Skip to main content

Case Record For:

98-1398-TP-AMT

File a Public Comment
Case Title: BELL ATLANTIC/GTE CORP.
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: AMT-Application for telephone company mergers
Date Opened: 10/2/1998
Date Closed: 9/23/2014
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
09/23/2014Case Action Form closing case with an effective date of 9/23/2014. electronically filed by Mrs. Donielle Genesky on behalf of PUCO2
11/07/2007Service notice.11
11/07/2007Entry ordering that the proposed AJPSA modifications are reasonable and should be adopted in Ohio,2
10/18/2007Agreement continued. (Part 4 of 4)65
10/18/2007Agreement continued. (Part 3 of 4)200
10/18/2007Agreement continued. (Part 2 of 4)200
10/18/2007 Amended Joint Partial Settlement Agreement on behalf of Verizon filed by C. Cole. (Part 1 of 4)200
01/26/2007Pursuant to the auditing provision of the Joint and Partial Settlement Agreement in effect in Ohio for Verizon North Inc., a conference call with interested parties has been scheduled for February 13, 2007 at 11:00 a.m. by calling 877.602.6583, filed by C. Cole. (ORIGINAL)6
01/25/2007Pursuant to the auditing provision of the Joint and Partial Settlement Agreement in effect in Ohio for Verizon north Inc., a conference call with interested parties has been scheduled February 13, 2007 at 11:00 a.m. by calling 877.602.6583, filed by C. Cole. (FAX)7
07/12/2006Final report to the PUCO regarding distribution of community technology funds in the matter of the Verizon-GTE merger agreement filed on behalf of the Ohio Community Computing Network by A. Stuber.5
02/03/2006Notice that the collaborative members have by consensus or acquiescence agreed to changes in the Parity Performance Incentive Program, filed on behalf of Verizon North Inc. by C. Cole.1
01/09/2006Notification of conference call scheduled for January 26, 2006 at 9:00 a.m.; 11:00 a.m., 1:00 p.m. and 2:00 p.m.filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by C. Cole.6
01/06/2006Service list filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by C. Cole.5
12/14/2005Letter submitting the final quarterly update on Lifeline expenditures filed by C. Cole on behalf of Verizon.1
12/14/2005Verizon is submitting the final quarterly update on Lifeline expenditures filed by C. Cole.1
12/12/2005Final quarterly update on Lifeline expenditures filed by C. Cole on behalf of Verizon. (FAX)1
10/06/2005Quarterly update on Lifeline expenditures filed by C. Cole on behalf of Verizon.1
10/03/2005Quarterly update on Lifeline expenditures filed by C. Cole on behalf of Verizon. (FAX)1
08/31/2005Certificate of service stating final report containing confidential information has been submitted to staff filed by C. Cole on behalf of Verizon.3
07/12/2005Correspondence stating that a conference will be held via telephone on August 9, 2005. 2 p.m. ET, filed by C. Cole on behalf of Verizon North, Inc.6
07/11/2005Notification of meeting and place of meeting via telephonic conference for August 9, 2005 at 2 p.m. ET, regarding its Operational Support System Performance Measures, filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by C. Cole. (FAX)7
06/28/2005Quarterly update on Lifeline expenditures, filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by C. Cole. (original)1
06/28/2005Quarterly update on Lifeline expenditures, filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by C. Cole. (FAX)1
05/19/2005Additional information filed by C. Cole on behalf of Verizon North.3
05/18/2005Additional information filed by C. Cole on behalf of Verizon North.(FAX).3
04/08/2005Entry ordering that the motion for extension of time is granted. (JA)1
04/08/2005Service Notice11
03/31/2005Motion for extension of time and memorandum in support filed by T. Lodge on behalf of Verizon North Inc.5
03/29/2005Correspondence stating that no significant changes have occurred since the August 200 filing that would require collaborative review filed by C. Cole on behalf of Verizon.3
03/21/2005Quarterly update on Lifeline expenditures filed by C. Cole on behalf of Verizon.1
03/18/2005Quarterly update on Lifeline expenditures filed on behalf of Verizon by C. Cole. (FAX)1
01/05/2005Letter advising the Commission that no significant changes have occurred since August 2000 filing that would require collaborative review filed by C. Cole on behalf of Verizon.3
01/03/2005Letter advising the Commission that Verizon and the involved CLECS have no significant changes since August 200 filed on behalf of Verizon by C. Cole.(FAX)3
12/27/2004Quarterly update on Lifeline expenditures filed by C. Cole on behalf of Verizon.1
12/17/2004Additional information concerning a teleconference regarding Performance Measures and related activities filed by C. Cole on behalf of Verizon North.8
09/30/2004Service Notice10
09/29/2004Entry ordering that Verizon North's motion for extension of time is granted.2
09/29/2004Letter advising to Commission that, upon review of both Verizon and the involved CLEC's, no significant changes have occurred since August 2000 filing that would require collaborative review filed by C. Cole.3
09/29/2004Executive summary of the Ohio Market study report, fourth report on competition in the local exchange service area of Verizon North Inc. filed by C. Cole.49
09/14/2004Motion and Memorandum in Support of Verizon North Inc. filed by T. Lodge.7
09/13/2004Letter requesting Commission approval to extend the period within which Outreach Budget may be spent filed on behalf of Verizon North Inc.by C. Cole.1
09/10/2004Letter requesting Commission approval to extend the period within which Outreach Budget may be spent filed on behalf of Verizon North Inc.by C. Cole.1
07/01/2004Conference call concerning OSS Performance Measures and related activities such as auditing and reporting procedures scheduled for Thursday, July 22,2004 at 8:00 am HT, 11:00 am PT, 1:00 pm CT, and 2:00 pm ET via conference call by dialing 972/893-7111, PASSCODE 9836498497# filed on behalf of Verizon by C. Cole.8
06/30/2004Letter to advise the Commission that upon review of both Verizon and the involved CLEC's, no significant changes have occurred filed on behalf of Verizon by C. Cole.3
06/28/2004Report filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by C. Coles. (Fax)9
03/31/2004Letter to advise the Commission that, upon review of both Verizon and the involved CLEC's, no significant changes have occurred since the December 31, 2003 filing that would require collaborative review by C. Cole.3
03/31/2004Letter stating that a fourth and final report containing confidential information has been submitted to staff filed on behalf of Verizon by C. Cole.3
03/26/2004Service Notice10
03/25/2004Entry on rehearing stating that the applications of Verizon North and OCC are denied.5
02/02/2004Final report including cycle 3 exchanges for repeat reports and network reports per 100 filed by T. Colquitt on behalf of Verizon North Inc.3
01/23/2004Service Notice10
01/21/2004Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing are granted for the limited purpose of allowing the Commission additional time to consider the issues raised on rehearing.2
01/05/2004Memorandum opposing application for rehearing of the OCC, filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by T. Lodge.8
01/05/2004Memorandum Contra Verizon North Inc.'s application for rehearing filed by J. Serio on behalf of OCC.26
12/31/2003Letter advising Commission that upon review both Verizon and the involved CLEC's, no significant changes have occurred since the September 26, 2003 filing that would require collaborative review, filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by C. Cole.3
12/26/2003Application for rehearing filed on behalf of The Office of Consumers' Counsel by J. Serio.13
12/24/2003Submitted information on the status of the enrollment processes and the status of qualifying programs, filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by T. Colquitt.1
12/24/2003Submitted detail information on funds spent relative to the activities of the lifeline public awareness collaborative and the activities of the nontelephone household study collaborative, filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by T. Colquitt.2
12/24/2003Application for rehearing memorandum in support, filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by T. Lodge.18
12/23/2003Notification of meeting via conference call regarding OSS Performance Measures and related activities, filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by C. Cole.7
12/19/2003Letter scheduling a conference call regarding OSS Performance Measures and related services filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by C. Cole. (FAX)7
11/25/2003Finding and order, ordering that Verizon North amend its existing lifeline program consistent with the directives of the Finding and Order, that Verizon North work wit staff to amend its lifeline program enrollment criteria consistent with this Finding and Order, that within 75 days of the F&O, Verizon North filed requisite tariff revisions incorporating the amendment s to its lifeline program, that within 30 days of the F&O, Verizon North docket an update regarding the status of qualifying programs consistent the this F&0, that Verizon North work with staff to establish a future budget for the purpose of promoting the lifeline program, that the lifeline advisory board be established consistent the terms and conditions of the F&O, that Verizon North provide future accounting of funds spent regarding the Verizon lifeline program, that to the extend not specifically addressed all other arguments raised are denied.17
11/06/2003Entry ordering that the proposed AJPSA modifications are reasonable and should be adopted in Ohio.2
