DIS - Case Record for 96-0389-TP-AEC Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 96-0389-TP-AEC
CASE DESCRIPTION: AMERITECH OHIO/SOUTHDOWN, INC.
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 5/10/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
06/18/1998 Second entry on rehearing that the contract filing policy first adopted in the April 30, 1998 entry on rehearing is clarified in accordance with this entry; that the OTIA's motion for leave to file an application for rehearing instanter and its application for rehearing, Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, and AT&T's memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing are moot; that this case be closed of record. (7 pgs.)
06/11/1998 AT&T's motion for leave to intervene and memorandum in support, and file its memorandum contra to Ameritech's application for rehearing instanter, filed by B. Kahn. (5 pgs.)
06/11/1998 AT&T's memorandum contra to Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, filed by B. Kahn. (5 pgs.)
06/01/1998 Application for rehearing filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Lang. (7 pgs.)
05/29/1998 Application for Rehearing of the Ohio Telecommunications Industry Association. submitted by: T. Lodge. (7 pgs.)
05/29/1998 Motion & Memorandum in support of the Ohio Telecommunication Industry Assoc. for Leave to File Application for Rehearing Instanter. Submitted by: T. Lodge. (4 pgs.)
04/30/1998 Entry granting Ameritech's application for rehearing; that the Docketing Division continue to treat the information filed under seal as protected material until December 31, 2002, unless otherwise ordered by the Commission. (9 pgs.)
04/21/1998 Letter regarding the confidential material filed in this case, filed on behalf of National City by R. Bradner. (1 pg.)
04/09/1998 Entry ordering that rehearing is granted for the limited purpose of affording the Commission additional time to consider the arguments raised on rehearing. (5 pgs.)
03/26/1998 Joint memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications by M. Schermer and Nextlink Ohio by D. Clayton. (7 pgs.)
03/16/1998 Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of applicant by J. Lang. (31 pgs.)
02/12/1998 Entry ordering that Ameritech's request for protective treatment of the redacted information is denied; that the Docketing Division is directed to release into the public record all documents filed under seal pursuant to the dir- ections given in Finding 12; that Ameritech's motions seek- ing to etend protective treatment to the contracts set forth in Findng 10 are denied; that the Commission's rulings do not effect the suspension of the contracts set forth in Finding 13. (10 pgs.)
09/08/1997 Motion to extend protective order filed on behalf of applicant cant by J. Kelly. (2 pgs.
08/01/1996 Entry approving the application; the Commission will address the motion for protective order in a separate entry. (9 pgs.)
06/28/1996 Withdrawal of its objections to Ameritech Ohio's filings, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by B. Kahn.
06/28/1996 Withdrawal of its objections to Ameritech Ohio's filings, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications by B. Kahn. (6 pgs.)
05/23/1996 Entry ordering that approval of the application is sus- pended until the Commission orders otherwise. (AE) (1 pg.)
05/16/1996 Reply to AT&T's and Time Warner's memoranda contra motion for protective order and AT&T's supplemental objections, filed on behalf of applicant by J. Kelly. (8 pgs.)
05/16/1996 Reply to AT&T's and Time Warner's memoranda contra motion for protective order and AT&T's supplemental objections, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly.
05/15/1996 Reply to Ameritech Ohio's response and supplemental response and continuing objections to Ameritech Ohio filings, filed on behalf of AT&T by B. Kahn. (10 pgs.) (FILED 5/10/96)
05/10/1996 Memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's motion for protective order, filed on behalf of Time Warner AxS by D. Clayton.
05/10/1996 Time Warner AxS' memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's motions for protective order filed by D. Clayton, M. Schermer. (10 pgs.)
05/06/1996 Supplemental objections, request for clarification and memorandum contra filed on behalf of AT&T by B. Kahn. (14 pgs.)
04/22/1996 Renewal of the Agreement filed on behalf of Ameritech by B. Cermak. (2 pgs.) (filed under seal)
04/22/1996 Ameritech Ohio's motion for protective order filed by J. Kelly. (6 pgs.)
04/22/1996 In the matter of the application of Ameritech Ohio for approval of a contract between itself and Southdown, Inc. dba Southwestern Portland Cement Company. (3 pgs.)