DIS - Case Record for 95-0845-TP-COI Skip to main content

Case Record For:

95-0845-TP-COI

Case Title: LOCAL EXCHANGE COMPETITIVE ISSUES
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: COI-Commission inquiry
Date Opened: 9/14/1995
Date Closed: 10/3/2023
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
10/03/2023Case Action Form closing the case with an effective date of 09/29/23 electronically filed by Ms. Mary E. Fischer on behalf of Jay S. Agranoff, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.3
11/20/2007Entry amending Rules 4901:1-5-05(C) and 4901:1-7-26(A) (1)(b}(i) in accordance with finding 4.8
11/20/2007Service Notice22
10/22/2007Reply memorandum of Verizon North Inc. in support of motion for waiver filed by T. Lodge.7
10/16/2007Memorandum contra Verizon's motion for waiver by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by D. Bergmann.8
10/12/2007Comments of Verizon North Inc. in support of AT&T's request for waiver or , in the alternative, motion for waiver filed by T. Lodge. 8
10/11/2007Reply to OCC's October 1, 2007 memorandum contra, filed by J. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.9
10/01/2007Memorandum contra AT&T's request for waiver by the Office of the Ohio Consumers Counsel, filed by T. Etter. 10
09/21/2007Request for waiver of AT&T, Ohio filed by J. Kelly.12
11/21/2006Entry ordered that in accordance with the above findings, AT&T Ohio's October 3, 2006, request for waiver of Local Service Guideline (X)(E)(4) is granted, that the waiver of Local Service Guideline (X)(E)(4) shall remain in effect until final carrier rules are approved and adopted or until such other time as determined by the Commission.4
11/21/2006Service Notice21
10/03/2006Request for waiver on behalf of AT&T Ohio filed by M. Ryan Fenlon.8
06/01/2006Return mail.1
05/25/2006Returned mail.1
05/25/2006Returned mail.1
05/25/2006Returned mail.1
05/25/2006Returned mail.1
05/16/2006Service Notice21
05/16/2006Entry ordering that the application for rehearing filed by AT&T Communications is denied as discussed in Finding (5).3
04/28/2006Application for rehearing and memorandum in support of the Commission's March 29, 2006 Entry filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by J. Kelly.13
03/29/2006Entry ordering that the request for extensions of time are granted; that the objection filed by AT&T Communications is denied as discussed in finding 6.4
03/29/2006Service Notice20
02/21/2006Revised tariff for PUCO No.1 filed by C. Neeld on behalf of Spectrotel, Inc.8
02/03/2006In the matter of the application of Sprint Communications Company L.P. to revise PUCO No.1 tariff to reflect the new IntraLATA PIC change charges and the updated Telephone Service Requirements form.21
02/03/2006Motion for extension of time, filed on behalf of XO Communications Services, Inc. by M. Dortch.6
01/27/2006Application of Alltel Ohio, Inc. and The Western Reserve Telephone Company for an extension of time to comply with the Finding and Order entered by the Commission on January 4, 2006, filed by C. Flahive.3
01/25/2006Revised tariff language in the Access Services Tariff, PUCO No.2, Section 13, 1st. Revised Page 244, cancels original page 244, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Extended Territories, LLC by E. King.11
01/25/2006Revised tariff language in the Access Service Tariff, PUCO No. 2, Section 13, to change the presubscribed interexchange carrier change charges to end users, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by E. King.10
01/24/2006Objections filed pursuant to Finding and Order adopted on January 4, 2006, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by D. Chorzempa.11
01/24/2006Objection and request for extension of time, filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by J. Kelly.4
01/05/2006Service Notice94
01/04/2006Finding and Order; ordered that end-use customers be charged no more that $5.50 for a manual intraLATA PIC change and $1.25 for an electron intraLATA PIC change, that LEC's waive one-half of the intraLATA PIC change charge when the intraLATA PIC is changed simultaneously with the interLATA PIC, that unless objections are filed in this case within 20 days following this Finding and Order, all LECs who assess PIC change charges to end use customers amend their tariffs currently on file with the Commission to reflect the Commissions' new intraLATA PIC change charge safe harbor rates through the filing of a ZTA case within 30 days following the date of this Finding and Order; that in accordance with Finding (10) all LEC's who assess PIC change charges to end use customers file an amended Service Requirement Form reflecting the new intraLATA PIC change charge safe harbor rates in either the same ZTA case filed by the LEC to amend its PIC change charge or, within 30 days following this Finding and Order, file an amended Service Requirements Form in a separate, stand-alone ZTA case dedicated soleley to the submission of a new Service Requirement Form.17
05/11/2000Finding and order, ordering that in the interim and while the Commission revaluates the entire regulatory telecommunications framework, telecommunications carriers be afford the flexible regulatory treatment as discussed.22
09/01/1999Revised tariff, PUCO No. 1, Section 9, 1st pages 165, 187, 190, 193, 196, and 199, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Long Distance by M. Cann. (7 pgs.)7
09/01/1999Revised tariff, PUCO No. 1, filed on behalf of CBLD by M. Cann. (7 pgs.)7
08/24/1999Notice of substitution of counsel filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. (5 pgs.)5
08/18/1999Request for waiver filed on behalf of P.V. Tel of Ohio, LLC by B. Ferris. (2 pgs.)2
08/03/1999IntraLATA presubscription implementation plan filed on be- half of Cable & Wireless USA by A. Pruitt. (6 pgs.)6
08/02/1999Reply memorandum to Ameritech Ohio's memorandum contra the motion to reopen proceeding or, in the alternative, to open a proceeding to amend the local service guidelines as set forth in this case, filed on behalf of NextLink Ohio by J. Bentine; ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris; ACI Corp. by S. Bloomfield; and Time Warner Telecom by M. Schermer. (8 pgs.)8
07/29/1999Joint reply to Ameritech Ohio's memorandum contra, filed on behalf of MCImetro Access Transmission by J. Sanders; and AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (14 pgs.)14
07/29/1999Letter requesting that the joint movants, NextLink, ICG Telecom, ACI, and time Warner Telecom, be permitted until August 2, 1999 to reply to the memorandum contra, filed by J. Bentine. (1 pg.)1
07/23/1999Request for the addition and deletion of certain parties from the service list to this case, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by B. Donahue. (10 pgs.)10
07/20/1999Request for waiver filed on behalf of BlueStar Networks, Inc. by B. Ferris. (2 pgs.)2
07/19/1999Memorandum contra filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (48 pgs.)48
07/01/1999Motion to reopen proceeding or, in the alternative, to open a proceeding to amend the local service guidelines set forth in this case and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by J. Bentine; ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris; CoreComm Newco by S. Bloomfield; and Time Warner Telecom by M. Schermer. (64 pgs.)65
02/05/1999Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (15 pgs.) (S.C. #99-0290)15
12/09/1998Entry denying the joint application for rehearing filed by AT&T Communications of Ohio and MCI Telecommunications Corp. (7 pgs.)7
11/09/1998Joint application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. San- ders; and AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (28 pgs.)28
10/22/1998Substitution of counsel and notice of address change filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Weston. (7 pgs.)7
10/08/1998Finding and Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in this case is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LECs are approved; that, in accordance with Finding 18 the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motion for suspension and intervention are denied23
10/06/1998Withdrawal of counsel filed by B. Weston. (4 pgs.)4
04/09/1998Entry ordering that GTE's and Sprint's waiver requests are approved in accordance with Finding 4; that both GTE and Sprint are required to provide the Commission's Compliance Department with updates at the end of each June and Dec- ember following the date of this entry, informing the Com- mission staff of th eprogress that each company is making. (5 pgs.)5