10/31/2003Final report containing confidential information has been submitted to staff, filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by C. Cole.3
10/29/2003Letter stating that a final report containing confidential information has been submitted to staff filed on behalf of applicant by C. Cole. 3
09/26/2003Executive summary of the Ohio Market Study Report fourth report on competition in the local exchange service area on behalf of Verizon North Inc. by T. Colquitt.45
09/26/2003Quarterly review filed on behalf of Verizon North by C. Cole.46
09/23/2003Implemented version of the California Amended Joint Partial Settlement Agreement (AJPSA) for operations support systems (OSS) in Ohio, jointly filed by the CLECs and Verizon in California, by C. Cole.152
09/18/2003Fourth and final report filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Colquitt.4
08/11/2003Updated listing of the conditions ordered by the Commission, and corresponding due dates, the status and activity related to each condition filed by T. Colquitt.13
08/08/2003Detailed analysis port-merger activities and compliances report, filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by T. Colquitt. (fax)13
08/07/2003Final report part of the semi-annual reporting requirement to staff containing confidential information regarding temporary repairs for the period of December 27, 2002 through June 27, 2003 on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by C. Cole.3
08/06/2003Final report filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by C. Cole.3
07/29/2003List of exchanges related to trouble reports per 100 and repeat reports that are currently being reviewed, filed on behalf of Verizon North by C. Cole.5
07/24/2003Letter to Commission, filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by C. Cole.3
07/01/2003Semi-annual report to staff containing confidential information regarding temporary repairs for the period of December 27, 2002 through June 27, 2003, filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by C. Cole.3
06/30/2003Semi-annual report to staff containing confidential information regarding temporary repairs for the period of December 27, 2002 through June 27, 2003, filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by C. Cole. (fax)4
06/20/2003Final report to satisfy the merger condition for Verizon's deployment within the state of Ohio of central offices capable of 56 kbs or above date transmission, filed by T. Colquitt.3
06/20/2003Letter stating that, upon review of both Verizon and the involved CLECs, no significant changes have occurred since the August 2000 filing that would require collaborative review, filed by T. Colquitt.3
05/23/2003Letter regarding the OSS performance measures filed by C. Cole.8
05/22/2003OSS performance measures filed by D. Bricely. (FAX)9
04/29/2003Letter regarding confidential material filed with the PUCO, filed on behalf of Verizon North by C. Cole.3
03/18/2003Letter advising the Commission that, upon review of both Verizon and the involved CLEC's, no significant changes have occurred since the August 2000 filing that would require collaborative review filed on behalf of Verizon by T. Colquitt.3
02/06/2003Ohio Non-Telephone Subscriber Survey-June 2001, filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Lodge.103
01/31/2003Updated list of the cycle 2 exchange for repeat reports and network reports per 100, filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc., by T. Colquitt.5
01/29/2003Letter notify Commission of Confidential documents filed on Februry 20, 2000, filed on behalf of Verizon North by C. Cole. 3
01/28/2003Confirmation of confidential report filed with Telecommunications staff reflecting certain company-wide minimum telephone service standards performance for the fourth quarter of 2002, filed on behalf of Verizon North by C. Cole (FAX)4
12/31/2002Letter stating that a report containing confidential information has been submitted to staff regarding temporary repairs for the period from June 27, 2002 through December 26, 2002, filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Colquitt.4
12/19/2002Quarterly report filed by T. Colquitt on behalf of Verizon and the involved CLECs.3
11/14/2002Letter regarding the conference call scheduled at 11:00 a.m. on November 22, 2002, filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Colquitt.7
11/12/2002Correspondence regarding the meeting to take place on November 22, 2002, filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Colquitt. (Fax)8
10/31/2002Letter stating a report containing confidential information has been submitted to staff reflecting certain company-wide minimum telephone service standards performance for the third quarter of 2002, filed by T. Colquitt.3
10/30/2002Additional information filed by T. Colquitt. (FAX)3
10/28/2002Joint partial settlement agreement (JPSA) in effect in Ohio for Verizon North Inc. ("Verizon") filed by T. Colquitt.7
10/25/2002Letter regarding the Auditing provision of the Joint Partial Settlement Agreement ("JPSA") in effect in Ohio for Verizon North Inc. filed by T. Colquitt. (FAX)7
09/27/2002Quarterly review filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Colquitt.3
09/27/2002Report filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Colquitt.4
09/27/2002Update to benchmark report filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Colquitt.44
07/30/2002Letter regarding the report containing confidential information reflecting certain company-wide minimum telephone service standards performance for the second quarter of 2002, filed by T. Colquitt.1
07/30/2002Letter on behalf of Verizon North Inc. provides an update to the listing of exchanges related to trouble reports per 100 and repeat reports as reported on July 30, 2000, filed by T. Colquitt5
07/30/2002Letter advising the Commission that, upon review of both Verizon and the involved CLEC's conditions are unchanged from the August 2000 filing and no changes have occurred that require Collaborative review filed by T. Colquitt.3
07/01/2002Second annual report on deployment within the state of Ohio filed on behalf of Verizon North by P. Cook.4
04/30/2002Letter stating a report containing confidential information has been submitted to staff reflecting certain company-wide minimum telephone service standards performance for the first quarter of 2002 by J. Kennedy.1
03/29/2002Letter advising the Commission of changes to metrics included in the FCC Remedy Plan that were recently approved by the FCC, filed on behalf of Verizon North Inc. by J. Kennedy.29
03/29/2002Letter regarding a second report containing confidential information, filed on behalf of applicants by J. Kennedy.3
03/29/2002Quarterly review filed on behalf of applicants by J. Kennedy.3
01/30/2002Letter stating fourth quarter report was filed containing confidential information filed by J. Kennedy on behalf of Verizon.1
12/20/2001Letter regarding the joint applicants committed to conduct quarterly reviews to assess the need for change or replacement of the interim PPIP, filed by J. Kennedy.3
10/29/2001List of exchanges related to trouble reports per 100 and repeat reports filed by J. Kennedy on behalf of Verizon North Inc.5
10/26/2001Letter regarding a report containing confidential information which has been submitted to the PUCO staff, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.1
10/12/2001Memorandum of Verizon North Inc. in reply to the responses of the consumer parties and of the staff to Verizon's report on Lifeline Program and non-telephone household study filed by T. Lodge9
09/28/2001Update to the benchmark report filed on behalf of Verizon North by J.Kennedy.34
09/28/2001Second annual report filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.4
09/28/2001Joint parties motion and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio, AT&T by D. Trabaris, Verizon, T. Lodge, MCI, J. Sanders, Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by P. Sherwood and PUCO by J. Bair.9
09/28/2001Minutes for June 29, 2001 meeting, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.5
09/24/2001Letter stating the Staff's views concerning Verizon's commitments regarding the Non-telephone Household study and the $1.5 million, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by J. Bair.4
09/21/2001Response to Verizon North's report on lifeline program and nontelephone household study, filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio; and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by M. Smalz.21
09/21/2001Motion for an extension and memorandum in support filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by J. Bair.3
09/13/2001Letter stating that upon review of both Verizon and the involved CLECs, conditions are unchanged from the August 2000 filing and no changes have occurred that require collaborative review, filed by J. Kennedy.3
09/12/2001Entry ordering that staff's motion for leave to file a reply is granted in accordance with Finding 3; that staff, OCC, and Edgemont should file replies in accordance with Finding 3. (AE)2
09/12/2001Service Notice.15
09/05/2001Memorandum in support of staff motion, filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio; and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by M. Smalz.4
09/04/2001Final report of the Lifeline and Nontelephone Household Study, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.5
09/04/2001Motion for leave to file reply and memorandum in support filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by J. Bair.7
08/27/2001Request for an extension of ten (10) days for the filing of the report, filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Lodge.1
08/23/2001Entry ordering that the proposed AJPSA modifications are reasonable and should be adopted in Ohio.2
