DIS - Case Record for 05-0974-GA-AAM Skip to main content

Case Record For:

05-0974-GA-AAM

File a Public Comment
Case Title: CINERGY CORP./ CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY / DEER HOLDING CORP.
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: GA-GAS
Purpose Code: AAM-Application to change accounting methods
Date Opened: 8/1/2005
Date Closed:
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
05/02/2008Letter to acknowledge concerns raised by some of the parties over the timing of the filing filed by S. Meyer, President on behalf of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. ("Duke Energy Ohio").2
04/25/2008Correspondence urging a forceful response from PUCO to the FERC regarding an application filed by Cinergy Corp., Duke Energy Ohio, Cinergy Power Investments, Inc., and various as-yet unformed affiliates, filed on behalf of IEU-Ohio by S. Randazzo.4
04/27/2007Report detailing the amount of merger credits that were provided to customers and request to eliminate the merger credit riders filed by D. Wathen on behalf of Duke Energy Ohio.3
03/01/2007Service Notice2
02/28/2007Entry ordering that the applicants revised tariff sheets be approved as filed.3
01/16/2007Additional information filed by R. D'Ascenzo on behalf of Duke Energy Ohio.2
05/16/2006Filing of revised redacted version of pages pursuant to entry dated May 11, 2006 filed by R. D'Ascenzo on behalf of joint applicants.11
05/12/2006Service Notice2
05/11/2006Entry ordering that not later than 5 calendar days from the date of this entry, Duke file revised redacted versions of those attachment pages. (JWK).12
05/08/2006Supreme court transmittal papers No. 06-0701.16
05/08/2006Service Notice2
04/07/2006Notice of appeal of Office of the Ohio Consumers' Council filed by J. Small. (S.C. No. 06-0701)10
03/31/2006Joint response to the Commission's March 20, 2006 Entry, filed on behalf of the Cinergy Corp/The Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company and Duke Energy Holding Corp.by M. Dortch. (part 3 of 3)47
03/31/2006Joint response to the Commission's March 20, 2006 Entry, filed on behalf of the Cinergy Corp/The Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company and Duke Energy Holding Corp.by M. Dortch. (Part 2 of 3)102
03/31/2006Notice of appearance of Michael D. Dortch on behalf of Cinergy Corp./ The Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company and Duke Energy Holding Corp. filed by M. Dortch.4
03/31/2006Joint response to the Commission's March 20, 2006 Entry, filed on behalf of the Cinergy Corp/The Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company and Duke Energy Holding Corp.by M. Dortch. (Part 1 of 3)101
03/30/2006Response continued. (Part 3 of 3)74
03/30/2006Response continued. (Part 2 of 3)201
03/30/2006Response to the entry dated March 20, 2006 by the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by M. Grady. (Part 1 of 3)200
03/20/2006Service Notice2
03/20/2006Entry ordered that; the applicants and OCC comply with finding (6), no later than March 31, 2006. (JWK)3
03/07/2006Entry ordering that the proposed tariff revisions of CG&E filed on February 9, 2006 be approved; that the proposed tariffs be effective upon filing in final form, on a bills-rendered basis.3
03/07/2006Service Notice2
02/21/2006Memorandum contra joint applicants' supplemental memorandum in support of motions for protective orders by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by M. Yost.16
02/07/2006Joint applicants' supplemental memorandum in support of motions for protective orders and withdrawing of certain motions, filed by Cinergy Corp. on behalf of the Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company and Duke Energy Holding Corp. by M. Dortch. '15
02/06/2006Service Notice2
02/06/2006Entry ordered; that the applications for rehearing by Mr. Albert E. Lane and OEG be denied, that the application for rehearing by Dominion and WPS be granted, that the application for rehearing by OCC be granted in part and denied in part; that the intervention by Dominion and WPS be denied.17
01/30/2006Joint applicants' memorandum contra application for rehearing filed by the office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel and the Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy, filed on behalf of Cinergy Corp., Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company and Duke Energy Holding Corp. by M. Dortch.32
01/30/2006Joint applicants' memorandum contra motions for leave to intervene and application for rehearing filed by Dominion Retail, Inc. and WPS Energy Services, Inc. filed on behalf of Cinergy Corp., Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company and Duke Energy Holding Corp. by M. Dortch.20
01/20/2006Application for rehearing and memorandum in support by The Office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by J. Small and The Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy filed by D. Rinebolt.39
01/20/2006Motion for leave to intervene, application for rehearing and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of WPS Energy Services, Inc. by M. Petricoff.10
