DIS - Case Record for 96-0565-TP-UNC Skip to main content

Case Record For:

96-0565-TP-UNC

File a Public Comment
Case Title: AMERITECH OHIO/MFS INTELENET OF OH
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: UNC-Unclassified
Date Opened: 6/4/1996
Date Closed: 8/29/1996
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
03/07/1997Notice of withdrawal of counsel filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications by R. Rosenberry. (2 pgs.)2
10/30/1996Opinion and order, ordering that the interconnection agreement between Ameritech and MFS is approved.12
10/30/1996Ameritech's Ohio's application for approval of an agreement, filed by M. Mulcahy.7
08/29/1996Opinion & Order approving the interconnection in accordance with and to the extent set forth in this order; that no changes in the proposed arrangement, including modification specifically provided for in the arrangement, shall occur without Commission approval; that MFS shall keep the Com- mission informed of its efforts to reach interconnection agreements with other LECs and shall provide to the Com- mission, by no later than the 150th day following the Ameritech/MFS interconnection activation date, a written report of the status of all such negotiations. (12 pgs.)12
07/29/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (8 pgs.)8
07/18/1996Comments filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders. (9 pgs.)9
07/18/1996Comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (7 pgs.)7
07/18/1996Comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Cable Telecommunica- tions Assn. by S. Howard. (4 pgs.)4
07/18/1996Comments filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston. (4 pgs.)4
07/18/1996Supplemental comments filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (4 pgs.)4
07/18/1996Additional comments filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by M. Jenkins. (13 pgs.)13
07/15/1996Motion to withdraw filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by M. Jenkins. (2 pgs.)2
07/15/1996Reply to comments on the interconnection agreement between Ameritech Ohio and MFS Intelenet of Ohio, filed on behalf of MFS Intelenet of Ohio by M. Albert. (9 pgs.)9
07/15/1996Ameritech Ohio's reply comments filed by M. Mulcahy. (8 pgs)8
07/08/1996Ameritech Ohio's Memorandum contra Sprint Communications motion to intervene filed by M. Mulcahy. (3 pgs.)3
07/05/1996Comments of MCI Telecommunications Corporation filed by D. Townsley, J. Sanders. (4 pgs.)4
07/05/1996Entry ordering that all interested persons or entities are invited to file comments which address the issue of whether the interconnection agreement submitted in this case fulfills the criteria of sections 271(c)(1)(a) and/or 271(c) (2)(B) of the Act. Such comments must be filed in this docket, and served upon Ameritech Ohio and MFS and their counsel on or before July 18, 1996, and that Ameritech Ohio and MFS shall file reply comments, if any and serve such upon all persons or entities who will have timely filed initial comments on this separate issue, by no later than July 29. 1996. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
07/05/1996Comments of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. on the inter- connection agreement by and between Ameritech information industry services and MFS Intelenet of Ohio, Inc. filed by B. Kahn. (9 pgs.)9
07/05/1996Comments of The Office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by D. Bergmann. (6 pgs.)6
07/05/1996Comments of the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition filed by E. Jacobs. (5 pgs.)5
07/05/1996Comments of Sprint Communications Company L.P. filed by M. Jenkins. (5 pgs.)5
07/03/1996Initial comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Communi- cations of Ohio by D. Clayton and M. Schermer. (7 pgs.)7
06/20/1996Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by M. Jenkins. (5 pgs.)5
06/13/1996Entry ordering that all interested persons or entities are invited to file comments which address either one or both of two issues presented for Commission consideration in this case; such comments must be filed and served upon Ameritech and MFS and its counsel by 7/5/96; that Ameritech and MFS shall file reply comments, if any, which must be served upon all persons or entities who will have timely filed initial comments by 7/15/96. (3 pgs.)3
06/05/1996Correction to Footnote 1 of its application, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (1 pg.)1
06/04/1996In the matter of the application of Ameritech Ohio for approval of an agreement between Ameritech Ohio and MFS Intelenet of Ohio pursuant to Section 252 of the Tele- communications Act of 1996. (135 pgs.)135