08/23/2001Service Notice.14
08/21/2001Proposal outlining how the designated funds will be utilized, as well as how the OCCCN will administer the process, filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs; the PUCO staff by J. Bair; Verizon North by T. Lodge; and OCC by J. Serio.6
07/30/2001Letter regarding a report containing confidential information reflecting certain company-wide minimum telephone service standards performance for the second quarter of 2001, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Kennedy.1
07/30/2001Information summarizing work performed in the 25 exchanges with the highest trouble and repeat reports as reported in July 2000, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.3
06/29/2001First annual report on Verizon's deployment within the state of Ohio of central offices capable of 56 kbs or above data transmission, filed by J. Kennedy.4
06/29/2001Service Notice.14
06/28/2001Entry ordering that OCC's and Edgemont's joint application for rehearing is denied as set forth in this entry.3
06/21/2001Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing filed by OCC/Edgemont and Verizon are granted for the limited purpose of allowing the Commission additional time in which to consider the issues raised on rehearing; that the parity with a MTSS floor model is stayed as directed in Finding 5.3
06/21/2001Minutes from the collaborative meetings that took place on March 2 and May 8, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.5
06/15/2001Letter advising the Commission that, upon review of both Verizon and the involved CLECs, conditions are unchanged from the August 2000 filing and no changes have occurred that require collaborative review, filed by J. Kennedy.3
06/12/2001Notice of additional authority filed by B. Kahn on behalf of AT&T.15
06/08/2001California Amended Joint Partial Settlement Agreement filed on behalf of applicant by J. Kennedy.210
06/05/2001Notice of errata filing submitted on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa.17
06/04/2001Memorandum contra application of Verizon North for rehearing and request for stay, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa.15
06/04/2001Memorandum in response to joint parties' application for rehearing regarding lifeline plans, filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Lodge.6
05/25/2001Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann; and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs.16
05/25/2001Amended business rule reflecting two changes, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.8
05/25/2001Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Lodge.21
04/27/2001Letter stating that a report containing confidential information has been submitted, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.1
04/25/2001Entry ordering that the FCC's parity performance incentive plan model be approved subject to the Ohio-specific modifications discussed in Finding 3; that OCC and Edgemont's motion regarding the requisite lifeline plans is denied in accordance with Finding 7; that OCC and Edgemont's motion for clarification is denied in accordance with Finding 10; that the disputed OSS issues are resolved in accordance with Finding 13; that Verizon North amend its business rules and file the supporting documentation in accordance with Finding 13.23
04/24/2001Letter stating that all the directories for Ohio have been updated to include governmental blue pages, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.3
03/30/2001Quarterly review filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.3
03/30/2001Letter regarding the confidential report, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.3
02/13/2001Minutes for 1/12/2001 meeting filed by J. Kennedy.5
01/29/2001Letter regarding a confidential report that was submitted to the PUCO staff, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.3
01/26/2001Finalized Best Practices report for OSS improvements filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.27
01/18/2001Minutes for December 14, 2000, collaborative meeting, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.5
01/12/2001Reply letter on the "Errata 10/27/2000 report filed by J. Kennedy.3
12/29/2000Minutes from the collaborative meeting that took place on November 8, 2000, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.5
12/29/2000Quarterly update (minutes from the collaborative meetings through November) filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.17
12/29/2000The Ohio Consumers Counsel reply to joint applicants' memorandum contra motion for oral argument filed by T. Etter.5
12/27/2000Detailed analysis of its post-merger activities and compliance, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.12
12/08/2000Errata to the October 27, 2000 report of The Ohio Specific Collaborative filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa; Time Warner Telecom by P. Sherwood; Data-Telecom Corp. by S. Bloomfield.7
12/05/2000Memorandum in response to joint parties' motion for clarification, filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Lodge.8
11/20/2000Motion for clarification and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio; and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs.36
11/20/2000Joint parties' motion for clarification and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio; and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs.36
10/31/2000Information regarding the 25 exchanges each with the highest trouble and repeat reports for 2000, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy. (5 pgs.)5
10/27/2000Best practices recommendations for OSS improvements, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy. 43
10/27/2000Minutes from the conference calls held September 12, October 2, October 4, October 11, October 17, and October 20, 2000, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.19
10/27/2000Letter stating that the final report of the collaborative will be submitted at such time as the collaborative feels that the best means for expending the $1.5 million have been identified, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.2
10/27/2000Report of Ohio Specific Collaborative, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Nourse; AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa; Verizon North by T. Mazzola; Data-Telecom Corp. by S. Bloomfield; OCC by J. Serio; and Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by P. Sherwood. (52 pgs.)52
10/27/2000Minutes from the collaborative meetings that took place on September 21 and October 12, 2000, filed on behalf of Veri- zon North by J. Kennedy. (6 pgs.)6
10/27/2000Minutes from the collaborative meetings that took place on 9/21 and 10/12 filed by J. Kennedy on behalf of Verizon North.6
10/25/2000Updated information filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by S. Bloomfield. 1
10/25/2000Updated information filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by S. Bloomfield. (1 pg.)1
10/23/2000Letter regarding a report containing confidential information, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy. 3
10/23/2000Letter regarding a report containing confidential infor- mation, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy. (3 pgs.)3
10/13/2000Letter regarding the collaborative to address issues involved with auditing OSS performance measures and the allocation of any possible penalty payments, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy. 7
10/13/2000Agreed-upon procedures for Verizon's Operations Support System Performance Measurement Reporting System, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy. (107 pgs.)107
10/13/2000Letter regarding the collaborative to address issues involved with auditing OSS performance measures and the allocation of any possible penalty payments, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy. (7 pgs.)7
10/06/2000Joint parties' response to Verizon North Inc.'s memorandum in response to joint parties' Motion to order Verizon to offer two Lifeline Plans. Filed by R. Tongren.6
10/06/2000Joint parties' response to Verizon North Inc.'s memorandum in response to joint parties' Motion to order Verizon to offer two Lifeline Plans. Filed by R. Tongren (6 pgs)6
10/03/2000Entry ordering that the joint parties' motion for a con- tinuance and expedited consideration is granted in accor- dance with Finding 3. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
10/03/2000Entry granting joint parties' motion for a continuance and expedited consideration in accordance with Finding (3). (AE)2
10/02/2000Letter stating quarterly reports will be filed no later than 10/23/00 filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.1
10/02/2000Letter stating quarterly reports will be filed no later than 10/23/00 filed by J. Kennedy (1 pg)1
09/29/2000Memorandum of Verizon North Inc. in response to joint parties' motion to order Verizon to offer two lifeline plans Filed by T. Lodge (8 pgs)8
09/29/2000Executive Summary of the Ohio Market study report on competition in the local exchange service area of Verizon North Inc. Filed by J. Kennedy (24 pgs)24
09/29/2000Letter regarding Verizon Ohio Specific Collaborative meeting minutes for 8/22/2000 conference call. Filed by J. Kennedy (9 pgs)9
09/28/2000Minutes from the collaborative meetings that took place on August 17 and September 7, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy. (8 pgs.)8
09/28/2000Executive summary of the Ohio Market Study Report on competition on the local exchange service of Verizon North Inc, filed by J. Kennedy.29
09/28/2000Report filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy. (4 pgs.)4
