Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
10/15/1999 | Transmittal Papers. (8 pgs) | 8 |
08/24/1999 | Notice of substitution of counsel filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
08/18/1999 | Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by R. Sugarman. (7 pgs.) | 7 |
08/02/1999 | Supreme Court Papers. (8 pgs.) (S.C. 399-1242) | 8 |
07/02/1999 | Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. Conway. (34 pgs.) (S.C. #99-1242) | 34 |
05/05/1999 | Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing filed by Ameritech are denied; that Ameritech's motion for an oral argument is denied; that Ameritech's request for a temporary stay is denied in accordance with Finding 19. (14 pgs.) | 14 |
05/05/1999 | Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing filed by Ameritech are denied; that Ameritech's motion for an oral argument is denied; that Ameritech's request for a temporary stay is denied in accordance with Finding 19. (14 pgs.) | 14 |
05/05/1999 | Entry on rehearing denying the application for rehearing by Ameritech; that Ameritech's motion for an oral argument is denied; that Ameritech request for a temporary stay is denied in accordance with Finding (19). | 14 |
04/02/1999 | Memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's motion for oral argument filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom by L. Reardon. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
03/29/1999 | Reply comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by R. Sugarman. (84 pgs.) | 84 |
03/29/1999 | Response to initial comments of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio concerning the FCC declaratory ruling, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (35 pgs.) | 35 |
03/29/1999 | Motion for oral argument and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio,b y M. Stemm. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
03/29/1999 | Reply comments filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (17 pgs.) | 17 |
03/19/1999 | Comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Trabaris. (58 pgs.) | 58 |
03/19/1999 | Comments filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (17 pgs.) | 17 |
03/19/1999 | Initial comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (30 pgs.) | 30 |
03/19/1999 | Initial comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by R. Sugarman. (47 pgs.) | 47 |
03/05/1999 | Entry ordering that comments must be filed by 5:00 p.m. on March 19, 1999; reply comments are to be filed by March 29, 1999. (AE) (3 pgs.) Service notice 2 pgs. | 3 |
03/01/1999 | Statement of position in response to the declaratory ruling of The Federal Communications Commission filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom by M. Schermer. (41 pgs.) | 41 |
02/26/1999 | Motion for leave to file comments and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. Conway. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
02/05/1999 | Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (15 pgs.) | 15 |
12/10/1998 | Entry ordering that the rehearing is granted for the limited purpose of affording the Commission more time to consider the arguments raised in the application for rehearing. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
11/23/1998 | Memorandum of Time Warner Communications of Ohio in opposi- tion to Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, filed by R. Sugarman. (19 pgs.) | 19 |
11/23/1998 | Opposition to application for rehearing and temporary stay of payment order, filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
11/13/1998 | Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing filed by D. Con- away and M. Mulcahy. (53 pgs) | 53 |
10/22/1998 | Notice of address change filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Weston. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
10/14/1998 | Opinion & Order denying Ameritech's motion to dismiss this matter; that Time Warner's complaint against Ameritech is sustained; that Ameritech pay to Time Warner reciprocal com- pensation payments as directed in this order. Dissenting Opinion of Commissioner Donald L. Mason. (13 pgs.) | 13 |
10/13/1998 | Notice of substitution of counsel filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Kahn and D. Chorzempa. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
10/06/1998 | Withdrawal of counsel filed by B. Weston. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
09/18/1998 | Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of com- plainant, Time Warner, by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (63 pgs.) | 63 |
09/04/1998 | Reply brief filed on behalf of complainant, Time Warner, by R. Sugarman. (42 pgs.) | 42 |
09/04/1998 | Reply brief filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (30 pgs.) | 30 |
08/21/1998 | Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Scher- mer. (11 pgs.) | 11 |
08/11/1998 | Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by L. Reardon and M. Schermer. (8 pgs.) | 8 |
08/06/1998 | Memorandum in support of Time Warners motion for consoli- dation, filed on behalf of MCImetro Access Transmission Services by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
08/04/1998 | Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by L. Reardon and M. Schermer. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
07/30/1998 | Ameritech Ohio's memorandum in opposition to motion to consolidate of Time Warner Communications of Ohio, filed by M. Stemm. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
07/30/1998 | Reply of ICG Telecom Group, Inc. to Ameritech Ohio's notice of supplemental authority, filed by B. Ferris. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
07/29/1998 | Response to Ameritech Ohio's notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (6 pgs.) | 6 |
07/27/1998 | Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of respon- dent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. Conway. (8 pgs.) | 8 |
07/22/1998 | Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Scher- mer. (32 pgs.) | 32 |
07/21/1998 | Motion to consolidate and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by L. Reardon and M. Schermer. (6 pgs.) | 6 |
06/26/1998 | Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Scher- mer. (62 pgs.) | 62 |
05/22/1998 | Initial brief filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (67 pgs.) | 67 |
05/22/1998 | Initial brief filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (52 pgs.) | 52 |
05/22/1998 | Brief of amicus curiae filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Weston. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
05/14/1998 | Entry ordering that TCG Ohio be granted amicus curiae status in this proceeding. (AE) (1 pg.) | 1 |
04/28/1998 | Entry ordering that initial briefs be filed on May 22, 1998, and reply briefs eight calendar days after the Commission issues its opinion and order in ICG Telecom Group (vs) Ameritech Ohio, Case No. 97-1557-TP-CSS. (AE) (1 pg.) | 1 |
04/20/1998 | Reply memorandum in support of its motion to dismiss, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (8 pgs.) | 8 |
04/15/1998 | Motion for limited intervention and memorandum in support filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Weston. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
04/13/1998 | Memorandum in opposition to Ameritech Ohio's motion to dismiss filed on behalf of complainant, Time Warner Communications of Ohio, by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (25 pgs.) | 25 |
04/03/1998 | Notice of withdrawing the Motion for Protective Order filed 3/36/98 filed on behalf of Ameritech by M. Stemm. (1 pg) | 1 |
03/26/1998 | Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (47 pgs.) | 47 |
03/26/1998 | Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (8 pgs.) | 8 |
03/26/1998 | Reply to Ameritech Ohio's answer and affirmative defenses filed on behalf of complainant, Time Warner, by R. Sugar- man and M. Schermer. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
03/12/1998 | Ameritech Ohio's Answer and Affirmative Defenses filed by D. Conway. (14 pgs) | 14 |
02/27/1998 | Entry scheduling a settlement conference at 9:30 a.m. on April 9, 1998, at the Commission offices; that, if the parties do not reach a settlement at the April 9, 1998 conference, the parties shall meet with the attorney ex- aminer at the conclusion of the conference to discuss several procedural matters. (AE) (2 pgs) | 2 |
02/20/1998 | Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Jon F. Kelly, Ameritech Ohio. (1 pg.) | 1 |
02/18/1998 | In the matter of the complaint of Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P. versus Ameritech Ohio filed by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (316 pgs) | 316 |