Skip to main content

Case Record For:

97-0718-TP-PEX

File a Public Comment
Case Title: BEN DONAHUE/AMERITECH/SPRINT
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: PEX-Petition for extended area service
Date Opened: 7/2/1997
Date Closed: 6/22/2000
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 20 documents 1 /  2 
Date FiledSummaryPages
11/29/2000Final revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Section C, 20th sheet 24, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by M. Prendergast.2
11/29/2000Revised tariff, PUCO No. 20, Part 4, Section 1, 3rd sheet 22, original sheet 22.1; Section 2, 1st sheet 10, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by K. Gentile-Klein.5
07/21/2000Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (2 pgs.)2
07/20/2000Letter stating that the in-service date for 2-way flat-rate EAS between the Warren and the North Jackson exchanges if December 6, 2000 at 12:01 a.m., filed on behalf of respon- dent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by B. Donahue. (2 pgs.)2
06/22/2000Finding & Order that the stipulation filed on June 4, 1999, is approved in part as set forth herein; as a result, the Commission finds that two-way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS should be instituted between the North Jackson and Warren exchanges as soon as practicable, but no later than 12 months after this order; that, within 30 days of the date of this order, Ameritech and Sprint are directed to establish an in-service date for two-way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS between the North Jackson and Warren exchanges and to inform the Commission and the spokesperson for the complainants of the in-service date.9
06/22/2000Finding & Order that the stipulation filed on June 4, 1999, by the parties is approved in part as set forth herein; as a result, the Commission finds that two-way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS should be instituted between the North Jackson and Warren exchanges. (9 pgs.)9
06/04/1999Stipulation and agreement filed on behalf of complainants by T. Vuletich; and respondents, Ameritech Ohio by C. Raw- lings, Sprint by J. Stewart. (16 pgs.)16
03/13/1998Amended information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (7 pgs.)7
03/05/1998Information response filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by M. Arendes, Jr. (41 pgs.)41
03/05/1998Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (22 pgs.)22
02/20/1998Entry ordering that this matter be rescheduled for a tele- phone conference at 2:00 p.m. on March 3, 1998; that Ameri- tech and Sprint's certain cost information, outlined in Finding 7 of the November 4, 1997 entry, is due on March 5, 1998. (AE) (2 pgs.) (ISSUED 2/18/98)2
02/05/1998Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (71 pgs.)71
02/05/1998Answer and information response filed on behalf of respon- dent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by M. Arendes, Jr. (63 pgs.)63
02/05/1998Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (3 pgs.)3
01/27/1998Affidavit of Kenton J. Pfister filed on behalf of AT&T Com- munications of Ohio by J. Troup. (11 pgs.)11
 
1 /  2 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Jones, Jeffrey