09/28/2000Minutes from collaborative meetings that took place on August 17 and September 7, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy. (8 pgs.)8
09/28/2000Executive summary of report filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy. (28 pgs.)28
09/28/2000Letter stating that a report containing confidential information has been submitted to staff reflecting benchmark circumstances as of June 30, 2000 for market power assessment, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy. (24 pgs.)24
09/28/2000Correspondence letter regarding the establishment of a collaborative to identify a project in Verizon North's Ohio territory that would address a commitment to education, filed by J. Kennedy. (2 pgs.)2
09/22/2000Joint parties motion for continuance and expedited con- sideration and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio; AT&T Corp. by D. Trabaris; Verizon by T. Lodge; MCI by J. Sanders; Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by P. Sherwood; and the PUCO staff by J. Bair. (9 pgs.)9
09/14/2000Joint parties motion to order Verizon to offer two lifeline plans filed by L. Parikh and E. Jacobs. (8 PGS)8
09/11/2000Minutes from the conference call held on July 20th, and supplemental signature page for the August 29th filing, filed on behalf of Verizon by J. Kennedy. (10 pgs.)10
08/30/2000Supplemental signature page for filing made August 29, 2000 by T. Lodge.2
08/30/2000Supplemental signature page for the filing made August 29, 2000, filed by T. Lodge. (2 pgs.)2
08/29/2000GTE/Bell Atlantic Ohio Specific Collaborative Meeting Minutes for July 27, 2000 Conference Call, filed by J. Kennedy. (10 pgs.)10
08/29/2000Minutes from the collaborative meeting on July 27, 2000, as well as conference calls on August 1st and August 14th, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.11
08/29/2000Report of parity performance incentive program (PIPP) collaboratives, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by T. McNamee; AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa; Verizon North by T. Lodge; Sprint by J. Stewart; OCC by J. Serio; and WorldCom, Inc. by J.Sanders.109
08/29/2000Report of parity performance incentive program collabora- tive filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by T. Nourse; AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa; Verizon North by T. Lodge; Sprint by J. Stewart; OCC by J. Serio; WorldCom, Inc. by J. Sanders. (111 pgs.)111
08/24/2000GTE/Bell Atlantic Ohio Lifeline Collaborative Minutes for July 27, 2000 Meeting, filed on behalf of Verizon by J. Kennedy. (4 pgs.)4
08/24/2000Minutes from the July 27, 2000 meeting, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.4
08/22/2000Final meeting minutes for 8/10/2000 Parity Performance Incentive Program. Filed by J. Kennedy (11 pgs)11
08/10/2000Information on status of the three OSS phases in Ohio, filed on behalf of Verizon North,Inc by J. Kennedy.22
08/10/2000Update filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy. (1 pg.)1
08/10/2000Minutes from conference call filed by J. Kennedy (22 pgs)22
08/10/2000Update to the 3 phases of OSS filed by J Kennedy. (1 pg)1
07/25/2000First filing listing the 25 exchanges each with the highest trouble and repeat reports, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy. (5 pgs.)5
07/18/2000Additional information filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Kennedy. (6 pgs.)6
07/18/2000Letter stating that during the June 30, 2000 meeting participants will determine the appropriate schedule and deliverables associated with identifying and implementing any Ohio specific modifications, additions, or deletions of OSS Performance Measures and Standards filed by J. Kennedy on behalf of GTE Service Corporation.6
07/13/2000Entry ordered, the Commission's Opinion & Order of 2/10/00, is granted as clarified as stated in this entry. (4 pgs.)4
07/09/2000Letter providing an update to the three phases of OSS filed by J. Kennedy on behalf of the GTE Service Corporation.1
07/09/2000Meeting minutes from the OSS Collaborative conference calls held on June 2nd, June 14th, and June 21st filed by J. Kennedy on behalf of GTE Service Corporation.21
07/07/2000Letter in compliance with page 14 of the PUCO opinion and order dated 2/10/00, GTE North Inc. provides this update to the three phases of OSS. Filed by J. Kennedy (1 pg)1
07/07/2000Letter regarding an update of the collaborative discussions. Filed by J. Kennedy ( 21 pgs)21
07/07/2000Letter regarding Alternative Dispute Resolution Mediation Process GTE Ohio. Filed by J. Kennedy (5 pgs)5
07/07/2000Letter regarding Alternative Dispute Resolution Mediation Process GTE Ohio. Filed by J. Kennedy5
07/06/2000Letter offering to file a tariff for a new lifeline plan filed on behalf of applicant by J. Kennedy. (FAX)4
07/06/2000Proposed lifeline plan-key components filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Kennedy. (4 pgs.)4
07/05/2000Notice of the merger of GTE Corporation and Bell Atlantic Corporation and the creation of Verizon Communications on June 30, 2000 filed by T. Lodge. 1
07/03/2000Notice of the merger of GTE Corporation and Bell Atlantic Corporation, and of the creation of Verizon Communications on June 30, 2000, filed by T. Lodge. (1 pg.)1
06/23/2000Memorandum of the joint applicants in response to request for clarification filed by T. Lodge on behalf of Bell Atlantic Corporation and GTE Corporation.30
06/23/2000Memorandum of the joint applicants in response to request for clarification, filed on behalf of GTE Corp. by T. Lodge; and Bell Atlantic Corp. by J. Walker. (30 pgs.)30
06/20/2000Request for clarification filed on behalf of McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services by M. Christensen. (4 pgs.)4
06/19/2000Joint participants request for clarification filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio; AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa; Buckeye TeleSystem by A. Silvidi; and Time Warner Telecom by T. Kagele. (13 pgs.)13
06/19/2000Request to join with the other parties in requesting the clarification set for in the June 19th pleading filed by M. Christensen on behalf of McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc.4
06/19/2000Joint participants request for clarification filed by J. Serio, OCC; D. Chorzempa, AT&T Communications; and T. Kagele, Time Warner Telecom.13
06/09/2000Update to the three phases of OSS, filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Kennedy. (9 pgs.)9
06/09/2000Meeting minutes for the May 19, 2000 OSS Collaborative meeting filed by J. Kennedy, GTE Service Corporation. 9
05/30/2000Minutes for the GTE OSS Collaborative meetings held April 25th and May 4th, filed on behalf of GTE by J. Kennedy. 13
05/30/2000Minutes for the GTE OSS Collaborative meetings held April 25th and May 4th, filed on behalf of GTE by J. Kennedy. (13 pgs.)13
05/22/2000Letter stating that GTE North Incorporated proposes to implement a $5 million access charge reduction by reducing its Intrastate Carrier Common Line Charges (CCLC) filed by J. Kennedy.2
05/22/2000Additonal information filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Kennedy. (3 pgs.)3
05/10/2000Copies of the two previous letters and this month's letter advising of the status of the three OSS phases in Ohio, filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Kennedy.8
05/10/2000Copies of the two previous letters and this month's letter advising of the status of the three OSS phases in Ohio, filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Kennedy. (8 pgs.)8
04/10/2000Documentation demonstrating their compliance with the emergency electrical power requirements identified in Rule 4901:1-5-22, O.A.C., filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Kennedy. (6 pgs.)6
04/10/2000Correspondence regarding the monthly status of Operations Systems Support (OSS), filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Kennedy. (1 pg.)1
04/06/2000Entry ordering that the Opinion & Order is clarified pur- suant to Finding 8; that the submitted applications for rehearing are otherwise denied; to the extent not specifi- cally addressed herein, all other arguments raised in the applications for rehearing are denied. (13 pgs.)13
03/20/2000Memorandum of the joint applications opposing applications for rehearing, filed by T. Lodge. (21 pgs.)21
03/13/2000Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (30 pgs.)30
03/10/2000Application for rehearing or, in the alternative, clarifi- cation, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Trabaris. (20 pgs.)20
03/10/2000Application for rehearing filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco, Inc. by S. Bloomfield. (8 pgs.)8
02/10/2000Opinion and order approving proposed merger and amended application to the extent described and clarified in this opinion and order; that the docketing division should maintain for 18 months from the date of this order all documents currently under seal in this docket; that joint applicants formally notify this Commission that the merger has occurred within 3 days of the merger closure; further hearings are not required. Concurring opinions of Donald L. Mason and Judith A. Jones.66
01/19/2000Letter relative to proposed GTE and Bell Atlantic merger. County of Hamilton. Filed by, J. Dowlin (1 pg)1
01/19/2000Letter relative to the proposed BELL Atlantic and GTE merger. City of Cincinnati. Filed by, J. Cissell (1 pg)1
01/03/2000Reply memorandum filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Trabaris. (5 pgs.)5
01/03/2000Letter supporting the proposed merger of Bell Atlantic and GTE filed by N. Mirth on behalf of Gateway.1
01/03/2000Letter urging approval of the Bell Atlantic and GTE merger filed by D. Wilber, WOBL Radio, Inc.1