02/25/1998Returned from Supreme Court, 18 Vols. - Destroyed.0
02/19/1998Letter clarifying the information provided in the letter dated September 29, 1997, filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Kennedy. (4 pgs.)4
02/19/1998delete Letter clarifying the information provided in the letter dated September 29, 1997, filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Kennedy. (4 pgs.)4
02/17/1998Second amended motion for waiver and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Sprint by M. Arendes, Jr. (5 pgs.)5
02/17/1998Second amended motion for waiver and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Sprint by M. Arendes, Jr. (5 pgs.)5
02/03/1998Letter requesting to relinquish the exemption of Section 251(c) obligations granted to Frontier Communications of Michigan's Ohio operations in this case, filed by J. Phillips. (1 pg.)1
01/29/1998Letter requesting to relinquish the exemption of Section 251(c) obligations granted to Frontier Communications of Michigan's Ohio operations in this case, filed by J. Phillips. (1 pg.)1
12/23/1997Entry ordering that, so they may more fully consider the SLECs' November 26, 1997 motion, they find it appropriate to grant an extension of the exemption afforded the SLECs through Guideline II.A.2.b.i. until the Commission deter- mines otherwise. (3 pgs.)3
11/26/1997Application of Small Local Exchange Telephone Companies for extension of exemption filed by R. Prohaska. (6 pgs.)6
11/12/1997Letter to update service list filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by J. Troup. (1 pg.)1
10/30/1997Update to service list filed on behalf of AT&T Communica- tions of Ohio by J. Troup. (1 pg.)1
10/07/1997Request for waiver filed on behalf of WorldCom, Inc., MFS Intelenet of Ohio, Inc., and WorldCom Technologies, Inc. by B. Ferris. (3 pgs.) (FILED 10/6/97)3
09/29/1997Additional information filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Kennedy. (3 pgs.)3
09/02/1997Mandate filed on behalf of The Supreme Court of Ohio by Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer. (1 pg.)1
09/02/1997Reconsideration entry filed on behalf of The Supreme Court of Ohio by Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer. (1 pg.)1
09/02/1997Judgment entry filed on behalf of The Supreme Court of Ohio by Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer. (1 pg.)1
08/25/1997Response to PUCO data request associated with pending waiver request filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Kennedy. (5 pgs.)5
08/21/1997Amendment to motion for waiver filed on behalf of Sprint by T. Jacobs. (6 pgs.)6
08/12/1997Entry ordering that the companies' requests for additional time are reasonable and should be granted. (AE) (1 pg.)1
08/01/1997Motion for extension of time filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (4 pgs.)4
07/29/1997Motion for extension of time and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Sprint by T. Jacobs. (5 pgs.)5
07/21/1997Fresh Look Notice filed on behalf of Brooks Fiber Comm. by T. Stein. (1 pg.)1
07/17/1997Comments of the Ashtabula County Telephone Coalition on motions for waivers by GTE North and Sprint, filed by E. Schaeffer. (5 pgs.)5
07/17/1997Entry ordering that the attached SRF and Fresh Look Notice Form are hereby adopted by the Commission; that these forms go into effect immediately; that all LECs regulated pur- suant to 845 include the revised SRF as part of their next filing before this Commission. (14 pgs.)14
07/16/1997Change of address filed by M. Schermer. (1 pg.)1
07/15/1997Motion to stay briefing submitted on behalf of appellant, Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company filed by D. Hart. (7 pgs)7
07/02/1997Entry ordering that a 60-day extension is granted in accor- dance with Finding 2. (2 pgs.)2
06/30/1997Correspondence letter regarding GTE's request for a waiver, filed by G. Minnick. (2 pgs.)2
06/26/1997Errata filed on behalf of Sprint (United) by T. Jacobs. (5 pgs.)5
06/26/1997Notice of withdrawal of motion for waiver filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (4 pgs.)4
06/23/1997Letter stating that ICG has interconnection agreements operational in Akron, Cleveland, Columbus and Dayton pursuant to an approved interconnection agreement with Ameritech Ohio, filed by B. Ferris. (1 pg.)1
06/19/1997Motion for withdrawal filed on behalf of Sprint by T. Jacobs. (5 pgs.)5
06/16/1997Letter informing the Commission that GTE North has nothing further to add to its motion for waiver previously filed September 11, 1996, filed by J. Stewart. (1 pg.)1
06/12/1997Copy of notice to customers with attached revised Registra- tion Form filed on behalf of the PUCO staff. (4 pgs.)4
06/12/1997Alltel Ohio, Inc. and Western Reserve Telephone Company's local compeititon plan filed by T. Lodge. (10 pgs.)10
06/12/1997Century Telephone of Ohio, Inc.'s plan to prepare for the introduction of local competition, filed by D. Conway. (7 pgs.)7
06/12/1997Entry ordering that a 60-day extension is granted in accor- dance with Finding 2. (2 pgs.)2
06/11/1997Motion for waiver and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Sprint (United) by T. Jacobs. (6 pgs.)6
05/30/1997Brief of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. regarding GTE North Inc.'s motion for waiver, filed by B. Kahn. (11 pgs.)11
05/14/1997Motion for waiver and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Sprint by T. Jacobs. (9 pgs.)9
05/13/1997Motion for waiver and memorandum in support filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (7 pgs.)7
04/21/1997Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by J. Harrison. (8 pgs.)8
04/21/1997Notice of appeal continues. (S.C. #97-0791) (Part 3 of 3)162
04/21/1997Notice of Appeal continues. (S.C. #97-0791) (Part 2 of 3)175
04/21/1997Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio, Inc. and The Western Reserve Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (S.C. # 97-0791) (Part 1 of 3)175
04/21/1997Notice of Appeal continued. (S.C. #0795) (Part 3 of 3)125
04/21/1997Notice of Appeal continued. (S.C. #0795) (Part 2 of 3)175
04/21/1997Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of GTE North Incorporated by J. Stewart. (S.C. #97-0795) (Part 1 of 3)175
04/21/1997delete Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of GTE North Incorporated by J. Stewart. (513 pgs.) (S.C. #97-0795)513
04/21/1997delete Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by J. Harrison. (8 pgs.)8
04/21/1997 delete Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio, Inc. and The Western Reserve Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (513 pgs.) (S.C. #97-0791)513
03/07/1997Notice of withdrawal of counsel filed on behalf of the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Assn. by R. Rosenberry. (4 pgs.)4
03/06/1997Entry ordering that the motion for leave to file late-filed comments made by MFS Intelenet of Ohio is granted; that the January 16, 1997 Supplemental Finding & Order is clarified to the limited extent outline in Findings 8 and 9; that, in all other respects, the applications for rehearing filed by OCC, APAC, Edgemont, and CBT are denied in their entirety.7
03/06/1997Entry ordering that the motion for leave to file late-filed comments made by MPS Intelenet of Ohio is granted; that the January 16, 1997 Supplemental Finding & Order is clarified to the limited extent outlined in Findings 8 and 9; that, in all other respects, the applications for rehearing filed by OCC, APAC, Edgemont, and CBT are denied in their entirety.8
03/04/1997Opposition of MFS Intelenet of Ohio to Cincinnati Bell's application for rehearing, and motion for leave to late file memorandum in opposition, filed by D. Myers. (14 pgs.)14
02/28/1997Memorandum contra Cincinnati Bell's application for rehear- ing, filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Rosenberry and M. Schermer. (7 pgs.)7
02/28/1997Memorandum contra Cincinnati Bell's application for rehear- ing, filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Rosenberry and M. Schermer. (7 pgs.)7
02/28/1997Opposition to application for rehearing of Cincinnati Bell Telephone, filed on behalf of Midcom Communications by C. Hunter. (14 pgs.)14
02/28/1997Opposition to application for rehearing of Cincinnati Bell Telephone, filed on behalf of Midcom Communications by C. Hunter. (14 pgs.)14
02/28/1997Memorandum contra CBT's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of CBG by N. Hawthorne. (8 pgs.)8
