| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 07/29/2009 | Confidential Release: Memorandum of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company in opposition to application for stay filed on 11/12/1992. | 28 |
| 10/08/1993 | Supreme Court Case No. 92-2248 returned. (Vol. 1 of 1) | 0 |
| 12/24/1992 | Appendix to motion for stay, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. | 0 |
| 12/24/1992 | Application for stay filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. | 0 |
| 12/24/1992 | Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (S.C. #92-2252) | 0 |
| 12/11/1992 | Supreme Court transmittal papers submitted. | 0 |
| 12/04/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the application for Caller ID, filed by D. Kuschner. | 0 |
| 11/13/1992 | Correspondence opposing application, filed by L. Peters. | 0 |
| 11/13/1992 | Amended Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of Roselawn Community Council, Inc. and the Telephone Privacy and Fair Rate Association by M. Bortz. | 0 |
| 11/12/1992 | Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of Roselawn Community Council, Inc. and the Telephone Privacy and Fair Rate Association by M. Bortz. | 0 |
| 11/06/1992 | Notice to the PUCO of OCC's intent to apply to the Ohio Supreme Court for stay of the Commission's Finding and Order in this case, on or after November 10, 1992, filed by D. Bergmann. | 0 |
| 10/06/1992 | Entry ordering that CBT's memorandum contra the applica- tions for rehearing is deemed timely filed; that requests for leave to file applications for rehearing filed by the City and the Published Subscribers are denied;; that OCC's application for rehearing of Commission's August 6, 1992 Finding & Order is granted to the extent stated in Finding 25 of this entry, and in all other respects it is denied in its entirety and the Commission's August 6, 1992 Finding & Order is reaffirmed. (AE) | 0 |
| 10/06/1992 | Application for rehearing filed by R. Cautley. | 0 |
| 10/05/1992 | Supplemental memorandum in support of application for rehearing, filed on behalf of OCC by Y. Ranft. | 0 |
| 10/05/1992 | Correspondence letter regarding Caller ID, filed by R. Cautley. | 0 |
| 09/29/1992 | Rebuttal memorandum of The Roselawn Community Council and the Telephone privacy and Fair Rate Association, filed by M. Bortz. | 0 |
| 09/29/1992 | Motion to accept memorandum contra as timely filed, filed on behalf of applicant by M. Longenecker, Jr. | 0 |
| 09/25/1992 | Correction to the City of Cincinnati's memorandum in support of request for leave to file application for rehearing, filed by R. Ganulin. | 0 |
| 09/21/1992 | Memorandum contra application for rehearing filed on behalf of the applicant by M. Longnecker. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Application for leave to file application for rehearing and application for rehearing, filed on behalf of the Roselawn Community Council and the Telephone Privacy and Fair Rate Association by M. Bortz. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Correspendence letter filed on behalf of the Cincinnati Coalition of Domestic Violence by D. Trujillo. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Correspondence letter filed on behalf of YWCA of Cincinnati by C. Ventura. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Request for leave to file application for rehearing filed on behalf of the City of Cincinnati by R. Ganulin. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Application for rehearing filed on behalf of the City of Cincinnati by R. Ganulin. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Application for rehearing filed on behalf of OCC by Y. Ranft. | 0 |
| 09/03/1992 | Notice of withdrawal of counsel and designation of new trial attorney filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston. | 0 |
| 08/27/1992 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 8, Section 2 - 1st page 40, filed on behalf of applicant by E. Napier. | 0 |
| 08/17/1992 | Tariffs, PUCO No. 8, Preface - 1st page 2, 1st page 6; Section 2 - 1st page 40; Section 25 - 1st page 9; Section 35 - original pages 1-16, filed on behalf of applicant by R. Sigmon. | 0 |
| 08/06/1992 | Finding & Order approving CBT's amended application; granting a waiver of Chapter 4901:1-5, OAC to the extent provided in this Order; ordering CBT to fulfill all of the commitments summarized in this Order; approving CBT's proposed customer notifications; ordering CBT to make a notation on each page of its quarterly update which it deems proprietary; and denying OCC's motion to intervene. | 0 |
| 08/04/1992 | Correspondence letter requesting that Cincinnati Bell's request to charge public agencies for maintaining private lines be denied, filed by G. Beckman, Hamilton County Association of Chiefs of Police, Inc. | 0 |
| 07/29/1992 | Revised tariffs, PUCO No. 8, Section 35 - original pages 1, 2, 3, and 12, filed on behalf of applicant by S. Stone- braker. | 0 |
| 07/15/1992 | Letter clarifying applicant's filing of June 26, 1992, filed by B. Stonebraker. | 0 |
| 06/26/1992 | Amended application filed on behalf of applicant by B. Stonebraker. | 0 |
| 11/14/1991 | Reply memorandum filed on behalf of OCC by B. Cohen. | 0 |
| 11/06/1991 | Revised page 3 of the memorandum contra the motion by the OCC filed on November 4, 1991, filed on behalf of applicant by R. Hopkins. | 0 |
| 11/04/1991 | Memorandum contra to the motion of the OCC, filed on behalf of applicant by M. Longenecker, Jr. | 0 |
| 10/17/1991 | Motion to intervene and motion to suspend application and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. | 0 |
| 09/09/1991 | In the matter of the application of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company for authority to revise its general exchange tariff, PUCO No. 7, by adding a new section called Custom Calling PLUS and within that section offering the following 4 new optional features: Call Block, Priority Call, Priority Forward, and Repeat Dialing. | 0 |