| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 09/12/1996 | Tariff, PUCO No. 6, Check Sheet 1, Section F, 10th sheet 3, filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Co., by G. Gratz. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
| 09/11/1996 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Check List, 356th sheet 1; Section 2.3, 41st sheet 4, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 08/29/1996 | Entry ordering that Sprint's motion be granted and that the seventh ordering paragraph on the Commission 6, 1996 finding and order in this case no longer applies to Sprint. | 5 |
| 08/29/1996 | Supplemental entry that Sprint's motion be granted and that the seventh ordering paragraph of the Commission's June 6, 1996 finding and order in this case no longer applies to Sprint. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 08/15/1996 | Motion of Sprint to eliminate the requirement that it provide recorded dialing instructions when instituting extended area service in this matter filed by S. Williams. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
| 07/06/1996 | Service notice filed. | 2 |
| 06/28/1996 | Letter stating that two-way measured-rate extended area service between Sterling and Creston will be established September 15, 1996, filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Co., by G. Gratz. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 06/20/1996 | Letter stating that the in-service date for the institution of two-way measured-rate EAS between GTE's Creston exchange and the Sterling exchange of United is September 15, 1996, at 12:01 a.m., filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 06/06/1996 | Entry ordering that this case be reopened; that GTE insti- tute two-way, measured-rate EAS between the Spencer and Wellington exchanges, and that GTE and United institute two-way, measured-rate EAS between the Creston and Sterling exchanges, to be implemented within six months from the date of this Finding & Order; that GTE establish an in-service date in 92-603 and GTE and United establish an in-service date in 89-1727 within three months of the date of this Finding & Order; that GTE issue in 92-603 and GTE and United issue in 89-1727, prior to the in-service date, either sep- arate press releases or a joint press release to inform the media of the effective dates and times of the EAS; that GTE and United shall coordinate their plans so that the in-ser- vice date and time in 89-1727 is the same for customers of both companies; that for a period of three months following the in-service dates, GTE and United provide a recording which informs customers who dial "1" prior to dialing a num- ber in an affected exchange that they no longer need to dial "1" before placing the EAS call. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
| 02/23/1996 | Letter of GTE North advising the Commission that it is no longer prohibited from providing interLATA services, filed by B. Kazee. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 06/30/1994 | Entry ordering that GTE's motion for relief is granted; GTE is relieved of the Commission directives contained in its Opinion & Order of July 2, 1992, and its Entry of June 7, 1993, and the complaint is dismissed; that, if the restriction against GTE's provision of interLATA services is lifted, GTE must notify the Commission within 10 days; that this case be closed of record. | 0 |
| 03/02/1994 | Motion for relief from Commission Order and motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee. | 0 |
| 12/21/1993 | Letter stating that the United States District Court Judge Harold Greene, on December 8, 1993, denied the motions of GTE Corporation which sought authority for GTE North to provide interLATA, non-optional measured rate extended area service in this case (copy of which is attached), filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee. | 0 |
| 11/24/1993 | Letter advising the Commission that the status of this case remains unchanged, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee. | 0 |
| 10/25/1993 | Letter filed on behalf of GTE stating that the case remains unchanged to dated filed by B. Kazee. | 0 |
|