|
06/18/1998
|
Second entry on rehearing that the contract filing policy first adopted in the April 30, 1998 entry on rehearing is clarified in accordance with this entry; that the OTIA's motion for leave to file an application for rehearing instanter and its application for rehearing, Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, and AT&T's memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing are moot; that this case be closed of record. (7 pgs.) |
|
06/11/1998
|
AT&T's motion for leave to intervene and memorandum in support, and file its memorandum contra to Ameritech's application for rehearing instanter, filed by B. Kahn. (5 pgs.) |
|
06/11/1998
|
AT&T's memorandum contra to Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, filed by B. Kahn. (5 pgs.) |
|
06/01/1998
|
Application for rehearing filed on behalf of applicant by J. Lang. (7 pgs.) |
|
05/29/1998
|
Application for Rehearing of the Ohio Telecommunications Industry Association. Submitted by: T. Lodge. (7 pgs.) |
|
05/29/1998
|
Motion & Memorandum in support of the Ohio Telecommunication Industry Assoc. for leave to file Application for Rehearing Instanter. Submitted by: T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) |
|
04/30/1998
|
Entry granting Ameritech's application for rehearing; that the Docketing Division continue to treat the information filed under seal as protected material until December 31, 2002, unless otherwise ordered by the Commission. (9 pgs.) |
|
04/09/1998
|
Entry ordering that rehearing is granted for the limited purpose of affording the Commission additional time to consider the arguments raised on rehearing. (5 pgs.) |
|
03/26/1998
|
Joint memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications by M. Schermer and Nextlink Ohio by D. Clayton. (7 pgs.) |
|
03/16/1998
|
Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of applicant by J. Lang. (30 pgs.) |
|
02/12/1998
|
Entry ordering that Ameritech's request for protective treatment of the redacted information is denied; that the Docketing Division is directed to release into the public record all documents filed under seal in these cases pur- suant to the directions given in Finding 12; that Ameri- tech's motions seeking to extend protective treatment to the contracts set forth in Finding 10 are denied; that the Commission's rulings in this entry do not affect the sus- pension of the contracts set forth in Finding 13. (10 pgs.) |
|
01/22/1998
|
Memo ordering to keep case open pending entry on protective order. |
|
01/22/1998
|
Entry ordering that Ameritech Ohio's December 22, 1997 application seeking approval of a contract for ISDN Prime Service should be subject to the automatic approval process set forth in Case No. 93-487-TP-ALT. It is further ordered that Ameritech Ohio's December 22, 1997 motion for protect- ive order be treated in the manner set forth in finding (4). (AE) (2 pgs.) |
|
12/22/1997
|
Confidential portion of application filed on behalf of applicant by J. Kelly. (10 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) |
|
12/22/1997
|
Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of applicant by J. Kelly. (7 pgs.) |
|
12/22/1997
|
In the matter of the redacted version of a contract for Ameritech ISDN Prime Service between Ameritech Ohio and Aurora Foods. (11 pgs.) |