11/07/1991
|
Entry closing case. |
10/22/1991
|
Final inspection report filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by R. Patterson. |
09/05/1991
|
Entry ordering the Commission's JUly 12, 1990 order be modified to provide that 80 percent of the cost of this project be paid from the state grade crossing protection fund. |
08/28/1991
|
Memorandum recommending that an Entry be made to order that a full public share of the Beech Street installation now be covered by state crossing funds under the supplemental program, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by R. Patterson. |
03/08/1991
|
Revisions to the warning device installation at the Beech Street grade crossing and statement that the Railroad Section of the staff has approved them, filed on behalf of PUCO staff by R. Patterson. |
02/07/1991
|
Entry ordering Conrail to proceed with the installation of flashing light signals and crossing gates, to be completed no later than 4/30/91. |
01/17/1991
|
Letter stating that the estimates and location plan be approved, with the exception mentioned in letter, and that construction authority for this project now be issued by Commission Order in this case, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by R. Patterson. |
08/22/1990
|
Returned from Supreme Court (1 Vol) S.C. # 89-1517 |
07/12/1990
|
Entry ordering that Conrail proceed with the installation of flashing lights signals at its crossing at Richland County Road 96, Crossing No. 502 645 V. Installation is to be completed no later than 11/15/90 in Case No. 85-705-RR-CSS; also, that Contail submit site plans in Case No. 88-1288-RR-CSS no later than 12/31/90. |
06/26/1990
|
Recommendation filed on behalf of the staff of the PUCO by F. Agler. |
06/01/1990
|
Correspondence letter to Mr. Rand Patterson, PUCO staff, from Robert D. Horowitz, Prosecuting Attorney of Stark County. |
05/24/1990
|
Entry approving the stipulation and directing the parties to proceed with implementation of terms of the agreement. |
09/28/1989
|
Supreme Court submittal papers filed. |
09/07/1989
|
Letter filed by M. DeHoff and R. Stocker, trustees for Washington Township Board, informing the Commission that the Township does not have funds available during the fiscal year 1989. |
08/30/1989
|
Designation of counsel filed by T. Shulina on behalf of appellant, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Supreme Court No. 89-1517. |
08/29/1989
|
Notice to file transcript filed by T. Schulina on behalf of respondent. |
08/29/1989
|
Supreme Court Appeal filed by T. Schulina on behalf of respondent. |
07/06/1989
|
Entry on Rehearing denying Conrail's application for rehearing; Ordering that Consolidated Rail Corporation install, operate and maintain cantilever supported, flash- ing lifhr signals and crossing gates at its crossing on Beech Street and Oakhill Avenue, Washington Township. |
06/15/1989
|
Application for Rehearing filed by R. Stroh on behalf of Consolidated Rail Corporation. |
05/16/1989
|
Opinion & Order upholding complaint and ordering the respondent install, operate and maintain crossing protection devices. |
02/01/1989
|
Post-Hearing Brief on behalf of the PUCO staff, filed by J. Martin. |
02/01/1989
|
Memorandum of Consolidated Rail Corporation filed by R. Stroh on behalf of Consolidated Rail Corporation. |
01/23/1989
|
Letter to Chairman Chema from J. Hastings, Jr. Clerk of Alliance City Council supporting the installation of appro- priate safety devices at the crossing at Beech Street near Oakhill Ave., in Washington Township. |
01/23/1989
|
Correspondent letter filed by Senator Scott Oelslager. |
01/09/1989
|
Transcript from the public hearing held January 5, 1989, in Alliance, Ohio, 73 pages, (KS). |
11/23/1988
|
Entry scheduling hearing held on 1/5/89, at 10:;00 a.m., at the Fire House Theater, 450 East Market Street, Alliance, Ohio (AE) |
11/10/1988
|
Letter filed by Mayor Carr, city of Alliance, Ohio, to; Mr. Chema, RE; to the crossing located at Beech Street and Oakhill Avenue, requesting the installation of flasher lights and gates. |
11/01/1988
|
Findings filed by the Railroad Section of the PUCO, sub- mitted by T. King. |
10/12/1988
|
Entry ordering the Railroad Section of the Commission initiate an investigation. |
09/29/1988
|
Accident Reports filed by T. King on behalf of the PUCO staff. |
09/20/1988
|
Correspondence letter filed by and on behalf of Patrick and Yvonne Willaman. |
09/14/1988
|
Answer filed by J. Jenchura and R. Stroh on behalf of Consolidated Rail Corporation. |
09/12/1988
|
Response letter filed by B. Hurst on behalf of Conrail to; Honorable Ronald V. Gerberry/Ohio House of Representatives - Statehouse. |
09/09/1988
|
Response letter filed by T. King on behalf the PUCO staff, to; Ms. Mary Louise Mille. |
09/09/1988
|
Correspondence leter filed by and on behalf of J. Williams. |
09/06/1988
|
Correspondence letters filed by consumers, RE: to obtaining a grade crossing at the Stark 502-742F location in Washing- ton Township. |
09/02/1988
|
Signed petitions of consumers, RE: to signal needed. |
08/30/1988
|
Complaint of Alliance area (Vs) Consolidated Rail Corpora- tion, Relative to request for installation of flasher lights and gates at Beech Street and Oakhill Avenue, Washington Township, Stark County. |