Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
02/03/2000 | Entry ordering that the application for rehearing is denied, but this ruling does not prevent Ms. Klinkner or any other customer of Sprint from filing additional evidence in this case that would show that Sprint assessed a late fee earlier than that authorized by the Commission. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
01/19/2000 | Letter regarding Sheila L.Klinker complaint against Sprint Communications Company, filed by B. Donahue. | 1 |
01/13/2000 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 2, Exhibit B, 3rd title page; Check Sehet, 3rd page 1; Exhibit B, original page 26.1, filed on behalf of applicant by T. Coup. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
01/13/2000 | Revised tariff PUCO No. 2, 3rd revised page 1, to introduce a late fee, filed on behalf of applicant by T. Coup. | 4 |
01/07/2000 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Sheila Klinkner. (1 pg.) | 1 |
12/30/1999 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, by S. Klinkner. | 1 |
12/21/1999 | Finding & Order approving the application. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
12/15/1999 | Revised tariff original Page 26.1, filed by B. Donahue (3pgs | 3 |
10/08/1999 | Entry ordering that Sprint's motion for an extension of time to November 29, 1999, be granted and that the notice be amended as set forth in Finding 4. (AE) (2 pgs.) | 2 |
10/07/1999 | Motion for extension of time and memorandum in support filed on behalf of applicant by L. Lauridsen. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
09/23/1999 | Entry ordering that Sprint provide notice to affected customers as set forth in Finding 5. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
08/23/1999 | In the matter of the application of Sprint Communications Company L.P. to revise its tariff, PUCO No. 2, to intro- duce a late fee. (9 pgs.) | 9 |