DIS - Case Record for 96-1200-TP-UNC Skip to main content

Case Record For:

96-1200-TP-UNC

Case Title: GERMANTOWN INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: UNC-Unclassified
Date Opened: 11/12/1996
Date Closed: 10/15/2010
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
06/25/1999Supreme Court Case returned. (5 boxes) located in the Fileroom for future use.0
03/08/1999Supreme Court Papers. (64 pgs.)64
02/05/1999Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (15 pgs.) (S.C. #99-0290)15
12/09/1998Entry denying the joint application for rehearing filed by AT&T Communications of Ohio and MCI Telecommunications Corp. (7 pgs.)7
11/19/1998Memorandum contra the joint application for rehearing of MCI Telecommunications and AT&T Communications, filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (8 pgs.)8
11/09/1998Joint application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. San- ders; and AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (28 pgs.)28
10/08/1998Finding & Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in Case No. 95-845- TP-COI is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LEC's are approved; that in accordance with Finding 18, the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motions for suspension and intervention are denied. (7 pgs.)7
10/08/1998Finding & Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in Case No. 95-845- TP-COI is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LEC's are approved; that in accordance with Finding 18, the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motions for suspension and intervention are denied. (7 pgs.)7
10/08/1998Finding and Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in this case is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LECs are approved; that, in accordance with Finding 18 the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motion for suspension and intervention are denied23
10/05/1998Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Sprint's motions to suspend and request for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. (12 pgs.)12
10/05/1998Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Sprint's motions to suspend and request for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. 12
10/05/1998Memorandum contra to the motion of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Co. L.P. to intervene and suspend the company's presubscription imple- mentation charge, filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (6 pgs.)6
10/05/1998Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Sprint's motions to suspend and re- quest for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. (12 pgs.)12
10/02/1998Supplemental motion of MCI Telecommunications Corp. for leave to intervene and request for clarification and/or Commission-ordered investigation and memorandum in sup- port filed by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (12 pgs.)12
10/02/1998Supplemental motion for leave to intervene, memorandum in support and request for clarification and/or Commission Ordered Investigation, filed by J. Sanders and M. Berns.12
09/24/1998Motion and memorandum of MCI for leave to intervene and suspend the implementation of IntraLATA Toll Presubscription Charges filed by J. Sanders/M. Berns. (12 pgs.)12
09/24/1998Motion and Memorandum of MCI for leave to intervene and to suspend the implementation of IntraLATA Toll Presubscription Charges filed by J. Sanders/M. Berns.12
09/21/1998Final tariff sheets, PUCO no. 1, first revised sheet no. 4 filed by G. Cooper. (2 pgs)2
09/21/1998Final tariff sheets, PUCO no. 1, first revised sheet no. 4 filed by G. Cooper. (2 pgs)2
09/17/1998Motion to intervene and suspend the applicant's presubscrip- tion implementation charges and memorandum in support filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart; and Sprint Communication Company L.P. by L. Lauridsen. (8 pgs.)8
08/21/1998Revised tariff sheet; first revised sheet 4 filed by G. Cooper. (2 pgs)2
07/10/1997Finding & Order that Ameritech Ohio's motion to intervene is moot in this case and, therefore, denied; that the applicant's motion to suspend this case is no longer relevant and, therefore, denied; that with the exception of the implementation cost recovery MOU rate, the propsed application application of the applicant to amend its tariff to include a service offering for intrastate intra- LATA equal access is approved; that applicant's plan for intraLATA toll presubscription procedures and presubscrip- tion change charge schedules are approved and sould be im- plemented by the application as indicated in the plan; that applicant file its proposed MOU rate for incremental cost recovery no later than August 24, 1998. (5 pgs.)5
07/03/1997Final tariff, PUCO No. 1, original sheets 2, 3, 4; Preface, 1st sheet 1, filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (5 pgs.)5
05/21/1997Amendment to supplemental application. Amended exhibit B- original sheet No 2 and the amended exhibit C replace the original sheet No 2 and the exhibit C filed on 4/30/97. Filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (5 pgs)5
04/30/1997Supplement application filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (12 pgs.)12
02/14/1997Motion and memorandum in support of the applicant, The Germantown Independent Telephone Company to suspend application filed by T. Lodge.3
02/14/1997Motion of the applicant, The Germantown Independent Tele- phone Company to suspend application filed by T. Lodge. (3 pgs.)24
12/06/1996Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on be- half of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (4 pgs.)4
11/12/1996Revised tariff sheet; first reevised Sheet No. 4 filed by G. Cooper. (2 pgs) In the matter of the application of The Germantown Indepen- dent Telephone Company to establish Intra LATA Equal Access and to amend its tariff accordingly. (15 pgs.)15