01/19/2006Petition for rehearing of the Ohio Energy Group filed by D.Boehm.7
01/18/2006Motion for leave to intervene and application for rehearing of Dominion Retail, Inc., memorandum in support, filed by J. Sanders.12
01/17/2006Memorandum contra Albert Lane's application for rehearing filed behalf of joint applicants filed by M. Dortch on behalf of Cinegry Corp. on the behalf of The Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company and Duke Energy Holding Corp.12
01/03/2006Joint applicants reply to the office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel's memorandum contra regarding joint applicants second set of motions for protective orders, filed on behalf of Cinergy Corp., The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company and Duke Energy Holding Corp. by M. Dortch.20
12/23/2005Memorandum Contra to Joint Applicants' December 5, 2005, motions for protective orders by The Office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by M. Yost.48
12/23/2005Confidential Memorandum Contra joint applications' filed by OCC.1
12/22/2005Letter of Eagle Energy requesting that exhibit C be modified so that all customers receive the surcredit regardless of the origination of the generation service filed by D. Marshall.2
12/21/2005Service Notice2
12/21/2005Finding and order approving additional commitments made by applicants in comments with subject to modifications and conditions set forth in this finding; that CG&E's application for authority to modify its current accounting procedures to defer costs be denied; that the affiliate agreements by and between CG&E and its affiliates, as set forth in the application and in the comments filed on December 1, 2005 be approved; that the motions for intervention be denied; that the approvals set forth in this finding and order do not constitute state action for the purpose of antitrust laws. It is not the Commission intent to insulate CG&E from the provision of any state or federal laws which prohibit the restraint of free trade; that the proposed tariff of CG&E are approved; that the proposed tariffs be effective January 1, 2006, on a services-rendered basis; that CG&E is authorized to file tariffs consistent with this finding and order and to update its tariff previously filed electronically, which shall be completed prior to January 1, 2006.21
12/19/2005Reply of joint applicants to the Office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel's memorandum contra filed by M. Dortch on behalf of Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company and Duke Energy Holding Corp.32
12/16/2005Updated signature page correcting the signature block of Mr. Kurtz in connection with the Stipulation and Recommendation filed on December 15, 2005 filed on behalf of applicants by M. Dortch.2
12/15/2005Stipulation and recommendation filed on behalf of The Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company by M. Dortch; for the City of Cincinnati by C. Miller; Buckeye Association of School Administrators, Ohio Association of School Business Officials, Ohio School Board Association by D. Stinson; The Kroger Co. by M. Kurtz; Ohio Energy Group, Inc. by D. Boehm and Interstate Gas Supply, Inc. by V. Parisi.21
12/12/2005Confidential document: Memorandum contra joint applicants' motions for protective order filed by M. Grady on behalf of OCC.1
12/12/2005Memorandum contra joint applicants' motions for protective orders filed on behalf of Ohio Consumers' Council by M. Grady. (public version)144
12/09/2005Reply comments of Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy filed by D. Rinebolt.12
12/09/2005Reply comments to the Staff Recommendations filed on behalf of Formica Corporation by C. Smith.9
12/08/2005Reply Comments of Industrial Energy Users-Ohio filed by L. McAlister.7
12/08/2005Reply Comments of the Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy on the staff recommendations filed by D. Rinebolt. (FAX)12
12/08/2005Reply Comments on staff recommendations by the office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by J. Small.18
12/08/2005Reply comments of Formica Corporation filed by C. Smith. (FAX)9
12/08/2005Reply comments filed on behalf of Joint applicants filed by M. Dortch.25
12/07/2005Entry denying OCC's application for rehearing and motion for clarification.5
12/07/2005Service Notice2
12/05/2005Joint Applicants' motion for protective order to protect the confidentiality of information provided to the office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel for their review under a protective agreement, memorandum in support (Project Four Corners), affidavit of Gregory C. Ficke filed by M. Dortch of Duke Energy Corp. and Cinergy Corp. on behalf of Cincinnati Gas & Electric.11
12/05/2005Joint Applicants' motion for protective order to protect the confidentiality of information provided to the office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel for their review under a protective agreement, memorandum in support (Project Panda: Presentation to the board of Directors UBS Report), affidavit of Richard J. Osborne filed by M Dortch of Duke Energy Corp. and Cinergy Corp. on behalf of Cincinnati Gas & Electric.10
