DIS - Case Record for 89-1727-TP-PEX Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 89-1727-TP-PEX
CASE DESCRIPTION: DALE BAUMAN VS UNITED AND GTE
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 4/24/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
09/12/1996 Tariff, PUCO No. 6, Check Sheet 1, Section F, 10th sheet 3, filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Co., by G. Gratz. (4 pgs.)
09/11/1996 Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Check List, 356th sheet 1; Section 2.3, 41st sheet 4, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy. (3 pgs.)
08/29/1996 Entry ordering that Sprint's motion be granted and that the seventh ordering paragraph on the Commission 6, 1996 finding and order in this case no longer applies to Sprint.
08/29/1996 Supplemental entry that Sprint's motion be granted and that the seventh ordering paragraph of the Commission's June 6, 1996 finding and order in this case no longer applies to Sprint. (3 pgs.)
08/15/1996 Motion of Sprint to eliminate the requirement that it provide recorded dialing instructions when instituting extended area service in this matter filed by S. Williams. (4 pgs.)
07/06/1996 Service notice filed.
06/28/1996 Letter stating that two-way measured-rate extended area service between Sterling and Creston will be established September 15, 1996, filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Co., by G. Gratz. (1 pg.)
06/20/1996 Letter stating that the in-service date for the institution of two-way measured-rate EAS between GTE's Creston exchange and the Sterling exchange of United is September 15, 1996, at 12:01 a.m., filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy. (1 pg.)
06/06/1996 Entry ordering that this case be reopened; that GTE insti- tute two-way, measured-rate EAS between the Spencer and Wellington exchanges, and that GTE and United institute two-way, measured-rate EAS between the Creston and Sterling exchanges, to be implemented within six months from the date of this Finding & Order; that GTE establish an in-service date in 92-603 and GTE and United establish an in-service date in 89-1727 within three months of the date of this Finding & Order; that GTE issue in 92-603 and GTE and United issue in 89-1727, prior to the in-service date, either sep- arate press releases or a joint press release to inform the media of the effective dates and times of the EAS; that GTE and United shall coordinate their plans so that the in-ser- vice date and time in 89-1727 is the same for customers of both companies; that for a period of three months following the in-service dates, GTE and United provide a recording which informs customers who dial "1" prior to dialing a num- ber in an affected exchange that they no longer need to dial "1" before placing the EAS call. (4 pgs.)
02/23/1996 Letter of GTE North advising the Commission that it is no longer prohibited from providing interLATA services, filed by B. Kazee. (1 pg.)
06/30/1994 Entry ordering that GTE's motion for relief is granted; GTE is relieved of the Commission directives contained in its Opinion & Order of July 2, 1992, and its Entry of June 7, 1993, and the complaint is dismissed; that, if the restriction against GTE's provision of interLATA services is lifted, GTE must notify the Commission within 10 days; that this case be closed of record.
03/02/1994 Motion for relief from Commission Order and motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee.
12/21/1993 Letter stating that the United States District Court Judge Harold Greene, on December 8, 1993, denied the motions of GTE Corporation which sought authority for GTE North to provide interLATA, non-optional measured rate extended area service in this case (copy of which is attached), filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee.
11/24/1993 Letter advising the Commission that the status of this case remains unchanged, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee.
10/25/1993 Letter filed on behalf of GTE stating that the case remains unchanged to dated filed by B. Kazee.
09/24/1993 Letter stating that the status of this case remains un- changed, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee.
09/03/1993 Letter stating that the waiver requested from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is still pending, and that respondent, GTE North, cannot yet advise the Commission of an in-service date for the ordered extended area service, filed by B. Kazee.
07/28/1993 Letter stating status of case remains unchanged filed by B. Kazee.
06/24/1993 Entry granting the motion for extension of the in-service date of June 25, 1993, and that GTE shall institute the ordered EAS between the Sterling and Creston exchanges within 30 days of the granting of the waiver by the District Court.
06/07/1993 Motion for extension of time and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee.
04/26/1993 Correspondence letter filed on behalf of GTE North by B. Kazee.
10/28/1992 Proposed implementation date for the extended area service from Sterling to Creston in June 25, 1993 filed on behalf of the United Telephone Co. by J. Ludenia.
