| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 08/19/2003 | Entry approving and adopting the settlement agreement; that this case be dismissed and closed of record. | 8 |
| 08/18/2003 | Attachment that was inadvertently left off settlement agreement filed on August 15, 2003., filed on behalf of PUCO staff by M. Satterwhite-Attorney General Section. | 5 |
| 08/15/2003 | Settlement agreement filed between Exide Technologies by B. Ferris and the PUCO by M. Satterwhite. | 6 |
| 04/21/2003 | Letter filed on behalf of Exide Technologies, Inc. and the Staff of the PUCO requesting that the hearing be continued, by M. Satterwhite. | 1 |
| 03/19/2003 | Entry ordering that the March 20, 2003 hearing be converted to a settlement conference and the March 24, 2003 hearing be continued to April 22, 2003, at 10:00 a.m., in Hearing Room 11-F at the offices of the Commission.(SF). | 5 |
| 03/19/2003 | Joint request for continuance of March 20, 2003 hearing to be continued to the week of April 21, 2003, filed on behalf of PUCO staff by M. Satterwhite. | 1 |
| 02/19/2003 | Service Notice. | 3 |
| 02/18/2003 | Entry ordering that the hearing be continued to March 20, 2003, at 10:00 a.m. in Hearing Room 11-D, Commission offices. (SF) | 2 |
| 02/12/2003 | Letter on behalf of the applicant requesting the hearing be continued for a period of sixty (60) days filed by B. Ferris. | 1 |
| 01/23/2003 | Entry granting Exide Technologies's application for rehearing for the limited purpose of holding a hearing on the issue of whether notices of apparent violation and intent to assess forfeiture and notices of preliminary determination were properly served; scheduling a hearing at 10:00 a.m. on February 20, 2003, Hearing Room 11-D, Commission offices. | 3 |
| 01/23/2003 | service notice filed. | 3 |
| 12/26/2002 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Exide Technologies by B. Ferris. | 6 |
| 11/27/2002 | Service Notice. | 3 |
| 11/27/2002 | Service Notice. | 3 |
| 11/27/2002 | Service Notice. | 3 |
| 11/26/2002 | Entry ordering that each respondent listed in the attachment to this entry is in default and must pay the forfeiture amount indicated by December 27, 2002 to avoid further collection efforts; that George E. Kuhn & Company, Inspection No. CY100103 is not in default and is dismissed from this proceeding; that R & L Transfer, Inspection No. GG300071C is not in default and is dismissed from this proceeding; that Arctic Express, Inspection Nos. GF300096C, GN300117C, CS200474C, OH007109C, and CU200274C are not in default and are dismissed from this proceeding; that M.C. Tank, Inspection Nos. GK300564C and GJ300150C are not in default and are dismissed from this proceeding; that Pohl Transportation, Inspection Nos. CS100567C and CS100583C are not in default and are dismissed from this proceeding; Pohl Transportation, Inspection No. CU200321C is in default and Pohl Transportation shall pay $675 by December 27, 2002; that Rush Package Delivery, Inspection Nos. CS100161C, CT100022C and CS200271C are not in default and are dismissed from this proceeding; Rush Package Delivery, Inspection Nos. GJ300009C and LA301029C are in default and Rush Package Delivery shall pay $3,515 by December 27, 2002; that Ruan Leasing, Inspection No. CU200442C is not in default and is dismissed from this proceeding; that H.L.C. Trucking are not in default and are dismissed from this proceeding; that Advantage Tank Lines is not in default and is dismissed from this proceeding and Advantage Tank Lines motion to dismiss is granted; that Exide Technologies motion to dismiss is granted with respect to Inspection Nos. LB300198C and AF200016C and these two inspections are not in default and are dismissed from this proceeding; in addition, Inspection Nos. BD200761S, GH300012S and GD300203C are not in default and are dismissed from this proceeding; Exide Technologies motion to dismiss is denied with respect to Inspection Nos. LH300689S, LH300166S, OH000620S, CP200270S, GK300398S, GK300629S