12/05/2005Joint Applicants' motion for protective order to protect the confidentiality of information provided to the office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel for their review under a protective agreement, memorandum in support (Project Panda: Corporate M&A Transaction Update), affidavit of Richard J. Osborne filed by M Dortch of Duke Energy Corp. and Cinergy Corp. on behalf of Cincinnati Gas & Electric.11
12/05/2005Joint Applicants' motion for protective order to protect the confidentiality of information provided to the office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel for their review under a protective agreement in the above referenced matter, memorandum in support (Hart Scott Rodino, Project Four Corners Outline), affidavit of G. Ficke filed by M. Dortch of Duke Energy and Cinergy Corp. on behalf of Cincinnati Gas & Electric (Joint Applicants).12
12/02/2005Comments of Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy on the staff recommendations filed by D. Rinebolt.12
12/01/2005Comments filed on behalf of Direct Energy Services filed by D. Stinson.6
12/01/2005Comments filed on behalf of Eagle Energy, LLC by D. Marshall.11
12/01/2005Comments of Industrial Energy Users-Ohio filed by L. McAlister.11
12/01/2005Comments by Formica Corporation on The Staff's Recommendation filed by C. Smith.12
12/01/2005Joint applicants' initial comments to the staff recommendations filed by M. Dortch on behalf of Cinergy Corp., The Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company and Duke Energy Holding Corp.22
12/01/2005Comments to the November 14, 2005, Staff Recommendations filed by C. Miller on behalf of The City of Cincinnati.9
12/01/2005Public version Initial Comments on Staff Recommendations by The Office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by J. Small (Part 3 of 3)62
12/01/2005Public version Initial Comments on Staff Recommendations by The Office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by J. Small (Part 2 of 2)100
12/01/2005Public version Initial Comments on Staff Recommendations by The Office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by J. Small (Part 1 of 2)101
12/01/2005Comments of Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy on The Staff Recommendations filed by D. Rinebolt.12
12/01/2005Initial Comments to Staff Comments and Recommendations filed by B. Singh on behalf of The City of Lebanon.6
12/01/2005Initial Comments to Staff Comments and Recommendations filed by B. Singh on behalf of Interstate Gas Supply, Inc's.9
12/01/2005Comments to Staff Recommendations of The Ohio Association of School Business Officials, The Ohio School Boards Association, and The Buckeye Association of School Administrators filed by D. Stinson.10
12/01/2005American Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc.'s initial comments to staff's comments and recommendations filed by B. Singh.7
11/23/2005Joint applicants' motion for protective order to protect the confidentiality of information provided to the office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel for their review under a protective agreement in the above referenced matter (Financial Executive Review), memorandum in support and affidavit of Gregory C. Ficke filed by M. Dortch.12
11/23/2005Joint applicants' motion for protective order to protect the confidentiality of information provided to the office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel for their review under a protective agreement in the above referenced matter(Project Panda: Transaction Status & Due Diligence Summary), memorandum in support and affidavit of Gregory C. Ficke filed by M. Dortch.11
11/23/2005Joint applicants' motion for protective order to protect the confidentiality of information provided to the office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel for their review under a protective agreement in the above referenced matter (Project Four Corners), affidavit of Gregory C. Ficke and memorandum in support filed by M. Dortch.12
11/23/2005Joint applicants' motion for protective order to protect the confidentiality of information provided to the office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel for their review under a protective agreement in the above referenced matter (DENA + CIN Gen Portfolio Analysis), memorandum in support and affidavit of Gregory C. Ficke filed by M. Dortch.12
11/23/2005Joint applicants' motion for protective order to protect the confidentiality of information provided to the office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel for their review under a protective agreement in the above referenced matter (Project Panda Regulated Business Unit Management), memorandum in support and affidavit of Gregory C. Ficke filed by M. Dortch.12
11/23/2005Joint applicants' motion for protective order to protect the confidentiality of information provided to the office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel for their review under a protective agreement in the above referenced matter (Project Panda Management Presentation Company Overview), memorandum in support and affidavit of Gregory C. Ficke filed by M. Dortch.12
