| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 09/28/2000 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Contents, 48th sheet 1; Check List, 394th sheet 1, 89th sheet 5; Section 2.1, 11th sheet 19; Section 3-Hanoverton, 19th sheet 1, filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by J. Kennedy. (6 pgs.) | 6 |
| 09/27/2000 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 20, Section 1, 4th sheet 25 filed on behalf of applicant by M. Schaedler. (2 pgs.) (98-979) | 2 |
| 04/21/2000 | Letter to Commission reporting that in-service the for the institution of two way flat rate EAS between GTE's Hanoverton and Ameritech's Salem exchange is October 4, 2000, filed on behalf of GTE North, Inc. by J. Kennedy. | 1 |
| 04/20/2000 | Letter regarding GTE North Inc. reports that the in-service date for the institution of two-way flat-rate EAS between GTE's Hanoverton and Ameritech's Salem exchanges is 10/4/2000. filed by J. Kennedy (1 pg) | 1 |
| 04/19/2000 | Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. | 2 |
| 04/02/2000 | Letter stating that the in-service date for the institution of two-way flat-rate EAS between GTE's Hanoverton and Ameritech's Salem exchanges is October 4, 2000, filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Kennedy. | 1 |
| 03/28/2000 | Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (8 pgs.) | 8 |
| 01/12/2000 | Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (121 pgs.) | 121 |
| 12/09/1999 | Supplemental Opinion & Order that, upon condition of Ameri- tech securing an appropriate LATA modification from the FCC, GTE and Ameritech shall provide two-way, nonoptional, flat- rate EAS between GTE's Hanoverton exchange and Ameritech's Salem exchange; that GTE and Ameritech should institute two-way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS between the Hanoverton and Salem exchanges as soon as practicable and, in any event, within 12 months of Ameritech's receipt of FCC authority to implement such service across the involved LATA boundary. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
| 11/19/1999 | Letter relative to GTE North Inc., to review the results of the balloting conducted in the Hanoverton exchange to determine the pay increased rates. Filed by P. Cook (1 pg) | 1 |
| 11/12/1999 | Ballots filed on behalf of complainants by R. Fortune. | 0 |
| 08/12/1999 | Opinion & Order that the request for two-way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS between the Hanoverton and Salem exchanges is granted, contingent upon the conducting and filing of a canvass of the Hanoverton Exchange subscribers that demon- strates that a substantial majority is willing to pay the appropriate rates for the service and also contingent upon Ameritech obtaining appropriate authority from the FCC to carry traffic across the interLATA boundary which currently exists between the Hanoverton and Salem exchanges; that GTE provide a list of all Hanoverton exchange subscribers' names and addresses to the complainants within 15 days of this order; that the complainants canvass the Hanoverton Exchange subscribers, using the sample ballot attached and report the results to the Commission by November 12, 1999; that after the complainants have submitted the ballots collected, the respondents should review the ballots and report the results of their review to the Commission by November 26, 1999; that this case shall remain open until otherwise ordered by the Commission. (19 pgs.) | 19 |
| 12/31/1998 | Transcript filed for hearing held 12/14/98, (DF), 169 pgs. (Hanoverton, Ohio) | 169 |
| 12/14/1998 | Proof of Publication filed. (Mahoning County) (2 pgs) | 2 |
| 12/10/1998 | Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Carroll County) | 1 |
|