| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 02/20/1996 | Letter advising the Commission that it is no longer pro- hibited from providing interLATA services, filed on behalf of GTE North by B. Kazee. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 05/18/1994 | Entry ordering that GTE's and Ohio Bell's motions for relief are granted; GTE and Ohio Bell are relieved of the Commission directives contained in its Opinion & Order of April 30, 1992, and its Entry of April 29, 1993, and the complaint is dismissed; that, if the restriction against GTE's and/or Ohio Bell's provision of interLATA services is lifted, GTE and/or Ohio Bell must notify the Commission within 10 days; that this case be closed of record. | 0 |
| 03/14/1994 | Memorandum of Ameritech Ohio in response to motion for relief from a Commission order and motion to dismiss, filed by C. Rawlings. | 0 |
| 03/02/1994 | Motion for relief from Commission Order and motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee. | 0 |
| 12/21/1993 | Letter stating that the United States District Court Judge Harold Greene, on December 8, 1993, denied the motions of GTE Corporation which sought authority for GTE North to provide interLATA, non-optional measured rate extended area service in this case (copy of which is attached), filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee. | 0 |
| 11/29/1993 | Letter stating status of case remains unchanged to date filed by B. Kazee. | 0 |
| 11/23/1993 | Letter stating that Mr. Kazee's letters of recent date accurately reflect the status of the GTE-Ameritech interLATA waiver requests, filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by C. Rawlings. | 0 |
| 10/29/1993 | Letter requesting that the status of this case remain un- changed, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee. | 0 |
| 10/25/1993 | Letter stating that the court has not ruled on either party's request for waiver filed by C. Rawlings. | 0 |
| 09/29/1993 | Letter stating that the status of this case is unchanged, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee. | 0 |
| 09/28/1993 | Letter stating that there has been no change in the status of this case, filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by C. Rawlings. | 0 |
| 09/03/1993 | Letter stating that the waiver requested from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is still pending, and that respondent, GTE North, cannot yet advise the Commission of an in-service date for the ordered extended area service, filed by B. Kazee. | 0 |
| 08/13/1993 | Letter stating that the most recent letter addressed to Chairman Glazer from GTE North counsel Bruce Kazee is equally applicable to Ameritech's requet for interLATA waiver, filed by C. Rawlings. | 0 |
| 08/03/1993 | Letter stating that the status of this case remains unchanged to date, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee. | 0 |
| 07/09/1993 | Letter stating that, as Mr. Kazee noted in his June 28 letter to Chairman Glazer, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has still not ruled on the waiver requests filed by GTE North and Ameritech to enable GTE North and Ohio Bell to provide the service ordered by the Commission, filed by C. Rawlings. | 0 |