DIS - Case Record for 96-0694-TP-ARB Skip to main content

Case Record For:

96-0694-TP-ARB

Case Title: TCG CLEVELAND/AMERITECH OHIO
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: ARB-Petition for arbitration
Date Opened: 7/17/1996
Date Closed: 12/24/1996
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
08/25/2009Confidential Release: Exceptions to the arbitration panel's report and requests for clarification filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway filed on October 15, 1996.20
08/25/2009Confidential Release: Unredacted pages of testimony of William Page Montgomery filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston filed on September 3, 1996.6
08/25/2009Confidential Release: Response to TCG's petition for arbitration filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway filed on August 12, 1996.67
08/25/2009Confidential Release: Identification of unresolved issues for arbitration statement of position on each unresolved issue and summary of resolved issues filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway filed September 3, 1996.31
08/25/2009Confidential Release: Direct testimony of James E. Farmer filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway filed on September 3, 1996.25
08/25/2009Confidential Release: Direct testimony of Suzanne J. Springsteen filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway filed on September 3, 1996.5
08/25/2009Confidential Release: Directed testimony of Dr. Kent A. Currie filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway filed on September 3, 1996.46
08/25/2009Confidential Release: Exhibits to the transcript of hearing on 9/10/96 filed on September 12, 1996.169
01/10/2000Entry ordering that Ameritech's December 14, 1999 motion to renew the protective orders in this case is granted; that, for 18 months from the date of this entry, the Docketing Division of the Commission should continue to maintain under seal the information that is currently under seal in this docket. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
12/14/1999Motion to renew protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (7 pgs.)7
08/24/1999Notice of substitution of counsel filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. (3 pgs.)3
10/22/1998Notice of address change filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Weston. (3 pgs.)3
10/13/1998Notice of substitution of counsel filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Kahn and D. Chorzempa. (3 pgs.)3
10/06/1998Withdrawal of counsel filed by B. Weston. (2 pgs.)2
07/29/1998Entry ordering that the motions of Ameritech to renew the protective orders previously granted in this case is granted; that the Docketing Division of the Commission shall maintain under seal the information currently under seal for 18 months from the date of this entry, except as specifically delineated in Finding 6. (AE) (3 pgs.)3
07/06/1998Ameritech Ohio's supplemental memorandum in support of its motion for renewed protective order filed by D. Conway. (19 pgs.)19
06/02/1998Memorandum in response to Ameritech's renewed motion for protective order filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Weston. (2 pgs.)2
05/29/1998Ameritech Ohio's Renewed Motion for Protective Order. Submitted by: D. Conway. (6 pgs.)6
04/24/1997Entry approving the application and closing this case of record. (3 pgs.)3
03/27/1997Amended interconnection agreement between TCG Cleveland and Ameritech Ohio filed by M. Stemm. (77 pgs.)77
02/27/1997Entry ordering that on or before March 31, 1997, the parties should file the amendment to their interconnection agreement that reflects the Commission's decision on the governing law issue for the Commission's review and approval. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
12/24/1996Opinion & Order that the Docketing Division of the Commis- sion maintain, under seal, all materials previously ruled to be confidential, for 18 months from the date of the Arbitration Award; that the 251/252 agreement shall be governed as set forth in this Order; that the interconnec- tion arrangement between Ameritech and TCG are approved in accordance with and to the extent set forth in this Order; that the parties should keep the Commission apprised of their efforts to implement the terms of these arrangements; unless an application for rehearing is filed within 30 days of this Order, this decision is a final appealable Order; that this case be closed of record. (14 pgs.)14
12/23/1996Letter stating that Ameritech does not object to the Com- mission issuing its decision by December 24, 1996, filed by D. Conway. (1 pg.)1
