| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 11/20/2015 | Memo archiving cases with an effective date of 11/19/15 | 3 |
| 01/21/2015 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 01/21/2015 | Opinion & Order stating that the complaint be resolved in favor of Ohio Edison and that this case be dismissed. | 10 |
| 12/05/2014 | Ohio Edison Company's Post Hearing Brief electronically filed by Mrs. Emily C. Wilcheck on behalf of Ohio Edison Company.
| 19 |
| 10/30/2014 | PUCO Exhibit: Complainant 1-2, Respondent 1-2-3-4-5. | 108 |
| 10/30/2014 | Transcript in the matter of James L. Griffith vs. Ohio Edison Company hearing held on 10/15/14 electronically filed by Mr. Ken Spencer on behalf of Armstrong & Okey, Inc. and Anderson, Rosemary Foster Mrs. | 49 |
| 10/08/2014 | Direct Testimony of Katherine M. Bloss on Behalf of Ohio Edison Company electronically filed by Mrs. Emily C. Wilcheck on behalf of Ohio Edison Company. | 52 |
| 10/08/2014 | Direct Testimony of Alan M. Glover on Behalf of Ohio Edison Company electronically filed by Mrs. Emily C. Wilcheck on behalf of Ohio Edison Company. | 18 |
| 09/03/2014 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 09/03/2014 | Attorney Examiner Entry scheduling a hearing for October 15, 2014, at 10:00 a.m.; electronically filed by Vesta R. Miller on behalf of Kerry K. Sheets, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. | 3 |
| 08/06/2014 | Notice of Deposition of Complainant, James L. Griffith electronically filed by Mrs. Emily C. Wilcheck on behalf of Ohio Edison Company. | 4 |
| 07/21/2014 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 07/21/2014 | Attorney Examiner Entry directing that Ohio Edison’s motion to compel be granted, that Ohio Edison’s request for dismissal of the complaint be denied at this time, and that Ohio Edison’s motion to continue the July 29, 2014 hearing date in this case be granted. The Complainant also is directed to participate in a deposition arranged by Ohio Edison in this matter no later than August 22, 2014, and provide the Company with full and complete answers to the Company’s questions at the deposition; otherwise, no hearing in this matter shall be rescheduled and, instead, the Commission would expect to consider a subsequent motion, if one is submitted by the Company, seeking a dismissal of this case for lack of sufficient prosecution by the Complainant. Further, the Complainant may, as an alternative to providing the information required at deposition, seek to have this case dismissed without prejudice at any time up to the August 22, 2014 deadline set forth in this Entry, but his ability to bring the same issues in a future case shall be subject to the contingencies expressed in Finding (10) of this Entry; electronically filed by Vesta R Miller on behalf of Kerry K. Sheets, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio | 5 |
| 07/16/2014 | Motion to Continue Hearing and Request for Expedited Ruling electronically filed by Mrs. Emily C. Wilcheck on behalf of Ohio Edison Company. | 5 |
| 06/19/2014 | Motion to Compel Complainant's Deposition of and Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support electronically filed by Mrs. Emily C. Wilcheck on behalf of Ohio Edison Company | 12 |