Hobbs. 2 08/14/2003 Entry ordering that consistent with Finding 5, each Ohio non-rural carrier that anticipates funding for the year 2004 from the federal hold harmless provision identified in Finding 2, above, and each rural carrier that wishes to be eligible for one or more of the high cost support mechanisms identified in Finding 3, above will file with the Commission a completed and notarized copy of the appropriate attached affidavit form, certifying that federal high cost support is being used consistent with Section 254(e), by no later than September 1, 2003. 31 09/12/2002 Finding & Order that all carriers identified in Finding 5 are hereby certified to the FCC and USAC as being eligible to receive federal high cost support (including interim hold harmless support for non-rural carriers, as well as high cost loop support [47 C.F.R., Part 36], local switching support [47 C.F.R. 54.301], and any high cost support received as a result of a purchase of exchanges [47 C.F.R. 54.305] for rural carriers), as such carriers have demonstrated their intent to utilize such funding in a manner consistent with Section 254(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. 4 09/12/2002 Service Notice. 27 09/06/2002 Affidavit amendment filed on behalf of Ridgeville Telephone Company and Conneaut Telephone Company by J. Matz. 4 09/04/2002 Replacement affidavit filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio by K. Hobbs. 2 08/29/2002 Affidavit of John Hoge filed on behalf of The New Knoxville Telephone Co. by P. Meyer. 2 08/29/2002 Affidavit of Steve R. Mowery filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio by K. Hobbs. 2 08/29/2002 Affidavits of various telephone companies, filed on behalf of OTA by J. Matz. 38 08/08/2002 Entry ordering that, consistent with Finding 5, each Ohio non-rural carrier that anticipates funding for the year 2003 from the federal hold-harmless provision identified in Finding 2, and each rural carrier that wishes to be eligible for one or more of the high cost support mechanisms identified in Finding 3 shall file with the Commission a completed and notarized copy of the attached affidavit form, certifying that federal high cost support is being used consistent with section 254(e). 33 05/15/2002 Path Three disaggregation plan filed on behalf of Chillicothe Telephone Co. by K. Rickey. 2 05/15/2002 Path 3 disaggregation plan filed on behalf of Fort Jennings Telephone Co. by J. Poole. 17 05/15/2002 Path 3 disaggregation plan filed on behalf of Kalida Telephone Co. by J. Poole. 17 05/15/2002 Path 3 disaggregation plan filed on behalf of Middle Point Home Telephone Co. by J. Poole. 17 05/15/2002 Path 3 disaggregation plan filed on behalf of Glandorf Telephone Co. by J. Poole. 17 05/15/2002 Letter stating Western Reserve Telephone Company that WRT elects Path Three for Universal Service Disaggregation. 8 05/15/2002 Letter stating that ALLTEL elects Path Three for Universal Service Disaggregation by L. Krajci. 8 05/14/2002 Disaggregation of Federal Universal Service support filed on behalf of Vaughnsville Telephone Co. by D. Caldwell. 16 05/14/2002 Disaggregation of Federal Universal Service support filed on behalf of The Ottoville Mutual Telephone Co. by D. Caldwell. 15 05/14/2002 Disaggregation of Federal Universal Service support filed on behalf of Benton Ridge Telephone Co. by D. Caldwell. 16 05/14/2002 Disaggregation of Federal Universal Service support filed on behalf of Ayersville Telephone Co. by D. Caldwell. 16 05/14/2002 Letter stating that CenturyTel of Ohio elects not to disaggregate and target high-cost universal service support, filed by J. Glover. 1 05/13/2002 Disaggregation Plan-Path Three filed on behalf of The Chillicothe Telephone Co. by K. Rickey. 17 05/10/2002 Affidavit certifying the Path 3 disaggregation plan for Federal Universal Service Funds, listing the zones with a per line amount for each category of support, amount of support for each zone, the percentage of support allocated to each zone, filed by l. Pedersen. 6 05/01/2002 Path Three disaggregation plan filed on behalf of Sycamore Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 28 05/01/2002 Path Three disaggregation plan filed on behalf of McClure Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 28 05/01/2002 Path Three disaggregation plan filed on behalf of The Nova Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 27 05/01/2002 Path Three disaggregation plan filed on behalf of Doylestown Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 30 04/15/2002 Letter advising the Commission that The Germantown Independent Telephone Co. tentatively elects Path One, but reserves the right to change its path election prior to May 15, 2002, filed by C. Flahive. 1 04/12/2002 Letter filed pursuant to Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (Commission) rule 4901-1-09, filed by D. Traboris. 1 04/05/2002 Letter advising the commission that McClure Telephone Company tentatively elects Path Three, but reserves its right to change its path election prior to 5/15/02, filed by L. Armstrong. 1 04/02/2002 Letter advising the Commission that Ayersville Telephone Company will elect either the Path One or Path Three loop allocation plan by 5/15/02, filed by T. Pontious. 1 04/01/2002 Affidavit of Michael W. Conrad filed on behalf of Champaign Telephone Company by J. Poole. 2 04/01/2002 Affidavit of Douglas place filed on behalf of Buckland Telephone Company by J. Poole. 2 04/01/2002 Letter of notification advising the Commission that Columbus Grove Telephone Company, has selected the FCC's Path One, filed by L. Purdy. 1 04/01/2002 Affidavit of Michael J. Woodring filed on behalf of Competitive Communications Group by J. Poole. 2 04/01/2002 Letter advising the Commission that CentruyTel of Ohio, Inc. intends to follow the Path One approach, filed by V. Norris. 1 04/01/2002 Response letter to serve as notification to the FCC's Path 1 with regard to Universal Service Fund Disaggregation, on behalf of the Columbus Grove Telephone Company by L. Puray. 1 04/01/2002 Notification that Path I has been selected with regard to disaggregation, filed on behalf of Orwell Telephone Co. by L. Purdy. 1 04/01/2002 Letter advising the Commission that Arcadia Telephone Company , Continental Telephone Company, Little Miami Communications Corporation, Oakwood Telephone Company, The Vanlue Telephone Company all elect the Path one-No disaggegation and targeting of high-cost support at this time, filed by J. Jung. 1 03/29/2002 Letter advising the Commission that Arcadia Telephone Company, Continental Telephone Company, Little Miami Communications Corp., Oakwood Telephone Co., and The Vanlue Telephone Co. all elect the Path One-No disaggregation and targeting of high-cost support at this time, filed by J. Jung. 1 03/29/2002 Affidavit of Eric Damman filed on behalf of Farmers Mutual Telephone Co. by J. Poole. 2 03/29/2002 Affidavit of Dennis Depinet filed on behalf of Bascom Mutual Telephone Co. by J. Poole. 2 03/28/2002 Affidavit of Donald Stachler filed on behalf of Wabash Mutual Telephone Co. by J. Spurlock Poole. 2 03/28/2002 Letter advising the Commission that The Conneaut Telephone Company elects the Path One loop allocation plan at this time, filed by T. Picard. 1 03/28/2002 Letter advising the Commission that Minford Telephone Company elects the Path One loop allocation plan at this time, filed by P. McGraw. 1 03/28/2002 Letter advising the Commission that Pattersonville Telephone Company elects the Path One loop allocation plan at this time, filed by S. Toot. 1 03/28/2002 Letter advising the Commission that Arthur Mutual Telephone Company elects the Path One loop allocation plan at this time, filed by J. Sholl. 1 03/28/2002 Letter advising the Commission that The Ridgeville Telephone Company elects the Path One loop allocation plan at this time, filed by K. Miller. 1 03/11/2002 Affidavit of John Hoge filed on behalf of New Knoxville Telephone Co. by P. Meyer. 2 03/01/2002 Letter notifying the Commission of its election of Path I loop allocation, filed on behalf of Frontier Communications of Michigan by R. Williams. 1 12/20/2001 Finding & Order that consistent with Finding 5, the applications for rural elligible telecommunications carrier status identified in Finding 2 and the applications for nonrural telecommunications carrier status identified in Finding 3 for the purpose of federal universal support shall be approved. 3 12/20/2001 Notice of self certification for a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed by D.Lambert. 