DIS - Case Record for 99-0552-TP-PEX Skip to main content

Case Record For:

99-0552-TP-PEX

File a Public Comment
Case Title: ANGELA COOK/GTE/CBT/SPRINT
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: PEX-Petition for extended area service
Date Opened: 5/4/1999
Date Closed: 6/8/2000
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
03/01/2001Request that the 798 exchange be included in this application, filed by Dr. J. DeLuca, Eaton City Schools.1
01/16/2001Revised tariff P.U.C.O. No. 6 filed by M. Prendergast.3
01/12/2001Revised tariff sheets filed by J. Kennedy6
11/20/2000Revised tariff, PUCO No. 3, Section 3, 3rd page 13, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by R. Wentz.2
10/31/2000Letter stating that Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company and Verizon North Have established 6:00 a.m. on January 23, 2001 as the implementation date for 2-way, flat-rate EAS between the Morning Sun exchange of Verizon North and the Hamilton exchange of CBT, filed by R. Wentz. (1 pg.) (FILED 10/30/00 INCORRECTLY IN CASE NO. 96-552-EL-AEC)1
10/16/2000Letter stating that an in-service date of January 23, 2000 at 6:00 a.m. for 2-way flat-rate EAS between the Eaton and the Morning Sun exchanges has been established, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by B. Donahue. (2 pgs.)2
10/13/2000Letter stating that the in-service date for the institution of two-way flat-rate EAS between Verizon's Morning Sun ex- change and the Eaton (Sprint) and Hamilton (Cincinnati Bell Telephone) exchanges is January 23, 2001, filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by J. Kennedy. (1 pg.)1
10/13/2000Letter stating that the in-service date for the institution of 2-way flat-rate EAS between Verizon's Morning Sun exchange and Eaton (Sprint) and Hamilton (CBT) exchanges is 1/23/01 filed by J. Kennedy on behalf of Verizon.1
08/24/2000Supplemental Opinion & Order that the two-way, flat-rate EAS be instituted between the Morning Sun Exchange and the Eaton and Hamilton exchanges within six months of this order; that the respondents establish an in-service date within two months of this order. (5 pgs.)5
07/10/2000Ballot results filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by P. Cook.1
06/28/2000Petitions continued. (Section 3 of 3)103
06/28/2000Petitions continued. (Section 2 of 3)230
06/28/2000Petitions filed. (Section 1 of 3)231
06/21/2000Additional information filed on behalf of complainant by A. Cook.1
06/08/2000Opinion & Order that the August 26, 1999, information response filed by Cincinnati Bell is deemed timely; that the request for two-way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS between the Morning Sun Exchange and the Eaton and Hamilton exchanges is granted, contingent upon the com- pletion of a canvass showing that a substantial majority of the Morning Sun Exchange subscribers is willing to pay appropriate rates for the service; that GTE provide a list of all Morning Sun subscribers' names and addresses to the complainants within 15 days of this order; that the com- plainants canvass the Morning Sun subscribers and report the results to the Commission by August 8, 2000; that after the complainants have submitted the ballots collected, the respondents may review the ballots and report the results of their review to the Commission no later than 15 days after the ballots are filed. (22 pgs.)22
06/08/2000Opinion and order ordering that the information response filed by Cincinnati Bell on 8/26/99 is deemed timely; that the request for two-way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS between the Morning Sun Exchange and the Eaton and Hamilton Exchanges is granted; that GTE provide a list of all Morning Sun subscribers within 15 days of this order; that complainants canvass results be reported to the Commission no later than 8/8/99; that respondents review ballots and report results no later than 15 days after the ballots are filed.22
06/08/2000Opinion and order that after the complainants have submitted the ballots collected, the respondents may review the ballots and report the results of their review to the Commission no later than 15 days after the ballots are filed.22
05/23/2000Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by Representative Gene Krebs.2
05/19/2000Response letter filed on behalf of complainant by A. Cook.2
05/12/2000Third information response filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keating.3
05/04/2000Entry ordering that, on or before May 12, 2000, GTE provide the information described in Findings 4 and 6 to the Commis- sion and to the spokesperson for the complainants; that the complainants shall be granted until May 19, 2000, to file a response tot he information to be provided by GTE. (AE) (3 pgs.)3
05/01/2000Additional information filed on behalf of complainant by A. Cook.3
12/06/1999Exhibits filed with Transcript dated 12/6/99.0
12/06/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 11/16/99, (DJ), 250 pgs. (Fairhaven, Ohio)250
11/15/1999Response to complainants' motion to compel, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keating. (3 pgs.)3
11/15/1999Entry ordering that, at the November 16, 1999, hearing, GTE provide as supplemental testimony the number of Morning Sun FX lines; that in all other respects the motion to compel shall be denied. (AE) (4 pgs.)4
