| Summary: |
|
ICN #0100 Entry ordering that the rulings of the Attorney Examiner do not constitute a new or novel question of interpretation, law, or policy, nor do they constitute rulings which represents a departure from past precedent; the rulings of the Attorney Examiner do not require an immediate determination by the Commission to prevent the likelihood of undue prejudice or expense to one or more of the parties should the Commission ultimately reverse the rulings; therefore, the requests of OCC for the certification to the Commission of the Attorney Examiner's rulings granting the companies' motions to strike portions of the testimony of Messrs. Centolella and Crandall are denied. ((AE) |
|