01/02/2000Letter supporting the proposed merger of Bell Atlantic and GTE filed by J. Daniel on behalf of the Ohio Conference of NAACP.1
01/01/2000Letter supporting the Bell Atlantic/GTE merger filed by T. Blaha on behalf of the Wood County Economic Development Commission.1
12/30/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by D. Wilber. (1 pg.)1
12/30/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by J. Daniel, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. (1 pg.)1
12/30/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by T. Blaha. (1 pg.)1
12/30/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by N. Mirth. (1 pg.)1
12/29/1999Memorandum of the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition in response to Ohio Consumers' Counsel motion for oral argument filed by E. Jacobs4
12/29/1999Reply to joint applicants' memorandum contra motion for oral argument, filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter. (5 pgs.)5
12/29/1999Memorandum in response to OCC's motion for oral argument filed on behalf of the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (4 pgs.)4
12/26/1999Memorandum of the joint applicants in response to the motion for oral argument filed by T. Lodge on behalf of GTE Corporation and J. Walker on behalf of Bell Atlantic Corporation.6
12/22/1999Memorandum in response to motion for oral argument, filed on behalf of GTE Corp. by T. Lodge; Bell Atlantic Corp. by J. Walker. (6 pgs.)6
12/17/1999Motion for oral argument and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (7 pgs.)7
11/30/1999Reply post-hearing brief filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (9 pgs.)9
11/30/1999Post-hearing brief filed on behalf of the joint applicants, GTE Corporation by T. Lodge; and Bell Atlantic Corp. by J. Walker. (298 pgs.)298
11/30/1999Reply brief filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (30 pgs.)30
11/30/1999Reply brief filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by E. Branf- man. (24 pgs.)24
11/30/1999Reply brief filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Trabaris. (22 pgs.)22
11/30/1999Reply brief filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by J. Bair. (14 pgs.)14
11/30/1999Reply brief filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by M. Schermer. (7 pgs.)7
11/16/1999Entry ordering that initial briefs shall be served no later than November 18, 1999, to parties who filed initial briefs. (AE) (2 pgs)2
11/16/1999Letter regarding a Certificate of Service, table of contents that was inadvertently omitted from CoreComm Newco, Inc.'s closing brief, which was filed with the PUCO and served upon all parties of record. Filed by S. Bloomfield (6 pgs)6
11/15/1999Initial post-hearing brief filed on behalf of the joint applicants, GTE Corporation by T. Lodge; and Bell Atlantic by J. Walker. (219 pgs.)219
11/15/1999Initial brief filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (124 pgs.)124
11/15/1999Initial post-hearing brief filed on behalf of AT&T Communi- cations of Ohio by D. Trabaris. (39 pgs.)39
11/15/1999Initial brief filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by J. Bair. (30 pgs.)30
11/15/1999Initial brief filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (23 pgs.)23
11/15/1999Closing brief filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco, Inc. by E. Branfman. (99 pgs.)97
11/15/1999Initial post-hearing brief filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by M. Schermer. (7 pgs.)7
11/05/1999Composite Index of hearings, Volumes I through XV, filed. (22 pgs.)22
11/05/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 10/22/99, (JA), 140 pgs., Submitted. (PUCO-Columbus, OH) (Volume XV)140
11/04/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 10/21/99, (JA), 135 pgs., Con't. (PUCO-Columbus, OH) (Volume XIV)135
10/27/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 10/13/99, (JA), 9 pgs., Con't. (PUCO-Columbus, OH) (Status Conference)9
10/25/1999Entry ordering that any intervenor interested in proceeding with surrebuttal testimony must notify the Commission by Wednesday, October 27, 1999; that initial briefs be filed by November 15, 1999, and reply briefs be filed by November 30, 1999. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
10/20/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 10/6/99, (JA), 132 pgs., Con't (PUCO-Columbus, Oh) (Volume XIII)132
10/20/1999Confidential Exhibits (Volume XIII) (FILED UNDER SEAL) (34 pgs)34
10/19/1999Confidential Exhibits (Volume XII) (FILED UNDER SEAL) (22 pgs)22
10/19/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 10/5/99, (JA), 309 pgs., Con't (PUCO-Columbus, Oh) (Volume XII)309
10/15/1999Transcript of the Joint Bell Atlantic Corp and GTE Corp for Consent and Approval of a Change in Control. (149 pgs)149
10/15/1999Letter regarding proposed merger of Bell Atlantic and GTE Gateway Mangement Center filed by N. Mirth (1pgs)1
10/15/1999Letter regarding GTE to merge with Bell Atlantic. Wood County Economic Development filed by T. Blaha (1pgs)1
10/14/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 9/30/99, (JA), 218 pgs., Con't. (PUCO-Columbus, OH) (Volume X)218
10/14/1999Proposed order of witnesses for the rebuttal phase of these proceedings, filed on behalf of the joint applicants by T. Lodge. (1 pg.)1
10/14/1999Entry ordering that the rebuttal testimony phase of this proceeding is rescheduled to October 21, 1999, at 10:00 a.m.; that no later than Thursday, October 14, 1999, joint applicants shall docket a letter in this proceeding reflect- ing the proposed schedule of witnesses; intervenors should notify the attorney examiner by Friday, October 15, 1999, as to any concerns regarding the proposed schedule of rebuttal witnesses. (AE) (1 pg.)1
10/13/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 9/29/99, (JA), 243 pgs., Con't. (PUCO-Columbus, OH) (Volume IX)243
10/12/1999Substitute rebuttal testimony of Taylor continued. (Part 2 of 2)221
10/12/1999Substitute rebuttal testimony of William E. Taylor filed. (Part 1 of 2)221
10/12/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 9/28/99, (JA), 230 pgs., Con't. (PUCO-Columbus, OH) (Volume VIII)230
10/12/1999Certificate of service filed on behalf of joint applicants by T. Mazzola. (3 pgs.)3
10/12/1999Substitute rebuttal testimony of Jerome Holland filed on behalf of joint appicants by T. Mazzola and J. Walker. (49 pgs.)49
10/12/1999Substitute rebuttal testimony of William Griswold filed on behalf of joint applicants by T. Mazzola and J. Walker. (32 pgs.)32
10/12/1999Substitute rebuttal testimony of John Peterson filed on behalf of joint applicants by T. Mazzola and J. Walker. (14 pgs.)14
10/08/1999Errata sheet filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by J. Bair. (3 pgs.)3
10/07/1999Entry ordering that all rebuttal testimony shall be prefiled on or before Tuesday October 12, 1999; that the rebuttal testimony phase of this proceeding shall commence on October 20, 1999; scheduling a status conference at 10:00 a.m. on October 13, 1999, at the Commission offices. (AE) (1 pg.)1
10/05/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 9/21/99, (JA), 19 pgs., Con't. (PUCO-Columbus, OH)19
10/05/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Shantel E. Grigsby, Marketing Solution. (1 pg.)1
10/05/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Thomas R. Bahr, Medina County Commissioner. (1 pg.)1
10/05/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Phil Heimlich, City of Cincinnati. (1 pg.)1
10/05/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by James A. Doutt, Medina County Economic Development Corp. (1 pg.)1
10/05/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Debra Lynn-Schmitz, Medina Area Chamber of Commerce. (1 pg.)1
09/29/1999Correspondence response letter to Ms. Frances Amison, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff. (1 pg.)1
09/27/1999Direct testimony of Hollie J. Mion filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by J. Bair. (16 pgs.)16
09/27/1999Confidential direct testimony of Hisham M. Choueiki, Ph.D., P.E., filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by J. Bair. (34 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)34
09/27/1999Confidential prepared testimony of Stephen R. Chaney filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by J. Bair. (7 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)7
09/27/1999Prepared testimony of Mike A. Castle filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by J. Bair. (9 pgs.)9
09/27/1999Prepared testimony of Doris E. McCarter filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by J. Bair. (18 pgs.)18
09/27/1999Prepared testimony of Stephen R. Chaney filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by J. Bair. (8 pgs.)8
09/27/1999Direct testimony of Hisham M. Choueiki, Ph.D., P.E., filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by J. Bair. (35 pgs.)35
09/27/1999Prepared testimony of Neal A. Krumme filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by J. Bair. (22 pgs.)22
09/24/1999Letter regarding the Washington State hearings, filed on behalf of applicants by T. Lodge. (1 pg.)1
09/24/1999Copy of letter sent to all parties of record filed on behalf of applicant by T. Mazzola. (1 pg.)1
09/20/1999Memorandum of the Joint Applicants in opposition to motion to compel and request for expedited ruling of September 13, 1999 filed by T. Lodge.42
09/20/1999Memorandum in support of motion of AT&T Communication's motion for protective order filed on behalf of GTE Corp. by T. Lodge; and Bell Atlantic by J. Walker. (4 pgs.)4
09/17/1999Supplemental direct testimony of Cathleen M. Conway filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (15 pgs.)15
