DIS - Case Record for 01-2565-TP-PEX Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 01-2565-TP-PEX
CASE DESCRIPTION: BETTY MILLER VS VERIZON NORTH
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 4/23/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
01/07/2004 Revised Tariff PUCO No.6 filed on behalf of applicant by T. Colquitt.
06/23/2003 Revised tariff sheets reflecting the implementation of flat rate extended area service (EAS) between SBC Ohio's Dayton exchange and Verizon's New Burlington Exchange, by R. Wentz.
05/23/2003 Revised tariff sheets filed by C. Cole.
03/04/2003 Revised tariff sheets reflect the establishment of Extended Local Calling (ELCP) between the Verizon North Inc. exchange of New Burlington and the Sprint exchange of Waynesville, filed by T. Colquitt.
03/03/2003 Revised tariff sheets reflect the establishment of extended local calling (ELCP) between the Verizon North Inc. exchange of New Burlington and the Sprint exchange of Waynesville, filed by T. Colquitt. (FAX)
01/21/2003 Letter stating that the in-service date for the institution of two-way, flat-rate EAS between the Dayton exchange of SBC Ohio and the New Burlington exchange of Verizon has been established as June 24, 2003 at 12:01 am, filed on behalf of respondent, SBC Ohio, by R. Wentz.
01/17/2003 Letter stating that the in-service date for the institution of two-way, flat rate EAS between Verizon's New Burlington exchange and Ameritech's Dayton exchange will be June 24, 2003 at 12:01 a.m., filed on behalf of Verizon North by C. Cole.
01/09/2003 Supplemental Opinion and Order, Ordering that two-way, flat rate EAS be instituted between the New Burlington Exchange and Dayton Exchange within six months of the order, that Verizon and Ameritech establish an in-service date within 60 days of this order, and advise the Commission and spokesperson not later than 30 days prior to in-service date in the event the date cannot be met, ordered that prior to the in-service date of the EAS, Verizon and Ameritech provide information through press releases, to customers and to the media which describes the new EAS service, explains the dialing procedures, states the date and time that the service will become available and explain the rates for the service, and file three copies of revised tariff sheets reflecting the establishment of two-way, flat-rate EAS. These tariffs shall be effective upon the institution of the service.
12/12/2002 Ballot results filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by C. Cole.
12/11/2002 Letter on behalf of Verizon North Inc. regarding the results of the balloting of the New Burlington exchange, filed by C. Cole.
12/09/2002 Ballots for Caesar Creek Park.
11/20/2002 Letter stating that the in-service date for the institution of one-way, measured EAS between Verizon's New Burlington exchange and Sprint's Waynesville exchange will be April 2, 2003 at 12:01 a.m., filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by C. Cole.
11/19/2002 Letter regarding the EAS between Verizon 's New Burlington exchange and Sprint's Waynesville exchange will be April 2, 2003, filed by C. Cole.
10/31/2002 Finding & Order that the complainants' request for two-way, flat-rate EAS between the New Burlington Exchange and the Dayton Exchange is granted provided that a substantial majority of the New Burlington Exchange subscribers is willing to pay appropriate rates for the service.
08/13/2002 Stipulation agreement and recommendation filed by B. Miller.
05/31/2002 Additional information filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Fenlon.
05/03/2002 Information response of Ameritech Ohio filed by J. Kelly.
05/02/2002 Information response filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by J. Stewart.
05/02/2002 Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by P. Cook.
04/03/2002 Affidavit of Dorinda Lanier on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P.
03/13/2002 Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by W. Keating. (Original copy)
03/12/2002 Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly.
03/12/2002 Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by W. Keating. (Fax copy)
03/12/2002 Answer filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by J. Stewart.
03/06/2002 Affidavit of Elizabeth Finnerty filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by E. Finnerty.
02/25/2002 Service Notice
02/13/2002 Entry ordering that the IXC provide the information required to Verizon, Ameritech and Sprint on or before 4/5/02. (AE)
02/13/2002 Service notice.
10/31/2001 Response letter to Betty Miller, filed by S. Farkas, PUCO staff.
10/02/2001 In the matter of the petition of Betty Miller vs. Verizon North, Inc. for EAS from the 488 exchange to Dayton, Spring Valley, and Bellbrook, Ohio.
10/02/2001 In the matter of the petition of Betty Miller and subscribers of the 488 exchange of Verizon North, Inc. for EAS into the Dayton, Spring Valley, Clarksville, Waynesville, Bellbrook, Beavercreek, Centerville, and Kettering exchanges of Verizon North, Inc. (17 pgs.)
10/02/2001 In the matter of the petition of Betty Miller and subscribers of the 488 exchange of Verizon North for extended area service into the Dayton, Spring Valley, Clarksville, Waynesville, Bellbrook, Beavercreek, Centerville, and Kettering exchanges of Verizon North.