DIS - Case Record for 88-1288-RR-CSS Skip to main content

Case Record For:

88-1288-RR-CSS

Case Title: CITIZENS OF ALLIANCE V CONSOLIDATED
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: RR-RAILROAD
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 8/30/1988
Date Closed: 5/16/1989
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 38 documents 1 /  3 
Date FiledSummaryPages
11/07/1991Entry closing case.0
10/22/1991Final inspection report filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by R. Patterson.0
09/05/1991Entry ordering the Commission's JUly 12, 1990 order be modified to provide that 80 percent of the cost of this project be paid from the state grade crossing protection fund.0
08/28/1991Memorandum recommending that an Entry be made to order that a full public share of the Beech Street installation now be covered by state crossing funds under the supplemental program, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by R. Patterson.0
03/08/1991Revisions to the warning device installation at the Beech Street grade crossing and statement that the Railroad Section of the staff has approved them, filed on behalf of PUCO staff by R. Patterson.0
02/07/1991Entry ordering Conrail to proceed with the installation of flashing light signals and crossing gates, to be completed no later than 4/30/91.0
01/17/1991Letter stating that the estimates and location plan be approved, with the exception mentioned in letter, and that construction authority for this project now be issued by Commission Order in this case, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by R. Patterson.0
08/22/1990Returned from Supreme Court (1 Vol) S.C. # 89-15170
07/12/1990Entry ordering that Conrail proceed with the installation of flashing lights signals at its crossing at Richland County Road 96, Crossing No. 502 645 V. Installation is to be completed no later than 11/15/90 in Case No. 85-705-RR-CSS; also, that Contail submit site plans in Case No. 88-1288-RR-CSS no later than 12/31/90.0
06/26/1990Recommendation filed on behalf of the staff of the PUCO by F. Agler.0
06/01/1990Correspondence letter to Mr. Rand Patterson, PUCO staff, from Robert D. Horowitz, Prosecuting Attorney of Stark County.0
05/24/1990Entry approving the stipulation and directing the parties to proceed with implementation of terms of the agreement.0
09/28/1989Supreme Court submittal papers filed.0
09/07/1989Letter filed by M. DeHoff and R. Stocker, trustees for Washington Township Board, informing the Commission that the Township does not have funds available during the fiscal year 1989.0
08/30/1989Designation of counsel filed by T. Shulina on behalf of appellant, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Supreme Court No. 89-1517.0
 
1 /  3 
      
      
Attorney General:
Martin,Jutta
Attorney Examiner:
Sheets, Kerry