3 12/20/2001 Service notice 28 12/19/2001 Notice of self-certification as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed by E. Damman. 5 12/19/2001 Notice of self certification that Farmers mutual Telephone Co. is a Rural Eligible Telecommunications Carrier filed by E. Damman. 5 12/18/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier. 3 12/18/2001 Amendment to page three of appendix A filed by D. Place. 2 12/10/2001 Revised page 2 of the rural eligible telecommunications carrier application, filed on behalf of Pattersonville Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 2 12/07/2001 Request to withdraw the application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on October 3, 2001, filed on behalf of CT Communications Network by T. Carney. 1 12/07/2001 Revised proposal attachment to replace 10/3/01 attachment filing filed by T. Carney on behalf of the Champaign Telephone Company. 2 12/06/2001 Corrected last page of the application for certification for status as a rural eligible communications carrier filed by S. Berelsman on behalf of company 2 11/29/2001 Entry ordering that all rural local exchange carriers receiving federal high cost support are instructed to file in this proceeding by the appropriate date their respective choice for loop support allocations; that any rural local exchange carrier choosing Path Two or Three is instructed to file its proposed disaggregation plan with the Commission, the FCC, and the USAC by May 15, 2002; that all local exchange carriers receiving federal high cost support are instructed to file with the FCC and the USAC all requisite information by May 15, 2002. 4 11/29/2001 Service notice 28 11/29/2001 Certification for status as a rural eligible communications carrier, filed by S. Wolfe. 4 11/28/2001 Replacement rural eligible telecommunications carrier application filed on behalf of Doylestown Telephone Co. 4 11/28/2001 Application refiled for certification for status as a Rural Eligible Communications Carrier (ETC), filed b K. Stumpp. 4 11/28/2001 Corrected last page of the application for certification for status as a Rural Eligible Communications Carrier (ETC), filed by S. Berelsman. 2 11/27/2001 Letter regarding a notarized application for status as a Rural Eligible Telecommunications Carrier on behalf of CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc., filed by N. Buchan. 4 11/27/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed by S. Wolfe. 4 11/02/2001 Application for certification for status as a nonrural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by M. Romito. 4 11/01/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of The Western Reserve Telephone Co. by L. Krajci. 6 11/01/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio, Inc. by L. Krajci. 6 10/31/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Benton Ridge Telephone Co. by K. Stumpp. 4 10/30/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Ayersville Telephone Co. by T. Pontious. 4 10/30/2001 Application for certification for status as a nonrural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Colquitt. 5 10/30/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of The Bascom Mutual Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 4 10/26/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of The Conneaut Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 4 10/26/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Middle Point Home Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 4 10/24/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier (ETC) filed by C. Flahive on behalf of Telephone Service Company. 4 10/23/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Vanlue Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 4 10/23/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Arcadia Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 4 10/23/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Oakwood Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 4 10/23/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Little Miami Communications Corp. by C. Flahive. 4 10/23/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Continental Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 4 10/23/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Ridgeville Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 4 10/23/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Oakwood Telephone Co. 3 10/19/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Orwell Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 4 10/19/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Columbus Grove Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 4 10/18/2001 Application for certification as a nonrural eligible telecommunications carrier filed by B. Donahue on behalf of Sprint. (Filed 10/17/01) 5 10/16/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Glandorf Telephone Co. by L. Heckman. 5 10/16/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Pattersonville Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 5 10/15/2001 Notice of self-certification as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Farmers Mutual Telephone Co. by E. Damman. 4 10/15/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of The Nova Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 4 10/15/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Sycamore Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 5 10/12/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Doylestown Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 4 10/12/2001 Application for certification as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Kalida Telephone Company, Inc. by C. Phillips. 4 10/12/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of The Chillicothe Telephone Co. by S. Wolfe. 4 10/11/2001 Application for certification for status as a nonrural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of SBC Ameritech Ohio by R. Wentz. 6 10/09/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of The Champaign Telephone Co. by T. Carney. (FILED 10/5/01) 4 10/09/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of Germantown Independent Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 4 10/09/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of McClure Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 4 10/05/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of CT Communications Network by T. Carney. 5 10/03/2001 Rural eligible telecommunications carrier application, filed on behalf of Sherwood Mutual Telephone Assoc. by C. Flahive. 4 10/03/2001 Application for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc. by N. Buchan. 4 10/02/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible communications carrier, filed on behalf of Fort Jennings Telephone Co. by S. Berelsman. 5 10/01/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of The Ottoville Mutual Telephone Co. by D. Hoersten. 4 09/28/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of New Knoxville Telephone Co. by P. Meyer. 5 09/28/2001 Rural eligible telecommunications carrier application filed on behalf of Minford Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 4 09/28/2001 Rural eligible telecommunications carrier application, filed on behalf of Wabash Mutual Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 4 09/28/2001 Application for rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Vaughnsville Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 4 09/28/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Frontier Communications of Michigan by R. Williams. 4 09/28/2001 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Arthur Mutual Telephone Co. by J. Sholl. 5 09/21/2001 Affidavit filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio by K. Hobbs. 2 09/20/2001 Entry ordering that all carriers desiring to continue their status as an ETC must comply with the requirements of this entry and refile their applications by November 1, 2001; that effective January 1, 2002, all local exchange carriers deemed to be ETCs must update their eligibility every five years, with the next phase for renewing ETC status beginning the fall of 2006. 10 09/20/2001 Service Notice. 20 09/13/2001 Service Notice. 20 09/13/2001 Finding & Order that all rural carriers identified in Finding 4 are hereby certified to the FCC and USAC as being eligible to receive federal high cost loop support, local switching support, and any high cost support received as a result of a purchase of exchanges, as such carriers have demonstrated their intent to utilize such funding in a manner consistent with Section 254(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. 