DIS - Case Record for 97-1066-TP-PEX Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 97-1066-TP-PEX
CASE DESCRIPTION: JANET WALTERS/GTE NORTH ET AL
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 4/26/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
03/23/2000 Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Check List, 390th sheet 1, 87th sheet 5; Contenct, 47th sheet 1; Section 2.1, 10th sheet 19; Section 3, 18th sheet 1, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy. (7 pgs.)
03/14/2000 Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Check List, 390th sheet 1; Section 2.3, 27th sheet 5, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy. (3 pgs.)
03/10/2000 Revised tariff, PUCO No. 3, Section 3, 5th page 7, 2nd page 10, filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by E. King. (3 pgs.)
12/09/1999 Letter stating that Cincinnati Bell Telephone and GTE North have established April 12, 2000 as the implementation date for two-way nonoptional flat-rate extended area service between CBT's Cincinnati and Clermont exchanges and the Higginsport exchange served by GTE North, filed by E. King. (2 pgs.)
11/05/1999 Letter regarding the date for institution of two-way, flat rate EAS between GTE's Higginsport exchange and the CBT Co. and Clermont. Filed by J. Kennedy (1 pg) (FILED 11/3/99)
08/26/1999 Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Brown County)
08/12/1999 Supplemental Opinion & Order that two-way, flat-rate EAS be instituted between the Higginsport Exchange of GTE and the Cincinnati and Clermont exchanges of Cincinnati Bell within 12 months and that the respondents make every effort to pro- vide service as soon as practicable; that the respondents establish an in-service date within four months of this supplemental order, inform the Commission of the date, and advise the Commission not later than 60 days prior to the in-service date in the event the date cannot be met; that the respondents are authorized to file three copies of re- vised tariff sheets. (4 pgs.)
07/16/1999 Results of the balloting conducted in the Higginsport ex- change, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy. (1 pg.)
07/02/1999 Ballots filed on behalf of complainant.
06/18/1999 Request that the implementation date for the establishment of EAS between the Higginsport exchange and the Cincinnati and Clermont exchanges be set at twelve months following the forthcoming supplemental finding and order, filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by E. King. (3 pgs.)
05/19/1999 Opinion & Order granting the request for two-way, non- optional, flat-rate EAS between the Higginsport exchange and the Cincinnati and Clermont exchanges, provided that a substantial majority of the Higginsport subscribers is willing to pay appropriate rates for the service; denying the request for two-way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS, or any alternative form of EAS, between the Higginsport exchange and the Bethel and Mt. Orab exchanges; accordingly, those exchanges are dismissed from this proceeding; that the com- plainants have failed to show a community of interest be- tween the Higginsport exchange and the Ripley exchange suf- ficient to warrant converting the existing measured-rate EAS to flat-rate EAS; that the complainants canvass the Higgins- port exchange subscribers and report the results to the Com- mission by July 19, 1999. (25 pgs.)
05/10/1999 Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Brown County)
05/06/1999 Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Butler County)
05/04/1999 Proof of Publication filed. (2 pgs.) (Clermont County)
04/30/1999 Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Hamilton County)
04/15/1999 Entry ordering that the secretary of the Commission cause publication of the legal notice set forth in Finding 5; that the parties comply with the procedural requirements in accordance with Finding 6. (AE) (4 pgs.)
04/15/1999 Legal Notice sent to: Journal News (Brown Co.); News Democrat (Butler Co.); Clermont Community Journal (Clermont Co.) & Cincinnati Enquirer (Hamilton Co.) by FAX.
03/18/1999 Transcript filed for hearing held 3/3/99, (DJ), 167 pgs. (Higginsport, Ohio)
03/02/1999 Testimony of Evelyn W. King filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by R. Shank. (11 pgs.)
02/24/1999 Testimony and attachments of Patricia J. Cook filed on be- half of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keating. (21 pgs.)
02/24/1999 Testimony of Jacqueline M. Young filed on behalf of respon- dent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (18 pgs.)
02/18/1999 Correspondence letter form Doug White. (1 pg)
01/27/1999 Entry ordering that Little Miami is dismissed from this proceeding and relieved of any pending obligations or orders; scheduling a public hearing at 10:00 a.m. on March 3, 1999, at Higginsport School, Higginsport, Ohio; that any person or entity requesting intervention in this matter do so by February 17, 1999; that any party intending to present direct expert testimony file such testimony and serve a copy upon all parties by February 24, 1999. (AE) (5 pgs.)
