Case Record For: 04-1439-EL-CSS Case Title: SPITZER GREAT LAKES LTD., CO. (VS) GREEN MOUNTAIN ENERGY CO., ET AL. Status: AR-Archived Industry Code: EL-ELECTRIC Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety Date Opened: 9/20/2004 Date Closed: Case Documents Public Comments Parties of Record Related Cases Printable Docket Card Service List View All 1 - 15 of 50 documents 1 / 4 Date FiledSummaryPages 01/11/2006Entry ordered, that the joint motions to dismiss be granted and case is dismissed and closed of record.3 01/11/2006Service Notice3 12/22/2005Joint motion to dismiss filed on behalf of Ohio Edison Company by C. Dacoros, Green Mountain Energy by R. Pace and E. Robinson, NOPEC by J. Heiser and Complainant, Spitzer Great Lakes LTD, Co. by A. Giardini.4 05/16/2005Notice of filing of deposition of Larry Ward and Frank Gumina, filed on behalf of FirstEnergy Service Company by C. Dacoros.2 05/16/2005Transcript with attachments from the depositions of complainants witnesses Frank Gumina and Larry Ward, filed on behalf of FirstEnergy Company by J. Burk.56 05/16/2005Notice of filing of deposition of Larry Ward and Frank Gumina, filed on behalf of FirstEnergy Company by C. Dacoros.2 05/13/2005Deposition w/attachments of Matt Edwards on behalf of Ohio Edison Company, filed by C. Dacoros.126 05/12/2005Joint stipulation of facts filed by C. Dacoros on behalf of FirstEnergy, E. Robinson on behalf of Green Mountain Energy Company and J. Heiser on behalf of Northeast Ohio Public Energy Council.26 05/11/2005Respondents' joint stipulation of facts, filed on behalf of Ohio Edison Co. by C. Dacoros, Green Mountain Energy Co. by E. Robinson and Northeast Ohio Public Energy Council by J. Heiser. (FAX)26 04/22/2005Service Notice2 04/21/2005Entry ordering that the motion to compel by Ohio Edison and CEI be granted to Sunrise Cove Phase II and Lakewood Manor Motel Co. (JS)3 04/13/2005Service Notice2 04/13/2005Entry ordered; that Spitzer's motion be granted in part and denied in part, consistent with finding 7. (JLS)4 04/11/2005Memorandum contra to motion of complainants to require respondents to respond to outstanding discovery request or in the alternative to allow complainants to file its discovery requests filed by C. Dacoros on behalf of Ohio Edison.6 04/08/2005Memorandum contra to motion of complainant to require respondents to respond to outstanding discovery request or in the alternative to allow complainant to file its discovery request filed on behalf of Ohio Edison by C. Dacoros.(FAX)6 1 / 4 Attorney General: Attorney Examiner: Shailer, John