Skip to main content

Case Record For:

05-0727-EL-UNC

File a Public Comment
Case Title: CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: EL-ELECTRIC
Purpose Code: UNC-Unclassified
Date Opened: 6/3/2005
Date Closed: 3/9/2011
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 69 documents 1 /  5 
Date FiledSummaryPages
03/09/2011Case action form closing case with an effective date of 3/9/11.1
10/06/2010Notice of withdrawal of counsel, L. McAlister, filed on behalf of McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC by J. Clark. 5
10/31/2008Notice of withdrawal of counsel of Daniel J. Nielsen filed by J. Clark on behalf of Industrial Energy Users-Ohio.2
10/17/2008Revised tariff pages, PUCO Tariff No, 19, filed by L. Steinkuhl on behalf of Duke Energy Ohio.29
05/30/2008Rider TCR, Transmission cost recovery tracker, effective for the period from May 30, 2008 through November 30, 2008, filed by L. Steinkuhl on behalf of Duke Energy.9
05/28/2008Entry ordered that Duke comply with the provisions of finding 5.4
05/28/2008Service Notice3
05/15/2008Service notice.3
05/14/2008Entry ordering comments by interested persons, with regard to the revised TCR proposal filed by Duke on April 30, 2008, be filed no later than May 20, 2008. (JK)3
04/30/2008Revised tariff pages, PUCO No. 19, correcting schedules C-2 and D-2 filed by D. Wathen, Jr. on behalf of Duke Energy Ohio. 27
04/15/2008Revised tariff pages, PUCO Tariff No. 19, filed on behalf of Duke Energy Ohio by L. Steinkuhl. 27
11/27/2007Staff's biennial review of controllable RTO costs for Duke Energy-Ohio in response to the Commission's finding and order in case no. 05-727-EL-UNC filed by R. Fortney.8
10/15/2007Updated tariffs filed on behalf of Duke Energy Ohio, reflecting the proposed rates for Rider TCR for the period of December 1, 2007 through May 31, 2008, by D. Wathen, Jr.24
06/01/2007Rider TCR transmission cost recovery tracker on behalf of Duke Energy Ohio effective for the period from May 31, 2007 through November 28, 2007, by L. Steinkuhl.9
05/30/2007Entry ordering that the motion by OCC to intervene be granted; that the motion by OCC for a reply opportunity and for resolution by the Commission be stayed, pending further discussion between OCC, Duke and the Commission staff prior to the next semi-annual adjustment.3
 
1 /  5 
      
      
Attorney General:
McNamee, Thomas
Lindgren, Thomas
Margard, Werner
Attorney Examiner:
Kingery, Jeanne