09/17/1999Confidential supplemental direct testimony of Cathleen M. Conway filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (17 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)17
09/17/1999Supplemental testimony of Kathleen Hagans filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (18 pgs.)18
09/17/1999Supplemental direct testimony of David E. Stahly filed on behalf of Sprint Communications L.P. and United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. (28 pgs.)28
09/17/1999Supplemental direct testimony of Joseph Gillan filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by B. Kahn. (16 pgs.)16
09/17/1999Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (8 pgs.)8
09/16/1999Correspondence letters regarding the application, filed on behalf of several consumers. (4 pgs.)4
09/13/1999Motion to compel discovery and request for an expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Trabaris. (18 pgs.)18
08/19/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Marjorie A. Harper, Services for Aging, Inc. (1 pg.)1
08/16/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 8/2/99, (JA), 24 pgs., Submitted. (PUCO-Columbus, OH)24
08/12/1999Entry ordering that joint applicants' motion to amend their application is granted; that the evidentiary hearing related to supplemental direct testimony shall begin at 10:00 a.m. on September 27, 1999, at the Commission; that the last day upon which a written discovery request can be served is Friday, September 3, 1999; that all discovery responses must be served within seven calendar days of the date that the request is served on the pertinent party; that intervenors file their supplemental direct testimony by September 17, 1999; that the Commission staff file its supplemental direct testimony by September 27, 1999; that the last day for joint applicants to serve requests to depose intervenor witnesses is September 21, 1999; that all responses to future motions be filed and served within seven calendar days of the date that the motion is filed with the Commission; scheduling a status conference on September 21, 1999. (5 pgs.)5
08/04/1999Correction filed on behalf of joint applicants by T. Mazzola. (2 pgs.)2
08/04/1999Joint respondents memorandum contra joint applicants motion for leave to file an amendment, filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio; AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa; Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by S. Hirtle. (10 pgs.)10
07/28/1999Amended joint application filed on behalf of applicants, GTE Corp. by T. Lodge; and Bell Atlantic Corp. by J. Wal- ker. (118 pgs.)118
07/28/1999Supplemental testimony of William Griswold filed on behalf of joint applicants; GTE Corp. by T. Lodge; and Bell Atlan- tic by J. Walker. (21 pgs.)21
07/28/1999Notice of filing of amended application and alternative motion of the joint applicants for leave to amend their joint application and request for an expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of joint applicants, GTE Corp. by T. Lodge; and Bell Atlantic Corp. by J. Walker. (12 pgs.)12
07/28/1999Certificate of service filed on behalf of joint applicants, GTE Corp. and Bell Atlantic, by T. Mazzola. (3 pgs.)3
07/28/1999Supplemental testimony of John Peterson filed on behalf of joint applicants, GTE Corp. by T. Mazzola; and Bell Atlantic Corp. by J. Walker. (9 pgs.)9
07/28/1999Supplemental testimony of Jerome Holland filed on behalf of joint applicants, GTE Corp. by T. Mazzola; and Bell Atlantic Corp. by J. Walker. (112 pgs.)112
07/23/1999Response to letter dated July 20, 1999, regarding the Joint Applicants plan to amend their application filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio, for Edgemont Coalition by E. Jacobs, AT&T Communications by D. Trabaris, United Telephone Co. of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart, Sprint Communications, L.P. by L. Lauridsen, and Corecomm Newco, Inc. by T. Finn.2
07/23/1999Correspondence to Thomas E. Lodge regarding the filing of an amendment to the application, filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio; Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs; AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Trabaris; United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart; Sprint Communica- tions Co. by L. Lauridsen; and CoreComm Newco by T. Finn. (2 pgs.)2
07/23/1999Entry scheduling a record conference at 10:00 a.m. on August 2, 1999, at the Commission offices. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
07/21/1999Response letter to Mr. Mark Roath, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff. (1 pg.)1
07/21/1999Response letter to Ms. Pamela S. Hall, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff. (1 pg.)1
07/21/1999Response letter to Councilman Robert J. White, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff. (1 pg.)1
07/21/1999Response letter to Mr. David W. Claborn, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff. (1 pg.)1
07/20/1999Notice, statement and suggested schedule of the joint applicants in response to entry of July 6, 1999, filed on behalf of Bell Atlantic Corp. by J. Walker; and GTE Corporation by T. Lodge. (6 pgs.)6
07/16/1999Entry ordering that joint applicants' motion to certify their interlocutory appeal is denied; that joint applicants are to notify the Commission by July 20, 1999, as to their intentions to proceed in this matter; that the attorney ex- aminer's ruling with respect to the matrix of commitments is modified in accordance with Finding 7. (AE) (6 pgs.)6
07/13/1999Correspondence letter to David Bergmann and Joseph P. Serio regarding the rebuttal testimony of Mr. Holland, filed by T. Mazzola. (3 pgs.)3
07/13/1999Correspondence letter to Thomas E. Lodge regarding the rebuttal testimony of Mr. Holland, filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (2 pgs.)2
07/08/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 6/24/99, (JA), 72 pgs., Con't. (PUCO-Columbus, OH)72
07/06/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 6/21/99, (JA), 4 pgs., Con't. (PUCO-Columbus, OH)4
07/01/1999Response to Mr. Marcus L. Neiman filed on behalf of the PUCO staff. (1 pg.) (FILED 6/30/99)1
06/30/1999Memorandum contra joint applicants' application to certify interlocutory appeal, and memorandum contra interlocutory appeal, filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio; and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (28 pgs.)28
06/30/1999Response to joint applicants' application for certification filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by S. Bloomfield. (6 pgs.)6
06/30/1999Memorandum contra joint applicants' application to certify interlocutory appeal, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (6 pgs.)6
06/30/1999Memorandum contra joint applicants' interlocutory appeal, filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by M. Schermer. (5 pgs.)5
06/28/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 6/14/99, (JA), 108 pgs., Con't. (Volume VI) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)108
06/25/1999Memorandum in support of application of the joint applicants to certify interlocutory appeal and application for review of AE 6/24 ruling. Filed by J. Walker and T. Lodge. (2 pgs.)52
06/25/1999Application of the joint applicants to certify Interlocutory Appeal and application for review of Attorney Examiner's June 24, 1999 ruling granting motion to strike rebuttal testimony. (2 pgs)2
06/21/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Councilman R. White, City of Cleveland. (2 pgs.)2
06/21/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by P. Hall, Marion Area Chamber of Commerce. (1 pg.)1
06/17/1999Certificate of service for rebuttal testimony of Joseph Gillan, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (4 pgs.)4
06/16/1999Memorandum in opposition to OCC's motion in limine and concerning their right to present rebuttal testimony on subjects addressed in the preliminary staff proposal, filed on behalf of the joint applicants, Bell Atlantic by J. Walker; and GTE Corp. by T. Lodge.27
06/16/1999Rebuttal testimony of Joseph Gillan filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio.17
06/16/1999Rebuttal testimony of William E. Taylor filed on behalf of Bell Atlantic Corp. and GTE Corp.74
06/16/1999Certificate of service filed by T. Mazzola. (3 pgs.)3
06/16/1999Rebuttal testimony of John Peterson filed on behalf of the joint applicants, GTE Corp. by T. Lodge; and Bell Atlantic by J. Walker. (23 pgs.)23
06/16/1999Rebuttal testimony of Jerome Holland filed on behalf of the joint applicants, GTE Corp. by T. Lodge; and Bell Atlantic by J. Walker. (103 pgs.)103
06/16/1999Rebuttal testimony of William Griswold filed on behalf of joint applicants, GTE Corp. by T. Lodge; and Bell Atlantic Corp. by J. Walker. (45 pgs.)45
06/11/1999Motion in limine and motion for expedited consideration and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (9 pgs.)9
06/11/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 5/28/99, (JA), 12 pgs., Con't. (PUCO-Columbus, OH)12
06/04/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Ben Rice, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers. (1 pg.)1
06/04/1999Direct testimony of R. Scott Potter filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by J. Bair. (6 pgs.)6
06/04/1999Letter stating that eight pieces of testimony (as indicated during the status conference held on May 25, 1999) are not necessary, and staff will be filing only testimony of Scott Potter, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by J. Bair. (1 pg.)1
06/03/1999Confidential exhibits filed with transcript of hearing held 4/19/99, Volume V. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (1501 pgs.)1501
