DIS - Case Record for 96-1200-TP-UNC Skip to main content

Case Record For:

96-1200-TP-UNC

Case Title: GERMANTOWN INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: UNC-Unclassified
Date Opened: 11/12/1996
Date Closed: 10/15/2010
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 29 documents 1 /  2 
Date FiledSummaryPages
06/25/1999Supreme Court Case returned. (5 boxes) located in the Fileroom for future use.0
03/08/1999Supreme Court Papers. (64 pgs.)64
02/05/1999Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (15 pgs.) (S.C. #99-0290)15
12/09/1998Entry denying the joint application for rehearing filed by AT&T Communications of Ohio and MCI Telecommunications Corp. (7 pgs.)7
11/19/1998Memorandum contra the joint application for rehearing of MCI Telecommunications and AT&T Communications, filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (8 pgs.)8
11/09/1998Joint application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. San- ders; and AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (28 pgs.)28
10/08/1998Finding & Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in Case No. 95-845- TP-COI is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LEC's are approved; that in accordance with Finding 18, the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motions for suspension and intervention are denied. (7 pgs.)7
10/08/1998Finding & Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in Case No. 95-845- TP-COI is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LEC's are approved; that in accordance with Finding 18, the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motions for suspension and intervention are denied. (7 pgs.)7
10/08/1998Finding and Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in this case is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LECs are approved; that, in accordance with Finding 18 the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motion for suspension and intervention are denied23
10/05/1998Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Sprint's motions to suspend and request for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. (12 pgs.)12
10/05/1998Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Sprint's motions to suspend and request for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. 12
10/05/1998Memorandum contra to the motion of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Co. L.P. to intervene and suspend the company's presubscription imple- mentation charge, filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (6 pgs.)6
10/05/1998Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Sprint's motions to suspend and re- quest for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. (12 pgs.)12
10/02/1998Supplemental motion of MCI Telecommunications Corp. for leave to intervene and request for clarification and/or Commission-ordered investigation and memorandum in sup- port filed by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (12 pgs.)12
10/02/1998Supplemental motion for leave to intervene, memorandum in support and request for clarification and/or Commission Ordered Investigation, filed by J. Sanders and M. Berns.12
 
1 /  2 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Farkas, Scott