| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 03/09/2011 | Case action form closing case with an effective date of 3/9/11. | 1 |
| 10/06/2010 | Notice of withdrawal of counsel, L. McAlister, filed on behalf of McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC by J. Clark. | 5 |
| 10/31/2008 | Notice of withdrawal of counsel of Daniel J. Nielsen filed by J. Clark on behalf of Industrial Energy Users-Ohio. | 2 |
| 10/17/2008 | Revised tariff pages, PUCO Tariff No, 19, filed by L. Steinkuhl on behalf of Duke Energy Ohio. | 29 |
| 05/30/2008 | Rider TCR, Transmission cost recovery tracker, effective for the period from May 30, 2008 through November 30, 2008, filed by L. Steinkuhl on behalf of Duke Energy. | 9 |
| 05/28/2008 | Entry ordered that Duke comply with the provisions of finding 5. | 4 |
| 05/28/2008 | Service Notice | 3 |
| 05/15/2008 | Service notice. | 3 |
| 05/14/2008 | Entry ordering comments by interested persons, with regard to the revised TCR proposal filed by Duke on April 30, 2008, be filed no later than May 20, 2008. (JK) | 3 |
| 04/30/2008 | Revised tariff pages, PUCO No. 19, correcting schedules C-2 and D-2 filed by D. Wathen, Jr. on behalf of Duke Energy Ohio. | 27 |
| 04/15/2008 | Revised tariff pages, PUCO Tariff No. 19, filed on behalf of Duke Energy Ohio by L. Steinkuhl. | 27 |
| 11/27/2007 | Staff's biennial review of controllable RTO costs for Duke Energy-Ohio in response to the Commission's finding and order in case no. 05-727-EL-UNC filed by R. Fortney. | 8 |
| 10/15/2007 | Updated tariffs filed on behalf of Duke Energy Ohio, reflecting the proposed rates for Rider TCR for the period of December 1, 2007 through May 31, 2008, by D. Wathen, Jr. | 24 |
| 06/01/2007 | Rider TCR transmission cost recovery tracker on behalf of Duke Energy Ohio effective for the period from May 31, 2007 through November 28, 2007, by L. Steinkuhl. | 9 |
| 05/30/2007 | Entry ordering that the motion by OCC to intervene be granted; that the motion by OCC for a reply opportunity and for resolution by the Commission be stayed, pending further discussion between OCC, Duke and the Commission staff prior to the next semi-annual adjustment. | 3 |