DIS - Case Record for 07-0259-TP-BLS Skip to main content

Case Record For:

07-0259-TP-BLS

Case Title: AT&T OHIO
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: BLS-Basic Local Exchange Service
Date Opened: 3/9/2007
Date Closed: 6/5/2012
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
06/05/2012Case status form to close case 07-259-TP-BLS effective 6/5/2012 filed by Doug Jennings. 1
03/08/2012Service Notice3
03/08/2012Entry ordered that AT&T's motion to extend the protective order is granted in accordance with Finding (5).3
02/24/2012Correspondence in support of Motion for Extension of Protective Order electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive on behalf of Verizon Wireless.2
02/24/2012Correspondence in support of Motion for Extension of Protective Order electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive on behalf of Verizon Business Services.2
02/22/2012Correspondence in support of AT&T Ohio's motion for an extension of the protective order electronically filed by Teresa Orahood on behalf of Sage Telecom, Inc.2
02/21/2012Motion for extension of protective order and memorandum in support electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.10
12/22/2011Supreme Court Document The following decision, announcement or notice of action by the Supreme Court of Ohio with respect to this case is provided solely for the information and convenience of the reader, and should not be construed as a part of the record of this case before the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, and may be subject to formal revision before it is published in the Ohio Official Reports. The Court’s opinions from 1992 to the present are available online from the Reporter of Decisions at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/ROD/ - Dismissal Entry (October 19, 2007) electronically filed by Kimberly L Keeton on behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.2
07/13/2011Notice of Withdrawal of counsel for David C Bergmann, Sup Ct. # 0009991, in all proceedings identified on the enclosed list.2
05/19/2011Entry that AT&T Ohio's motion to dismiss be granted in accordance with Finding (11).4
05/19/2011Service notice.3
03/01/2011Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.6
10/27/2010Service Notice3
10/27/2010Entry ordering that AT&T's motion to extend the protective order is granted in accordance with Finding (3). (DJ)2
09/22/2010Correspondence in Support of AT&T Ohio's Motion for Extension of Protective Order electronically filed by Teresa Orahood on behalf of Sage Telecom, Inc.2
09/16/2010Correspondence - in support of the Motion for Extension of Protective Order sought by AT&T Ohio electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive on behalf of Verizon Business Services.2
09/16/2010Correspondence - in support of the Motion for Extension of Protective Order sought by AT&T Ohio electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive on behalf of Verizon Wireless.2
09/14/2010Motion for extension and memorandum in support of protective order electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.10
05/01/2009Service notice.3
05/01/2009Entry ordering AT&T's motion for a permanent protective order is denied; the Commission's protective order issued June 27, 2007, is extended for an 18 month time frame commencing with the date of this entry. (LDJ)3
10/23/2008Motion for extension of protective order and memorandum in support, electronically filed by Mrs. Verneda J. Engram on behalf of AT&T Ohio.10
10/20/2008Reply to OCC's memorandum contra electronically filed by Mrs. Verneda J. Engram on behalf of AT&T Ohio.6
10/08/2008Memorandum Contra AT&T Ohio's Motion for a Protective Order by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Patti Mallarnee on behalf of Etter, Terry L Mr.11
09/25/2008Motion for a protective order and memorandum in support, electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.25
09/12/2008Reply to AT&T Ohio's show cause pleading of August 29, 2008 by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel.21
08/29/2008AT&T Ohio's response Showing Why Basic Local Exchange Service Alternative Regulation Should Not Be Revoked electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio113
08/18/2008Service Notice2
08/15/2008Entry ordering that OCC's motions set forth reasonable grounds, consistent with finding (7); that AT&T Ohio should file its show cause pleading and OCC should file its reply in accordance with Finding (7). (JSA)4
07/11/2008Reply to AT&T Ohio's Memorandum Contra by The Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel21
07/01/2008Memorandum contra OCC's June 13, 2008 motion electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.38
06/13/2008Motion and memorandum in support by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel for an order requiring AT&T Ohio to show cause as to why its alternative regulation Of Basic Local Exchange Service In The Burton, Cheshire, Dresden, Ironton, Lowellville, New Lexington, Rogers and Toronto Exchanges Should Not Be Revoked Pursuant to R.C. 4927.03(C) And Ohio Adm. Code 4901:1-4-12(B) electronically filed by Ms. Deb J. Bingham on behalf of Etter, Terry L.22
