DIS - Case Record for 96-0389-TP-AEC Skip to main content

Case Record For:


Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: AEC-Application to revise or cancel a contract
Date Opened: 4/22/1996
Date Closed: 6/18/1998
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 26 documents 1 /  2 
Date FiledSummaryPages
06/18/1998Second entry on rehearing that the contract filing policy first adopted in the April 30, 1998 entry on rehearing is clarified in accordance with this entry; that the OTIA's motion for leave to file an application for rehearing instanter and its application for rehearing, Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, and AT&T's memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing are moot; that this case be closed of record. (7 pgs.)7
06/11/1998AT&T's motion for leave to intervene and memorandum in support, and file its memorandum contra to Ameritech's application for rehearing instanter, filed by B. Kahn. (5 pgs.)5
06/11/1998AT&T's memorandum contra to Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, filed by B. Kahn. (5 pgs.)5
06/01/1998Application for rehearing filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Lang. (7 pgs.)7
05/29/1998Application for Rehearing of the Ohio Telecommunications Industry Association. submitted by: T. Lodge. (7 pgs.)7
05/29/1998Motion & Memorandum in support of the Ohio Telecommunication Industry Assoc. for Leave to File Application for Rehearing Instanter. Submitted by: T. Lodge. (4 pgs.)4
04/30/1998Entry granting Ameritech's application for rehearing; that the Docketing Division continue to treat the information filed under seal as protected material until December 31, 2002, unless otherwise ordered by the Commission. (9 pgs.)9
04/21/1998Letter regarding the confidential material filed in this case, filed on behalf of National City by R. Bradner. (1 pg.)1
04/09/1998Entry ordering that rehearing is granted for the limited purpose of affording the Commission additional time to consider the arguments raised on rehearing. (5 pgs.)5
03/26/1998Joint memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications by M. Schermer and Nextlink Ohio by D. Clayton. (7 pgs.)7
03/16/1998Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of applicant by J. Lang. (31 pgs.)31
02/12/1998Entry ordering that Ameritech's request for protective treatment of the redacted information is denied; that the Docketing Division is directed to release into the public record all documents filed under seal pursuant to the dir- ections given in Finding 12; that Ameritech's motions seek- ing to etend protective treatment to the contracts set forth in Findng 10 are denied; that the Commission's rulings do not effect the suspension of the contracts set forth in Finding 13. (10 pgs.)10
09/08/1997Motion to extend protective order filed on behalf of applicant cant by J. Kelly. (2 pgs.2
08/01/1996Entry approving the application; the Commission will address the motion for protective order in a separate entry. (9 pgs.)9
06/28/1996Withdrawal of its objections to Ameritech Ohio's filings, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by B. Kahn.6
1 /  2 
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner: