| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 01/11/2006 | Entry ordered, that the joint motions to dismiss be granted and case is dismissed and closed of record. | 3 |
| 01/11/2006 | Service Notice | 3 |
| 12/22/2005 | Joint motion to dismiss filed on behalf of Ohio Edison Company by C. Dacoros, Green Mountain Energy by R. Pace and E. Robinson, NOPEC by J. Heiser and Complainant, Spitzer Great Lakes LTD, Co. by A. Giardini. | 4 |
| 05/16/2005 | Notice of filing of deposition of Larry Ward and Frank Gumina, filed on behalf of FirstEnergy Service Company by C. Dacoros. | 2 |
| 05/16/2005 | Transcript with attachments from the depositions of complainants witnesses Frank Gumina and Larry Ward, filed on behalf of FirstEnergy Company by J. Burk. | 56 |
| 05/16/2005 | Notice of filing of deposition of Larry Ward and Frank Gumina, filed on behalf of FirstEnergy Company by C. Dacoros. | 2 |
| 05/13/2005 | Deposition w/attachments of Matt Edwards on behalf of Ohio Edison Company, filed by C. Dacoros. | 126 |
| 05/12/2005 | Joint stipulation of facts filed by C. Dacoros on behalf of FirstEnergy, E. Robinson on behalf of Green Mountain Energy Company and J. Heiser on behalf of Northeast Ohio Public Energy Council. | 26 |
| 05/11/2005 | Respondents' joint stipulation of facts, filed on behalf of Ohio Edison Co. by C. Dacoros, Green Mountain Energy Co. by E. Robinson and Northeast Ohio Public Energy Council by J. Heiser. (FAX) | 26 |
| 04/22/2005 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 04/21/2005 | Entry ordering that the motion to compel by Ohio Edison and CEI be granted to Sunrise Cove Phase II and Lakewood Manor Motel Co. (JS) | 3 |
| 04/13/2005 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 04/13/2005 | Entry ordered; that Spitzer's motion be granted in part and denied in part, consistent with finding 7. (JLS) | 4 |
| 04/11/2005 | Memorandum contra to motion of complainants to require respondents to respond to outstanding discovery request or in the alternative to allow complainants to file its discovery requests filed by C. Dacoros on behalf of Ohio Edison. | 6 |
| 04/08/2005 | Memorandum contra to motion of complainant to require respondents to respond to outstanding discovery request or in the alternative to allow complainant to file its discovery request filed on behalf of Ohio Edison by C. Dacoros.(FAX) | 6 |
| 04/04/2005 | Motion of complainant to require respondents to respond to outstanding discovery request or in the alternative to allow complainant to file its discovery requests and brief in support of motion filed by A. Giardini. | 5 |
| 03/31/2005 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 03/30/2005 | Entry ordering that an evidentiary hearing be held May 18, 2005 at 10:00 a.m., hearing room 11G, Commission offices; that Lakewood Manor Motel Company direct its attorney to file a notice of appearance in the docket of 04-412-EL-CSS no later than April 11, 2005. (JS) | 4 |
| 03/28/2005 | Motion to compel and motion for continuance, memorandum in support filed by J. Burk on behalf of the Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company and Ohio Edison Company. | 26 |
| 03/25/2005 | Motion to compel and motion for continuance with memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. and Ohio Edison Company by J. Burk. | 28 |
| 02/09/2005 | Service Notice | 3 |
| 02/09/2005 | Entry ordered, that an evidentiary hearing in these consolidated cases is scheduled for Tuesday, April 5 and 6, 2005, at 10:00 a.m. in Hearing Room 11-G-11th fl., at the offices of the Commission, that the cutoff date for completion of discovery is March 22, 2005, that any stipulations of fact be filed by March 29, 2005, that all direct, expert testimony be pre-filed by March 29, 2005. (JLS) | 5 |
| 12/17/2004 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 12/17/2004 | Entry stating that Sunrise Coves II's motion to consolidated for purposes of hearing is granted; that Sunrise Cove shall be bound by procedural schedule established by examiner entry dated December 3, 2004 in 03-2112 et al; that a procedural established by the examiner entry issued December 3, 2004, remains unchanged; the evidentiary hearing in the consolidated cases remains scheduled for March 8 and 9, 2005, at 10:00 a.m., in hearing room 11-F, Commission offices. (JS) | 4 |