3 09/05/2001 Affidavit filed on behalf of Columbus Grove Telephone Co. by C. Flahive. 2 08/30/2001 Amendment to include Kalida Telephone Company to the list of companies filing notarized affidavits, filed on behalf of Ohio Telecommunications Industry Assoc. by J. Matz. 3 08/23/2001 Amendment filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecommunications Industry Assoc. by J. Matz. 3 08/22/2001 Affidavits filed on behalf of several telephone companies by J. Matz. 31 08/21/2001 Affidavit filed on behalf of Benton Ridge Telephone Co. 1 08/14/2001 Notarized copy of the affidavit form, certifying that high cost support is being used consistent with Section 254(3), filed on behalf of Ft. Jennings Telephone Co. by S. Berelsman. 2 08/14/2001 Affidavit certifying that high cost support is being used consistent with Section 254(3), filed on behalf of Sherwood Mutual Telephone Assoc. by M. Woodring. 1 08/13/2001 Affidavit form certifying that the Federal High Cost Support is being used consistent with Section 254(e) of the 1996 Telecommunications Act, filed on behalf of Champaign Telephone Co. by T. Carney. 2 08/02/2001 Entry ordering that, consistent with Finding 4, all carriers in the state of Ohio eligible for rural carrier federal universal service support shall file with the Commission a completed and notarized copy of the attached affidavit form, certifying that federal high cost support is being used consistent with Section 254(3). 3 08/02/2001 Service Notice. 20 01/14/2000 Final a tariff pages P.U.C.O. No. 8, filed on behalf of applicant by L. Whipkey. 7 01/14/2000 Final tariff sheets filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio, Inc. by L. Whipkey. 6 01/14/2000 Final tariff pages filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio by L. Whipkey. 6 01/06/2000 Entry ordering that every local exchange carrier required to provide TSA as of December 1999, that has neither init- iated the customer notification efforts nor committed to sustain the $3.50 monthly discount shall issue customer notification in accordance with the guidelines set forth within Findings 3 and 6 of this entry; that every local exchange carrier required to provide TSA as of December 1999, that has not yet filed requisite revisions to company tariffs must do so pursuant to the guidelines set forth within Finding 7 of this entry; that, effective immediately, all TSA-related monthly and annual advertisement and/or notification requirements previously promulgated under Case No. 91-564-TP-UNC are hereby repealed; that every local exchange carrier required to provide TSA during the six- month period beginning with July 1, 1999, and ending with the program's sunset date of December 31, 1999, shall file its final TSA annual report for that period no later than September 1, 2000. (6 pgs.) 6 12/16/1999 Finding & Order that, consistent with Finding 7, the appli- cations for rural elegible telecommunications carrier status identified in Finding 5 and the application for nonrural telecommunications carrier status identified in Finding 6 for the purpose of federal universal support shall be approved. (3 pgs.) 3 12/03/1999 Certificate of service filed on behalf of GTE North by S. Halteman. (3 pgs.) (FILED 12/2/99) 3 12/02/1999 Certificate of service, filed on behalf of GTE North, Inc., by S. Halterman. 3 11/30/1999 Amended application for certification as a non-rural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (6 pgs.) 6 11/30/1999 Corrected sheet in its ELTEL application, filed on behalf of GTE North by T. Colquitt. (2 pgs.) 2 11/24/1999 AT&T's reply comments to July 7, 1999 entry. Submitted by: D. Chorzempa. 17 pgs.) 17 11/24/1999 Reply comments of GTE North. Submitted by: W. Keating. (10 pgs.) 10 11/24/1999 Reply comments of OCC. Submitted by: D. Bergmann, (69 pgs.) 69 11/24/1999 Ameritech Ohio's reply comments. Submitted by: J. Kelly (14 pgs.) 14 11/24/1999 Reply comments of United Tel. Co/Sprint Communications in response to July 7, 1999 entry. Submitted by: J. Stewart (13 pgs.) 13 11/24/1999 Reply comments of MCI Worldcom, Inc. Submitted by: J. Sanders. (5 pgs.) 5 11/24/1999 Last page of Rural ETC Application. Submitted by: P. Maag (Columbus Grove Tel. Co.) (2 pgs.) 2 11/23/1999 Separate reply comments filed on behalf of applicants: Arcadia Telephone, Arthur Mutual Telephone, Ayersville Telephone, Benton Ridge Telephone, Buckland Telephone, Champaign Telephone, Columbus Grove Telephone, Continental Telephone, Conneaut Telephone, Doylestown Telephone, Farmers Mutual Telephone, Fort Jennings Telephone, Frontier Communi- cations of MI, Germantown Independent Telephone, Gladorf Telephone, Kalida Telephone, Little Miami Communications, McClure Telephone, Middle Point Home Telephone, Minford Telephone, New Knoxville Telephone, Nova Telephone, Oakwood Telephone, Orwell Telephone, Ottoville Mutual Telephone, Pattersonville Telephone, Ridgeville Telephone, Sherwood Mutual Telephone, Sycamore Telephone, Telephone Service, Vanlue Telephone, Vaughnsville Telephone, and Wabash Mutual Telephone by T. Lodge. (36 pgs.) 36 11/23/1999 Reply comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecommunica- tions Industry Assn. by T. Lodge. (8 pgs.) 8 11/23/1999 Reply comments filed on behalf of The Icore Companies: Doylestown Telephone Co., McClure Telephone Co., The Nova Telephone Co., Orwell Telephone Co., The Ridgeville Tele- phone Co., and The Sycamore Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (12 pgs.) 12 11/23/1999 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Wabash Mutual Telephone Co. by D. Stachler. (6 pgs.) 6 11/23/1999 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of McClure Tele- phone Co. (1 pg.) 1 11/23/1999 Rural ETC application filed on behalf of Fort Jennings Tele- phone Co. (1 pg.) 1 11/22/1999 Updated page 3 for the application, filed on behalf of New Knoxville Telephone Co. by B. Ferris. (2 pgs.) 2 11/22/1999 Updated page 3 for the application, filed on behalf of Buckland Telephone Co. by B. Ferris. (2 pgs.) 2 11/12/1999 Application for certification as a rural eligible telecom- munications carrier, filed on behalf of Orwell Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 4 11/09/1999 Page 1 of comments which was omitted from the October 25th filing, submitted on behalf of GTE North by S. Halteman. (4 pgs.) 4 11/09/1999 Certificate of service filed on behalf of GTE North by S. Halteman. (3 pgs.) 3 11/09/1999 Application for certification as a rural eligible tele- communications carrier, filed on behalf of The New Knox- ville Telephone Co. by B. Ferris. (12 pgs.) 12 11/08/1999 Certificate of service filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by D. Marshall. (12 pgs.) 12 11/02/1999 Self-certification as a rural telephone company filed on behalf of McClure Telephone Co. by H. Miller. (5 pgs.) 5 11/02/1999 Certificate of service filed on behalf of OCC by D. Berg- mann. (2 pgs.) 2 11/02/1999 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of Buckland Telephone Co. by D. Place. (11 pgs.) 11 11/01/1999 Application for certification for status as a nonrural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of GTE North by W. Keating. (12 pgs.) 12 11/01/1999 Application for certification for status as a rural elegible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Vaughnsville Telephone Co. by R. Rimer. (5 pgs.) 5 11/01/1999 Application for certification as a rural eligible telecom- munications carriers, filed on behalf of The Champaign Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 4 11/01/1999 Entry ordering that each person who filed comments in response to the entry issued July 27, 1999, shall serve a copy of those comments as well as any reply comments on the persons listed in the attached appendix. (AE) (5 pgs.) 5 10/29/1999 In the matter of the application of Pattersonville Telephone Company for certification as a rural eligible telecommunications carriers, filed by G. Cooper. 4 10/29/1999 Application for certification for status as a non-rural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. 