DIS - Case Record for 01-1528-TP-CSS Skip to main content

Case Record For:

01-1528-TP-CSS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: CORECOMM NEWCO INC
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 6/28/2001
Date Closed: 9/8/2004
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
09/08/2004Entry ordering that SBC's motion be granted and CoreComm's complaint be dismissed without prejudice and that these cases be closed of record.2
09/08/2004Service Notice2
07/09/2003Motion to hold interlocutory appeal in abeyance on behalf of SBC Ohio, filed by M. Mulcahy.2
05/15/2003Surreply to SBC Ohio's Thrid Supplemental to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of CoreComm by T. O'Brien.(FILED UNDER SEAL)54
05/15/2003Surreply to SBC Ohio's third supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of CoreComm by T. O'Brien.32
05/15/2003Motion for protective order and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco, Inc. by T. O'Brien.3
05/09/2003Confidential version of reply in support of third supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the Hearing Examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of respondent, SBC Ohio, by J. Lang. (FILED UNDER SEAL)18
05/09/2003Public version of Reply in support of third supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the Hearing Examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of respondent, SBC Ohio, by J. Lang.17
05/09/2003Motion for protective order filed on behalf of respondent, SBC Ohio, by J. Lang.3
05/02/2003Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant, CoreComm Newco, by T. O'Brien.3
05/02/2003Reply to Ameritech Ohio's Third Supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of CoreComm by T. O'Brien. (Filed under seal)145
05/02/2003Reply to SBC Ohio's Third Supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of Corecomm by T. O'Brien.144
04/16/2003Confidential filing supplement to the application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner ruling filed on behalf of SBC Ohio, by M. Mulcany. (FILED UNDER SEAL)9
04/16/2003Third supplement to application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiners' June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Lang.7
04/16/2003Motion for protective order, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Lang.3
08/08/2002Affidavit of Gert P. Anderson. (FILED UNDER SEAL on 8/7/02)4
08/05/2002Confidential of SBC Ameritech Ohio's Reply Support of Second Supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling Confidential version. (FILED UNDER SEAL)10
08/05/2002SBC Ameritech Ohio's reply in support of second supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling Public Version filed by J. Lang.9
07/26/2002Original signature page for faxed copy of signature page of affidavit, filed on behalf of complainant by T. O'Brien.2
07/25/2002Confidential reply to Ameritech Ohio's second supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of applicant by T. O'Brien. (FILED UNDER SEAL)39
07/25/2002Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by T. O'Brien.3
07/25/2002Reply to Ameritech Ohio's second supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of complainant by T. O'Brien. (Public version)36
07/09/2002Confidential second supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Lang. (FILED UNDER SEAL)13
07/09/2002Motion for protective order filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Lang.3
07/09/2002Request that the Commission give due consideration to its application for review dated July 5, 2001 and to its second supplement filed July 9, 2002, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Smith.4
07/09/2002Second supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appear of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling (public version) filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Lang.10
10/22/2001Reply to Ameritech Ohio's supplement to its application, filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by T. O'Brien.70
10/15/2001Supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Lang.5
09/10/2001Supplement to CoreComm Newco's motion to dismiss complaint; alternative suggestion of stay, filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by T. O'Brien.14
08/27/2001Entry granting Ameritech's motion to consolidate 01-1721 and 01-1528; scheduling a settlement conference at 10:00 a.m. on September 12, 2001, Hearing Room 11-F, Commission offices; that, if the parties donot reach a settlement at this conference, they shall meet with the attorney examiner at the conclusion of the conference to discuss procedural matters related to this case. (AE)3
07/25/2001Motion and memorandum in support for admission Pro Hac Vice of Eric J. Branfman filed by S. Bloomfield on behalf of CoreComm Newco, Inc.3
07/18/2001Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy.4
07/10/2001Memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's 6/29/01 ruling filed by T, O'Brien.23
07/05/2001Application for review through interlocutory appeal of the Hearing Examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.17
06/29/2001Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Jon Kelly, Ameritech Ohio.1
06/29/2001Entry ordering that CoreComm's motion to stop Ameritech from blocking service to new customers is granted until the Commission orders otherwise. (AE)3
06/29/2001Memorandum contra CoreComm's motion for an immediate order, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.24
06/27/2001In the matter of the complaint of CoreComm Newco, Inc. against Ameritech Ohio for unlawfully terminating service.6