02/28/1997Memorandum contra CBT's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of CBG by N. Hawthorne. (8 pgs.)8
02/20/1997Entry granting the applications for rehearing and requests for clarification of issues filed by OITA and Ameritech to the limited extent indicated in Findings 13, 14, 15, and 16; that, in all other respects, the applications for rehearing and requests for clarification of issues filed by OTIA, Ameritech, and GTE are denied in their entirety.106
02/20/1997Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing and requests for clarification of issues filed by OTIA and Ameritech are granted to the limited extent indicated in Findings 13, 14, 15, and 16; that, in all other respects, the applications for rehearing and requests for clarifica- tion of issues filed by OTIA, Ameritech, and GTE are denied in their entirety; that in all other respects, the Commis- sion's November 7, 1996 entry on rehearing shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. (93 pgs.)93
02/18/1997Application for rehearing filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by C. Wilson. (9 pgs.)9
02/18/1997Application for rehearing filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by C. Wilson. (9 pgs.)9
02/14/1997Consolidated application for rehearing/request for clarification and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by Y. Ranft; Appalachian People's Action Coalition by M. Smalz; and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (14 pgs.)14
02/14/1997Consolidated application for rehearing/request for clari- fication and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by Y. Ranft; Appalachian People's Action Coalition by M. Smalz; and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (14 pgs.)14
01/16/1997Supplemental Finding & Order that the requests for inter- vention and hearing in the applications listed in Appendix A are denied and the applications will be considered through a public paper proceeding; that, in accordance with Finding 3, Cable & Wireless' waiver of the USOA requirement is denied and its waiver of the filing of a carrier-to-carrier tariff is granted; that the applications and proposed tariffs filed by those companies listed in Finding (6)(a) shoudl be approved and these cases be closed of record; that the applications of the companies listed in Finding (6)(b) shall be approved; however, the cases are partially suspended pending review of the tariffs which will be auto- matically approved and these cases closed of record, absent full or partial suspension, on March 3, 1997; that the cases listed in Finding (6)(d) file their propsed tariffs by Jan- uary 31, 1997, such tariffs shall be automatically approved and these cases closed of record, absent full or partial suspension, on March 3, 1997; that the cases listed in Find- ing (6)(e) are suspended pending review and they will be automatically approved and these cases closed of record, absent full or partial suspension, on March 3, 1997; that MCI's Case No. 96-1240-CT-AAC be closed of record and the pleadings considered in Case No. 94-2019-TP-ACE; that MFS' application for approval of an amendment to its certifica- tion application is approved; that ICG's Case No. 96-1336- TP-AAC should be approved and Case No. 96-1336-TP-AAC and 95-814-TP-ACE should be closed of record; that, in accor- dance with Finding 12, LCI is authorized to withdraw Case No. 96-263-TP-ACE and, therefore, it should be closed of record; that the application of Blue Ribbon Rentals II, docketed in Case No. 96-926-TP-ACE, remain under suspen- sion, in accordance with Finding 13; that ACI-specific issues be dealt with in Case Nos. 96-327-TP-ACE and 96- 658-TP-ACE and not in this supplemental order, as set forth in Finding 14. (13 pgs.)13
01/06/1997Notice of appeal of Appellant, Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company. (S.C. #97-0026) (Part 2 of 2)172
01/06/1997Notice of appeal of Appellant, Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company. (S.C. #97-0026) (Part 1 of 2)192
01/06/1997Notice of appeal filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio, Inc and Western Reserve Telephone Company by T. Lodge. (362 pgs.) (S.C. #97-0021)362
01/06/1997Notice of appeal filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio, Inc. and The Western Reserve Telephone Company by T. Lodge. (398 pgs.) (S.C. #97-0021)398
01/06/1997Notice of appeal filed on behalf of GTE North Incorporated by J. Stewart. (9 pgs.) (S.C. #97-0024)9
12/24/1996Entry granting the rehearing solely to afford the Commission a limited amount of additional time to consider the issues on which rehearing and clarification have been sought. (2 pgs.)2
12/18/1996Memorandum contra of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. to December 9, 1996 applications for rehearing filed by B. Kahn. (10 pgs.)10
12/09/1996Application for rehearing filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (10 pgs.)10
12/09/1996Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. (11 pgs.)11
12/06/1996Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (8 pgs.)8
12/06/1996Letter resubmitting previous letter dated November 19, 1996, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by D. Marshall. (1 pg.)1
11/07/1996Entry making clarifications and modifications on the appli- cations for rehearing; that, in accordance with Finding 24, all interconnection agreements entered into prior to Febru- ary 8, 1996, be filed for Commission review pursuant to Section 252(e)(4) of the 1996 Act no later than June 30, 1997; that those pending certification cases subject to a 60-day approval process are suspended in accordance with Finding 13; that any revisions necessitated by revisions to the ORP/SCO agreements by Guideline IV.H. be filed within 30 days of this entry; that, in accordance with Finding 62, the ILECs are directed to file plans implementing intraLATA toll dialing parity; that the adoption of these guidelines does not constitute state action for purposes of the antitrust law which prohibit the restraint of trade. (182 pgs.)181
10/15/1996Correspondence letter regarding the meeting with Commis- sioner Fergus on October 8, 1996 at the Cuyahoga County Public Library, Independence, Ohio, filed by E. Schaeffer. (16 pgs.)16
10/15/1996Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Lloyd E. Lewis, Jr., State Representative. (1 pg.)1
10/01/1996Correspondence letters filed on behalf of various consumers. (21 pgs.)21
09/30/1996Motion for waiver and memorandum in support filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (7 pgs.) A fax was filed on 9/30/96. 7
09/11/1996Motion for waiver and memorandum in support filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (6 pgs.)6
09/09/1996Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by P. Bradley on behalf of Mt. Pleasant Community Council, Inc. and D. Lovelace, City Commissioner, on behalf of the City of Dayton, Ohio. (4 pg.)4
09/09/1996Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by P. Bradley, Mt. Pleasant Community Council, Inc. (1 pg.)1
09/09/1996Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by D. Lovelace, City of Dayton. (3 pgs.)3
08/30/1996Reply to additional comments filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by D. Townsley and J. Sanders. (11 pgs.)11
08/30/1996Additional reply comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Cable Telecommunications Assn. by R. Rosenberry. (13 pgs.)13
08/30/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (59 pgs.)59
08/30/1996Supplemental reply comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by D. Clayton and M. Schermer. (10 pgs.)10
08/30/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston. (11 pgs.)11
08/30/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (11 pgs.)11
08/30/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of Sprint Communication by S. Williams. (10 pgs.)10
08/30/1996Additional reply comments filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (26 pgs.)26
08/30/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (9 pgs.)9
08/30/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of The Chillicothe Telephone Co. by A. Korkosz. (8 pgs.)8
08/30/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by J. Harrison. (8 pgs.)8
08/26/1996Letter of concerns filed by E. Schaeffer. (8pgs)8
08/23/1996Additional comments filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (40 pgs.)40
08/23/1996Comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (24 pgs.)24
08/23/1996Comments filed on behalf of CompTel by L. Oliver. (23 pgs.)23