08/19/1992 Tariffs, PUCO No. 6, Check sheet 1; Section F - 10th sheet 2, filed on behalf of respondent, United Tele- phone, by J. Ludenia.
08/06/1992 Letter stating that the in-service date for the institution of two-way measured-rate EAS between GTE's Creston exchange and United's Sterling exchange is June 25, 1993, filed on behalf of GTE by J. Kennedy.
07/16/1992 Letter stating that the proposed implementation date for two-way measured-rate extended area service from Sterling to Wooster is August 14, 1992, filed on behalf of respon- dent, United Telephone, by J. Ludenia.
07/02/1992 Opinion & Order denying the request for two-way, non- optional, flat-rate EAS between the Sterling Exchange and the Burbank, Creston, and Wooster exchanges and ordering two-way, Measured-rate EAS be instituted between the Sterling Exchange and the Creston and Wooster exchanges.
06/17/1991 Transcript filed for hearing held 6/11/91, (DJ), 231 pgs., Submitted.
06/05/1991 Proof of Publication filed. (Medina County)
06/03/1991 Information response filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Sterwart.
06/03/1991 Testimony and attachments of David E. Kasmenn filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart.
06/03/1991 Testimony and attachments 1 thru 20 of Arthur Huggler filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart.
06/03/1991 Supplemental information response of United Telephone Company of Ohio filed by T. Jacobs.
05/31/1991 Proof of Publication filed (Medina)
05/17/1991 Proof of Publication filed. (Wayne County)
04/23/1991 Legal notices sent to the Gazette (Medina) and the Daily Record (Wayne).
04/03/1991 Entry scheduling public hearing at 10:00 a.m. on June 11, 1991, at Norwayne High School, Creston, Ohio; that the respondents provide the information described in Finding 6 to the Commission and to the complainants within 60 days of the date of this entry; that the secretary of the Commission cause publication of legal notice as set forth in Finding 8; that all parties intending to present direct expert testimony comply with Rule 4901-1-29(A)(1)(j), O.A.C. (AE)
02/06/1991 Letter stating that the Concurrence with Canvass Results filed in Case No. 89-1727-TP-PEX on January 30, 1991, by United Telephone Company should have been filed in Case No. 89-960-TP-PEX, filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company, by T. Jacobs.
01/30/1991 Supplemental information response filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart.
01/09/1991 Entry ordering that AT&T shall authorize United and GTE to provide the pertinent calling data in this case to the Commission within 10 days of the date of this entry; United and GTE shall file the calling data requested by the Commission's May 4, 1990 entry within 10 days of the receipt of the authorization. (AE)
07/03/1990 Letter filed on behalf of GTE North stating that they are unable to provide the calling data as it was directed by entry dated May 4, 1990 filed by B. Kazee.
06/29/1990 Supplemental information response filed on behalf of applicant by T. Jacobs.
06/28/1990 Letter requesting that the Commission waive or rescind the data requests in these and in future EAS cases, filed on behalf respondent, MCI, by D. Trabaris.
06/14/1990 Letter requesting that the Commission waive or rescind the data request that was requested in two previous entries, as respondent does not have the information available, filed on behalf of respondent, US Sprint, by M. Ball.
05/04/1990 Entry ordering Allnet ,AT&T, MCI, and U.S. Sprint shall provide the information described in Finding (5) to the respondents within 30 days of the date of this entry; respondents should compile the calling data provided by Allnet, AT&T, MCI, and U.S. Sprint and filed within 60 days of the date of this entry the calling rates, including the mean, median, and mode, and the distributions of calling between the involved exchanges. (AE)
12/28/1989 Information response filed on behalf of GTE North by A. Gillman.
12/28/1989 Answer of GTE North filed by A. Gillman.
12/26/1989 Information response of United Telephone Company of Ohio filed by T. Jacobs.
12/26/1989 Answer of United Telephone Company of Ohio filed by T. Jacobs.
11/28/1989 Entry ordering the respondent to file written answer or other pleadings and provide information requested by the Commission within 30 days of this entry. (AE)
11/15/1989 Petition of Dale Bauman and subcribers of the Sterling exchange of United Telephone for extended area service into the Wooster, Creston & Burbank exchange of the United Telephone Company and GTE North.