06/03/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 4/19/99, (JA), 180 pgs., Continued. (Volume V) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)180
06/03/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by G. Fuhrer, Tuscarawas County Labor-Management Council. (1 pg.)1
06/03/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by M. Neiman. (1 pg.)1
06/03/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by T. Ward, Blue Chip Marketing. (1 pg.)1
05/24/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 5/10/99, (JA), 12 pgs., Con't. (PUCO-Columbus, OH)12
05/21/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Mayor Douglas E. Cellar, City of Ashland. (1 pg.)1
05/12/1999Entry scheduling a status conference at 10:00 a.m. on May 28, 1999, at the Commission offices. (AE) (1 pg.)1
05/11/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 4/16/99, (JA), 237 pgs., Continued. (Volume IV) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)237
05/03/1999Entry scheduling a status conference at 10:00 a.m. on May 10, 1999, at the Commission offices. (AE) (1 pg.)1
04/30/1999Letter stating that the status conference shall be post- poned for one week, until May 10, 1999, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by J. Bair. (1 pg.)1
04/29/1999Confidential exhibit GTEOH 010011282-112140.0
04/29/1999Confidential OCC Exhibit 9 filed with transcript of hearing held 4/15/99, Volume III. (60 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)60
04/29/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 4/15/99, (JA), 242 pgs., Con't. (Volume III) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)242
04/29/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 4/14/99, (JA), 233 pgs., Con't. (Volume II) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)233
04/27/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 4/13/99, (JA), 228 pgs., Con't. (PUCO-Columbus, OH)228
04/12/1999Letter stating that Emeric Kapka, Sprint's witness, is not available for the hearing and that David Stahly will adopt Mr. Kapka's testimony and will be available for cross- examination, filed on behalf of Sprint by L. Lauridsen. (3 pgs.)3
04/09/1999Motion for practice before the Commission filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stew- art. (3 pgs.)3
04/09/1999Entry ordering that GTE's motion to compel is granted in part and denied in part; that AT&T provide the requisite discovery responses in accordance with Finding 5; that GTE's request for sanctions is denied at this time. (AE) (4 pgs.)4
04/08/1999Memorandum in response to CoreComm Newco's motion for leave to file supplemental testimony of Hamid Heidary, filed on behalf of Bell Atlantic by J. Walker; and GTE Corp. by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.)4
04/08/1999Entry ordering that the joint applicants' interlocutory appeal is granted to the extent set forth in this entry. (4 pgs.)4
04/07/1999Memorandum contra filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Trabaris. (27 pgs.)27
04/06/1999Supplemental testimony of Hamid Heidary on behalf of Core- Comm Newco, Inc. (29 pgs)29
04/06/1999Motion of CoreComm Newco, Inc. for leave to file supple- mental testimony of Hamid Heidary, memorandum in support filed by S. Bloomfield. (3 pgs)3
04/05/1999Letter stating that the joint applicants do not intend to reply on any stipulations at hearing, filed by T. Lodge. (1 pg.)1
04/02/1999Entry granting the request for a continuance of the eviden- tiary hearing; hearing shall now begin at 10:00 a.m. on April 13, 1999, at the Commission offices. (AE) (1 pg.)1
04/02/1999Motion of the joint applicants to compel expedited responses to discovery, or, alternatively, to strike testimony or for other sanctions, and request for an expedited ruling, filed by T. Lodge. (87 pgs.)87
04/01/1999Entry filed by Jay S. Argonoff7
04/01/1999Motion for extension of time and request for an expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Trabaris. (8 pgs.)8
04/01/1999Memorandum of the joint applicants in support of motion of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel for protective order filed on behalf of Bell Atlantic by J. Walker; and GTE Corporation by T. Lodge. (5 pgs.)5
04/01/1999List of exhibits filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (1 pg.)1
03/31/1999Confidential non-public version of testimony of Kathleen Hagans filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (18 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)18
03/31/1999Public version of testimony of Kathleen Hagans filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (19 pgs.)19
03/31/1999Motion for a protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (5 pgs.)5
03/30/1999Service list filed on behalf of joint applicants by T. Mazzola. (3 pgs.)3
03/30/1999Letter stating that aside from the testimony, already filed, of Hamid Heidary, there will be no additional exhibits from CoreComm Newco, filed by S. Bloomfield. (1 pg.)1
03/29/1999Memorandum contra and exhibits 1-3 filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Trabaris. (85 pgs.)85
03/29/1999Supplemental memorandum in support of the application of the joint applicants for interlocutory review of entry granting motion to compel, filed on behalf of Bell Atlantic Corp. by J. Walker; and GTE Corporation by T. Lodge. (65 pgs.)65
03/29/1999List of intended exhibits filed on behalf of AT&T Communi- cations of Ohio by D. Trabaris. (5 pgs.)5
03/29/1999Exhibit list filed on behalf of joint applicants, GTE Corporation by T. Lodge; and Bell Atlantic by J. Walker. (5 pgs.)5
03/29/1999List of exhibits filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart; and Sprint Communications Company L.P. by L. Lauridsen. (5 pgs.)5
03/29/1999List of exhibits which will contain confidential information filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (1 pg.)1
03/24/1999Application of the joint applicants for interlocutory review of entry granting motion to compel filed by J. Walker (40 pgs)40
03/19/1999Entry ordering that the designated "copy prohibited" docu- ments be addressed in accordance with Finding 4; that the joint applicants serve responses to interrogatories 1, 30, 33, 43, 61, and 69 in accordance with Findings 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11, respectively. (AE) (5 pgs.)5
03/16/1999Direct testimony of Hamid Heidary filed on behalf of Core- Comm Newco. (63 pgs.) (FILED 3/15/99)63
03/16/1999Letter stating that ICG Telecom Group does not intend to call any witnesses in this matter, filed by B. Ferris. (1 pg.)1
03/15/1999Part 4 to Sprint209
03/15/1999Part 3 to Sprint137
03/15/1999Part 2 of Sprint Transcript135
03/15/1999Direct testimony of Emeric W. Kapka filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company L.P. by B. Donahue.0
03/15/1999Memorandum in opposition to motion to compel and request for expedited ruling of March 8, 1999, filed on behalf of Bell Atlantic by J. Walker; and GTE Corp. by T. Lodge. (49 pgs.)49
03/15/1999Direct testimony and exhibits of the following persons filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs: (46 pgs.) 1) Michael Lucking 2) Carl Franklin 3) Amy Borgstrom 4) Dennis Harrington46
03/15/1999Direct testimony of Joseph Gillan filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (40 pgs.)40
03/15/1999Direct testimony of CAthleen M. Conway filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (21 pgs.)21
03/15/1999Testimony of Kathleen Hagans filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (18 pgs.)18
03/15/1999Letter regarding the direct expert testimony of Joseph Gillan and Cathleen Conway, filed on behalf of AT&T Com- munications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (4 pgs.)4
03/15/1999Motion for leave to file an amendment to AT&T's list of witnesses and amendment of same, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (4 pgs.)4
03/12/1999Witness list of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition filed by E, Jacobs. (5 pgs)5
03/08/1999Motion to compel discovery and request for an expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Trabaris. (50 pgs.)50
03/08/1999Witness list filed on behalf of joint applicants, GTE Corporation by T. Lodge; and Bell Atlantic by J. Walker. (5 pgs.)5
03/08/1999Witness list filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter. (4 pgs.)4
03/08/1999Witness list filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (5 pgs.)5
03/08/1999Notice of deposition and list of witnesses filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (3 pgs.)3
03/08/1999Letter stating that The Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association does not intend to call any witnesses in this matter, filed by S. Howard. (1 pg.)1
03/08/1999Witness list filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by S. Bloomfield. (1 pg.)1
03/08/1999Letter stating that Nextlink Ohio will not be presenting any witnesses in this case, filed by D. Clayton. (1 pg.)1
03/05/1999Entry ordering that Edgemont's motion to intervene is granted pursuant to Finding 3. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
03/04/1999Witness list filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Co. L.P. by L. Lauridsen; and United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. (3 pgs.)3
03/01/1999Submission of prefiled direct testimony of the following persons filed on behalf of joint applicants, GTE Corpora- tion by T. Lodge; and Bell Atlantic Corp. by J. Walker: 1) Sherry F. Bellamy 2) William Griswold 3) Jerome Holland 4) H. Chris Jacobi 5) Mark Sievers (185 pgs.)185
03/01/1999Response to Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition's motion to intervene, filed on behalf of Bell Atlantic Corp. by J. Walker; and GTE Corporation by T. Lodge. (6 pgs.)6