11/10/1999Response to complainants' motion to compel, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keating. (3 pgs.)3
11/09/1999Testimony and attachments of Patricia J. Cook filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keating. (14 pgs.)14
11/09/1999Direct testimony of Robert J. Wentz filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by J. Harrison. (8 pgs.)8
11/09/1999Request that GTE North, Cincinnati Bell, and Sprint dba United respond completely to the Attorney Examiner's initial entry of June 21, 1999, and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by A. Cook. (6 pgs.)6
11/09/1999Memorandum contra to complainants' motion to compel, filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by J. Stewart. (4 pgs.)4
11/08/1999Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.)1
11/02/1999Testimony of Rebecca J. Donahue filed on behalf of respon- dent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by B. Donahue. (7 pgs.)7
10/18/1999Legal Notice sent to: Journal News (Butler Co.); The Register Herald (Preble Co.) Faxed: 10/18/99.0
10/15/1999Entry ordering that a public hearing at the Commission Office, scheduled to begin at 10:00 a.m. November 16, 1999 (4 pgs)4
09/20/1999Information response concerning revenues and cost data filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell Telephone, by R. Shank. (7 pgs.)7
09/20/1999Direct testimony of Robert J. Wentz filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell Telephone, by R. Shank. (8 pgs.)8
09/20/1999Supplemental information response filed on behalf of respon- dent, GTE North, by W. Keating. (2 pgs.)2
09/17/1999Information response filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint,b y B. Donahue. (4 pgs.)4
09/17/1999Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed on behalf of the Preble County Farm Bureau, Inc. (1 pg.)1
08/30/1999List of discovery questions filed on behalf of complainant by A. Cook. (3 pgs.)3
08/27/1999Affidavit of Bernie Moore filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by R. Shank. (3 pgs.)3
08/26/1999Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Cin- cinnati Bell, by R. Wentz. (9 pgs.)9
08/20/1999Information response filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by P. Cook. (43 pgs.)43
08/20/1999Information response filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by B. Donahue. (7 pgs.)7
08/19/1999Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Tom McQuiston, Preble County Commissioner. (1 pg.)1
08/17/1999Entry rescheduling the prehearing conference for September 18, 1999; that the affidavits filed on July 22, 1999, by MCI and WorldCom shall be accepted as if timely filed; that CBLD file by August 27, 1999, an affidavit attesting that it has submitted calling data to the respondents or otherwise ex- plaine its failure to provide such information. (AE) (3 pgs.) (ISSUED 8/13/99)3
08/13/1999Entry ordering a prehearing conference set for 9/28/99, 10:00 a.m. at the Commission offices; affidavits filed 7/22/ 99 by MCI and WorldCom are accepted as timely filed; that CBLD file by 8/27/99 an affidavit attesting that it has submitted calling data to the respondents. (3 pgs)3
08/09/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Richard Charles. (1 pg.)1
08/09/1999Additional information filed on behalf of complainant by Angela Cook. (15 pgs.)15
07/26/1999Affidavit of Elizabeth Finnerty filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by E. Finnerty. (3 pgs.)3
07/22/1999Affidavit of Judith B. Sanders filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders. (1 pg.)1
07/22/1999Affidavit of Judith B. Sanders filed on behalf of MCI WorldCom by J. Sanders. (1 pg.)1
07/13/1999Affidavit of LaTrisha C. Miles filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by L. Miles. (2 pgs.)2
07/13/1999Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by State Senator Scott R. Nein. (1 pg.)1
07/12/1999Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by R. Wentz. (4 pgs.)4
07/12/1999Answer filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keating. (3 pgs.)3
07/12/1999Answer filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Com- pany of Ohio dba Sprint, by J. Stewart. (4 pgs.)4
07/08/1999Affidavit of Kim Logue filed on behalf of LCI International Telecom Corp. by K. Logue. (2 pgs.)2
06/21/1999Entry ordering that the respondents file written answers by July 12, 1999; that AT&T, CBLD, LCI, MCI, Sprint, and WorldCom provide the information required by Finding 3 to the respondents and file an affidavit with the Commission by July 21, 1999; that respondents coordinate all the cal- ling information in accordance with Finding 5; that the respondents provide information required by Finding 6 by August 20, 1999; that respondents provide cost information required by Finding 7 by September 20, 1999; scheduling a settlement conference at 10:00 a.m. on August 26, 1999, at the Commission offices. (AE) (8 pgs.)8
06/02/1999Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by Representative Gene Krebs. (1 pg.)1
05/04/1999In the matter of the petition of Angela F. Cook and sub- scribers of the GTE North Morning Sun exchange for two-way, flat-rate extended area service to the Eaton exchange of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and the Hamil- ton exchange of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company. (3 pgs.)3