DIS - Case Record for 04-0429-TP-UNC Skip to main content

Case Record For:

04-0429-TP-UNC

Case Title: KALIDA TELEPHONE COMPANY
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: UNC-Unclassified
Date Opened: 3/31/2004
Date Closed: 1/25/2008
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
01/25/2008Case Action Form electronically filed by Erin E. Scribner on behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio2
01/22/2008Withdrawal of Todd M. Rodgers and the substitution of Mark S. Yurick and John W. Bentine as counsel of record for Verizon Wireless filed by J. Bentine.4
12/19/2007Third Supplemental Finding and Order ordering that wireless carriers seeking intermodal LNP in the applicants' service territories comply with Finding (9); that the applicable applicants provide intermodal LNP within 90 days of receiving a BFR; that Buckland is granted additional time to satisfy its intermodal obligations consistent with Finding (10). 7
05/25/2006Letter informing that Kalida Telephone Company has LNP capability filed by C. Phillips.1
02/23/2005Second supplemental finding and order stating that the applicants motion of January 20, 2005 is granted; that the applicant comply with the applicable time frames; that the designated companies provide quarterly updates until such time that the switch replacements or upgrades occur.8
02/23/2005Service Notice2
02/22/2005Notice of supplemental filing filed on behalf of applicants by D. Ferris and P. Schudel.6
01/20/2005Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed by D. Ferris.5
01/20/2005Motion to amend the supplemental finding and order filed by D. Ferris.6
12/22/2004Service Notice1
12/21/2004Supplemental Finding and Order ordering that the applications for suspension of intertidal LNP obligations are denied in accordance with the provisions of this Finding and Order; that the applicable ILECs as addressed in findings (13) and (14) file with the FCC for a determination of the pertinent LNP surcharge,that the applicable ILECs supplement their respective applications consistent with Finding(12),that the other ILECs identified in Finding(13) file with the FCC for a determination of the pertinent LNP surcharge at te designated time.17
07/20/2004Service Notice1
07/20/2004Finding and Order, ordered that the applicants are granted a temporary interim waiver of the their local number portability obligations consistent with Finding (10), that the applicants' work with the Commission staff for the purpose of assessing the public desire for intermodal LNP, that the applicants provide the capability to query the local routing number consistent with Finding (11); that the Pattersonville Telephone Company notify the Commission staff as to the status of its LNP deployment within 15 days of the F&O.18
06/24/2004Response to Entry of May 19, 2004, filed on behalf of applicants by D. Ferris. (original)7
06/23/2004Response to Entry of 5/19/2004, filed on behalf of applicants by D. Ferris. (Fax)6
06/22/2004Motion for extension of time filed on behalf of applicants by D. Ferris. (original)4
06/21/2004Motion for an extension of time, filed on behalf of applicants by D. Ferris. (FAX)3
06/18/2004Response to Commission's request to file intentions of pursuing interconnection agreements filed on behalf of Verizon Wireless by T. Rodgers.3
06/18/2004Response to the Commission's May 19, 2004 order, filed on behalf of Sprint Spectrum L.P. by J. Stewart.18
05/20/2004Service Notice7
05/19/2004Entry ordering that the motions for interventions are granted consistent with Finding (9), that the applicants motions to strike are denied in accordance with Finding (9), that the applicants motion for a protective order are granted in accordance with Finding (10), that the applicants are granted an interim waiver of their local number portability obligations consistent with Finding (12), that the parties file responses to the Commission directive consistent with Finding (12), that the applicants provide the capability to query the local routing number consistent with Finding (13).18
05/14/2004A Decision, A Public Notice issued by the Federal Communications Commission and a Notice of apparent Liability for Forfeiture issued by the Chief of Enforcement Bureau filed in support of Verizon Wireless objections and position that the applicants request for interim and permanent relief from the Local Number Portability requirements must be denied filed by T. Rodgers.25
05/11/2004Motion to strike objections and memorandum contra of and Verizon Wireless or, in the alternative memorandum contra, filed on behalf of applicants by D. Ferris. (original)9
05/10/2004Motion to strike objections and memorandum contra of and Verizon Wireless or, in the alternative memorandum contra filed on behalf of applicants by D. Ferris. (FAX)9
05/10/2004Reply of Sprint Spectrum L.P. to applicants' motion to strike objections and memoranda contra of Sprint Spectrum L.P. and Verizon Wireless or, in the alternative, memorandum contra, by J. Stewart.4
05/06/2004Reply to entry of April 28, 2004, filed on behalf of applicant by D. Ferris. (original)14
05/06/2004Applicants' reply to Entry of 4/28/04 filed by D. Ferris.(original) (FILED UNDER SEAL)22
05/05/2004Reply to entry of 4/38/04 filed by D. Ferris on behalf of applicants. (FILED UNDER SEAL)(FAX)20
05/05/2004Applicants' reply to entry of April 28, 2004, filed by D. Ferris. (FAX)13
04/30/2004Motion to strike objections and memorandum contra of Sprint Spectrum L.P. and Verizon Wireless or, in the alternative, memorandum contra, and memorandum in support filed on behalf of applicant by D. Ferris.22
04/29/2004Service Notice1
04/28/2004Entry ordering that the applicants file the revised local number portability cost information consistent with finding (2).3
04/23/2004Objection to application for suspension or modification of the local number portability mandate pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 251(f)(2) filed on behalf of Verizon Wireless by T. Rodgers43
04/20/2004Memorandum opposing motion for order granting interim relief from complying with local number portability requirements pursuant to 47 u.s.c. 251(f)(2) filed on behalf of Verizon Wireless by T. Rodgers.8
04/15/2004Objects to application of Kalida Telephone Company, EL AL for suspension or modification of the FCC requirement to implement wireline-wireless number portability filed on behalf of Sprint Spectrum, LP by J. Stewart.13
04/15/2004Motion to intervene, memorandum in support filed on behalf of Sprint Spectrum, LP by J. Stewart.6
04/15/2004Motion of Verizon Wireless to intervene in the matter of the application of the suspension of wireline-wireless number portability requirement: and memorandum of Verizon Wireless in support of it's motion to intervene filed by T. Rodgers.7
04/15/2004Memorandum Contra of Sprint Spectrum L.P. to the motions of Kalida Telephone Company, ET AL. for orders granting interim relief pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 251(f)(2) and request for hearing filed by J. Stewart.9
03/31/2004Motion for order granting interim relief pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 151 (f)(2) and request for hearing filed on behalf of applicant by D. Ferris.4
03/31/2004Motion for protective treatment and memorandum in support filed on behalf of applicant by D. Ferris.2
03/31/2004Confidential version of the application of Kalida Telephone Company for suspension or modification of the federal communications Commission's requirements to implement wireline-wireless number portability pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 251(f)(2).(FILED UNDER SEAL)15
03/31/2004In the matter of the application of The Kalida Telephone Company for suspension or modification of the Federal Communications Commission's requirements to implement wireline-wireless number portability pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 251 (f)(2).14