DIS - Case Record for 90-0327-TP-PEX Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 90-0327-TP-PEX
CASE DESCRIPTION: ROBERT F HILDRETH/OHIO BELL TEL
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 12/7/2023
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
02/20/1996 Letter advising the Commission that it is no longer pro- hibited from providing interLATA services, filed on behalf of GTE North by B. Kazee. (1 pg.)
05/18/1994 Entry ordering that GTE's and Ohio Bell's motions for relief are granted; GTE and Ohio Bell are relieved of the Commission directives contained in its Opinion & Order of April 30, 1992, and its Entry of April 29, 1993, and the complaint is dismissed; that, if the restriction against GTE's and/or Ohio Bell's provision of interLATA services is lifted, GTE and/or Ohio Bell must notify the Commission within 10 days; that this case be closed of record.
03/14/1994 Memorandum of Ameritech Ohio in response to motion for relief from a Commission order and motion to dismiss, filed by C. Rawlings.
03/02/1994 Motion for relief from Commission Order and motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee.
12/21/1993 Letter stating that the United States District Court Judge Harold Greene, on December 8, 1993, denied the motions of GTE Corporation which sought authority for GTE North to provide interLATA, non-optional measured rate extended area service in this case (copy of which is attached), filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee.
11/29/1993 Letter stating status of case remains unchanged to date filed by B. Kazee.
11/23/1993 Letter stating that Mr. Kazee's letters of recent date accurately reflect the status of the GTE-Ameritech interLATA waiver requests, filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by C. Rawlings.
10/29/1993 Letter requesting that the status of this case remain un- changed, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee.
10/25/1993 Letter stating that the court has not ruled on either party's request for waiver filed by C. Rawlings.
09/29/1993 Letter stating that the status of this case is unchanged, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee.
09/28/1993 Letter stating that there has been no change in the status of this case, filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by C. Rawlings.
09/03/1993 Letter stating that the waiver requested from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is still pending, and that respondent, GTE North, cannot yet advise the Commission of an in-service date for the ordered extended area service, filed by B. Kazee.
08/13/1993 Letter stating that the most recent letter addressed to Chairman Glazer from GTE North counsel Bruce Kazee is equally applicable to Ameritech's requet for interLATA waiver, filed by C. Rawlings.
08/03/1993 Letter stating that the status of this case remains unchanged to date, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee.
07/09/1993 Letter stating that, as Mr. Kazee noted in his June 28 letter to Chairman Glazer, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has still not ruled on the waiver requests filed by GTE North and Ameritech to enable GTE North and Ohio Bell to provide the service ordered by the Commission, filed by C. Rawlings.
05/28/1993 Letter stating that the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has not yet ruled on Ameritech's request for waiver, filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by C. Rawlings.
04/29/1993 Entry ordering that the movants' motion for extension of the in-service date of April 30, 1993, be granted and that movants shall institute the ordered EAS between Newcomers- town and New Philadelphia exchanges within 30 days of the granting of the waivers by the District Court; that the movants continue to inform the Commission every 30 days from the date of this entry of the status of their petitions for waiver before the District Court, until there is a final disposition of the cases.
04/14/1993 Letter stating that GTE North in unable to institute the service date of October 21, 1992 for two-way measured-rate EAS and that GTE North, as well as Ohio Bell, must obtain authorization from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to provide such service, filed by B. Kazee.
04/06/1993 Motion for extension of time, filed on behalf of respondents, GTE North, by B. Kazee and Ohio Bell by C. Rawlings.
10/16/1992 Letter regarding the waiver request of GTE North, filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by C. Rawlings.
10/14/1992 Letter stating that GTE North is unable to institute the service date by October 21, 1992, filed by B. Kazee.
08/21/1992 Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by C. Rawlings.
08/06/1992 Letter stating that the in-service date for the institution of two-way measured-rate EAS between GTE's new Philadelphia Exchange and OBT's Newcomberstown Exchange is October 21, 1992, filed on behalf of GTE by J. Kennedy.
04/30/1992 Opinion & Order denying request for two-way, non-optional, flat-rate EAS but two-way, measured-rate be instituted.
05/15/1991 Transcript for public hearing held May 1, 1991, (DJ) 142 pages, Submitted.
05/02/1991 Correspondence letter supporting extended area service, filed by A. Segalavich.
05/02/1991 Correspondence letter supporting extended area service filed by J. Sandstead.
04/29/1991 Testimony and attachments 1 thru 5 of Clarence Owens filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart.
04/29/1991 Motion for leave to file expert testimony two days prior to hearing, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart.
04/24/1991 Testimony and attachments of David E. Kasmenn filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart.
04/23/1991 Testimony of David L. Schiska filed on behalf of respondent by A. Sedory.
04/23/1991 Testimony of Andrew C. Hirsch filed on behalf of respondent by A. Sedory.
04/23/1991 Information response filed on behalf of respondent by A. Sedory.
04/22/1991 Proof of Publication filed. (Guernsey County)
04/18/1991 Proof of Publication filed (Tuscarawas).
04/17/1991 Proof of Publication filed. (Coshocton County)
04/16/1991 Proof of Publication filed. (Carroll County)
03/19/1991 Legal notice sent to the Free Press Journal (Carroll), Coshocton Tribune (Coshocton), Daily Jeffersonian (Guernsey) and Times-Reporter (Tuscarawas).
03/01/1991 Entry granting GTE's motion to file its answer instanter; that respondents provide the information described in Finding (7) to the Commission and to the spokesperson for the complainants by April 24, 1991; scheduling public hearing on May 1, 1991, at 10:00 a.m. at Newcomerstown High School, Newcomerstown, Ohio; that the secretary of the Commission cause publication of legal notice in accordance with Finding (9); any party intending to present expert testimony comply with Rule 4901-1-29(A)(1) (J), O.A.C. (AE)
01/30/1991 Supplemental information response filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart.
01/29/1991 Amended information response filed on behalf of respondent by A. Sedory.
01/09/1991 Entry ordering that AT&T shall authorize Ohio Bell and GTE to provide the pertinent calling data in this case to the Commission within 10 days of the date of this entry; Ohio Bell and GTE shall file the calling data requested by the Commission's May 4, 1990 entry within 10 days of the receipt of the authorization. (AE)
07/03/1990 Information response filed on behalf respondent, Ohio Bell, by A. Sedory.
06/28/1990 Letter requesting that the Commission waive or rescind the data requests in these and in future EAS cases, filed on behalf respondent, MCI, by D. Trabaris.
06/27/1990 Additional information filed on behalf of the applicant by B. Kazee.
06/14/1990 Letter requesting that the Commission waive or rescind the data request that was requested in two previous entries, as respondent does not have the information available, filed on behalf of respondent, US Sprint, by M. Ball.
06/13/1990 Answer filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North Incorporated by J. Stewart.
06/13/1990 Motion to file answer instanter filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North Incorporated, by J. Stewart.
06/04/1990 Answer filed on behalf of respondent by A. Sedory.
05/04/1990 Entry ordering respondents shall file written answers or other pleadings with the Commission and the spokesperson for the complainants within 30 days of the date of this entry; Allnet, AT&T, MCI, and U.S. Spring provide the respondents with toll calling rates and distributions of calling between the involved exchanges with 30 days; respondents shall provide the information required in Finding (4) to the Commission and to the spokesperson for the complainants within 60 days of the date of this entry. (AE)
02/13/1990 In the matter of the petition of Robert f. Hildreth and other subscribers of the New Philadelphia-Dover exchange of The Ohio Bell Telephone Company (VS) The Ohio Bell Telephone Company for two-way, non-optional EAS.