7 10/29/1999 Application for certification as a non-rural eligible tele- communications carrier, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (7 pgs.) 7 10/29/1999 Application for certification as a rural eligible telecom- munications carrier, filed on behalf of Pattersonville Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 4 10/28/1999 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of Western Reserve Telephone by J. Bassett, III. (6 pgs.) 6 10/28/1999 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio by J. Bassett, III. 6 p gs.) 6 10/28/1999 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of Bascom Mutual Telephone by D. Depinet. (5 pgs.) 5 10/28/1999 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of Ayersville Telephone by T. Pontious. (4 pgs.) 4 10/28/1999 Application for certification as a rural eligible telecom- munications carrier, filed on behalf of Conneaut Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 4 10/28/1999 Application for certification as a rural eligible telecom- munications carrier, filed on behalf of Doylestown Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 4 10/28/1999 Application for certification as a rural elegible telecom- munications carrier, filed on behalf of Farmers Mutual Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 4 10/28/1999 Application for certification as a rural eligible telecom- munications carrier, filed on behalf of Germantown Indepen- dent Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 4 10/28/1999 Application for certification as a rural eligible telecom- munications carrier, filed on behalf of Middle Point Home Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 4 10/28/1999 Application for certification as a rural eligible telecom- munications carrier, filed on behalf of Minford Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 4 10/28/1999 Application for certification as a rural eligible telecom- munications carrier, filed on behalf of Nova Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 4 10/28/1999 Application for certification as a rural eligible telecom- munications carrier, filed on behalf of Ridgeville Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 4 10/28/1999 Application for certification as a rural eligible telecom- munications carrier, filed on behalf of Sherwood Mutual Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 4 10/28/1999 Application for certification as a rural eligible telecom- munications carrier, filed on behalf of Sycamore Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 4 10/28/1999 Application for certification as a rural eligible telecom- munications carrier, filed on behalf of Telephone Service Co. by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 4 10/27/1999 Application for certification for status as a nonrural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone by M. Romito. (5 pgs.) 5 10/27/1999 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of Glandorf Telephone Co. by L. Heckman. (4 pgs.) 4 10/26/1999 Comments filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by D. Marshall. (12 pgs.) 12 10/25/1999 Certificate of service filed by T. Lodge. 6 10/25/1999 Initial separate comments of the applicant Small Telephone Companies. 76 10/25/1999 Comments filed on behalf of GTE North by W. Keating. (31 pgs.) 31 10/25/1999 Certificate of service filed by T. Lodge. (6 pgs.) 6 10/25/1999 Initial separate comments filed on behalf of The Small Telepone Companies: Arcadia Telephone, Arthur Mutual Telephone, Ayersville Telephone, Benton Ridge Telephone, Buckland Telephone, Champaign Telephone, Columbus Grove, Telephone, Continental Telephone, Conneaut Telephone, Doylestown Telephone, Farmers Mutual Telephone, Fort Jennings Telephone, Frontier Communications of MI, German- town Independent Telephone, Glandorf Telephone, Kalida Telephone, Little Miami Communications, McClure Telephone, Middle Point Home Telephone, Minford Telephone, New Knox- ville Telephone, Nova Telephone, Oakwood Telephone, Orwell Telephone, Ottoville Mutual Telephone, Pattersonville Tele- phone, Ridgeville Telephone, Sherwood Mutual Telephone, Sycamore Telephone, Telephone Service, Vanlue Telephone, Vaughnsville Telephone, and Wabash Mutual Telephone by T. Lodge. (76 pgs.) 76 10/25/1999 Initial comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecommunica- tions Industry Assn. by T. Lodge. (13 pgs.) 13 10/25/1999 Confidential comments filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (98 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 98 10/25/1999 Comments filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (100 pgs.) 100 10/25/1999 Comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (22 pgs.) 22 10/25/1999 Comments of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint filed by J. Stewart. (13 pgs.) 13 10/25/1999 Initial comments filed on behafl of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (35 pgs.) 35 10/25/1999 Comments filed on behalf of MCI WorldCom, Inc. by J. Sanders and J. Campion. (18 pgs.) 18 10/25/1999 Initial separate comments of the ICORE Companies; Doyles- town Telephone, McClure Telephone, Nova Telephone, Orwell Telephone, Ridgeville Telephone, and Sycamore Telephone by T. Lodge. (11 pgs.) 11 10/25/1999 Initial separate comments filed on behalf of Telephone Ser- vice Company by T. Lodge. (37 pgs.) 37 10/25/1999 Comments filed on behalf of The Ashtabula County Telephone Coalition by E. Schaeffer. (16 pgs.) 16 10/25/1999 Initial comments filed on behalf of the Ohio Telecommunications Industry Association by T. Lodge. 13 10/21/1999 Application for certification as a rural eligible tele- communications carrier, filed on behalf of Arcadia Tele- phone Co. by G. Cooper. (5 pgs.) 5 10/21/1999 Application for certification as a rural eligible tele- communications carrier, filed on behalf of Continental Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (5 pgs.) 5 10/21/1999 Application for certification as a rural eligible tele- communications carrier, filed on behalf of Little Miami Communications Corp. by G. Cooper. (5 pgs.) 5 10/21/1999 Application for certification as a rural eligible tele- communications carrier, filed on behalf of Oakwood Tele- phone Co. by G. Cooper. (5 pgs.) 5 10/21/1999 Application for certification as a rural eligible telecom- munications carrier, filed on behalf of Vanlue Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (5 pgs.) 5 10/21/1999 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of The Ottoville Mutual Telephone Co. by D. Hoersten. (4 pgs.) 4 10/20/1999 Letter of notification Certification, Kalida Telephone Co., filed by C. Phillps (5 pgs) 5 10/19/1999 Letter of the application for Certification as a Nonrural Eligible Telecommunications Carrier by United Telephone Co. of Ohio dba Sprint. filed by B. Donahue (5 pgs) 5 10/18/1999 In the matter of Arthur Mutual Telephone Co application for certification filed by J. Sholl (5 pgs) 5 10/18/1999 The Chillicothe Telephone Co. submits the appropriate application for Certification filed by S. Wolfe (4 pgs) 4 10/14/1999 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier (ETC) filed on behalf of Frontier Communications of Michigan by R. Williams. (4 pgs.) 4 10/13/1999 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier (ETC), filed on behalf of Glan- dorf Telephone Co. by L. Heckman. (3 pgs.) 3 10/08/1999 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier (ETC), filed on behalf of Centurytel of Ohio by N. Buchan. (4 pgs.) 4 09/30/1999 Entry ordering that all carriers desiring to continue their status as an ETC must comply with the requirements of this entry and refile their applications by November 1, 1999. (11 pgs.) 11 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of McClure Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of McClure Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Vanlue Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Sycamore Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Sycamore Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Vanlue Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Vaughnsville Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Vaughnsville Tele- phone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Wabash Mutual Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Wabash Mutual Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Telephone Service Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Telephone Service Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Ridgeville Tele- phone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Sherwood Mutual Telephone by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Sherwood Mutual Telephone by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Orwell Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Orwell Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Ottoville Mutual Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Kalida Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Middle Point