DIS - Case Record for 98-0979-TP-PEX Skip to main content

Case Record For:

98-0979-TP-PEX

File a Public Comment
Case Title: RAY FORTUNE/GTE
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: PEX-Petition for extended area service
Date Opened: 6/26/1998
Date Closed: 12/9/1999
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
09/28/2000Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Contents, 48th sheet 1; Check List, 394th sheet 1, 89th sheet 5; Section 2.1, 11th sheet 19; Section 3-Hanoverton, 19th sheet 1, filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by J. Kennedy. (6 pgs.)6
09/27/2000Revised tariff, PUCO No. 20, Section 1, 4th sheet 25 filed on behalf of applicant by M. Schaedler. (2 pgs.) (98-979)2
04/21/2000Letter to Commission reporting that in-service the for the institution of two way flat rate EAS between GTE's Hanoverton and Ameritech's Salem exchange is October 4, 2000, filed on behalf of GTE North, Inc. by J. Kennedy.1
04/20/2000Letter regarding GTE North Inc. reports that the in-service date for the institution of two-way flat-rate EAS between GTE's Hanoverton and Ameritech's Salem exchanges is 10/4/2000. filed by J. Kennedy (1 pg)1
04/19/2000Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings.2
04/02/2000Letter stating that the in-service date for the institution of two-way flat-rate EAS between GTE's Hanoverton and Ameritech's Salem exchanges is October 4, 2000, filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Kennedy.1
03/28/2000Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (8 pgs.)8
01/12/2000Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (121 pgs.)121
12/09/1999Supplemental Opinion & Order that, upon condition of Ameri- tech securing an appropriate LATA modification from the FCC, GTE and Ameritech shall provide two-way, nonoptional, flat- rate EAS between GTE's Hanoverton exchange and Ameritech's Salem exchange; that GTE and Ameritech should institute two-way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS between the Hanoverton and Salem exchanges as soon as practicable and, in any event, within 12 months of Ameritech's receipt of FCC authority to implement such service across the involved LATA boundary. (5 pgs.)5
11/19/1999Letter relative to GTE North Inc., to review the results of the balloting conducted in the Hanoverton exchange to determine the pay increased rates. Filed by P. Cook (1 pg)1
11/12/1999Ballots filed on behalf of complainants by R. Fortune.0
08/12/1999Opinion & Order that the request for two-way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS between the Hanoverton and Salem exchanges is granted, contingent upon the conducting and filing of a canvass of the Hanoverton Exchange subscribers that demon- strates that a substantial majority is willing to pay the appropriate rates for the service and also contingent upon Ameritech obtaining appropriate authority from the FCC to carry traffic across the interLATA boundary which currently exists between the Hanoverton and Salem exchanges; that GTE provide a list of all Hanoverton exchange subscribers' names and addresses to the complainants within 15 days of this order; that the complainants canvass the Hanoverton Exchange subscribers, using the sample ballot attached and report the results to the Commission by November 12, 1999; that after the complainants have submitted the ballots collected, the respondents should review the ballots and report the results of their review to the Commission by November 26, 1999; that this case shall remain open until otherwise ordered by the Commission. (19 pgs.)19
12/31/1998Transcript filed for hearing held 12/14/98, (DF), 169 pgs. (Hanoverton, Ohio)169
12/14/1998Proof of Publication filed. (Mahoning County) (2 pgs)2
12/10/1998Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Carroll County)1
12/08/1998Proof of Publication filed. (2 pgs.) (Carroll County)2
12/08/1998Testimony and attachments of Patricia J. Cook filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keating. (17 pgs.)17
12/08/1998Testimony of Jacqueline M. Young filed on behalf of respon- dent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (22 pgs.)22
11/19/1998Legal Notices FAXED to: Free Press (Carroll Co.), Evening Review (Columbiana Co.), Youngstown Vindicator (Mahoning Co)7
11/18/1998Entry scheduling a hearing at 10:00 a.m. on December 15, 1998, at the Hanoverton Village Hall, Hanoverton, Ohio; that any person or entity requesting intervention in this matter do so by November 30, 1998. (AE) (3 pgs.) (ISSUED 11/13/98)3
11/16/1998Supplemental information response of GTE North filed by W. Keating. (10 pgs)10
11/16/1998Information response of Ameritech filed by C. Rawlings. (12 pgs)12
10/15/1998Answer and information response filed on behalf of respon- dent, GTE North, by W. Keating. (37 pgs.)37
10/15/1998Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (52 pgs.)52
10/15/1998Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (3 pgs.)3
09/24/1998Affidavit filed on behalf of MCI. Submitted by: J. Sanders. (1 pg.)1
09/15/1998Affidavit of Elizabeth Finnerty filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by J. Troup. (11 pgs.)11
09/11/1998Affidavit of LaTrischa C. Miles filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Co. L.P. by L. MIles. (2 pgs.)2
09/01/1998Letter requesting that it not be required to provide the distribution of calling statistics for its customers in the instant proceeding, filed on behalf of respondent, WorldCom Techonolgies, by B. Ferris. (1 pg.)1
07/15/1998Entry ordering that AT&T, LCI, MCI, U.S. Sprint, and World- com, Inc. shall provide by September 15, 1998, the infor- mation and affidavits required under Findings 4 and 5; that Ameritech and GTE shall file their answers with the Commis- sion by October 15, 1998; that Ameritech and GTE shall pro- vide the information required by Finding 7 by October 15, 1998; that Ameritech and GTE shall provide the information required by Finding 8 by November 16, 1998; scheduling a settlement conference at 10:00 a.m. on November 5, 1998, at the Commission offices. (AE) (7 pgs.)7
06/26/1998In the matter of the petition of Ray Fortune and subscribers of the Hanoverton 223 exchange for extended area service to the Salem (area code 330) 332, 337 exchanges, GTE North Incorporated. (17 pgs.)17