01/25/1999 Letter adding the Hamilton exchange to the list that will not be included in toll-free calling from Higginsport filed by J. Walters. (1 pg)
01/11/1999 More exchanges to be added to the petition, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Walters. (1 pg.)
01/11/1999 Additional list of phone exchanges to be included in the petition, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Walters. (1 pg.)
12/17/1998 Supplemental information response filed on behalf of respon- dent, GTE North, by W. Keating. (9 pgs.)
12/17/1998 Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Cin- cinnati Bell, by J. Harrison. (8 pgs.)
12/17/1998 Testimony of Evelyn W. King regarding cost data filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by J. Harrison. (6 pgs.)
12/11/1998 Submission of calling information by Cincinnati Bell Tele- phone filed by J. Harrison. (6 pgs)
11/18/1998 Entry ordering that respondents file cost data by December 17, 1998; scheduling a settlement conference by telephone at 10:00 a.m. on December 3, 1998. (AE) (4 pgs.)
07/15/1998 Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (10 pgs.)
07/08/1998 Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Little Miami Communications, by G. Cooper. (43 pgs.)
07/06/1998 Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Cin- cinnati Bell, by R. Shank. (59 pgs.)
06/10/1998 Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (77 pgs.)
06/10/1998 Information response filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart. (47 pgs.)
06/10/1998 Entry ordering that CBLD file by June 18, 1998 an affidavit confirming that it has provided calling information to the respondent LECs or, otherwise, explain its failure for not having provided such information; that Worldcom's request for waiver shall be granted; that MCI's motion to extend until June 22, 1998, the time within which to provide call- ing information to the LECs is granted; that MCI, upon the submission of calling information to the LECs, shall file an affidavit attesting that it has submitted information in compliance with the March 10, 1998 entry; that the prehear- ing conference scheduled for June 17, 1998, is canceled and shall be rescheduled at a later date. (AE) (4 pgs.) (ISSUED 6/5/98)
06/05/1998 Affidavit stating MCI Telecommunications Corp. has forwarded their calling statistics between exchanges in this pro- ceeding to the respondent. Submited by: J. Sanders. (1 pg.)
05/26/1998 Motion for extension of time and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (5 pgs.)
05/14/1998 Affidavit of Kim Logue informing the Commission that LCI has submitted the required calling information to the designated local exchange companies, filed by K. Logue. (2 pgs.)
05/12/1998 Additional information filed on behalf of respondent, WorldCom Technologies, by B. Ferris. (1 pg.)
05/11/1998 Affidavit of Kenton J. Pfister on behalf of AT&T. (4 pgs.)
05/08/1998 Affidavit of LaTrischa Miles on behalf of Sprint Communica- tions Company L.P. (2 pgs)
03/30/1998 Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by J. Harrison. (4 pgs.)
03/30/1998 Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Little Miami Com- munications Corp., by G. Cooper. (4 pgs.)
03/30/1998 Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (3 pgs.)
03/30/1998 Answer filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart. (3 pgs.)
03/10/1998 Entry ordering respondents to file answers and serve copies upon the spokesperson for the complainants by 3/30/98; that AT&T, CBLD, LCI, MCI, Worldcom and Sprint provide the infor- mation required in Finding 3 to the respondents and file an affidavit on or before 5/11/98; that respondents comply with Finding 5; that respondents provide information required by Finding 6 by 6/10/98; provide the information required by Finding 7 by 7/15/98; that the parties comply with Finding 8; that a settlement conference be scheduled in accordance with Finding 9; and a copy of the petition be served upon the respondents. (DJ) (8 pgs)
09/12/1997 In the matter of the petition of Janet Walters and sub- scribers of the Higginsport, Ohio 375 exchange for ex- tended area service to the following exchanges: 734, 735 Bethel, 288 Danville, 528, 553, 557, 732, 737, 752, 753, 794, 797, 943, all of Clermont Co., 373 Decatur, 875 Fay- etteville, 444 Mt. Orab, 442 Mowrystown, 392 Ripley, 377 Russellvisse, 446 Sardinia, 927 sugar Tree Ridge, 695 Win- chester, and all of the Greater Cininnati area of GTE North Incorporated, Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, Little Miami Communications (TDS Telecom, Inc.), and Ameritech Ohio. (20 pgs.)