08/23/1996Supplemental comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by D. Clayton. (17 pgs.)17
08/23/1996Comments filed on behalf of the Telecommunications Resellers Assn. by A. Isar. (15 pgs.)15
08/23/1996Additional comments filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications by D. Townsley and J. Sanders. (14 pgs.)14
08/23/1996Comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (13 pgs.)13
08/23/1996Comments filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston. (13 pgs.)13
08/23/1996Comments filed on behalf of Cablevision Lightpath-OH, Inc. by C. Kiser. (10 pgs.)10
08/23/1996Supplemental comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Cable Telecommunications Assn. by R. Rosenberry. (9 pgs.)9
08/23/1996Comments filed on behalf of Frontier Telemanagement by S. Bloomfield. (8 pgs.)8
08/23/1996Supplemental comments filed on behalf of Sprint by S. Williams, and Sprint Communications Co. L.P. by M. Jenkins. (7 pgs.)7
08/23/1996Statement in lieu of initial comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. (6 pgs.)6
08/23/1996Comments filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone by J. Harrison. (6 pgs.)6
08/23/1996Statement in lieu of comments filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve Telephone by T. Lodge. (6 pgs.)6
08/23/1996Letter advising the Commission that The Chillicothe Tele- phone Company will not be filing initial comments, filed by A. Korkosz. (5 pgs.)5
08/23/1996Additional comments filed on behalf of MFS Intelenet of Ohio by M. Albert. (11 pgs.)11
08/22/1996Comment on FCC order in Docket 96-98 filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (6 pgs.)6
08/19/1996Letter regarding the submittal of tariff information, filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve Telephone by T. Lodge. (1 pg.)1
08/13/1996Letter stating that Ameritech representatives and Commissioner Butler met to discuss certain provisions of the Local Service Guidelines filed on behalf of Ameritech by J. Smith. (2 pgs.)2
08/12/1996Memorandum contra to the letter of The Ohio Centrex Association, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (9 pgs.)9
08/12/1996Letter confirming that Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve requested an extension of time within which to submit their applications to revise their tariffs, filed by T. Lodge. (1 pg.)1
08/12/1996Letter stating that Arcadia Telephone Company is in the process of preparing a tariff amendment application and will file such application by September 12, 1996, filed by G. Cooper. (1 pg.)1
08/12/1996Letter stating that Little Miami Telephone Company is in the process of preparing a tariff amendment application and will file such application by September 12, 1996, filed by G. Cooper. (1 pg.)1
08/12/1996Letter stating that Continental Telephone Company is in the process of preparing a tariff amendment application and will file such application by September 12, 1996, filed by G. Cooper. (1 pg.)1
08/12/1996Letter stating that Oakwood Mutual Telephone Company is in the process of preparing a tariff amendment application and will file such application by September 12, 1996, filed by G. Cooper. (1 pg.)1
08/12/1996Letter stating that Vanlue Telephone Co. is in the process of preparing a tariff amendment application and will file such application by September 12, 1996, filed by G. Cooper. (1 pg.)1
08/09/1996Entry ordering that interested parties shall have an oppor- tunity to file comments by 8/23/96 and reply comments by 8/30/96; that interested persons serve copies of their comments upon all other interested persons commenting in response to this entry. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
08/07/1996Letter pertaining to the meeting of the samll telephone companies and Chairman Glazer and Commissioner Fergus on Wednesday, July 31, 1996, filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by K. Collins. (2 pgs.)2
08/02/1996Letter regarding the July 30, 1996 meeting with Chairman Glazer, Commissioner Fergus, several members of the Com- mission's staff, and representatives of Ameritech Ohio, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Smith. (2 pgs.)2
08/01/1996Entry ordering that rehearing is granted affording the Commission additional time in which to consider the issues raised on rehearing in conjunction with the FCC's order in CC Docket 96-98 as addressed in Finding 4; that interested entities are invited to file additional comments as set for forth in Finding 4; that the Commission's June 12, 1996 finding & order and Appendix A is in full force and effect except for the automatic approval time frames as discussed in Finding 5; that the Association's July 12, 1996 letter shall be construed as an application for rehearing and interested parties shall have ten days from the date of this entry to file memoranda contra. (5 pgs.)5
07/26/1996Correspondence letter regarding guidelines filed by R. Mclin. (1 pg.)1
07/23/1996Letter regarding the meeting of the small telephone companies and Commissioner Fergus on July 16, 1996, filed by K. Collins. (2 pgs.)2
07/22/1996Memorandum contra applications for rehearing filed on behalf of The Appalachian People's Action Coalition by M. Smalz and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalitaion by E. Jacobs. (16 pgs.)16
07/22/1996Memorandum contra applications for rehearing filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (78 pgs.)78
07/22/1996Memorandum contra applications for rehearing filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (38 pgs.)38
07/22/1996Memorandum contra filed on behalf of The Ohio Cable Tele- communications Assn. by R. Rosenberry. (31 pgs.)31
07/22/1996Memorandum contra in response to certain issues raised in applications for rehearing filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by T. Taylor. (25 pgs.)25
07/22/1996Memorandum contra to July 12, 1996 applications for rehear- ing filed on behalf of AT&T Communications by B. Kahn. (23 pgs.)23
07/22/1996Memorandum contra applications for rehearing filed on behalf of Time Warner by D. Clayton and M. Schermer. (21 pgs.)21
07/22/1996Memorandum contra the applications for rehearing filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders. (19 pgs.)19
07/22/1996Memorandum contra filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston. (15 pgs.)15
07/22/1996Reply to applications for rehearing filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (13 pgs.)13
07/22/1996Memorandum contra filed on behalf of Century Telephone of Ohio by D. Conway. (4 pgs.)4
07/19/1996Memorandum opposing applications for rehearing by other entities, filed on behalf of Ashtabula County Telephone Coalition by E. Schaeffer. (8 pgs.)8
07/17/1996Correction to the application for rehearing (page 76 was blank and was, therefore, removed from docketing), filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (1 pg.)1
07/12/1996Application for rehearing filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by T. Taylor. (43 pgs.)43
07/12/1996Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of the Edgemont Neighborhool Coalition and Appa- lachian People's Action Coalition by E. Jacobs. (27 pgs.)27
07/12/1996Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Chillicothe Telephone Co. by A. Korkosz. (15 pgs.)15
07/12/1996Application for rehearing filed on behalf of the City of Cleveland by W. Gruber. (7 pgs.)7
07/12/1996Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (46 pgs.)46
07/12/1996Application for rehearing filed on behalf of The Ohio Tele- phone Association by J. Prohaska. (17 pgs.)17
07/12/1996Application for rehearing filed on behalf of The Small Local Exchange Companies of Ohio by J. Prohaska. (11 pgs.)11
07/12/1996Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association by R. Rosenberry. (9 pgs.)9
07/12/1996Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Century Telephone of Ohio by D. Conway. (15 pgs.)15
07/12/1996Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalfof AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (19 pgs.)19
07/12/1996Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Alltel Companies (Western Reserve and Alltel Ohio) by T. Lodge. (24 pgs.)24
07/12/1996Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by D. Clay- ton and M. Schermer. (13 pgs.)13
07/12/1996Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by D. Townsley and J. Sanders. (41 pgs.)41
07/12/1996Application for rehearing filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (106 pgs.)106