Home Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Nova Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Oakwood Mutual Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Middle Point Home Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ridgeville Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ottoville Mutual Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Nova Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Oakwood Mutual Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of New Knoxville Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of New Knoxville Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Minford Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Minford Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Frontier Communications of Michigan by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Kalida Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Frontier Communi- cations of Michigan by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Fort Jennings Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Glandorf Tele- phone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Fort Jennings Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Farmers Mutual Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Conneaut Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Columbus Grove Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Doylestown Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Glandorf Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Germantown Indepen- dent Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Germantown Independent Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Conneaut Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Farmers Mutual Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Doylestown Tele- phone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Continental Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Continental Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Champaign Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Bascom Mutual Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Columbus Grove Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Buckland Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Arthur Mutual Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Benton Ridge Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Bascom Mutual Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Champaign Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Benton Ridge Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Buckland Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Arthur Mutual Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Ayersville Tele- phone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ayersville Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Arcadia Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Arcadia Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Little Miami Communications Corp. by T. Lodge. (19 pgs.) 19 09/23/1999 Confidential response filed on behalf of Little Miami Telecommunications Corp. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) 4 08/31/1999 Sprint's notice of substitution of counsel, filed by J. Stewart. (5 pgs.) 5 08/26/1999 Notice of substitution of counsel filed on behalf of Sprint by J. Stewart. (4 pgs.) 4 08/09/1999 Correspondence letter filed by Angela Cook. (15 pgs.) 15 07/27/1999 Entry ordering that modification in the schedule for the submission of data request responses and initial and reply comments are granted; responses to the Commission's data requests attached to the July 7, 1999 entry are now due September 23, 1999; comments are now due October 25, 1999 and reply comments by November 24, 1999. (AE) (4 pgs.) 4 07/26/1999 Request for extension of time and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecommunications Industry Association by T. Lodge. (6 pgs.) 6 07/16/1999 Joint motion for extension of time, request for expedited ruling, and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann; Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs; and the Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland and Parkview Areaside Seniors by J. Meissner. (8 pgs.) 8 07/07/1999 Entry ordering that responses to the Commission's data requests attached as Appendices A and B shall be filed by August 9, 1999; comments in response to this entry are due August 9, 1999, and reply comments are due by August 24, 1999. (22 pgs.) 22 07/07/1999 Entry ordering that responses to the Commission's data requests attached as Appendices A and B shall be filed by August 9, 1999; that comments in response to this entry are due August 9, 1999, and reply comments are due by August 24, 1999. (22 pgs.) 22 06/23/1999 Self-certification as a rural telephone company, filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio by L. Krajci. (1 pg.) 1 06/23/1999 Self-certification as a rural telephone company, filed on behalf of Western Reserve Telephone by L. Krajci. (1 pg.) 1 05/27/1999 Letter stating Wabash Mutual Telephone Company's notice of self certification as a rural carrier pursuant to the FCC Universal Service Order, FCC 97-157. Submitted by: G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 05/05/1999 Notification of self-certification as a rural telephone company, filed on behalf of Kalida Telephone Company by C. Phillips. (3 pgs.) 3 05/04/1999 Notice of self certification as a rural carrier filed on behalf of Champaign Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/29/1999 Notice of self certification as a rural carrier, filed on behalf of Sycamore Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/27/1999 Notice of self certification as a rural carrier, filed on behalf of Ridgeville Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/26/1999 Certification that Columbus Grove Telephone is a rural tele- phone company filed by P. Maag. (2 pgs) 2 04/23/1999 Notification of self-certification as a rural telephone company filed by L. Pedersen on behalf of Telephone Service Company. (1 pg) 1 04/22/1999 Revised tariff, PUCO No. 8, Section 17, 2nd page 3, 3rd page 7, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by T. McCloud. (3 pgs.) 3 04/22/1999 Additional information filed on behalf of Ottoville Mutual Telephone Co. by D. Hoersten. (1 pg.) 1 04/09/1999 Notice of self certification as a rural carrier, filed on behalf of Arthur Mutual Telephone Company by G. Cooper. 2 04/09/1999 Notice of self certification as a rural carrier, filed on behalf of Arthur Mutual Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1999 Notice of self certification as a rural carrier, filed on behalf of Benton Ridge Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1999 Notice of self certification as a rural carrier, filed on behalf of Conneaut Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1999 Notice of self certification as a rural carrier, filed on behalf of Doylestown Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1999 Notice of self certification as a rural carrier, filed on behalf of Germantown Independent Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1999 Notice of self certification as a rural carrier, filed on behalf of Middle Point Home Telephone by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1999 Notice of self certification as a rural carrier, filed on behalf of Minford Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1999 Notice of self certification as a rural carrier, filed on behalf of Nova Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1999 Notice of self certification as a rural carrier, filed on behalf of Orwell Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1999 Notice of self certification as a rural carrier, filed on behalf of Vaughnsville Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1999 Notice of self certification as a rural carrier filed on behalf of Sherwood Mutual Telephone Assn. