| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 08/17/2001 | Entry ordering that the motions for renewal of the protective orders filed by AT&T, Sprint, and WorldCom on August 7 and August 8, 2001, are denied and that the Commission's Docketing Department should place the involved information in the public file one week after issuance of this entry in accordance with Finding 3. (AE) | 3 |
| 08/17/2001 | Service Notice. | 3 |
| 08/08/2001 | Motion to renew protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of WorldCom, Inc. by J. Sanders and E. Siegel. | 8 |
| 08/07/2001 | Motion to renew protective order and request for an expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by J. Stewart. | 7 |
| 08/07/2001 | Motion to renew protective order and request for an expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by J. Kelroy. | 9 |
| 07/17/2000 | Entry ordering that the January 14, 18, and 25, 2000 motions to renew the protective orders are granted; that, for 18 months from the date of this entry, the Docketing Division should continue to maintain under seal all of the information that is currently under seal in this docket. (AE) | 4 |
| 02/17/2000 | Entry ordering that the January 14, 18, and 25, 2000 motions to renew the protective orders are granted; that, for 18 months from the date of this entry, the Docketing Division of the Commission should continue to maintain under seal all of the information that is currently under seal in this docket. (AE) (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 01/25/2000 | Motion to renew protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by L. Lauridsen. (7 pgs.) | 7 |
| 01/18/2000 | Motion of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. to Renew Protective Order. Respectfully submitted by, D. Chorzempa (8 pgs) | 8 |
| 01/14/2000 | Motion to renew protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI WorldCom Communications by J. Sanders and D. McGann. (7 pgs.) | 7 |
| 09/30/1999 | Finding & Order denying the motions to intervene by Ameri- tech, the Payphone Association, and the OTIA for the reasons set forth in this order; that AT&T, MCI, and Sprint have demonstrated their compliance with their pass through com- mitments; that this case be closed of record. (14 pgs.) | 14 |
| 12/02/1998 | Entry ordering that the motion for protective order filed by AT&T is granted; that the Docketing Division of the Commission maintain the unredacted copies of the supplemental responses of AT&T, which were filed on November 2, 1998, under seal for 18 months from the date of this entry; that any party wishing to extend this confidential treatment should file an appropriate motion at least 45 days in advance of the expiration date of this protective order; that any current or intervening party (except OCC, if its executes an appropriate confidentially agreement) is prohibited from reviewing the sensitive information in the supplemental responses of AT&T to questions one, two, three, and four, un- til otherwise ordered. (AE) (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 11/02/1998 | Unredacted Supplemental Data Reponses filed by B. Kahn (5 pgs) (FILED UNDER SEAL). | 5 |
| 11/02/1998 | Motion for a protective order and readacted version of the Supplemental Data Response filed by B. Kahn (18 pgs) | 18 |
| 09/23/1998 | Supplemental information to the responses filed 9/18/98, filed by B. Kahn. (3 pgs) (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 1 |