11/23/2005Joint applicants' motion for protective order to protect the confidentiality of information provided to the office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel for their review under a protective agreement in the above referenced matter (Project Panda Due Diligence Report DENA Team), memorandum in support and affidavit of Gregory C. Ficke filed by M. Dortch.12
11/23/2005Joint applicants' motion for protective order to protect the confidentiality of information provided to the office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel for their review under a protective agreement in the above referenced matter (Lazard Synergies Analysis), memorandum in support and affidavit of Richard J. Osborne filed by M. Dortch.11
11/23/2005Joint applicants' motion for protective order to protect the confidentiality of information provided to the office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel for their review under a protective agreement in the above referenced matter (Project Panda Update), memorandum in support and affidavit of Gregory C. Ficke filed by M. Dortch.11
11/23/2005Joint applicants' motion for protective order to protect the confidentiality of information provided to the office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel for their review under a protective agreement in the above referenced matter (Exhibit 34 Document), memorandum in support and affidavit of Gregory C. Ficke filed by M. Dortch.13
11/23/2005Joint applicants' motion for protective order to protect the confidentiality of information provided to the office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel for their review under a protective agreement in the above referenced matter (Project Panda Phase I Financial Due Diligence), memorandum in support and affidavit of Gregory C. Ficke filed by M. Dortch.12
11/16/2005Memorandum contra The Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel's application for rehearing and motion for clarification filed by M. Dortch on behalf of Cinergy Corp.14
11/14/2005Staff recommendations submitted by T. McNamee on behalf of PUCO.9
11/07/2005Application for rehearing and motion for clarification by The Office of The Consumers' Counsel and memorandum in support filed by J.Small.14
10/26/2005Entry ordered that the Commission staff shall examine the application and filed comments and file its recommendations by November 14, 2005, the Commission also finds that in order to ensure its complete review of staff recommendations, interested persons may comment on the substance of those recommendations, therefore comments may be filed by no later than December 1, 2005. Reply comments may be filed by no later that December 8, 2005.3
10/26/2005Service Notice1
09/28/2005Resolution which was adopted by the Mason City School Board of Education on September 13, 2005 filed by P. Jones.3
09/21/2005Reply to applicants' comments regarding its motion to intervene filed by C. Miller on behalf of the City of Forest Park.5
09/12/2005Reply to the applicant's memorandum contra the City of Lebanon's motion for a declaratory order filed by B/ Singh on behalf of the City of Lebanon.7
09/01/2005Reply comments filed by J. Small on behalf of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Council.21
09/01/2005Reply comments filed by C. Smith on behalf of Formica Corporation.16
09/01/2005Reply comments filed on behalf of Industrial Energy Users-Ohio by D. Neilsen.47
09/01/2005Reply comments of Interstate Gas Supply, Inc. filed by B. Singh.11
09/01/2005Memorandum in opposition to the City of Lebanon's motion for declaratory order and reply comments of CG&E filed by M Dortch on behalf of applicants.32
09/01/2005Reply comments of Direct Energy Services filed by D. Stinson.10
08/22/2005Reply to applicants' memorandum contra The City of Lebanon's intervention request and motion for a Declaratory Order, filed on behalf of The City of Lebanon by B. Singh.11
08/22/2005Reply to applicants' memorandum contra American Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc.'s intervention request, filed on behalf of American Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc. by B. Singh.9
08/18/2005Entry ordering that CG&E's motions to strike comments by AMP-Ohio, Lebanon, and DP&L be denied; that CG&E' s request to strike the notice filed by FirstEnergy be denied; that CG&E's motions to consolidate Case No. 05-974-GA-AAM with Case Nos. 05-732-EL-MER and 05-733-EL-AAM be granted; that CG&E 's motion to modify the caption of Case No. 05-732-EL-MER be granted. (JK)4
08/18/2005Service Notice1
08/01/2005Application continued. (Part 2 of 2)204
08/01/2005In the matter of the joint application of The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company to introduce a new case number 05-974-GA-AAM for authority to modify current accounting procedures in order to defer costs incurred in order to realize cost saving as a result of the merger transaction, motion to consolidate, motion to modify caption, and direct testimony in support of their application.201