DIS - Case Record for 01-1528-TP-CSS Skip to main content

Case Record For:

01-1528-TP-CSS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: CORECOMM NEWCO INC
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 6/28/2001
Date Closed: 9/8/2004
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 38 documents 1 /  3 
Date FiledSummaryPages
09/08/2004Entry ordering that SBC's motion be granted and CoreComm's complaint be dismissed without prejudice and that these cases be closed of record.2
09/08/2004Service Notice2
07/09/2003Motion to hold interlocutory appeal in abeyance on behalf of SBC Ohio, filed by M. Mulcahy.2
05/15/2003Surreply to SBC Ohio's Thrid Supplemental to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of CoreComm by T. O'Brien.(FILED UNDER SEAL)54
05/15/2003Surreply to SBC Ohio's third supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of CoreComm by T. O'Brien.32
05/15/2003Motion for protective order and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco, Inc. by T. O'Brien.3
05/09/2003Confidential version of reply in support of third supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the Hearing Examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of respondent, SBC Ohio, by J. Lang. (FILED UNDER SEAL)18
05/09/2003Public version of Reply in support of third supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the Hearing Examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of respondent, SBC Ohio, by J. Lang.17
05/09/2003Motion for protective order filed on behalf of respondent, SBC Ohio, by J. Lang.3
05/02/2003Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant, CoreComm Newco, by T. O'Brien.3
05/02/2003Reply to Ameritech Ohio's Third Supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of CoreComm by T. O'Brien. (Filed under seal)145
05/02/2003Reply to SBC Ohio's Third Supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of Corecomm by T. O'Brien.144
04/16/2003Confidential filing supplement to the application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner ruling filed on behalf of SBC Ohio, by M. Mulcany. (FILED UNDER SEAL)9
04/16/2003Third supplement to application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiners' June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Lang.7
04/16/2003Motion for protective order, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Lang.3
 
1 /  3 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Farkas, Scott