Skip to main content

Case Record For:

97-1557-TP-CSS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: ICG TELECOM/AMERITECH OHIO
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 11/26/1997
Date Closed: 5/5/1999
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
11/22/1999Entry ordering that Ameritech's September 22, 1999 motions to renew the protective orders in Case Nos. 97-1557-TP-CSS, 97-1723-TP-CSS,a nd 96-336-TP-CSS are granted; that, for 18 months from the date of this entry, the Docketing Div- ision of the Commission should continue to maintain under seal the information that is currently under seal in these dockets. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
10/15/1999In the Matter of the complaint of ICG Telecom Group, Inc. against Ameritech Ohio regarding the payment of reciprocal compensation. (12 pgs)12
09/22/1999Motion to renew protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. Conway. (8 pgs.)8
08/31/1999Sprint's notice of substitution of counsel, filed by J. Stewart. (5 pgs.)5
08/02/1999Supreme Court Papers. (12 pgs.) (S.C. #99-1240)12
07/02/1999Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. Conway. (35 pgs.) (S.C. #99-1240)35
05/05/1999Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing filed by Ameritech are denied; that Ameritech's motion for an oral argument is denied; that Ameritech's request for a temporary stay is denied in accordance with Finding 19. (14 pgs.)14
05/05/1999Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing filed by Ameritech are denied as set forth in this entry; that Ameri- tech's motion for an oral argument is denied; that Ameri- tech's request for a temporary stay is denied in accordance with Finding 19. (14 pgs.)14
05/05/1999Entry on rehearing denying the application for rehearing by Ameritech; that Ameritech's motion for an oral argument is denied; that Ameritech request for a temporary stay is denied in accordance with Finding (19).14
04/02/1999Memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's motion for oral argument filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (4 pgs.)4
03/29/1999Response to comments of ICG Telecom Group, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (38 pgs.)38
03/29/1999Motion for oral argument and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (4 pgs.)4
03/29/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (17 pgs.)17
03/19/1999Comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Trabaris. (58 pgs.)58
03/19/1999Comments filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (17 pgs.)17
03/19/1999Initial comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (29 pgs.)29
03/01/1999Memorandum contra Ameritech motion for leave to file comments and memorandum in support filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (36 pgs.)36
02/26/1999Motion for leave to file comments and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. Conway. (4 pgs.)4
02/05/1999Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Scherman. (15 pgs.)15
12/17/1998Letter referring to ICG's letter dated September 1, 1998, requesting payment in full for Reciprocal Compensation billing from Ameritech Ohio, filed on behalf of ICG Telecom by K. Bryant. (1 pg.)1
11/23/1998Notice of recent developments filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (27 pgs.)27
10/22/1998Substitution of counsel and notice of address change filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Weston. (7 pgs.)7
10/22/1998Entry granting the rehearing for the limited purpose of affording the Commission more time to consider the argu- ments raised in Ameritech Ohio's September 28, 1998 appli- cation for rehearing; pending a decision on the merits being issued on the application for rehearing, Ameritech is relieved of the obligation to distribute the funds held in escrow. (2 pgs.)2
10/08/1998Memorandum in opposition to Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing and temporary stay of payment order, filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (4 pgs.)4
10/08/1998Opposition to application for rehearing and temporary stay of payment order filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (11 pgs.)11
10/06/1998Withdrawal of counsel filed by B. Weston. (2 pgs.)2
09/28/1998Application for rehearing and temporary stay of payment order filed by D. Conway and M. Mulcahy on behalf of Ameri- tech. (56 pgs)56
08/27/1998Opinion & Order granting the application; that Ameritech pay to ICG reciprocal compensation payments held in escrow as directed in this order. Dissenting Opinion of Donald L. Mason. (14 pgs.)14
08/21/1998Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Scher- mer. (11 pgs.)11
08/11/1998Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by L. Reardon and M. Schermer. (8 pgs.)8
08/06/1998Memorandum in support of Time Warner's motion for consoli- dation, filed on behalf of MCImetro Access Transmission Servcies by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (3 pgs.)3
08/04/1998Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by L. Reardon and M. Schermer. (5 pgs.)5
07/30/1998Ameritech Ohio's memorandum in opposition to motion to consolidate of Time Warner Communications of Ohio, filed by M. Stemm. (5 pgs.)5
07/30/1998Reply of ICG Telecom Group, Inc. to Ameritech Ohio's notice of supplemental authority, filed by B. Ferris. (5 pgs.)5
