DIS - Case Record for 99-1181-TP-CSS Skip to main content

Case Record For:

99-1181-TP-CSS

Case Title: AT&T/GTE NORTH
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 9/30/1999
Date Closed: 9/25/2001
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
09/25/2001Service Notice.2
09/25/2001Entry dismissing the complaint without prejudice and closing this case of record.2
09/10/2001Notice of withdrawal filed on behalf of complainant, AT&T Communications of Ohio, by B. Kahn.2
11/02/2000Memorandum in opposition to AT&T's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by T. Lodge.7
03/16/2000Entry ordering that AT&T's request for clarification is granted to the extent discussed in this entry. Concurring Opinion of Commissioner Craig Glazer. (8 pgs.)8
03/02/2000memorandum of GTE North Incorporated in opposition to AT&T's application for rehearing filed by T. Lodge.7
03/02/2000Memorandum in opposition to AT&T's application for rehear- ing, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by T. Lodge. (7 pgs.)7
02/22/2000Application for rehearing or, in the alternative, clarifi- cation and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of com- plainant, AT&T Communications of Ohio, by B. Kahn. (14 pgs.)14
02/22/2000 Application for rehearing or, in the alternative, clarification, and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of complainant, AT&T Communications of Ohio, by B. Kahn 14
01/20/2000Entry Ordering, that discovery shall be stayed in both of these matters until otherwise ordered by the Commission, and that the deadlines for filing and service of expert testimony are vacated in both of these cases. It is further ordered, that the evidentiary hearings scheduled to begin on 3/8 and 4/4/2000, in these matters are canceled. 4p4
12/16/1999Entry ordering that GTE's motion to dismiss this complaint is denied; that OCC's motion to intervene is granted; that responses to written discovery requests shall be served within 14 calendar days of service of the discovery re- quests; that the last day upon which to serve written dis- covery requests shall be March 7, 2000; that AT&T file its initial direct, expert testimony and serve such upon the other parties by January 26, 2000; that GTE and OCC file their direct, expert testimony and serve such upon the other parties by March 1, 2000; that AT&T file its reply direct, expert testimony and serve such upon the other parties by March 24, 2000; scheduling the evidentiary hearing at 10:00 a.m., on April 4, 2000, at the Commission offices. (AE) (ISSUED 12/15/99)5
12/03/1999Reply memorandum to AT&T's memorandum contra GTE North's motion to dismiss complaint, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by T. Lodge. (12 pgs.)12
11/23/1999Memorandum contra GTE North's motion to dismiss complaint, filed on behalf of complainant, AT&T, by D. Chorzempa. (12 pgs.)12
11/08/1999Motion to dismiss complaint and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by T. Lodge. (16 pgs.)16
11/08/1999Answer filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by T. Lodge. (10 pgs.)10
11/01/1999Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann.4
10/27/1999Letter regarding the rescheduling of the settlement con- ference to Tuesday, November 16, 1999 at 1:30 p.m., filed on behalf of complainant, AT&T Communications, by T. Lodge. (1 pg.)1
10/22/1999Entry scheduling a settlement conference at 1:30 p.m. on November 10, 1999, at the Commission offices; that, in the event a settlement is not reached at the conference, the parties thereafter discuss with the examiner several pro- cedural matters. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
10/21/1999Letter agreeing to an extension of time for response to complaint, which will now be due on November 8, 1999, filed on behalf of complainant, AT&T Communications of Ohio, by T. Lodge. (1 pg.)1
10/04/1999Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Patricia Cook, GTE North. (1 pg.)1
09/30/1999In the matter of the complaint of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. (vs) GTE North Incorporated relative to the alleged unjust and unreasonable violation of Ohio law by imposing switched access rates on Ohio interexchange carriers. (20 pgs.)20