and EG200072S, these inspections are in default and Exide Technologies shall pay $5,100 by December 27, 2002; that on or after December 27, 2002, staff forward a list to the Attorney General of unpaid civil forfeitures identified in the attachment; the Attorney General is directed to take appropriate action to enforce this entry as provided by law against any respondent who has failed to pay the requisite forfeiture by December 27, 2002; that Triad Transport's motion for relief from the Commission's October 16, 2001 entry is granted in part and denied in part; Triad Transport shall pay $450 by December 27, 2002. | 92 |
| 04/01/2002 | Motion to dismiss Advantage Tank Lines, Inc. the citation involved, filed by B. Ferris. | 6 |
| 04/01/2002 | Motion to dismiss M.C. Tank Transport, Inc. the citations involved, filed by B. Ferris | 11 |
| 03/15/2002 | Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Exide Technologies by B. Ferris. | 8 |
| 12/16/2001 | Response to Entry dated 10-16/01 filed by S. Cason-Adams on behalf of Pohl Transportation, Inc. | 2 |
| 11/19/2001 | Response to the October 16, 2001 order filed by B. Ferris on behalf of Exide Corp. | 2 |
| 11/19/2001 | Motion for relief from Commission entry and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Triad Transport, Inc. by E. Beery. | 8 |
| 11/19/2001 | Response to entry dated October 16, 2001, filed on behalf of Advantage Tank Lines by B. Ferris. | 3 |
| 11/19/2001 | Response to entry filed on behalf of Exide Corp. by B. Ferris. | 2 |
| 11/19/2001 | Response to entry dated October 16, 2001, filed on behalf of Ruan Leasing Co. by B. Ferris. | 1 |
| 11/19/2001 | Response to entry dated October 16, 2001, filed on behalf of R&L Transfer by B. Ferris. | 2 |
| 11/19/2001 | Response to entry dated October 16, 2001, filed on behalf of H.L.C. Trucking Co. by S. Cason-Adams. | 1 |
| 11/19/2001 | Response to entry dated October 16, 2001, filed on behalf of M.C. Tank Transport by B. Ferris. | 2 |
| 11/19/2001 | Response to entry dated October 16, 2001, filed on behalf of Arctic Express by B. Ferris. | 1 |
| 11/16/2001 | Response to entry dated October 16, 2001, filed on behalf of Pohl Transportation by S. Cason-Adams. | 2 |
| 11/16/2001 | delete Response to entry dated October 16, 2001, filed on behalf of Pohl Transportation by S. Cason-Adams. | 2 |
| 11/16/2001 | Response to entry dated October 16, 2001, filed on behalf of Rush Package Delivery by S. Cason-Adams. | 4 |
| 11/16/2001 | Additional information showing that M.C. Tank Transport was not in default in this case, filed by B. Ferris. | 6 |
| 10/31/2001 | Letter stating that Arctic Express should not be held in default in this proceeding, filed by B. Ferris. (CS200474C) | 2 |
| 10/31/2001 | Letter stating that Arctic Express should not be held in default in this proceeding, filed by B. Ferris. (GF300096C) | 2 |
| 10/31/2001 | Letter stating that Arctic Express should not be held in default in this proceeding, filed by B. Ferris. (OH007109C) | 2 |
| 10/29/2001 | Letter stating that company should not be held in default in this case filed by B.
Ferris. | 2 |
| 10/25/2001 | Response filed on behalf of R&L Transfer, Inc. by B. Ferris. | 2 |
| 10/25/2001 | Response filed on behalf of George E. Kuhn & Company by B. Ferris. | 2 |
| 10/16/2001 | Entry ordering that, by November 19, 2001, each respondent listed in the attachment to this entry pay the forfeiture amount indicated or show cause why it should not be held in default and ordered to make payment of the forfeiture indicated on the attachment; that the staff determine whether a respondent has demonstrated good cause and report to the Commission those respondents who should be found liable for and ordered to make payment of the forfeiture. | 210 |
| 10/16/2001 | Service Notice. | 1 |
| 09/05/2001 | In the matter of the default of hazardous materials carriers, shippers and drivers pursuant to Rule 4901:2-7-14, Ohio Administrative Code. | 1 |