07/29/1998Response to Ameritech Ohio's notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (6 pgs.)6
07/28/1998Letter stating that ICG Telecom Group, Inc. has no objection to any consolidation with Case Nos. 97-1723-TP-CSS and 98- 308-TP-CSS provided such consolidation will not result in any additional delay in the Commission's decision in this case, filed by B. Ferris. (1 pg.)1
07/27/1998Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of respon- dent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. Conway. (8 pgs.)8
07/22/1998Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Scher- mer. (32 pgs.)32
07/21/1998Motion to consolidate and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by L. Reardon and M. Schermer. (6 pgs.)6
06/26/1998Notice of supplemental authority filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Scher- mer. (62 pgs.)62
05/18/1998Response to Ameritech Ohio's notice of supplementary authority filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (13 pgs.)13
05/11/1998Ameritech Ohio's Notice of Supplemental Authority. Submitted by: D. Conway. (15 pgs.)15
03/13/1998Reply brief filed on behalf of complainant, ICG Telecom Group, by B. Ferris. (67 pgs.)67
03/13/1998Post-hearing reply brief filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. Conway. (30 pgs.)30
03/10/1998Reply Brief of Amicus Curiae MCImetro Access Transmission Services, Inc. filed by J. Sanders and J Van Duzer. (6 pgs)6
03/10/1998Post-Hearing Reply Brief of Amicus Curiae Time Warner Comm- ications of Ohio, L.P.; Brooks Fiber Communications of Ohio, Inc.; and AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. filed by R. Sugarman, M. Schermer, S. Bloomfield, B. Kahn, and D. Chorzempa. (62 pgs)62
03/03/1998Confidential Ameritech Exhibit Nos. 4A and 5A filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio. (378 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)378
03/03/1998Transcript filed for hearing held 2/17/98, (GP), 188 pgs., Submitted. (PUCO-Columbus, OH)188
03/03/1998Motion for leave to participate and file its position paper as an amicus curiae, memorandum in support, proof of service, and position paper on reciprocal compensa- tion, filed on behalf of America Online by Y. Dori. (17 pgs.)17
03/03/1998Initial brief of amicus curiae filed on behalf of GTE North by W. Keating. (16 pgs.)16
03/03/1998Motion for leave to participate, memorandum in support, and brief amicus curiae filed on behalf of Cablevision Light- path-OH by M. Bressman. (13 pgs.)13
03/03/1998Amicus curiae brief filed on behalf of Brooks Fiber Com- munications of Ohio by S. Bloomfield. (5 pgs.)5
03/03/1998Post hearing brief filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (215 pgs.)215
03/03/1998Initial brief of amicus curiae filed on behalf of MCImetro Avccess Transmission Services by J. Sanders. (62 pgs.)62
03/03/1998Initial post-hearing brief filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. Conway. (38 pgs.)38
03/03/1998Post-hearing brief of amicus curiae filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Scher- mer; Brooks Fiber Communications of Ohio by S. Bloomfield; TCG Ohio by B. Weston and D. Trabaris; and AT&T Communica- tions of Ohio by B. Kahn. (39 pgs.)39
03/03/1998Brief of amicus curiae filed on behalf of Ohio Cable Tele- communications Assn. by S. Howard. (14 pgs.)14
03/03/1998Motion for leave to be granted amicus curiae status and memorandum in support and initial brief of amicus curiae filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecommunications Industry Assn. by T. Lodge. (13 pgs.)13
03/03/1998Motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (4 pgs.)4
03/03/1998Motion requesting leave to file amicus curiae brief and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Cable Telecommunications Assn. by S. Howard. (3 pgs.)3
02/23/1998Reply to GTE North's motion to be granted amicus curiae status filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (3 pgs.)3
02/17/1998Motion for leave to be granted amius curiae status and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart. (5 pgs.)5
02/10/1998Confidential unredacted version of direct testimony of Suzanne J. Springsteen filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio. (330 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)330
02/10/1998Confidential unredacted version of direct testimony of Eric L. Panfil filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio. (50 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)50
02/10/1998Direct testimony of Eric L. Panfil filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio. (49 pgs.)49
02/10/1998Testimony of Cindy Z. Schonhaut filed on behalf of complain- ant, ICG Telecom, by B. Ferris. (22 pgs.)22
02/10/1998Direct testimony of H. Edward Wynn filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio. (12 pgs.)12
02/10/1998Direct testimny of Suzanne J. Springsteen filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio. (10 pgs.)10
02/10/1998Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (4 pgs.)4
02/03/1998Entry scheduling a hearing at 9:00 a.m. on February 17, 1998, at the Commission offices; that the parties serve any discovery requests by February 4, 1998; that responses to those discovery requests must be completed (and, if those responses are in the written format, served) by February 9, 1998; that any party intending to present direct, expert testimony do so by February 10, 1998. (AE) (3 pgs.)3
