DIS - Case Record for 96-0828-TP-UNC Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 96-0828-TP-UNC
CASE DESCRIPTION: AMERITECH OHIO/BROOKS FIBER
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 5/7/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
03/11/1997 Notice of withdrawal of counsel filed by R. Rosenberry. (2 pgs.)
11/07/1996 Opinion & Order approving the interconnection agreement between Ameritech and Brooks in accordance with with and to the extent set forth in this Order; that, for the reasons explained in this Order, the Commission specifically does not approve Subsection 4.2.2(iv), Subsection 5.6.1, and Sub- section 9.4.3(iii) of the submitted interconnection agree- ment; that no changes in the proposed agreement, including modifications specifically provided for in the agreement, shall occur without Commission approval; that no assignment or transfer of the rights and responsibilities provided under this agreement shall occur without Commission approv- al; that Ameritech and Brooks must seek and obtain prior Commission approval of the methodology which they intend to utilize for billing calls which cannot be identified as being either local or toll calls. (9 pgs.)
09/17/1996 Reply filed on behalf of Brooks Fiber Communications of Ohio by S. Bloomfield. (6 pgs.)
09/11/1996 Reply comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mul- cahy. (9 pgs.)
09/11/1996 Letter requesting an extension of time to file reply com- ments, filed on behalf of Brooks Fiber Communications by S. Bloomfield. (1 pg.)
09/11/1996 Entry granting Brooks an extension of time until 9/18/96 for filing reply comments in this case. (AE) (2 pgs.)
09/05/1996 Comments of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel (OCC) filed by A. Kelsey. (7 pgs)
09/04/1996 Comments filed on behalf of OCC by A. Kelsey. (7 pgs.)
09/04/1996 Comments filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Co. by M. Jenkins. (8 pgs.)
09/04/1996 Comments filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by D. Townsley and J. Sanders. (10 pgs.)
09/04/1996 Comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications by D. Clayton and M. Schermer. (3 pgs.)
08/28/1996 Comments filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston. (4 pgs.)
08/21/1996 Entry ordering that all interested persons or entities are invited to file comments which address the issues presented for the Commission's consideration in this case, to be filed by and served upon Ameritech and Brooks and their counsel by 9/4/96; that Ameritech and Brooks shall file reply com- ments by 9/11/96. (AE) (4 pgs.)
08/15/1996 Application for approval of an agreement, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy.
08/15/1996 In the matter of Ameritech Ohio's application for approval of an agreement between Ameritech Ohio and Brooks Fiber Communications of Ohio, Inc. pursuant to section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. (67 pgs.)