12/13/1996Letter stating that Ameritech Ohio does not object to the Commission issuing its decision during the calendar week following December 14, 1996 filed by D. Conway. (1 pg.)1
12/12/1996Letter stating that TCG does not object to the Commission timeline filed by B. Weston. (1 pg.)1
12/02/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Wes- ton. (2 pgs.)2
11/25/1996TCG Cleveland's comments filed by B. Weston. (3 pgs.)3
11/25/1996Comments of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by A. Kelsey. (6 pgs.)6
11/20/1996Correction to Ameritech's version of the remaining language needed for Section 29.6, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio b D. Conway. (5 pgs.)5
11/19/1996Ameritech's version of the remaining language needed for Section 29.6 with a brief statement of support, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (2 pgs.)2
11/19/1996Version of the language which should be used in a Commission approved interconnection agreement, filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by D. Trabaris. (2 pgs.)2
11/15/1996Joint Exhibit 2, interconnection agreement between Ameritech Information Industry Services, a division of Ameritech Services, Inc. on behalf of Ameritech Ohio, and TCG Cleve- land filed. (70 pgs.) (FILED 11/4/96)70
11/15/1996Entry ordering that written comments supporting or opposing the proposed interconnection agreement be filed by November 25, 1996; that any responses to those comments be filed by December 2, 1996. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
11/14/1996Interconnection Agreement under Sections 251 and 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; and Agreement for Enhanced 9-1-1 service, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Con- way. (93 pgs.)93
11/01/1996Service Notice.0
10/31/1996Arbitration Award ordering that Ameritech's October 15, 1996 motion for a protective order is granted; that the Docketing Division maintain, under seal, the unredacted copy of Ameritech's exceptions to the arbitration panel report filed on October 15, 1996, for 18 months from the date of this award; that TCG and Ameritech incorporate the directives as set forth in this arbitration award within their interconnection agreement; that B&K shall be the com- pensation method for transport and termination of calls for a period of time no greater than 12 months, unless further extended by the Commission; that, within 14 days of this arbitration award, TCG and Ameritech file in this docket their interconnection agreement for review; that any motions not expressly ruled upon in this award are denied; that this docket shall remain open until further order of the Commis- sion. (21 pgs.)21
10/18/1996Reply to TCG's exceptions to the arbitration panel's report filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (13 pgs.)13
10/18/1996Reply to Ameritech's exceptions, filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston. (29 pgs.)29
10/15/1996Motion for protective order and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston.116
10/15/1996Exceptions to the arbitration panel's report and requests for clarification filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (19 pgs.) (UNREDACTED COPY - FILED UNDER SEAL)19
10/15/1996Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (6 pgs.)6
10/15/1996Exceptions to the arbitration panel's report and requests for clarification filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (19 pgs.)19
10/15/1996Exceptions to the arbitration panel report filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston. (16 pgs.)16
10/09/1996Responses to data requests filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston. (5 pgs.)5
10/09/1996Response to question posed by Nadia Soliman, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (2 pgs.)2
10/09/1996Responses to Nadia Soliman's requests for information, filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston. (2 pgs.)2
10/09/1996Arbitration Panel Report submitted by the PUCO staff. (33 pgs.)33
10/03/1996Transcript filed for hearing held 9/19/96, (MKF), 78 pgs., Con't. (Columbus, OH-PUCO)78
10/03/1996Transcript filed for hearing held 9/19/96, (MKF), 78 pgs., Con't. (Columbus, OH-PUCO)78
09/27/1996Joint motion for leave to intervene of Sprint Communications Company L.P. and United Telephone Company of Ohio filed by M. Jenkins. (6 pgs.)6
09/18/1996Confidential transcript of hearing held 9/10/96, 4 pgs., Volume II. (FILED UNDER SEAL ON 9/12/96)4
09/18/1996Ameritech Exhibit No. 7. (21 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL ON 9/12/96)21
