DIS - Case Record for 08-0107-TP-BLS Skip to main content

Case Record For:

08-0107-TP-BLS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: AT&T OHIO
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: BLS-Basic Local Exchange Service
Date Opened: 2/8/2008
Date Closed: 9/23/2014
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
09/23/2014Case Action Form closing case with an effective date of 9/23/2014. electronically filed by Mrs. Donielle Genesky on behalf of PUCO2
01/06/2011Entry ordering that the protective order be extended in accordance with finding (5). (JSA)3
01/06/2011Service Notice3
12/16/2010Correspondence in Support of Motion for Protective Orders sought by AT&T Ohio electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive on behalf of Verizon Business Services2
12/16/2010Correspondence in Support of Motion for Extension of Protective Orders sought by AT&T Ohio electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive on behalf of Verizon Wireless.2
12/15/2010Correspondence in support of AT&T Ohio's motion to extend the protective order electronically filed by Teresa Orahood on behalf of Sage Telecom, Inc.2
12/14/2010Motion for extension of protective orders and memorandum in support electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.10
07/21/2009Service Notice.3
07/20/2009Entry ordering that the protective orders of February 27, 2008 and June 25, 2008 shall be extended for a period of 18 months from the date of their scheduled expiration. (JA)3
07/13/2009Correspondence of Sage Telecom Inc. in Support of AT&T Ohio's Motion for an Extension of the Protective Orders electronically filed by Teresa Orahood on behalf of Sage Telecom, Inc.2
07/07/2009Letter in Support of AT&T's Motion for an Extension of a Protective Order electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Verizon Wireless.2
07/07/2009Letter in Support of AT&T's Motion for an Extension of a Protective Order electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Verizon Business.2
06/25/2009Motion for extension of protective orders and memorandum in support electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio10
07/11/2008Revised tariff P.U.C.O. No. 20 to add newly competitive exchanges, electronically filed by Maryann Mackey on behalf of AT&T Ohio.34
07/10/2008Reply to AT&T Ohio's memorandum contra by the office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel.12
07/03/2008Memorandum Contra the Ohio Consumers' Counsel's Motion to Dismiss electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio6
06/25/2008Service Notice.2
06/25/2008Opinion and order that AT&T's application for alternative regulation of BLES and other Tier 1 services is granted in part and denied in part; that OCC's request for a hearing is denied; that OCC's motion to dismiss AT&T's application as it pertains to the Pitchin Exchange is moot; that to the extent addressed in this Opinion and order, all arguments are denied; that all documents that were filed under seal in conjunction with OCC's motion for protective order be maintained for 18 months from the date of this Opinion and order. 28
06/18/2008Motion and memorandum in support to dismiss the applications, in part, as they pertain to the pitchin exchange by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, electronically filed by Patti Mallarnee on behalf of Etter, Terry L Mr.12
06/03/2008Entry ordered that the application be suspended in accordance with Finding (3).2
06/03/2008Service Notice1
04/08/2008Reply of Ohio Consumers' Council to AT&T Ohio's memorandum contra filed by T. Etter.10
04/03/2008AT&T Ohio's memorandum contra the Ohio Consumers' Counsel's opposition filed by J. Kelly.27
03/24/2008Confidential document target of the opposition to AT&T Ohio's application filed by OCC by T. Etter..1
03/24/2008Motion for protective order filed on behalf of Ohio Consumers' Counsel by D. Bergmann.3
03/24/2008Opposition to AT&T Ohio's application for basic local service alternative regulation and demonstration of why the application should not be granted filed on behalf of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel by D. Bergmann.98
03/10/2008Service notice.1
03/07/2008Entry ordering AT&T's motion regarding publication of legal notice is granted. (JA)2
03/04/2008Motion for extension of time for the publication of the public notices associated filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by M. Fenlon.3
02/27/2008Entry ordering that the motion for protective order is granted and shall be maintained by the docketing division for 18 months from the date of this entry; OCC's motion for intervention is granted; discovery and procedural filing schedule proceed in accordance with Findings (5) and (8). (JA)3
02/27/2008Service Notice1
02/12/2008Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel by T. Etter. 7
02/08/2008Confidential document: Exhibit 3 filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by J. Kelly. (33 pgs)1
02/08/2008Motion for a protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by J. Kelly. 6
02/08/2008Application continued. (Part 2 of 2)105
02/08/2008In the matter of the application of the Ohio Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T Ohio for approval of an alternative form of regulation of basic local exchange and other Tier 1 services. (Part 1 of 2)193