01/29/1998Motion for clarification of the Commission's January 22, 1998 entry and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (6 pgs.)6
01/22/1998Entry ordering that Ameritech's motion for a protective order is granted. Ameritech need not produce personnel to respond to Time Warner's January 9, 1997 notice of deposit- ion and that Time Warner's request to submit additional written discovery requests, in the form of admission and/or interrogatories, within two days of this ruling is denied. Time Warner's request for a Commission order to require Ameritech to enter into the list of stipulations contained in Time Warner's January 16, 1998 memorandum contra is also denied. (AE) (3 pgs.)3
01/22/1998Entry ordering that Ameritech's motion for a stay of this proceeding is denied. It is further ordered that the motions to intervene of TCG, Brooks, Time Warner, and MCIm are denied, as described in finding 10. However TCG, Brooks Time Warner, MCIm are granted amicus curiae, in this case. It is further ordered that MCI's motion to consolidate this case with case No. 97-1723-TP-CSS is denied and that reason- able grounds for complaint have been stated and that a second conference be held with the examiner at 1:30 p.m. on January 29, 1998 at the offices of the Commission. (11 pgs)11
01/21/1998Supplemental memorandum in support of its motion to stay proceeding filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. Conway. (7 pgs.)7
01/21/1998Letter to the attorney examiner in response to Ameritech Ohio's Supplemental Memorandum in support of its motion to stay filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (3 pgs.)3
01/16/1998Reply to ICG Telecom Group and intervenors' joint memoran- da contra Ameritech Ohio's motion to stay proceeding, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. Conway. (52 pgs.)52
01/16/1998Memorandum in opposition to Ameritech Ohio's motion for protective order filed on behalf of Time Warner Communi- cations of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (9 pgs.)9
01/16/1998Notice of deposition filed on behalf of Time Warner Commissions by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (3 pgs.)3
01/16/1998Reply to memorandum contra motion to intervene of Brooks Fiber Communications of Ohio by S. Bloomfield. (3 pgs.)3
01/15/1998Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy and D. Conway. (13 pgs.)13
01/15/1998Response to Ameritech Ohio's memorandum contra motions to intervene, filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (13 pgs.)13
01/15/1998Reply in support of its motion for intervention and con- solidation filed on behalf of MCImetro Access Transmission Services by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (5 pgs.)5
01/14/1998Reply to Ameritech's memorandum contra filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Weston. (3 pgs.)3
01/09/1998Joint memoranda contra Ameritech Ohio's motion to say pro- ceedings, filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris and R. Rindler; Teleport Communications Group by B. Weston and D. Trabaris; Brooks Fiber Communications of Ohio by S. Bloomfield; MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders and M. Berns; and Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (31 pgs.)31
01/09/1998Notice of deposition filed on behalf of Time Warner Com- munications of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (3 pgs.)3
01/08/1998Entry ordering that all requests for intervention in this matter be filed on or before January 16, 1998. (2 pgs)2
01/08/1998Ameritech Ohio's memorandum contra filed by M. Mulcahy. (5 pgs)5
01/05/1998Reply of ICG Telecom Group to answer of Ameritech Ohio filed by B. Ferris. (8 pgs.)8
12/30/1997Motion to intervene or to consolidate and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCImetro Access Transmission Services by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (10 pgs.)10
12/22/1997Motion to intervene, institute carrier-to-carrier complaint or in the alternative grant leave to participate as an amicus curiae and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by M. Schermer. (83 pgs.)83
12/22/1997Motion to stay proceeding and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy. (20 pgs.)20
12/22/1997Answer and affirmative defenses filed on behalf of respon- dent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy. (10 pgs.)10
12/22/1997Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Brooks Fiber Communications of Ohio by S. Bloom- field. (6 pgs.)6
12/17/1997Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of TCG Ohio by B. Weston. (4 pgs.)4
12/15/1997Entry scheduling a settlement conference at 10:00 a.m. on January 5, 1998, at the Commission offices; that, if the parties do not reach a settlement at the January 5, 1998 conference, the parties shall meet with the attorney ex- aminer at the conclusion of the conference to discuss sev- eral procedural matters. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
12/01/1997Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Jon F. Kelly, Ameritech Ohio.1
12/01/1997Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Jon F. Kelly, Ameritech Ohio. (1 pg.)1
11/26/1997In the matter of the complaint of ICG Telecom Group, Inc. against Ameritech Ohio regarding the payment of reciprocal compensation. (14 pgs.)14