07/12/1996Application for rehearing filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (23 pgs.)23
07/12/1996Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by D. Trabaris. (17 pgs.)17
07/12/1996Motion for clarification filed on behalf of Cellnet of Ohio, Inc. by J. Migden. (4 pgs.)4
07/12/1996Application for rehearing filed on behalf of The Ashtabula County Telephone Coalition by E. Schaeffer. (8 pgs.)8
07/12/1996Application for rehearing and/or clarification filed on behalf of United Telephone by S. Williams and Sprint Com- munications by M. Jenkins. (18 pgs.)18
07/12/1996Correspondence letter regarding the focus group meeting held on June 25, 1996, filed on behalf of Ohio Centrex Association by D. Mills. (2 pgs.)2
06/27/1996Entry ordering that the June 12, 1996 Finding and Order is clarified nunc pro tunc that the local competition guide- lines set forth in Appendix A took effect upon signing of the June 12, 1996 Finding & Order; the only provisions which are delayed to take effect until 8/15/96 are the guidelines setting forth automatic approval time frames in both the certification and tariffing section; in all other respects, the June 12, 1996 Finding & Order is in full force and effect. (2 pgs.)2
06/12/1996Finding & Order that, in accordance with the findings of this finding and order, it is in the public interest to adopt a new regulatory framework for the provision, within Ohio, of competitive local exchange telecommunication services, as set forth in Appendix A to this finding and order; that ILECs resubmit tariffs within 60 days of this finding and order which remove all restrictions on resale of services except as specifically noted otherwise in this order; that the ILECs submit for Commission approval the revisions to ORP/SCO discussed in this order and in Appendix A; that any telephone company currently offering basic local ex- change service, who has not yet been certified to do so, shall file an application for certification pursuant to the attached guidelines; that all ILECs and NECs shall comply with this order and the attached guidelines; that the effective date of the guidelines shall be August 15, 1996.171
06/12/1996Finding & Order that, in accordance with the findings of this finding and order, it is in the public interest to adopt a new regulatory framework for the provision, within Ohio, of competitive local exchange telecommunication services, as set forth in Appendix A to this finding and order; that ILECs resubmit tariffs within 60 days of this finding and order which remove all restrictions on resale of services except as specifically noted otherwise in this order; that the ILECs submit for Commission approval the revisions to ORP/SCO discussed in this order and in Appendix A; that any telephone company currently offering basic local ex- change service, who has not yet been certified to do so, shall file an application for certification pursuant to the attached guidelines; that all ILECs and NECs shall comply with this order and the attached guidelines; that the effective date of the guidelines shall be August 15, 1996.74
06/12/1996Finding & Order that, in accordance with the findings of this finding and order, it is in the public interest to adopt a new regulatory framework for the provision, within Ohio, of competitive local exchange telecommunication ser- vices, as set forth in Appendix A to this finding and order; that ILECs resubmit tariffs within 60 days of this finding and order which remove all restrictions on resale of ser- vices except as specifically noted otherwise in this order; that the ILECs submit for Commission approval the revisions to ORP/SCO discussed in this order and in Appendix A; that any telephone company currently offering basic local ex- change service, who has not yet been certified to do so, shall file an application for certification pursuant to the attached guidelines; that all ILECs and NECs shall comply with this order and the attached guidelines; that the effective date of the guidelines shall be August 15, 1996. (171 pgs.)171
06/12/1996Finding and order ordering that a new regulatory framework for the provision, within Ohio, of competitive local exchange telecommunications services, as set forth in Appendix A to this order be adopted; that ILECs resubmit revised tariffs within 60 days of this order; that ILECs submit for approval the revisions to ORP/SCO; that any telephone company currently offering basic local exchange service who has not yet been certified to do so; that all ILECs and NECs comply with this order and attached guidelines; that the effective date of the guidelines shall be 8/15/96.171
06/03/1996Comments filed on behalf of the Ashtabula County Telephone Coalition by E. Schaeffer. (4 pgs.)4
06/03/1996Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by M. Eshleman. (1 pg.)1
05/28/1996Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by R. Lewis, Association of Directory Publishers. (2 pgs.)2
05/20/1996Comments filed on behalf of TCG by D. Trabaris.2
05/20/1996Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by H. Crawford. (2 pgs.)2
05/20/1996Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by H. Crawford. (2 pgs.)2
05/15/1996Response filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by J. Troup. (10 pgs.)10
05/10/1996Resolution 96-04 filed on behalf of the Village of Powell by D. Moore. (3 pgs.)3
05/10/1996Resolution 96-04 filed on behalf of the Village of Powell by D. Moore. (3 pgs.)3
04/15/1996Copies of correspondence letters to Governor Voinovich and Attorney Examiner Scott Farkas regarding the application, filed by J. Bennett. (5 pgs.)5
04/10/1996 delete Correspondence letter supporting the application, filed by B. Wagner. (1 pg.)1
04/10/1996Correspondence letter supporting the application, filed by B. Wagner. 1
04/03/1996Letter stating that the arbitration procedures was discuss with Commissioner Fergus on April 2, 1996 filed by W. Newcomb, Jr. (1 pg.)1
03/29/1996Resolution filed on behalf of the Montgomery County Health Alternative Plan Joint Advisory Council by F. Elig, Ohio Department of Human Services. (2 pgs.)2
03/29/1996delete Resolution filed on behalf of the Montgomery County Health Alternative Plan Joint Advisory Council by F. Elig, Ohio Department of Human Services. (2 pgs.)2
03/15/1996Reply to supplemental comments filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders. (20 pgs.)20
03/15/1996Supplemental reply comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (63 pgs.)63
03/15/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (9 pgs.)9
03/15/1996Supplemental joint reply comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio and The Ohio Cable Telecommu- nications Association by D. Clayton and M. Schermer. (14 pgs.)14
03/15/1996Supplemental reply comments filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by T. Taylor. (17 pgs.)17
03/15/1996Supplemental reply comments filed on behalf of The Chilli- cothe Telephone Co. by A. Korkosz. (8 pgs.)8
03/15/1996Supplemental reply comments filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (25 pgs.)25
03/15/1996Supplemental reply comments filed on behalf of TCG Cleve- land by B. Weston. (17 pgs.)17
03/15/1996Reply comments to supplemental comments of other parties filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve Tele- phone Co. by T. Lodge. (9 pgs.)9
03/15/1996Reply supplemental comments filed on behalf of the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (40 pgs.)40
03/15/1996Supplemental reply comments filed on behalf of MFS Communi- cations Co. by K. Kinkopf. (13 pgs.)13
03/15/1996Reply to supplemental comments filed on behalf of ComTel by L. Oliver. (11 pgs.)11
03/15/1996Reply supplemental comments filed on behalf of Century Telephone of Ohio by D. Conway. (4 pgs.)4
03/08/1996Supplemental comments filed on behalf of ComTel by L. Oliver. (17 pgs.)17
03/08/1996Supplemental comments filed on behalf of the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (7 pgs.)7
03/08/1996Supplemental comments filed on behalf of the Telecommunica- tions Resellers Assn. by A. Isar. (21 pgs.)21
03/08/1996Supplemental comments filed on behalf of Enhanced Tele- Management, Inc. by M. Trinchero. (7 pgs.)7
03/08/1996Supplemental comments filed on behalf of MFS Communications Co. by K. Kinkipf. (24 pgs.)24
03/08/1996Supplemental comments filed on behalf of United Telephone Co. of Ohio by S. Williams and Sprint Communications Co. L.P. by R. Lipman. (13 pgs.)13
03/08/1996Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by a consumer. (1 pg.)1
