DIS - Case Record for 96-0565-TP-UNC Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 96-0565-TP-UNC
CASE DESCRIPTION: AMERITECH OHIO/MFS INTELENET OF OH
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 4/25/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
03/07/1997 Notice of withdrawal of counsel filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications by R. Rosenberry. (2 pgs.)
10/30/1996 Opinion and order, ordering that the interconnection agreement between Ameritech and MFS is approved.
10/30/1996 Ameritech's Ohio's application for approval of an agreement, filed by M. Mulcahy.
08/29/1996 Opinion & Order approving the interconnection in accordance with and to the extent set forth in this order; that no changes in the proposed arrangement, including modification specifically provided for in the arrangement, shall occur without Commission approval; that MFS shall keep the Com- mission informed of its efforts to reach interconnection agreements with other LECs and shall provide to the Com- mission, by no later than the 150th day following the Ameritech/MFS interconnection activation date, a written report of the status of all such negotiations. (12 pgs.)
07/29/1996 Reply comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (8 pgs.)
07/18/1996 Comments filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders. (9 pgs.)
07/18/1996 Comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (7 pgs.)
07/18/1996 Comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Cable Telecommunica- tions Assn. by S. Howard. (4 pgs.)
07/18/1996 Comments filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston. (4 pgs.)
07/18/1996 Supplemental comments filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (4 pgs.)
07/18/1996 Additional comments filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by M. Jenkins. (13 pgs.)
07/15/1996 Motion to withdraw filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by M. Jenkins. (2 pgs.)
07/15/1996 Reply to comments on the interconnection agreement between Ameritech Ohio and MFS Intelenet of Ohio, filed on behalf of MFS Intelenet of Ohio by M. Albert. (9 pgs.)
07/15/1996 Ameritech Ohio's reply comments filed by M. Mulcahy. (8 pgs)
07/08/1996 Ameritech Ohio's Memorandum contra Sprint Communications motion to intervene filed by M. Mulcahy. (3 pgs.)
07/05/1996 Comments of MCI Telecommunications Corporation filed by D. Townsley, J. Sanders. (4 pgs.)
07/05/1996 Entry ordering that all interested persons or entities are invited to file comments which address the issue of whether the interconnection agreement submitted in this case fulfills the criteria of sections 271(c)(1)(a) and/or 271(c) (2)(B) of the Act. Such comments must be filed in this docket, and served upon Ameritech Ohio and MFS and their counsel on or before July 18, 1996, and that Ameritech Ohio and MFS shall file reply comments, if any and serve such upon all persons or entities who will have timely filed initial comments on this separate issue, by no later than July 29. 1996. (AE) (2 pgs.)
07/05/1996 Comments of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. on the inter- connection agreement by and between Ameritech information industry services and MFS Intelenet of Ohio, Inc. filed by B. Kahn. (9 pgs.)
07/05/1996 Comments of The Office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by D. Bergmann. (6 pgs.)
07/05/1996 Comments of the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition filed by E. Jacobs. (5 pgs.)
07/05/1996 Comments of Sprint Communications Company L.P. filed by M. Jenkins. (5 pgs.)
07/03/1996 Initial comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Communi- cations of Ohio by D. Clayton and M. Schermer. (7 pgs.)
06/20/1996 Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by M. Jenkins. (5 pgs.)
06/13/1996 Entry ordering that all interested persons or entities are invited to file comments which address either one or both of two issues presented for Commission consideration in this case; such comments must be filed and served upon Ameritech and MFS and its counsel by 7/5/96; that Ameritech and MFS shall file reply comments, if any, which must be served upon all persons or entities who will have timely filed initial comments by 7/15/96. (3 pgs.)
06/05/1996 Correction to Footnote 1 of its application, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (1 pg.)
06/04/1996 In the matter of the application of Ameritech Ohio for approval of an agreement between Ameritech Ohio and MFS Intelenet of Ohio pursuant to Section 252 of the Tele- communications Act of 1996. (135 pgs.)