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1999 Tariff, PUCO No. 8, Section 17, 2nd page 3, 3rd page 7, filed on behalf of applicant by T. McCloud. (3 pgs.) 3 02/26/1999 Revised tariff, PUCO No. 2, 2nd page 168, 2nd page 165, filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by C. Marsh. (3 pgs.) 3 02/11/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 1, original sheets 3, 4, 5, and 6 filed on behalf of New Knoxville Telephone Co. by B. Ferris. (5 pgs.) 5 02/11/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 4, Section 7, 2nd sheet 3, 1st sheet 6, filed on behalf of Buckland Telephone Co. by B. Ferris. (3 pgs.) 3 01/12/1999 Revised tariff, PUCO No. 4, Section 2, 1st sheet 6, 1st sheet 7, 1st sheet 8, filed on behalf of Kalida Telephone Co. by C. Phillips. (4 pgs.) 4 01/07/1999 Revised tariff, PUCO No. 7, Section 8, 3rd sheet 3, 5th sheet 6, filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Kennedy. (3 pgs.) 3 01/07/1999 Revised tariff, PUCO No. 8, Section 10, 2nd sheet 3, 4th sheet 7, filed on behalf of Western Reserve Telephone Co. by L. Whipkey. (3 pgs.) 3 01/07/1999 Revised tariff, PUCO No. 1, Section 10, 2nd sheet 3, 3rd sheet 7, filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio by L. Whipkey. (3 pgs.) 3 01/06/1999 New language for telephone service assistance tariffs filed on behalf of Kalida Telephone Co. by C. Phillips. (8 pgs.) 8 01/06/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 5, Section 8, 2nd sheet 3, 2nd sheet 6, filed on behalf of Wabash Mutual Telephone Co. by G. Coo- per. (3 pgs.) 3 01/06/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 3, Section 2A, 1st sheet 3, 1st sheet 7, filed on behalf of Vaughnsville Telephone Co. by G. Coo- per. (3 pgs.) 3 01/06/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 6, Section 7, 2nd sheet 3, 2nd sheet 5, filed on behalf of The Vanlue Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (3 pgs.) 3 01/06/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 12, Section 8, 2nd sheet 3, 2nd sheet 6, filed on behalf of The Sycamore Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (3 pgs.) 3 01/06/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 6, Section 2, 2nd sheet 51, 2nd sheet 54A, filed on behalf of Orwell Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (3 pgs.) 3 01/06/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 3, Section VIII, 2nd sheet 3, 2nd sheet 5, filed on behalf of Oakwood Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (3 pgs.) 3 01/06/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 4, Section 2, 2nd sheet 10, 2nd sheet 13, filed on behalf of The Nova Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (3 pgs.) 3 01/06/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 5, Section 3A, 2nd sheet 3, 2nd sheet 6, filed on behalf of Minford Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (3 pgs.) 3 01/06/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 5, Section 8, 2nd sheet 3, 2nd sheet 7, filed on behalf of McClure Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (3 pgs.) 3 01/06/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 5, Section 4, 3rd sheet 10, 2nd sheet 13, filed on behalf of Little Miami Communications Corp. by G. Cooper. (3 pgs.) 3 01/06/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 7, Section 2A, 2nd sheet 3, 2nd sheet 6, filed on behalf of The Germantown Independent Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (3 pgs.) 3 01/06/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 3, Section 2, 2nd sheet 15, 2nd sheet 18, filed on behalf of Farmers Mutual Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (3 pgs.) 3 01/06/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 7, Section 4, 2nd sheet 3, 1st sheet 6, filed on behalf of Doylestown Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (3 pgs.) 3 01/06/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 8, Section 4, 2nd sheet 9, 2nd sheet 12, filed on behalf of Continental Telephone Co. by G. Coo- per. (3 pgs.) 3 01/06/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 6, Section 4, 2nd sheet 2, original sheet 6, filed on behalf of The Conneaut Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (3 pgs.) 3 01/06/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 6, Section 8, 3rd sheet 3, 3rd sheet 7, filed on behalf of Columbus Grove Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (3 pgs.) 3 01/06/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 5, Section 6, 2nd sheet 3, 1st sheet 7, filed on behalf of The Champaign Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (3 pgs.) 3 01/06/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 6, Section 2A, 2nd sheet 3, 3rd sheet 7, filed on behalf of Benton Ridge Telephone Co. by G. Coo- per. (3 pgs.) 3 01/06/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 5, Section 7, 2nd sheet 3, 2nd sheet 7, filed on behalf of Ayersville Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (3 pgs.) 3 01/06/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 3, Section 7, 2nd sheet 3, 2nd sheet 6, filed on behalf of The Arthur Mutual Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (3 pgs.) 3 01/06/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 8, Section 4, 2nd sheet 9, 2nd sheet 11, filed on behalf of Arcadia Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (3 pgs.) 3 01/04/1999 Revised tariff, PUCO No. 20, Part 4, Section 4, 2nd sheet 3, 1st sheet 5.1, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by L. Watiker. (3 pgs.) 3 01/04/1999 Final tariff, PUCO No. 12, Checklist, 14th sheet 1; Section 2, 2nd sheet 17, 2nd sheet 20, filed on behalf of Chilli- cothe Telephone Co. by L. Claytor. (4 pgs.) 4 12/30/1998 Entry ordering that, effective January 1, 1999, the pro- hibition promulgated by the Commission on December 23, 1997, which prevents a telephone customer from simultaneously participating in TSA and the federal Lifeline program shall be repealed; that, all carriers currently required to pro- vide TSA are directed to insert the necessary company- specific information into the language included as Attach- ment A to this entry, and to file the two revised TSA tariff sections by January 4, 1999; that, beginning January 1, 1999 the TSA customer notice required by Section 4905.76(D), Re- vised Code, and included as Attachment C to the PUCO's June 20, 1991 Finding and Order, shall be revised in accordance with Finding 8. (5 pgs.) 5 10/22/1998 Substitution of counsel and notice of address change filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Weston. (7 pgs.) 7 10/06/1998 Withdrawal of counsel filed by B. Weston. (2 pgs.) 2 06/10/1998 Notice of self certification as a rural carrier, filed on behalf of Columbus Grove Telephone Co. by J. Gettman. (2 pgs.) 2 04/30/1998 Notice of self certification as a rural carrier filed on behalf of Orwell Telephone co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/29/1998 Notice of self certification as a rural carrier filed on behalf of Farmers Mutual Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/28/1998 Notice of self certification as a rural carrier filed on behalf of Ayersville Telephone Company by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/27/1998 Notice of self-certification as a rural carrier filed by G. Cooper on behalf of Ottoville Mutual Telephone. (2 pgs) 2 04/27/1998 Notice of self-certification as a rural carrier filed by G. Cooper on behalf of The Ridgeville Telephone Company (2 pgs) 2 04/27/1998 Notice of self-certification as a rural carrier filed by G. Cooper on behalf of The Benton Ridge Telephone Company. (2 pgs) 2 04/23/1998 Notice of self certification as a rural carrier filed on behalf of McClure Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/22/1998 Self certification of rural telephone company status filed on behalf of Frontier Corporation by J. Phillips. (3 pgs.) 3 04/21/1998 Self certification as a rural telephone company filed on behalf of Telephone Service Company by C. Conover. (1 pg.) 1 04/20/1998 Notice of self certification as a rural carrier filed on behalf of Vaughnsville Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/15/1998 Notice of self certification as a rural carrier, filed on behalf of Champaign Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/15/1998 Notice of self certification as a rural carrier filed on behalf of Columbus Grove Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1998 Self certification as a rural carrier filed on behalf of Sycamore Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1998 Self certification as a rural carrier filed on behalf of Sherwood Mutual Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1998 Self certification as a rural carrier filed on behalf of The Nova Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1998 Self certification as a rural carrier filed on behalf of Minford Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1998 Self certification as a rural carrier filed on behalf of Middle Point Home Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1998 Self certification as a rural carrier filed on behalf of Pattersonville Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1998 Self certification as a rural carrier filed on behalf of The Germantown Independent Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1998 Self certification as a rural carrier filed on behalf of Fort Jennings Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1998 Self certification as a rural carrier filed on behalf of Doylestown Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1998 Self certification as a rural carrier filed on behalf of The Conneaut Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1998 Self certification as a rural carrier filed on behalf of Bascom Mutual Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1998 Self certification as a rural carrier filed on behalf of Arthur Mutual Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 04/09/1998 Letter filed on behalf of Bascom Mutual Telephone Company for a self certification as a rural carrier filed by G. Cooper. 