| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 03/23/2000 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Check List, 390th sheet 1, 87th sheet 5; Contenct, 47th sheet 1; Section 2.1, 10th sheet 19; Section 3, 18th sheet 1, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy. (7 pgs.) | 7 |
| 03/14/2000 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Check List, 390th sheet 1; Section 2.3, 27th sheet 5, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 03/10/2000 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 3, Section 3, 5th page 7, 2nd page 10, filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by E. King. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 12/09/1999 | Letter stating that Cincinnati Bell Telephone and GTE North have established April 12, 2000 as the implementation date for two-way nonoptional flat-rate extended area service between CBT's Cincinnati and Clermont exchanges and the Higginsport exchange served by GTE North, filed by E. King. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 11/05/1999 | Letter regarding the date for institution of two-way, flat rate EAS between GTE's Higginsport exchange and the CBT Co. and Clermont. Filed by J. Kennedy (1 pg) (FILED 11/3/99) | 1 |
| 08/26/1999 | Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Brown County) | 1 |
| 08/12/1999 | Supplemental Opinion & Order that two-way, flat-rate EAS be instituted between the Higginsport Exchange of GTE and the Cincinnati and Clermont exchanges of Cincinnati Bell within 12 months and that the respondents make every effort to pro- vide service as soon as practicable; that the respondents establish an in-service date within four months of this supplemental order, inform the Commission of the date, and advise the Commission not later than 60 days prior to the in-service date in the event the date cannot be met; that the respondents are authorized to file three copies of re- vised tariff sheets. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
| 07/16/1999 | Results of the balloting conducted in the Higginsport ex- change, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 07/02/1999 | Ballots filed on behalf of complainant. | 0 |
| 06/18/1999 | Request that the implementation date for the establishment of EAS between the Higginsport exchange and the Cincinnati and Clermont exchanges be set at twelve months following the forthcoming supplemental finding and order, filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by E. King. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 05/19/1999 | Opinion & Order granting the request for two-way, non- optional, flat-rate EAS between the Higginsport exchange and the Cincinnati and Clermont exchanges, provided that a substantial majority of the Higginsport subscribers is willing to pay appropriate rates for the service; denying the request for two-way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS, or any alternative form of EAS, between the Higginsport exchange and the Bethel and Mt. Orab exchanges; accordingly, those exchanges are dismissed from this proceeding; that the com- plainants have failed to show a community of interest be- tween the Higginsport exchange and the Ripley exchange suf- ficient to warrant converting the existing measured-rate EAS to flat-rate EAS; that the complainants canvass the Higgins- port exchange subscribers and report the results to the Com- mission by July 19, 1999. (25 pgs.) | 25 |
| 05/10/1999 | Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Brown County) | 1 |
| 05/06/1999 | Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Butler County) | 1 |
| 05/04/1999 | Proof of Publication filed. (2 pgs.) (Clermont County) | 2 |
| 04/30/1999 | Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Hamilton County) | 1 |
|