| 12/03/2004 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 12/03/2004 | Entry stating that an evidentiary hearing be held March 8 and 9, 2005 at 10:00 a.m.; that telephonic status conference be held February 2, 2005 at 2:30 p.m.; that the cutoff date for completion of discovery is February 22, 2005; any stipulations of fact be filed by March 1, 2005; all direct expert testimony be pre-filed by March 1, 2005; and the motion to admit Scott DeBroff pro hac vice in 03-2362-EL-CSS be granted(JS) | 5 |
| 12/01/2004 | Letter stating that James Burk and Carol Dacoros, attorneys with FirstEnergy Service Company, as their representatives for purposes of the December 2, 2004 settlement conference filed by J. Burk. | 2 |
| 12/01/2004 | Respondent, Northeast Ohio Public Energy Council's letter of authority filed by J. Heiser. | 3 |
| 11/09/2004 | Notice of withdrawal of counsel filed by R. Karl on behalf of Sunrise Cove Phase I, III, IV, V. | 3 |
| 11/01/2004 | Entry of appearance filed by S. DeBroff on behalf of Gates Medical Center, Inc. (original) | 6 |
| 10/29/2004 | Notice of entry of appearance of Scott H. DeBroff in this proceeding filed by S. DeBroff on behalf of Gates Medical Center, Inc. (FAX) | 6 |
| 10/28/2004 | Answer regarding NOPEC's cross-claim filed by C. Dacoros on behalf of FirstEnergy Service Company. (original) | 7 |
| 10/28/2004 | Motion for admission pro hac vice of Scott Debroff filed by B Edwards on behalf of Gates Medical Center, Inc. | 6 |
| 10/27/2004 | Answer to NOPEC's cross-claim filed by C. Dacoros on behalf of FirstEnergy Service Company. (FAX) | 6 |
| 10/26/2004 | Notice of appearance filed by R. Karl on behalf of Sunrise Cove Phase I, III, IV & V. | 3 |
| 10/21/2004 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 10/20/2004 | Entry ordering that a settlement conference be held Thursday, December 2, 2004 at 10:00 AM in hearing room 11-C in the offices of the Commission. (JS) | 4 |
| 10/04/2004 | Answer and Cross-Claim of NorthEast Ohio Public Energy Council filed by J. Heiser. | 8 |
| 10/04/2004 | Joint motion for continuance filed on behalf of respondents by C. Dacoros, E. Robinson, J. Heiser, J. Burk. | 7 |
| 10/01/2004 | Joint motion for continuance filed on behalf of Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, Ohio Edison Company, Green Mountain Energy Company, Northeast Ohio Public Energy Council and request that the evidentiary hearing previously scheduled for the consolidation cases set forth above for Oct. 26, 2004 be continued for the reasons set fourth in this filed by C. Dacoros, E. Robinson, J. Heiser and J. Burk. (FAX) | 7 |
| 09/30/2004 | Answer of Green Mountain Energy Company filed by E. Robinson and R. Pace. | 4 |
| 09/28/2004 | Answer of Ohio Edison Company filed by C. Dacoros. | 4 |
| 09/27/2004 | Answer of the Ohio Edison Company to Spitzer Great Lakes LTD Co. by C. Dacoros. (FAX) | 4 |
| 09/21/2004 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 09/21/2004 | Entry ordering that Spitzer's motion to consolidate is granted, subject to restrictions. Spitzer shall be bound by the procedural schedule established by examiner entry dated August 17,2004. NOPEC, Green Mountain and Ohio Edison shall file and serve answers within 10 days following service of Spitzer complaint in 04-1439. Spitzer shall respond to discovery requests of respondents that are served prior to Oct. 8, 2004 by Oct. 18, 2004 and that the evidentiary hearing remains scheduled Oct. 26, 2004 at 10:00 AM in hearing room 11-F in the offices of the Commission. | 4 |
| 09/20/2004 | Motion requesting that the complaint be consolidated with existing complaints filed by A. Giardini. | 3 |
| 09/20/2004 | Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to Ohio Edison Company. | 1 |
| 09/20/2004 | Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to Green Mountain Energy Co. | 1 |
| 09/20/2004 | Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to NOPEC. | 1 |
| 09/20/2004 | In the matter of the complaint of Spitzer Great Lakes LTD., Co. vs. Green mountain Energy Co. NOPEC and Ohio Edison Company alleges that the electric was a higher rate. | 5 |