2 04/09/1998 Letter filed on behalf of Sherwood Mutual Telephone Company for a self certification as a rural telephone company, by G. Cooper. 2 03/20/1998 Correspondence letter in support of the findings of the Commission in the matter of the Commission investigation of the Intrastate Universal Service Discounts, filed by M. Lucas, The State Library of Ohio. (1 pg.) 1 01/20/1998 Response to the Commission order relative for certification for Status as a Rural Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC), filed on behalf of Western Reserve Telephone Company by K. Hobbs. 2 01/20/1998 Further documentation filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio, Inc. by K. Hobbs. (2 pgs.) 2 12/23/1997 Second Supplemental Finding & Order that the application for rural eligible telecommunications carrier status filed on behalf of Alltel-Ohio, Inc. and The Western Reserve Tele- phone Co. are approved; that the application for rural eli- gible telecommunications carrier status filed on behalf of Sprint-United Telephone is denied and that Sprint-United be classified by the Commission as nonrural eligible telecom- munications carrier. (4 pgs.) 4 12/22/1997 Request to withdraw the application and tariff filed on behalf of WorldCom Technologies, Inc. by B. Ferris. (1 pg.) 1 12/18/1997 Supplemental Finding & Order that, consistent with Finding 7, the applications for rural eligible telecommunications carrier identified in Finding 4 and the applications for nonrural telecommunications carrier identified in Finding 5 for the purpose of federal universal support shall be approved. (4 pgs.) 4 12/17/1997 Addendum to application for certification for status as a rural ETC, filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio by K. Hobbs. (2 pgs.) 2 12/17/1997 Addendum to application for certification for status as a rural ETC, filed on behalf of Western Reserve Telephone Co. by K. Hobbs. (2 pgs.) 2 12/17/1997 Amended attachment to application for certification for status as a nonrural ETC, filed on behalf of Brooks Fiber Communications by P. Venema. (2 pgs.) 2 12/16/1997 Amended application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of Bascom Mutual Telephone Co. by D. Depinet. (4 pgs.) 4 12/12/1997 Comments on applications for ETC status filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (4 pgs.) 4 12/12/1997 Amended and notarized signature page to Brooks Fiber Communications of Ohio's application for certification for status as a nonrural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed by P. Venema. (2 pgs.) 2 12/12/1997 Amended page 3 of application for certification as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of Arcadia Telephone Co., Continental Telephone Co., Little Miami Communications, Oakwood Telephone Co., and Vanlue Telephone Co. by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.) 2 12/11/1997 Amended pages pertaining to the application, filed on behalf of WorldCom Technologies, Inc. by B. Ferris. (3 pgs.) 3 12/11/1997 Amended pages pertaining to the application, filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group, Inc. by B. Ferris. (3 pgs.) 3 12/11/1997 Amended page pertaining to the application, filed on behalf of Buckland Telephone Co. by B. Ferris. (2 pgs.) 2 12/10/1997 Amended application filed on behalf of Columbus Grove Tele- phone Company. (3 pgs.) 3 12/09/1997 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Frontier Com- munications of Michigan, Inc. (3 pgs.) (FILED 12/8/97) 3 12/09/1997 Application for certification for status as a nonrural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group, Inc. by B. Ferris. (7 pgs.) 7 12/09/1997 Application for certification for status as a nonrural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of WorldCom Technologies, Inc. by B. Ferris. (5 pgs.) 5 12/09/1997 Application for certification for Status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Buckland Tele phone Co. by B. Ferris. (4 pgs.) 4 12/08/1997 Supplement to previous pages filed in regards to certificat ion of rural ETC filed on behalf of The New Knoxville Telephone Company by R. Eversman. (4 pgs.) 4 12/08/1997 Rural ETC certification filed on behalf of Minford Telephone Company by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 4 12/08/1997 Rural ETC certification filed on behalf of Telephone Service Company by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 4 12/08/1997 Rural ETC certification filed on behalf of Benton Ridge Telephone Company by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 4 12/08/1997 Rural ETC certification filed on behalf of Arthur Mutual Telephone Company by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 5 12/08/1997 Rural ETC certification filed on behalf of The Champaign Telephone Company by G. Cooper. (5 pgs.) 5 12/08/1997 Rural ETC certification filed on behalf of Columbus Grove Telephone Company by G. Cooper. (5 pgs.) 4 12/08/1997 Rural ETC certification filed on behalf of The Conneaut Telephone Company by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 4 12/08/1997 Rural ETC certification filed on behalf of Doylestown Tele- phone Company by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 5 12/08/1997 Rural ETC certification filed on behalf of Germantown Independent Telephone by G. Cooper. (5 pgs.) 5 12/08/1997 Rural ETC certification filed on behalf of McClure Telephone Company by G. Cooper. (5 pgs.) 4 12/08/1997 Rural ETC certification filed on behalf of Pattersonville Telephone Company by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 27 12/08/1997 Rural ETC certification filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio by K. Hobbs. (8 pgs.) 8 12/08/1997 Rural ETC certification filed on behalf of Western Reserve Telephone Company by K. Hobbs. (8 pgs.) 5 12/08/1997 Rural ETC certification filed on behalf of Ayersville Tele- phone Company by G. Cooper. (5 pgs.) 4 12/08/1997 Rural ETC certification filed on behalf of Sherwood Mutual Telephone Company by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 4 12/08/1997 Rural ETC certification filed on behalf of The Sycamore Telephone Company by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 4 12/08/1997 Rural ETC certification filed on behalf of The Nova Tele- phone Company by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.) 5 12/08/1997 Rural ETC certification filed on behalf of Wabash Mutual Telephone Company by G. Cooper. (5 pgs.) 6 12/08/1997 Non-rural ETC certification filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (6 pgs.) 6 12/08/1997 Rural ETC certification filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio (dba Sprint) by A. Matsumoto. (6 pgs.) 3 12/08/1997 Rural ETC certification filed on behalf of Kalida Telephone Company, Inc. by C. Phillips. (3 pgs.) 3 12/08/1997 Rural ETC certification filed on behalf of The Ottoville Mutual Telephone Company by D. Hoersten. (5 pgs.) 5 12/08/1997 ETC tariff and certification filed on behalf of Frontier Communication of Michigan, Inc. by L. Hammer. (14 pgs.) 14 12/08/1997 Rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of The Ridgeville Telephone Company by K. Miller. (2 pgs.) 2 12/08/1997 Rural ETC application for certification Bascom Mutual Telephone Company, filed by D. Depinet. 