03/08/1996delete Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by a consumer. (1 pg.)1
03/08/1996Supplemental comments filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by T. Taylor. (11 pgs.)11
03/08/1996Supplemental comments filed on behalf of OCC by D. Berg- mann. (87 pgs.)87
03/08/1996Supplemental comments filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston. (18 pgs.)18
03/08/1996Supplemental comments filed on behalf of Cablevision Lightpath-OH, Inc. by S. Bloomfield. (15 pgs.)15
03/08/1996Comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications by R. Quinn, Jr. (8 pgs.)8
03/08/1996Supplemental comments filed on behalf of MCI Telecommuni- cations Corp. by D. Townsley and J. Sanders. (15 pgs.)15
03/08/1996Supplemental comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy and J. Kelly. (27 pgs.)27
03/08/1996Supplemental comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. (6 pgs.)6
03/08/1996Supplemental comments and motion to consider comments as joint petition for suspension filed on behalf of the Small Telephone Companies by J. Prohaska. (9 pgs.)9
03/08/1996Supplemental comments filed on behalf of GTE North by B. Kazee. (10 pgs.)10
03/08/1996Supplemental comments filed on behalf of The Chillicothe Telephone Co. by A. Korkosz. (10 pgs.)10
03/08/1996Initial supplemental comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio and the Ohio Cable Tele- communications Assn. by D. Clayton and M. Schermer. (19 pgs.)19
03/08/1996Supplemental comments filed on behalf of Century Telephone of Ohio by D. Conway. (4 pgs.)4
03/08/1996Supplemental comments filed on behalf of New Par by E. Miller. (9 pgs.)9
03/08/1996Supplemental comments filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve Telephone by T. Lodge. (11 pgs.)11
03/07/1996Joint supplemental comments filed on behalf of the National Emergency Number Association and its Ohio Chapter by J. Hobson. (9 pgs.)9
02/23/1996Information regarding the meeting on Feb. 22, 1996, and attached handout used during the meeting, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (3 pgs.)3
02/23/1996Entry ordering that interested entities be afforded an additional opportunity to comment in this docket in accordance with Finding 4; initial comments are due on March 8, 1996, and reply comments are due March 15, 1996. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
02/21/1996Letter regarding the meeting between the small telephone company representatives and Chairman Glazer and Commissioner Fergus on February 13, 1996, filed on behalf of the small telephone companies. (3 pgs.)3
02/20/1996Motion to establish supplemental pleading cycle filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (6 pgs.)6
02/14/1996Letter in regard to its initial comments filed on December 14, 1995, submitted on behalf of the Chillicothe Telephone Co. by A. Korkosz. (6 pgs.)6
02/13/1996Memo from P. Duffy, PUCO staff, stating that the attached notice and memorandum of City of Columbus of presentation should be deemed to have been filed in compliance with the Commission's directive. (7 pgs.)7
02/07/1996Amended Appendix B filed on behalf of AT&T Communications by R. Quinn, Jr. (22 pgs.)22
02/05/1996Letter which issues an erratum for two letters dated Janu- ary 23, 1996 and January 25, 1996, filed by on behalf of Ohio Cable Telecommunications Assn. by D. Clayton. (2 pgs.)2
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (93 pgs.)93
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of The Small Local Exchange Telephone Companies by J. Prohaska. (10 pgs.)10
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone by T. Taylor. (127 pgs.)127
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (39 pgs.)39
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Cable Tele- communications Association by D. Clayton. (100 pgs.)100
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications by R. Rosenberry. (43 pgs.)43
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by D. Townsley and J. Sanders. (112 pgs.)112
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by D. Tra- baris and B. Weston. (43 pgs.)43
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of Cablevision Lightpath-OH by S. Bloomfield. (16 pgs.)16
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of The City of Columbus by R. O'Brien, J. Klein, III, and G. Dunn. (10 pgs.)10
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of The Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition and The Appalachian People's Action Coalition by E. Jacobs. (100 pgs.)100
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of New Par by A. Miller. (22 pgs.)22
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by R. Quinn, Jr. (162 pgs.)162
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of The Chillicothe Telephone Company by A. Korkosz. (9 pgs.)9
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of Westside Cellular Inc. dba Cellnet of Ohio by M. Tricarichi. (5 pgs.)5
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of Century Telephone of Ohio by D. Conway. (9 pgs.)9
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. (16 pgs.)16
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (16 pgs.)16
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (175 pgs.)175
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio by S. Williams and Sprint Communications Company, L.P. by M. Jenkins. (24 pgs.)24
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of Sprint Telecommunications Venture by R. Lipman. (26 pgs.)26
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of The United States Depart- ment of Defense and all other Federal Executive Agencies by R. Ganton. (12 pgs.)12
01/31/1996Certificate of service filed on behalf of the U.S. Depart- ment of Defense and all other Federal Executive Agencies by R. Ganton. (4 pgs.)4
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of Telecommunications Resellers Association by A. Isar. (19 pgs.)19
01/31/1996Certificate of service filed on behalf of Competitive Tele- communications Assn. (CompTel) by L. Oliver. (7 pgs.)7
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of Competitive Telecommunica- tions Assn. (CompTel) by L. Oliver. (23 pgs.)23
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of MFS Communications Com- pany by K. Kinkopf. (82 pgs.)82
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of Enhanced TeleManagement, Inc. by M. Trinchero. (23 pgs.)23
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of The Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland by J. Meissner. (9 pgs.)9
01/31/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of Communications Buying Group by N. Hawthorne. (3 pgs.)3
01/30/1996Reply comments of The Ashtabula County Telephone Coalition filed by E. Schaeffer. (35 pgs.)35
01/30/1996Letter to confirm and acknowledge that the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association met to discuss the following issues filed by D. Clayton. (2 pgs.)2
01/29/1996Reply comments of the National Emergency Number Association and its Ohio Chapter filed by J. Hobson. (5 pgs.)5
01/25/1996Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Senator M. Ben Gaeth. 1
01/25/1996Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by J. Bednarz. (4 pgs.)4
01/25/1996delete Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Senator M. Ben Gaeth. (2 pgs.)2
01/24/1996Additional information filed on behalf of the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association by D. Clayton. (2 pgs.)2
01/23/1996Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by J. Trudel.2
01/23/1996delete Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by J. Trudel. (2 pgs.)2
01/18/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of North Ridgeville con- sumers by G. Minnick. (10 pgs.)10
01/12/1996Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by F. Gerlach. (1 pg.)1
01/12/1996Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by R. Myers, Jr. (2 pgs.)2
01/09/1996Certificate of service stating that comments were served upon all parties either by hand delivery on December 14, 1995, or by regular U.S. Mail on December 18, 1995, filed on behalf of the Appalachian People's Action Caolition Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by M. Smalz. (4 pgs.)4
01/09/1996Certificate of service stating that comments were served on all parties by U.S. Mail on January 2, 1996, filed on behalf of the Appalachian People's Action Coalition Edge- mont Neighborhood Coalition by M. Smalz. (2 pgs.)2