02/22/1999Preliminary independent staff proposal relative to the issues identified by the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio filed. (21 pgs.)21
02/11/1999Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (7 pgs.)7
01/22/1999Entry granting in part and denying in part the request for a continuance of the evidentiary hearing; hearing shall be held 4/12/99 at 10:00 a.m. at PUCO offices; written discov- ery request must be served by 3/8/99; PUCO staff report must be filed on or before 2/22/99; direct expert testimony by joint applicants be filed on or before 3/1/99; direct expert testimony by any intervenor be filed on or before 3/15/99; all intervenors presenting witnesses file a list of those witnesses by 3/8/99; joint applicants file a list on non- expert witnesses by 3/8/99; all parties file a list of their intended exhibits and stipulations in accordance with this entry; nothing in this entry alters the requirement that reponses to any future motions be filed and served within seven calendar days of the date that the motion is filed with the Commission (JA) (6 pgs)6
01/20/1999Motion for extension of time and request for an expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio; Sprint Communications L.P. by D. Woodsmall; AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa; Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by R. Sugarman. (12 pgs.)12
01/20/1999Memorandum of the joint applicants in opposition to proposed rescheduling filed on behalf of GTE Corporation by T. Lodge and Bell Atlantic by J. Walker. (9 pgs.)9
01/20/1999Letter in support of extending the time frame for filing testimony, discovery and a hearing, filed on behalf of the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Assn. by S. Howard. (1 pg.)1
01/20/1999Letter stating that Nextlink Ohio has no objections to the current hearing schedule nor does it object to a stay of the hearing currently scheduled for March 8, 1999, filed by D. Clayton. (1 pg.)1
01/20/1999Letter supporting AT&T's request for an extension of the procedural schedule, filed on behalf of MCI WorldCom by J. Sanders. (1 pg.)1
01/20/1999Letter in support of the request by AT&T, MCI, Sprint, and OCC for a change of the schedule in this matter, filed on behalf of CoreComm by S. Bloomfield. (1 pg.)1
12/22/1998Entry ordering that the Commission staff analyze and evalu- ate the application filed in this case in light of the issues set forth in Finding 5 and file a proposal by Friday January 29, 1999; that all outstanding motions to intervene are granted; that discovery is now permitted, but limited to the issues identified in this entry in Finding 5; that the responses to interrogatories, requests for production of documents, and requests for admissions should be served within 10 calendar days after receipt of the wirtten dis- covery request; the last date upon which a party may serve a discovery request shall be February 19, 1999; that all responses to any future motions shall be filed and served within seven calendar days of the date that the motion is filed with the Commission; that the Commission will enter- tain ex parte communications requests during the pendency of this case; scheduling a prehearing conference at 1:30 p.m. on January 15, 1999 at the Commission offices; schedul- ing an evidentiary hearing at 10:00 a.m. on March 8, 1999 at the Commission offices; that any direct, expert testimony to be presented by the joint applicants should be filed by January 25, 1999; that any direct, expert testimony to be presented by any other party should be filed by February 8, 1999. (13 pgs.)13
12/08/1998Letter from State Representative, 53rd House District, Darrell Opfer supporting application.4
12/07/1998Response of the joint applicants to Nextlink Ohio's motion to intervene, filed on behalf of Bell Atlantic Corp. by J. Walker; and GTE Corp. by T. Lodge. (5 pgs.)5
11/27/1998Reply to joint applicants' memorandum contra motion for a document room, filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (5 pgs.)5
11/25/1998Entry ordering that the prehearing conference should be postponed until sometime after the Commission issues its entry establishing the scope of the issues to be addressed at the hearing; that the OCC's motion for a document room is denied; that GTE Corp.'s motion for admission is granted in accordance with Finding 7. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
11/24/1998Service list filed on behalf of applicant by C. Hale. (4 pgs.)4
11/20/1998Reply comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa.11
11/20/1998Reply comments of AT&T filed by D. Chorzempa.11
11/20/1998Reply comments and responses to motions to intervene, filed on behalf of Bell Atlantic by J. Walker; and GTE Corp. by T. Lodge. (22 pgs.)22
11/20/1998Reply comments filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter. (13 pgs.)13
11/20/1998Reply comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (11 pgs.)11
11/20/1998Reply comments filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by D. Kin- koph and D. Clayton. (11 pgs.)11
11/20/1998Reply comments filed on behalf of Sprint Communication Co. L.P. by L. Lauridsen; and United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. (9 pgs.)9
11/20/1998Reply comments filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by H. Liebman. (6 pgs.)6
11/20/1998Reply comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Cable Telecommunications Assn. by S. Howard. (5 pgs.)5
11/20/1998Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by D. Kinkoph and D. Clayton. (3 pgs.)3
11/19/1998Memorandum of the joint applicants in opposition to motion of OCC for a document room filed on behalf of Bell Atlantic by J. Walker; and GTE Corp. by T. Lodge. (6 pgs.)6
11/16/1998Motion for admission of John M. Walker pro hac vice filed on behalf of respondent, GTE Corp., by T. Lodge. (5 pgs.)5
11/16/1998Request for extension of time filed on behalf of respondent, GTE Corp., by T. Lodge. (1 pg.)1
11/06/1998Motion for MCI WorldCom for leave to intervene filed by J. Sanders and J. V. Duzer. (7 pgs)7
11/06/1998Initial comments of the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition filed by E. Jacobs. (9 pgs)9
11/05/1998Comments filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by L. Lauridsen; and United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. (91 pgs.)91
11/05/1998Comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by L. Reardon and M. Schermer. (90 pgs.)90
11/05/1998Comments filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by H. Liebman. (35 pgs.)35
11/05/1998Comments filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter. (32 pgs.)32
11/05/1998Comments filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by C. Hale. (22 pgs.)22
11/05/1998Responses to motions to intervene and to requests for hearing, and initial comments filed on behalf of joint appli- cants, Bell Atlantic Corp. by M. Lowe; and GTE Corporation by T. Lodge. (17 pgs.)17
11/05/1998Comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association by S. Howard. (16 pgs.)16
11/05/1998Comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (15 pgs.)15
11/05/1998Comments filed on behalf of Telecommunications Resellers Association by S. Bloomfield. (11 pgs.)11
11/05/1998Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association by S. Howard. (9 pgs.)9
11/05/1998Initial comments filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (8 pgs.)8
11/05/1998Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by H. Liebman. (6 pgs.)6
11/05/1998Comments filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (4 pgs.)4
11/05/1998Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Telecommunications Resellers Association by S. Bloomfield. (3 pgs.)3
11/05/1998Comments filed by E. Schaeffer. (3 pgs.)3
11/04/1998Motion for a document room and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (10 pgs.)10
11/04/1998Petition to intervene filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group, Inc. by B. Ferris. (4 pgs.)4
10/30/1998Entry ordering that the motion for extension of time is granted and all interested persons shall be granted until November 5, 1998, to file their responses to the afore- mentioned motions to dismiss. (AE) (1 pg.)1
10/28/1998Motion for consensual extension of time and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Bell Atlantic by M. Lowe; and GTE Corp. by T. Lodge. (5 pgs.)5
10/23/1998Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart; and Sprint Communications Company L.P. by L. Lauridsen. (7 pgs.)7
10/22/1998Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by L. Reardon and M. Schermer. (7 pgs.)7
10/15/1998Order that this case be designated as 98-1398-TP-AMT; that interested persons file comments regarding the merger-re- lated issues they believe should be considered by the Com- mission when evaluating this merger; such comments shall be filed by November 5, 1998 and any reply comments shall be filed by November 20, 1998; scheduling a prehearing confer- ence at 11:00 a.m. on November 30, 1998, at the Commission offices; that discovery be suspended until otherwise stated. (3 pgs.)3
10/14/1998Motion to intervene and motion for an evidentiary hearing or, in the alternative, motion to deny joint application, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (15 pgs.)15
10/13/1998Motion to intervene and motion for a hearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bermann. (9 pgs.)9
10/02/1998Joint Application of Bell Atlantic Corporation and GTE Corporation for Consent and Approval of a Change in Control of GTE Corporation to Bell Atlantic Corporation, filed by J. Kennedy. 198
10/02/1998In the matter of the joint application of Bell Atlantic Corporation and GTE Corporation for consent and approval of a change in control. (196 pgs.)196