04/10/2008Reply to AT&T Ohio's memorandum contra filed by T. Etter on behalf of Ohio Consumers' Counsel.16
03/31/2008Memorandum contra OCC's March 13, 2008 motion filed by J. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio. 33
03/13/2008Motion and memorandum in support for an order requiring AT&T Ohio to show cause as to why its alternative regulation of basic local exchange service in eleven exchanges should not be revoked by the office of the Ohio Consumers' Council filed by T. Etter.25
11/19/2007Supreme Court Transmittal papers. (S. C. No. 07-1934)6
10/19/2007Notice of appeal of appellant the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by D. Bergman. 71
09/26/2007Memo to reopen case with an effective date of 9/26/07.1
09/24/2007Memo closing case with an effective date of 9/24/2007.1
08/22/2007Service notice.1
08/22/2007Entry ordering the OCC's application for rehearing is denied; that consistent with the June 27, 2007, Opinion and Order, the record from case No. 05-1305-TP-ORD should be considered as part of the record in this case.24
08/06/2007Memorandum contra the Ohio Consumers' Counsel's application for rehearing filed by J. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio. 37
07/27/2007Correction to tariff sheet filed on July 23, 2007 for PUCO Tariff No. 20 filed by M. Mackey on behalf of AT&T Ohio.2
07/27/2007Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed by T. Etter on behalf of OCC.59
07/25/2007Corrections to replace the revised tariff sheets submitted on July 23, 2007 filed by M. Mackey on behalf of AT&T Ohio.6
07/23/2007Final tariff amendments filed on behalf of AT&T by M. Mackey.68
06/27/2007Opinion and Order ordering that AT&T's application for alternative regulation BLES and other Tier 1 services is granted in part and denied in part; that OCC's request for a hearing is denied; that, to the extent not addressed in this opinion and order, all other arguments are denied; that the Docketing Division maintain for 18 months from the date of this opinion and order, all documents that were filed under seal in conjunction with AT&T's motion for protective order filed March 9, 2007, its supplement to motion for protective order filed May 3, 2007, and OCC's motion for protective order filed May 8, 2007. 39
06/27/2007Service Notice1
06/06/2007Corrections and amendments to tariff filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by J. Kelly.7
05/25/2007Revised tariff pages, PUCO No. 20 filed by J. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio. 3
05/08/2007Motion for protective order filed by T. Etter on behalf of OCC.3
05/08/2007Reply of OCC to AT&T Ohio's memorandum contra filed by T. Etter.35
05/08/2007Confidential Document: Reply to memorandum contra filed on behalf of OCC.1
05/03/2007Confidential Document: Memorandum contra filed by J. Kelly on behalf of AT&T. (33 pages)1
05/03/2007Memorandum of AT&T Ohio contra opposition of Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by J. Kelly. (public version)33
05/03/2007Supplement to motion for a protective order filed by J. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.3
04/23/2007Confidential target for opposition to AT&T Ohio's application for basic local service alternative regulation demonstration why the application should not be granted.1
04/23/2007Opposition to AT&T Ohio's application for basic local service alternative regulation; demonstration of why the application should not be granted filed by T. Etter on behalf of The Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel. (Part 2 of 2)136
04/23/2007Opposition to AT&T Ohio's application for basic local service alternative regulation; demonstration of why the application should not be granted filed by T. Etter on behalf of The Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel. (Part 1 of 2)128
04/17/2007Entry permitting interested persons to file objections to the application. (DJ)2
04/17/2007Service Notice1
04/11/2007Entry ordering that OCC's motion to intervene is granted and that discovery proceed in accordance with Rule 4901:1-4-09(I), O.A.C. (DJ)2
04/11/2007Service Notice1
03/19/2007Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed by T. Etter on behalf of Ohio Consumer Counsel.7
03/09/2007Confidential document: Exhibit 3, filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by J. Kelly. (49 pgs).1
03/09/2007Motion for protective order and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by J. Kelly.6
03/09/2007Application cont'd. (Part 2 of 2)167
03/09/2007In the matter of the application of the Ohio Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T Ohio for approval of an alternative form of regulation of Basic Local Exchange and other Tier 1 Services and memorandum in support with attached affidavit of Connie Browning. (Part 1 of 2)200