01/05/1996Certificate of Service filed on behalf of Competitive Telecommunications Association ("CompTel") by L. Oliver.4
01/02/1996Errata filed on behalf of Communications Buying Group by N. Hawthorne. (1 pg.)1
12/29/1995Certificate of service filed on behalf of Enhanced Tele- Management, Inc. by M. Trinchero. (6 pgs.)6
12/29/1995Certificate of service filed on behalf of Scherers Communi- cations Group, Inc. by S. Drombetta. (11 pgs.)11
12/28/1995Certificate of service filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by C. Wilson. (3 pgs.)3
12/27/1995Correction to comments filed on December 14, 1995, filed on behalf of Time Warner by S. Randazzo. (2 pgs.)2
12/22/1995Certificate of service filed on behalf of Edgemont Neigh- borhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (7 pgs.)7
12/22/1995Letter stating that Mike Conrad, Champaign Telephone Com- pany and Jane Gettman, Columbus Grove Telephone Company met with Commissioners Glazer and Fergus on Monday, Decem- ber 18, 1995 and discussed the agenda items which are attached. (2 pgs.)2
12/22/1995Certificate of service filed on behalf of AT&T Communica- tions of Ohio by R. Quinn, Jr. (6 pgs.)6
12/21/1995Certificate of service filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve by K. Hobbs. (3 pgs.)3
12/21/1995Certificate of service filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (4 pgs.)4
12/21/1995Letter requesting to be included on the service list which was attached to the entry dated December 15, 1995, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (1 pg.)1
12/21/1995Errata sheet containing the corrections to the typographical errors in the comments, and certificate of service, filed on behalf of MCI Metro Access by J. Sanders. (6 pgs.)6
12/21/1995Certificate of service filed on behalf of the Ohio Telephone phone Association by J. Prohaska. (4 pgs.)4
12/21/1995Certificate of service filed on behalf of the Small Local Exchange Telephone Companies by J. Prohaska. (4 pgs.)4
12/21/1995Entry ordering that the initial comments of Sprint Telecommunications communications Venture are accepted as timely filed in accordance with Finding 2; that the time frame for sub- submitting reply comments is extended to January 31, 1996; that, in accordance with Finding 4, the corrected service list be used by all entities who have filed initial comments. (AE) (7 pgs.)7
12/20/1995Certificate of service filed on behalf of Century Telephone Co. by V. Norris. (4 pgs.)4
12/20/1995Letter stating that the appearance of GTE Mobilnet and request for service has been served upon the service list identified in the Commission's entry or December 15, 1995, filed by T. Lodge. (1 pg.)1
12/20/1995Certificate of service filed on behalf of Telephone Service Compahy by T. Lodge. (1 pg.)1
12/20/1995Certificate of service filed on behalf of the City of Columbus by G. Dunn. (5 pgs.)5
12/20/1995Certificate of service filed on behalf of the Cities of Delaware, Dublin, Upper Arlington, Westerville, Worthin- ton and the Village of Powell, by G. Dunn. (5 pgs.)5
12/19/1995Letter stating that copies of the initial comments filed December 14, 1995 were served on all entities directed by the entry, filed on behalf of The Chillicothe Telephone Co. by A. Korkosz. (1 pg.)1
12/19/1995Motion for extension of time for filing of comments and responses and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. (6 pgs.)6
12/19/1995Certificate of service filed on behalf of OCC by D. Berg- mann. (5 pgs.)5
12/18/1995Additional information filed on behalf of The Ohio Cable Telecommunications Assn. by D. Clayton. (2 pgs.)2
12/15/1995Comments filed on behalf of Sprint Telecommunications Venture by R. Lipman. (17 pgs.)17
12/15/1995Testimony filed by Sprint/Centel in the Illinois case, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company by W. Walston. (39 pgs.)39
12/15/1995Entry ordering that all entities who have filed initial comments in this matter are to serve promptly copies of those comments, as well as any reply comments, upon each of the other entities listed in Finding 3; that reply comments are due on 1/12/96. (AE) (3 pgs.)3
12/14/1995Comments filed on behalf of the Ashtabula County Telephone Coalition by E. Schaeffer. (16 pgs.)16
12/14/1995Initial comments filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve Telephone by T. Lodge. (94 pgs.)94
12/14/1995Response to Appendix A filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (118 pgs.)118
12/14/1995Comments filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by D. Trabaris. (218 pgs.)218
12/14/1995Initial comments filed on behalf of The Appalachian Peoples Action Coalition (APAC) by M. Smalz. (25 pgs.)25
12/14/1995Comments filed on behalf of The Small Local Exchange Tele- phone Companies by J. Prohaska. (15 pgs.)15
12/14/1995Initial comments filed on behalf of The Chillicothe Tele- phone Co. by A. Korkosz. (11 pgs.)11
12/14/1995Appearance of GTE Mobilnet and request for service filed by T. Lodge. (2 pgs.)2
12/14/1995Separate comments and concurrence filed on behalf of Tele- phone Service Company by T. Lodge. (27 pgs.)27
12/14/1995Initial comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Cable Tele- communications Assn. by D. Clayton. (94 pgs.)94
12/14/1995Joint comments filed on behalf of Ohio Direct Communications Inc. and Ridgefield Homes, Inc. by H. Eckhart. (10 pgs.)10
12/14/1995Initial comments filed on behalf of Time Warner by S. Randazzo and M. Schermer. (86 pgs.)86
12/14/1995Comments filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Campion and J. Sanders. (134 pgs.)134
12/14/1995Comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (298 pgs.)298
12/14/1995Initial comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by R. Quinn, Jr. (220 pgs.)220
12/14/1995Comments filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (124 pgs.)124
12/14/1995Letter stating that USN Communications, Inc. has decided not to submit initial comments in this proceeding, filed by M. Dortch. (1 pg.)1
12/14/1995Initial comments filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio by S. Williams; and Sprint Communications Company, L.P. by M. Jenkins. (150 pgs.)150
12/14/1995Initial comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. (47 pgs.)47
12/14/1995Initial comments filed on behalf of Century Telephone of Ohio, Inc. by D. Conway. (19 pgs.)19
12/14/1995Comments filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by T. Taylor. (116 pgs.)116
12/14/1995Comments filed on behalf of ICG Access Services, Inc. by B. Ferris. (8 pgs.)8
12/14/1995Comments filed on behalf of the Edgemont Neighborhood Coali- tion by E. Jacobs. (34 pgs.)34
12/14/1995Comments filed on behalf of the cities of Delaware, Dublin, Upper Arlington, Westerville, Worthington, and the Village of Powell by G. Dunn. (4 pgs.)4
12/14/1995Comments filed on behalf of the City of Columbus by R. O'Brien, J. Klein, III, and G. Dunn. (6 pgs.)6
12/14/1995Comments filed on behalf of USA Mobile Communications, Inc. II Maximum Communications, Inc.; MobileComm of the North- east, Inc.; paging Network of Ohio, Inc.; and Southern Ohio Communication Services, Inc. by S. Bloomfield. (7 pgs.)7
12/14/1995Initial comments filed on behalf of Communications Buying Group Inc. by N. Hawthorne. (4 pgs.)4
12/14/1995Comments filed on behalf of New Par by A. Miller. (32 pgs.)32
12/14/1995Comments and responses filed on behalf of MFS Communica- tions Company by K. Kinkopf. (114 pgs.)114
12/14/1995Comments filed on behalf of Competitive Telecommunications Association (Comptel) by L. Oliver. (42 pgs.)42
12/14/1995Opening comments filed on behalf of Enhanced TeleManagement Inc. by M. Trinchero. (21 pgs.)21
12/13/1995Comments filed on behalf of Westside Cellular, Inc. dba Cellnet of Ohio, Inc. by J. Migden. (8 pgs.) (FILED 12/12/95)8
12/13/1995Comments filed on behalf of the City of Cleveland by W. Gruber. (13 pgs.)13
12/13/1995Comments filed on behalf of the City of Toledo by K. Bruce. (6 pgs.)6
12/12/1995Comments filed on behalf of The Ohio State Legislative Committee American Association of Retired Persons by M. Grady. (12 pgs.)12
12/12/1995Comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Domestic Violence Network by J. Migden. (3 pgs.)3
12/12/1995Comments filed on behalf of Scherers Communications Group, Inc. by S. Drombetta. (12 pgs.)12
12/07/1995Comments of The Telecommunications Resellers Association filed by A. Isar. (15 pgs.)15
11/27/1995Correspondence letter filed on behalf of Greater Cincinnati Coalition of Deaf and Hearing Impaired by B. Timon. (1 pg.)1
