DIS - Case Record for 01-1528-TP-CSS Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 01-1528-TP-CSS
CASE DESCRIPTION: CORECOMM NEWCO INC
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 5/10/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
09/08/2004 Entry ordering that SBC's motion be granted and CoreComm's complaint be dismissed without prejudice and that these cases be closed of record.
09/08/2004 Service Notice
07/09/2003 Motion to hold interlocutory appeal in abeyance on behalf of SBC Ohio, filed by M. Mulcahy.
05/15/2003 Surreply to SBC Ohio's Thrid Supplemental to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of CoreComm by T. O'Brien.(FILED UNDER SEAL)
05/15/2003 Surreply to SBC Ohio's third supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of CoreComm by T. O'Brien.
05/15/2003 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco, Inc. by T. O'Brien.
05/09/2003 Confidential version of reply in support of third supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the Hearing Examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of respondent, SBC Ohio, by J. Lang. (FILED UNDER SEAL)
05/09/2003 Public version of Reply in support of third supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the Hearing Examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of respondent, SBC Ohio, by J. Lang.
05/09/2003 Motion for protective order filed on behalf of respondent, SBC Ohio, by J. Lang.
05/02/2003 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant, CoreComm Newco, by T. O'Brien.
05/02/2003 Reply to Ameritech Ohio's Third Supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of CoreComm by T. O'Brien. (Filed under seal)
05/02/2003 Reply to SBC Ohio's Third Supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of Corecomm by T. O'Brien.
04/16/2003 Confidential filing supplement to the application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner ruling filed on behalf of SBC Ohio, by M. Mulcany. (FILED UNDER SEAL)
04/16/2003 Third supplement to application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiners' June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Lang.
04/16/2003 Motion for protective order, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Lang.
08/08/2002 Affidavit of Gert P. Anderson. (FILED UNDER SEAL on 8/7/02)
08/05/2002 Confidential of SBC Ameritech Ohio's Reply Support of Second Supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling Confidential version. (FILED UNDER SEAL)
08/05/2002 SBC Ameritech Ohio's reply in support of second supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling Public Version filed by J. Lang.
07/26/2002 Original signature page for faxed copy of signature page of affidavit, filed on behalf of complainant by T. O'Brien.
07/25/2002 Confidential reply to Ameritech Ohio's second supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of applicant by T. O'Brien. (FILED UNDER SEAL)
07/25/2002 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by T. O'Brien.
07/25/2002 Reply to Ameritech Ohio's second supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of complainant by T. O'Brien. (Public version)
07/09/2002 Confidential second supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Lang. (FILED UNDER SEAL)
07/09/2002 Motion for protective order filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Lang.
07/09/2002 Request that the Commission give due consideration to its application for review dated July 5, 2001 and to its second supplement filed July 9, 2002, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Smith.
07/09/2002 Second supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appear of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling (public version) filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Lang.
10/22/2001 Reply to Ameritech Ohio's supplement to its application, filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by T. O'Brien.
10/15/2001 Supplement to its application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Lang.
09/10/2001 Supplement to CoreComm Newco's motion to dismiss complaint; alternative suggestion of stay, filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by T. O'Brien.
08/27/2001 Entry granting Ameritech's motion to consolidate 01-1721 and 01-1528; scheduling a settlement conference at 10:00 a.m. on September 12, 2001, Hearing Room 11-F, Commission offices; that, if the parties donot reach a settlement at this conference, they shall meet with the attorney examiner at the conclusion of the conference to discuss procedural matters related to this case. (AE)
07/25/2001 Motion and memorandum in support for admission Pro Hac Vice of Eric J. Branfman filed by S. Bloomfield on behalf of CoreComm Newco, Inc.
07/18/2001 Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy.
07/10/2001 Memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for review through interlocutory appeal of the hearing examiner's 6/29/01 ruling filed by T, O'Brien.
07/05/2001 Application for review through interlocutory appeal of the Hearing Examiner's June 29, 2001 ruling, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.
06/29/2001 Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Jon Kelly, Ameritech Ohio.
06/29/2001 Entry ordering that CoreComm's motion to stop Ameritech from blocking service to new customers is granted until the Commission orders otherwise. (AE)
06/29/2001 Memorandum contra CoreComm's motion for an immediate order, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.
06/27/2001 In the matter of the complaint of CoreComm Newco, Inc. against Ameritech Ohio for unlawfully terminating service.