9 12/05/1997 Rural ETC application filed on behalf of Fort Jennings Telephone Company by S. Berelsman. (5 pgs) 5 12/05/1997 Rural ETC application filed on behalf of Middle Point Home Telephone Company by R. Long. (5 pgs) 5 12/05/1997 Rural ETC application filed on behalf of Glandorf Telephone Co., Inc. by K. Heckman. (2 pgs) 2 12/05/1997 Nonrural ETC application filed on behalf of GTE North by B. Kazee. (8 pgs) 8 12/05/1997 Rural ETC application filed on behalf of Continental Telephone Company by G. Cooper. (5 pgs) 5 12/05/1997 Rural ETC application filed on behalf of Vanlue Telephone Company by G. Cooper. (5 pgs) 5 12/05/1997 Rural ETC application filed on behalf of Oakwood Telephone Company by G. Cooper. (5 pgs) 5 12/05/1997 Rural ETC application filed on behalf of Little Miami Communications Corporation by G. Cooper. (5 pgs) 5 12/05/1997 Rural ETC application filed on behalf of Arcadia Telephone Company by G. Cooper. (5 pgs) 5 12/05/1997 Nonrural ETC application filed on behalf of Brooks Fiber Communications of Ohio, Inc. (4 pgs) 4 12/05/1997 Rural ETC application filed on behalf of The Farmers Mutual Telephone Co by E. Damman. (2 pgs) 2 12/05/1997 Nonrural ETC application filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by M. Romito. (4 pgs) 4 12/05/1997 Rural ETC application filed on behalf of Century Telephone of Ohio, Inc. by V. Norris. (31 pgs) 31 12/05/1997 Rural ETC application filed on behalf of The Chillicothe Telephone Co by S. Wolfe. (4 pgs) 4 12/04/1997 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Orwell Tele- phone Co. by D. Pokorny. (7 pgs.) 7 12/04/1997 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Vaughnsville Telephone Co. by R. Rimer. (5 pgs.) 5 12/04/1997 Verification pages filed on behalf of New Knoxville Tele- phone Co. by R. Eversman. (4 pgs.) 4 12/03/1997 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of The Ridge- ville Telephone Co. by K. Miller. (5 pgs.) (FILED 12/2/97) 5 12/02/1997 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of Fort Jennings Telephone Co. by S. Berelsman. (4 pgs.) 4 12/02/1997 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of The Farmers Mutual Telephone Co. by E. Damman. (4 pgs.) 4 12/02/1997 Entry ordering that all carriers currently required to pro- vide SCA and TSA, and all carriers required to provide Life- line and Link Up for purposes of objtaining ETC designation, are directed to insert the necessary company-specific infor- mation into the attached boilerplate tariff language, and file such language by December 8, 1997; that Ameritech Ohio shall file, by December 8, 1997, its amended Universal Ser- vice Assistance tariff language, as revised during the Nov- ember 26, 1997 meeting with Commission staff. (AE) (25 pgs.) 25 12/01/1997 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of Kalida Tele- phone Co. by C. Phillips. (6 pgs.) 6 12/01/1997 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier, filed on behalf of Vaughnsville Telephone Co. by R. Rimer. (4 pgs.) 4 12/01/1997 Application for certification for status as a rural eligible telecommunications carrier filed on behalf of Glandorf Tele- phone Co. by L. Heckman. (3 pgs.) 3 11/28/1997 Application for certification for status as a Rural Eligible Telecommunications Carrier filed on behalf of New Knoxville Telephone Co. by R. Eversman. (4 pgs.) 4 11/20/1997 Finding & Order that all companies interested in becoming an ETC must comply with the requirements stated in this order; that all companies interested in becomming an ETC in order to begin receiving federal universal support as of January 1, 1998, must file the appropriate application with the Commission by December 8, 1997. (25 pgs.) 25 10/28/1997 Certificate of service filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by D. Clayton. (3 pgs.) 3 10/27/1997 Reply comments filed on behalf of The Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (6 pgs.) 6 10/27/1997 Certificate of service filed on behalf of GTE North by B. Kazee. (3 pgs.) 3 10/24/1997 Joint reply to initial comments filed on behalf of AT&T by D. Chorzempa; and The Competitive Telecommunications Assn. by L. Oliver. (15 pgs.) 15 10/24/1997 Reply comments filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (13 pgs.) 13 10/24/1997 Reply comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (8 pgs.) 8 10/24/1997 Reply comments filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (7 pgs.) 7 10/24/1997 Reply comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecommunica- tions Industry Assn. by T. Lodge. (6 pgs.) 6 10/24/1997 Reply comments filed on behalf of Sprint (United Telephone Co. of Ohio) by T. Jacobs; and Sprint Communications Company L.P. by M. Jenkins. (5 pgs.) 5 10/24/1997 Reply comments filed on behalf of The Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (5 pgs.) 5 10/24/1997 Reply comments filed on behalf of GTE North by B. Kazee. (4 pgs.) 4 10/23/1997 Certificate of service filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (4 pgs.) 4 10/22/1997 Certificate of service filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (3 pgs.) 3 10/21/1997 Certificate of service filed on behalf of The Ohio Tele- communications Industry by T. Lodge. (3 pgs.) 4 10/21/1997 Certificate of service filed on behalf of Time Warner Com- munications of Ohio by M. Schermer. (2 pgs.) 2 10/20/1997 Entry ordering that each person who filed comments in response to the entry issued October 2, 1997, in this docket, shall serve a copy of those comments, as well as any reply comments, on the persons listed in the attached appendix. (AE) (4 pgs.) 4 10/17/1997 Initial comments of United Telephone Company of Ohio and Sprint Communications Company, L.P., filed by T. Jacobs and M. Jenkins. 5 10/17/1997 Comments filed on behalf of CompTel by L. Oliver. (27 pgs.) 27 10/17/1997 Comments filed on behalf of NextLink Ohio by D. Waggoner. (13 pgs.) 13 10/17/1997 Comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by J. Troup. (13 pgs.) 13 10/17/1997 Comments filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders. (8 pgs.) 5 10/17/1997 Comments filed on behalf of OCC by B. Cohen. (8 pgs.) 8 10/17/1997 Comments filed on behalf of GTE North by B. Kazee. (7 pgs.) 7 10/17/1997 Comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (6 pgs.) 6 10/17/1997 Initial comments filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio by T. Jacobs; and Sprint Communications Co. L.P. by M. Jenkins. (5 pgs.) 5 10/17/1997 Comments filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Weston. (5 pgs.) 5 10/17/1997 Initial comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Communi- cations of Ohio by M. Schermer. (1 pg.) 1 10/16/1997 Letter confirming that the request for clarification can be and should be considered also to be the comments filed on behalf of Ohio Telecommunications Industry Association by T. Lodge. (1 pg.) 1 10/14/1997 The Ohio Telecommunications Industry Association's request for clarification filed by T. Lodge. (5 pgs.) 5 10/02/1997 Entry ordering that any person wishing to file comments to the attached appendices should do so by October 17, 1997; reply comments should be filed by October 24, 1997; that the Commission approves the additional federally funded discount in accordance with Finding 5. 10 10/02/1997 Entry ordering that any person wishing to file comments to the attached appendices, should do so by October 17, 1997; reply comments should be filed by October 24, 1997; that the Commission approves the additional federally funded discount in accordance with Finding 5. (10 pgs.) 10 07/18/1997 Entry ordering that Edgemont's motion is denied. (AE) (1 pg.) 1 06/30/1997 Motion to file out of time and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (12 pgs.) 12 06/26/1997 Finding & Order approving the proposed universal service guidelines attached as Appendix A, for schools and public libraries. (7 pgs.) 7 06/25/1997 Correspondence letter in support of providing schools and libraries with the intrastate universal service discounts, filed by M. Frances Haley, Ohio Library Council. (1 pg.) 1 06/19/1997 Comments filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (8 pgs.) 8 06/19/1997 Comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (4 pgs.) 4 06/19/1997 Comments filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (3 pgs.) 3 06/19/1997 Comments filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by D. Clayton. (3 pgs.) 3 06/19/1997 Comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (2 pgs.) 2 06/19/1997 Comments filed on behalf of The State Library of Ohio by M. Lucas. (1 pg.) 1 06/12/1997 Entry ordering that any person wishing to file comments relating to the proposed intrastate school and public library universal service funding mechanism should do so by June 19, 1997. (5 pgs.) 5 06/11/1997 In the matter of the Commission investigation of the intra- state universal service discounts for Frontier Communica- tion of Michigan, Inc. (11 pgs.) (FILED 12/8/97 INCORRECT- LY IN CASE NO. 97-632-TP-COI.) In the matter of the Commission investigation of the Intra- state Universal Service Discounts. (1 pg.) 1