09/18/1996Transcript filed for hearing held 9/16/96, (GP) (NS) (AW) (NG) (RM), 90 pgs., Submitted. (Columbus, OH-PUCO) (Vol- ume V)90
09/16/1996Transcript of hearing held 9/12/1996, PUCO . (Gretchen Petrucci) Vol IV.31
09/16/1996Composite index of hearings filed.6
09/16/1996Exhibits to hearing held Sept.11, 1996 (vol III) 31
09/16/1996Transcript of hearing held Sept. 11, 1996 . (Vol. III. )47
09/16/1996Transcript for hearing held 9/12/96, (GP) (NS) (AW) (NG) (RM), Vol. IV, 31 pgs. cont.31
09/16/1996Transcript for hearing held 9/11/96, (GP) (NS) (AW) (NG) (RM), Vol. III, 47 pgs. cont.47
09/13/1996TCG exhibits 2 and 7 filed with vol. I transcript for hear- ing held 9/9/96. (8pgs.) (filed 9/11/96) (filed under seal)8
09/12/1996Transcript filed for hearing held 9/10/96, (GP) (NS) (AW) (NG) (RM), 74 pgs., Con't. (Columbus, OH-PUCO) (Volume II)74
09/12/1996Confidential exhibits to the transcript of hearing on 9/10/96. (119 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)119
09/11/1996Transcript filed for hearing held September 9, 1996, (GP) 192 pgs Submitted. (Volume I)192
09/05/1996Entry ordering that Time Warner's limited motion to inter- vene (for the sole purpose of supporting the severance of the TELRIC cost studies) is granted; that the interlocutory appeals of Ameritech and MCI are denied; that Case No. 96- 922-TP-UNC be consolidated with Case No. 96-702-TP-COI; scheduling a conference in consolidated Case Nos. 96-702- TP-COI and 96-922-TP-UNC at 1:00 p.m. on September 19, 1996 at the Commission offices. (9 pgs.)9
09/05/1996Errata to Ameritech Ohio's exhibit list filed by D. Conway. (6 pgs)6
09/04/1996Application for issuance of subpoenas duces tecum and memor- andum in support filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston. (6 pgs.)6
09/04/1996Motion to intervene adn response to interlocutory appeal and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Time Warner by D. Clayton and M. Schermer. (8 pgs.)8
09/04/1996Memorandum in response to motion for clarification, inter- locutory appeal and or motion for clarification of MCI Telecommunications Corp., filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (4 pgs.)4
09/04/1996Motion for an extension of time and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston. (6 pgs.)6
09/04/1996Memorandum in opposition to Ameritech Ohio's interlocutory appeal of hearing examiner's order granting joint motion to sever, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by R. Quinn, Jr. (33 pgs.)33
09/04/1996Memorandum contra interlocutory appeals of Ameritech and MCI filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston. (24 pgs.)24
09/04/1996Testimony of Kenneth A. Shulman filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland. (6 pgs.)6
09/04/1996Response to interlocutory appeal filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (2 pgs.)2
09/03/1996Ameritech Exhibit A. 13 from hearing. Vol IV.11
09/03/1996Exhibits, Ameritech II, hearing.24
09/03/1996Unredacted identification of unresolved issues for arbi- tration, statement of position on each unresolved issue and summary of resolved issues filed on behalf of Ameri- tech Ohio by D. Conway. (115 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)115
09/03/1996Unredacted pages of testimony of William Page Montgomery filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston. (7 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)7
09/03/1996Motion for protective order and request for an expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston. (5 pgs.)5
09/03/1996Testimony of William Page Montgomery filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston. (71 pgs.)71
09/03/1996Arbitration package filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston. (12 pgs.)12
09/03/1996Motion for certification, interlocutory appeal and or motion for clarification filed on behalf of MCI Tele- communications by D. Townsley and J. Sanders. (10 pgs.)10
09/03/1996Direct testimony of Suzanne J. Springsteen filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (4 pgs.)4
09/03/1996Identification of unresolved issues for arbitration, state- ment of position on each unresolved issue and summary of resolved issues filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Con- way. (30 pgs.)30
09/03/1996Direct testimony of James E. Farmer filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (24 pgs.)24
09/03/1996Directed testimony of Dr. Kent A. Currie filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (26 pgs.)26
