DIS - Case Record for 91-1648-TP-ATA Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 91-1648-TP-ATA
CASE DESCRIPTION: CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 5/24/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
07/29/2009 Confidential Release: Memorandum of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company in opposition to application for stay filed on 11/12/1992.
10/08/1993 Supreme Court Case No. 92-2248 returned. (Vol. 1 of 1)
12/24/1992 Appendix to motion for stay, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann.
12/24/1992 Application for stay filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann.
12/24/1992 Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (S.C. #92-2252)
12/11/1992 Supreme Court transmittal papers submitted.
12/04/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the application for Caller ID, filed by D. Kuschner.
11/13/1992 Correspondence opposing application, filed by L. Peters.
11/13/1992 Amended Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of Roselawn Community Council, Inc. and the Telephone Privacy and Fair Rate Association by M. Bortz.
11/12/1992 Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of Roselawn Community Council, Inc. and the Telephone Privacy and Fair Rate Association by M. Bortz.
11/06/1992 Notice to the PUCO of OCC's intent to apply to the Ohio Supreme Court for stay of the Commission's Finding and Order in this case, on or after November 10, 1992, filed by D. Bergmann.
10/06/1992 Entry ordering that CBT's memorandum contra the applica- tions for rehearing is deemed timely filed; that requests for leave to file applications for rehearing filed by the City and the Published Subscribers are denied;; that OCC's application for rehearing of Commission's August 6, 1992 Finding & Order is granted to the extent stated in Finding 25 of this entry, and in all other respects it is denied in its entirety and the Commission's August 6, 1992 Finding & Order is reaffirmed. (AE)
10/06/1992 Application for rehearing filed by R. Cautley.
10/05/1992 Supplemental memorandum in support of application for rehearing, filed on behalf of OCC by Y. Ranft.
10/05/1992 Correspondence letter regarding Caller ID, filed by R. Cautley.
09/29/1992 Rebuttal memorandum of The Roselawn Community Council and the Telephone privacy and Fair Rate Association, filed by M. Bortz.
09/29/1992 Motion to accept memorandum contra as timely filed, filed on behalf of applicant by M. Longenecker, Jr.
09/25/1992 Correction to the City of Cincinnati's memorandum in support of request for leave to file application for rehearing, filed by R. Ganulin.
09/21/1992 Memorandum contra application for rehearing filed on behalf of the applicant by M. Longnecker.
09/08/1992 Application for leave to file application for rehearing and application for rehearing, filed on behalf of the Roselawn Community Council and the Telephone Privacy and Fair Rate Association by M. Bortz.
09/08/1992 Correspendence letter filed on behalf of the Cincinnati Coalition of Domestic Violence by D. Trujillo.
09/08/1992 Correspondence letter filed on behalf of YWCA of Cincinnati by C. Ventura.
09/08/1992 Request for leave to file application for rehearing filed on behalf of the City of Cincinnati by R. Ganulin.
09/08/1992 Application for rehearing filed on behalf of the City of Cincinnati by R. Ganulin.
09/08/1992 Application for rehearing filed on behalf of OCC by Y. Ranft.
09/03/1992 Notice of withdrawal of counsel and designation of new trial attorney filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston.
08/27/1992 Revised tariff, PUCO No. 8, Section 2 - 1st page 40, filed on behalf of applicant by E. Napier.
08/17/1992 Tariffs, PUCO No. 8, Preface - 1st page 2, 1st page 6; Section 2 - 1st page 40; Section 25 - 1st page 9; Section 35 - original pages 1-16, filed on behalf of applicant by R. Sigmon.
08/06/1992 Finding & Order approving CBT's amended application; granting a waiver of Chapter 4901:1-5, OAC to the extent provided in this Order; ordering CBT to fulfill all of the commitments summarized in this Order; approving CBT's proposed customer notifications; ordering CBT to make a notation on each page of its quarterly update which it deems proprietary; and denying OCC's motion to intervene.
08/04/1992 Correspondence letter requesting that Cincinnati Bell's request to charge public agencies for maintaining private lines be denied, filed by G. Beckman, Hamilton County Association of Chiefs of Police, Inc.
07/29/1992 Revised tariffs, PUCO No. 8, Section 35 - original pages 1, 2, 3, and 12, filed on behalf of applicant by S. Stone- braker.
07/15/1992 Letter clarifying applicant's filing of June 26, 1992, filed by B. Stonebraker.
06/26/1992 Amended application filed on behalf of applicant by B. Stonebraker.
11/14/1991 Reply memorandum filed on behalf of OCC by B. Cohen.
11/06/1991 Revised page 3 of the memorandum contra the motion by the OCC filed on November 4, 1991, filed on behalf of applicant by R. Hopkins.
11/04/1991 Memorandum contra to the motion of the OCC, filed on behalf of applicant by M. Longenecker, Jr.
10/17/1991 Motion to intervene and motion to suspend application and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann.
09/09/1991 In the matter of the application of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company for authority to revise its general exchange tariff, PUCO No. 7, by adding a new section called Custom Calling PLUS and within that section offering the following 4 new optional features: Call Block, Priority Call, Priority Forward, and Repeat Dialing.