DIS - Case Record for 92-0191-TP-PEX Skip to main content

Case Record For:

92-0191-TP-PEX

File a Public Comment
Case Title: JAMES F. STRUNA/OHIO BELL TELEPHONE
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: PEX-Petition for extended area service
Date Opened: 1/31/1992
Date Closed: 9/1/1994
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 16 documents 1 /  2 
Date FiledSummaryPages
09/01/1994Entry dismissing this case and closing it of record. (2 pgs.)0
06/30/1994Voluntary dismissal filed on behalf of the City of Mentor by M. Grady.0
02/18/1994Letter updating the Commission as to the status of discussions between Ameritech and the Cities of Mentor and Painesville, filed by J. Migden.0
06/11/1993Letter stating that the City of Mentor, at this time, is not prepared to go forward with the stipulation, and requesting that the Commission hold approval of the stipulation in abeyance until after their analysis is completed, filed by J. Migden.0
05/19/1993Stipulation, agreement, and recommendation filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden and respondent, Ohio Bell, by C. Rawlings.0
10/30/1992Letter stating that negotiations between Mentor and Ohio Bell are in progress, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
08/12/1992Entry ordering that the settlement conference scheduled for August 12, 1992 is indefinitely postponed; if the parties fail jointly to submit, within 30 days of the date of this entry, an executed stipulation and settlement agreement, the postponed settlement conference will be rescheduled by a subsequent entry. (AE)0
08/11/1992Letter stating that the parties wish to negotiate on an informal basis and do not need to meed at the settlement conference scheduled for August 12, 1992, filed on behalf of the City of Mentor by M. Grady and Ohio Bell by C. Rawlings.0
07/31/1992Information response of the Ohio Bell Telephone Company by C. Rawlings.0
07/31/1992Answer filed on behalf of Ohio Bell Telephone Company by C. Rawlings.0
06/30/1992Entry ordering that Ohio Bell file its written answer by 8/1/92; that Ohio Bell provide the information required by Finding 6 by 8/1/92; that the requirement set forth in the June 1, 1992 entry, that Ohio Bell should produce certain cost/revenue impact studies by no later than 8/1/92 is waived; that the settlement conference be re- scheduled to 8/12/92 at 10:00 a.m. at the Commission offices. (AE)0
06/29/1992Letter clarifying which exchanges are involved in the petition, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
06/24/1992Letter requesting an extension and continuance of the time frames established by the entry of June 1, 1992, filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by C. Rawlings.0
06/01/1992Entry ordering that Ohio Bell file its written answer by 7/1/92; that Ohio Bell provide the information required by Finding 3 by 7/1/92; that Ohio Bell provide the infor- mation required by Finding 4 by 8/1/92; that the parties comply with Finding 5; that a settlement conference be scheduled at 10:00 a.m. on 7/13/92 at the Commission offices. (AE)0
02/03/1992Attachment A which was inadvertently omitted from the January 31, 1992 filing, filed on behalf of complainant by M. Grady.0
 
1 /  2 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Fullin, Daniel