09/03/1996Direct testimony of Debra J. Aron and Robert G. Harris filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (22 pgs.)22
09/03/1996Direct testimony of William J. McSorley filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (10 pgs.)10
09/03/1996Porposed Exhibits filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (9 pgs.)9
09/03/1996Letter regarding Ameritech Ohio's arbitration package filed by D. Conway. (1 pg.)1
09/03/1996Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (6 pgs.)6
09/03/1996Interlocutory appeal filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (10 pgs.)10
09/03/1996Entry ordering that the interlocutory appeals of MCI and Ameritech are hereby certified to the Commission. (AE) (4 pgs.)4
08/30/1996Memorandum in response to motion to consolidate filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (4 pgs.)4
08/30/1996Entry ordering that the joint motion of TCG and AT&T to sever the cost issues contained in their arbitration is granted; that MCI's motion to consolidate arbitration proceedings is denied; that any interlocutory appeal of these rulings be filed with the Commission by noon on September 3, 1996; the party who files an interlocutory appeal shall serve a copy of that pleading upon all parties by facsimile by noon on September 3, 1996; that any re- sponses to an interlocutory appeal be filed with the Com- mission by noon on September 4, 1996; any party who files a response to an interlocutory appeal shall serve a copy of that pleading upon all other parties by facsimile by noon on September 4, 1996. (AE) (5 pgs.)5
08/29/1996Response to motion of MCI Telecommunications Corp. to con- solidate petitions for arbitration, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications by B. Kahn. (4 pgs.)4
08/28/1996Letter supporting the motion to sever the cost issues, filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston. (1 pg.)1
08/26/1996Service Notice0
08/26/1996Ameritech Ohio's memorandum contra motion to sever cost issues filed by M. Stemm. (8 pgs.)8
08/26/1996Entry ordering that the arbitration hearing commence at 9:30 on Sept. 9, 1996 and continue for a maximum of four days. If the hearing does not conclude until Sept 12, 1996, oral argu arguments shall be held on Sept 16, 1996 beginning at 9:30 at the Commission. If the hearing concludes before Sept 12, oral arguments shall be held on Sept 13, 1996 at 9:30 a.m. Ordered that the parties' arbitration packages be filed and a copy served upon the other party by noon on Sept 3, 1996. That the second conference be held at 3:30 p.m. on Sept 4; and that Ameritech's August 12th motion for protective order is granted.3
08/19/1996Joint motion to sever cost issues and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of TCG by B. Weston; and AT&T by R. Quinn. (10 pgs.)10
08/15/1996Preliminary statement regarding the arbitration petition of TCG Cleveland submitted by William Page Montgomery filed by B. Weston. (283 pgs.)283
08/12/1996Response to TCG's petition for arbitration, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway.67
08/12/1996Response to TCG's petition for arbitration filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (66 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)66
08/12/1996Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (5 pgs.)5
08/12/1996Motion to consolidate petitions for arbitration and memor- andum in support filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications by D. Townsley and J. Sanders. (8 pgs.)8
08/09/1996Entry denying the motions for a protective order of TCG and Ameritech; that the Commission's docketing division should remove the unredacted copy of TCG's July 17, 1996 motion, including the attachments,and place it in the open record if no interlocutory appeal is filed by 8/14/96. (AE) (3 pgs.)3
08/02/1996Letter to Bruce J. Weston and Daniel R. Conway confirming telephone conversation regarding a conference, filed by G. Petrucci, PUCO staff.2
08/01/1996Memorandum in support of TCG Cleveland's motion for pro- tective order, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (5 pgs.)5
07/17/1996In the matter of the petition of TCG Cleveland for arbitration of open issues pursuant to 252(b) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to establish an interconnection agreement with Ameritech Ohio.206
07/17/1996Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by D. Trabaris.18
07/17/1996Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston.18
07/17/1996Unredacted copies of confidential information, filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston. (115 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)115