| Summary: |
|
The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio's (PUCO's) comments responding to the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC's) July 21, 2004, invitation for public input on alternative unbundling rules that will implement the obligations of section 251(c)(3) in a manner consistent with U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit's decision in United States Telecom Ass'n v FCC (In the Matter of Unbundled Access to Network Elements [WC Docket No. 313] and Review of Section 251 Unbundling Obligations of Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers [CC Docket No.01-338]). |
|