11/24/1995Transcript filed for hearing held 10/27/95, Toledo, Ohio (CG, LC, NS), 52 pgs. sub.52
11/17/1995Comments filed on behalf of the City of Cincinnati by P. Knecht. (3 pgs.) (FILED 11/16/95)3
11/17/1995Transcript filed for hearing held 10/27/95, (DJ), 73 pgs. (Akron, Ohio)73
11/17/1995Transcript filed for hearing held 10/26/95, (CG), 68 pgs. (Vanlue, Ohio)68
11/16/1995Correspondence letters regarding the application, filed by L. Heckman and various consumers. (29 pgs.)26
11/16/1995Joint comments filed on behalf of National Emergency Number Association (NENA) and its Ohio Chapter by J. Hobson. (6 pgs.)6
11/16/1995Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Mayor Dennis Spencer, Village of Williamsburg. (2 pgs.)2
11/15/1995Rochester Telephone Corp. response to AT&T's filing in New York on local competition, filed on behalf of The Ohio Telehone Assoc. by K. Collins. (62 pgs.)62
11/15/1995Several correspondence letters concerning competition, filed by L. Heckman and various consumers. (153 pgs.)153
11/14/1995Comments filed on behalf of The United States Department of Defense and all other Federal Executive Agencies by R. Ganton. (33 pgs.)33
11/13/1995Correspondence letter filed by G. Minnick. (5 pgs.)5
11/13/1995Transcript filed for hearing held 11/1/95, (RF), 57 pgs., Submitted.57
11/13/1995Original and condensed transcripts for the hearing held 10/26/95 in Dayton, Ohio. (68 pgs. total - 2 volumes)68
11/13/1995Correspondence letters by Hilda Miller and Ruth Mihm filed on behalf of the people of Middle Point. (3 pgs.)3
11/13/1995Letter requesting to be added to the service list as counsel for Cincinnati Bell Long Distance, filed by T. Taylor. (2 pgs.)2
11/13/1995Responsive pleading filed by Time Warner at the New York Public Service Commission, filed on behalf of Time Warner by M. Smith. (18 pgs.)18
11/07/1995Transcript filed for hearing held 10/26/95, (RHF), 51 pgs. (Cincinnati, Ohio)51
11/07/1995Transcript filed for hearing held 10/26/95, (RHF), 51 pgs. (Cincinnati, Ohio)51
11/07/1995Comments filed on behalf of the City of Cincinnati by P. Knecht. (3 pgs.)3
11/01/1995Transcript filed for hearing held 10/18/95, (JBB), 84 pgs. (Athens, Ohio)84
10/31/1995Correspondence letters regarding the application, filed by A. Schroeder and various consumers. (49 pgs.)49
10/31/1995Information on a recent AT&T filing in New York that directly relates to the Ohio Commission's pending docket on local competition, filed on behalf of AT&T by K. Pfister. (15 pgs.)15
10/31/1995Transcript for local telephone competition forum for date of 10/13/95, Warren, Ohio. (33 pgs.)33
10/31/1995Entry ordering that the time frames for submitting initial and reply comments and responses are extended to December 14, 1995, and January 12, 1996, respectively. (AE) (4 pgs.)4
10/30/1995Correspondence letter regarding application filed on behalf of the Village of Buckland by D. Green, T. Bice, N. Green, L. Bice, C. Sutton, J. Eisley, D. Lambert, T. Vorhees. (1pg)1
10/30/1995Local telephone uniform service reform effort filed by the City of Brunswick by R. A. Trimble. (4 pgs.)4
10/27/1995Correspondence Letter in regard to application filed by C. Neal. (1 pg.)1
10/26/1995Letter urging the Commission to deny all requests for extensions which have been filed, or which may be filed in the upcoming weeks, filed on behalf of MCI by J. Sanders. (2 pgs.)2
10/26/1995Memorandum contra Ohio Telephone Association's, Telephone Service Company's, and Century Telephone of Ohio's motions for extension of time for filing of comments and replies, filed on behalf of AT&T by R. Quinn, Jr. (5 pgs.)5
10/26/1995Memorandum contra Ohio Telephone Association motion for extension of time, filed on behalf of The Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association by S. Howard. (4 pgs.)4
10/24/1995Transcript filed for hearing held 10/13/95, (CG) (RR) (NS), 74 pgs. (Cleveland, Ohio)74
10/23/1995Transcript filed for hearing held 10/12/95, (CG) (RR) (NS), 138 pgs. (Cleveland Heights, Ohio)138
10/23/1995Memorandum contra OCC's motion and memorandum in support of extension of time, and alternative recommendation of Time Warner for extension of time for filing of reply comments to December 22, 1995, filed on behalf of Time Warner Com- munications by R. Rosenberry. (3 pgs.)3
10/19/1995Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Lucas County)1
10/19/1995Motion in response to motions for extension of time for filing of comments and responses and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (5 pgs.)5
10/18/1995Memorandum of MCI Telecommunications Corp and MCI Metro Access Transmission Services contra the motion for extension of time, filed by D. Townsley and J. Sanders. (4 pgs.)4
10/17/1995Memorandum contra Ohio Telephone Association's motion for extension of time for filing of comments and replies, filed on behalf of Time Warner AXS of Ohio by R. Rosenberry. (4 pgs.)4
10/17/1995Separate motion for extension of time to file comments, filed on behalf of Telephone Service Company by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.)4
10/13/1995Proof of Publication filed. (2 pgs.) (Wyandot County)2
10/13/1995Motion for extension of time for filing of comments and responses and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of Century Telephone Co. by D. Conway. (3 pgs.)3
10/13/1995Proof of Publication filed. (2 pgs.) (Summit County)2
10/11/1995Statement of joinder in and support of The Ohio Telephone Association's motion for extension of time for filing of comments and responses of Arcadia Telephone Co., The Arthur Mutual Telephone Co., The Ayersville Telephone Co., The Champaign Telephone Co., Continental Telephone Co., The Fort Jennings Telephone Co., Glandorf Telephone Co., The Kalida Telephone Co., Little Miami Communication Corp, Oakwood Telephone Co., The Ottoville Mutual Telephone Co., The Sycamore Telephone Co., and Telephone Service Co. filed by J. Prohaska. (2 pgs.)2
10/11/1995Motion for extension of time for filing of comments and responses and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. (2 pgs.)2
10/06/1995Proof of Publication filed. (Trumbull County) (1 pg.)1
10/05/1995Comments filed on behalf of USA Mobile Communications, Inc. II, Maximum Communications, Inc., MobileComm of the North- east, Inc., Paging Network of Ohio, Inc., and Southern Ohio Communication Services, Inc. by S. Bloomfield. (7 pgs.) AT&T Communications of Illinois Inc.'s petition for a total local exchange wholesale service filed on behalf of AT&T by K. Pfister. (35 pgs.)35
10/05/1995Proof of Publication filed. (Stark County) (1 pg.)1
10/04/1995Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Hamilton County)1
09/28/1995Entry ordering that all interested stakeholders are invited to file comments and reply comments to the proposal, set forth in Appendices A and B, and responses to the questions set forth in Appendix C, by November 14, 1995, and December 5, 1995, respectively; that the September 21, 1995 Commis- sion entry is amended and republication of legal notice is ordered in accordance with Finding 3. Concurring Opinion of Chairman Craig A. Glazer. (87 pgs.) (ISSUED 9/27/95)87
09/22/1995Legal Notice sent to: Athens Messenger (Athens Co.), Plain Dealer (Cuyahoga Co.), Columbus Dispatch (Franklin Co) Cincinnati Enquirer (Hamilton Co.), The Courier (Hancock Co) The Blade (Lucas Co.), Dayton Daily (Montgomery Co.), Canton Repository (Stark Co.), Akron-Beacon (Summit Co.), Warren Tribune (Trumbull Co.) & Daily Chief Union (Wyandot Co.) Certified Mail.3
09/21/1995Entry ordering that this matter proceed in the framework outlined in Finding 2; that the ex parte process set forth in Finding 5 is adopted for purposes of this proceeding; that the local public forums be held as follows: Athens - 10/11/95 at 5:30 p.m., City Hall Council Chambers Cleveland Heights - 10/12/95 at 7:15 p.m., The Civic Cleveland - 10/13/95 at 10:00 a.m., Lausche State Office Bldg. Warren - 10/13/95 at 10:00 a.m., Warren-Trumbull County Public Library Dayton - 10/26/95 at 11:00 a.m., Dayton Municipal Bldg. Cincinnati - 10/26/95 at 6:30 p.m., City Hall Council Cham- bers Vanlue - 10/26/95 at 7:15 p.m. at Vanlue Community Bldg. Akron - 10/27/95 at 10:00 a.m. at Ocasek Government Office Bldg. Toledo - 10/27/95 at 10:15 a.m. at Toledo Government Center Columbus - 11/1/95 at 6:30 p.m. at the PUCO (7 pgs.)7
09/14/1995In the matter of the Commission investigation relative to the establishment of local exchange competition and other competitive issues. (1 pg.) (FILED 9/12/95)1